The real killer was someone very close to the accused killer according to a book published a few years ago. This is why the accused killer seemingly was part of so many illogical implausible acts that made him only look guiltier. He was trying to protect him and took the blame himself. Yes, the accused killer was called to the sight of the killing by the real killer and it was bloody which explains the presence of evidence introduced during the trial. The book laid out the case against the real killer from behavior (which includes an arrest and history of violence) to access to the murder weapon to lack of an alibi to motive. The behavior part of the case which stems from the real killer’s mental illness is about to come up again as the real killer is soon to be sued in court for battery and his past history is sure to be brought up.
No comments:
Post a Comment