Thursday, December 12, 2019

Blind Item #1

A phone call is all it would have taken. Instead, the alliterate royal decided to humiliate someone she would have begged for friendship a few years back. To make it worse, she then leaked what she had done to the media. 

47 comments:

  1. And Jennifer Meyer maybe RE the jewerly

    ReplyDelete
  2. @Tricia that's it. Seems like a poor move on Megs part and something that will def come back to haunt her

    ReplyDelete
  3. @E it’s true years ago she would’ve given her left arm.. Meyers dad is a Hollywood insider/Producer and Jen was married to Toby McQuire (not that that really matters lol)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Totally bizarre, I read about this in daily mail. She prolly got all the jewelry comped my JM too. Why did she burn the bridge?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to Blind Gossip, Meghan was making money off the deal. She might have bought an $800 piece with her own money but then got paid something like $50,000 (just a random number) to promise to wear it and be photographed. And that's a big no-no with the Royal Family. A newspaper or magazine can report what a member of the Royal Family is wearing but not the manufacturer/designer/creator. The Royal Warrant exists for that. And Meghan can't be profiting from things if she sticks it in her own bank account. (Prince Charles' Duchy of Cornwall turns a profit, but it's public knowledge how the Duchy is run and where the money goes.)

      Delete
  5. @Tricia, you know it sure does matter to a climber like MM. Meyer is serious Hollywood, and can't be too happy right now.

    Though she did steal her designs from Me & To, if you ask me

    ReplyDelete
  6. Me & Ro, not To

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fat Markle can be counted on to pull a shithead stunt.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree she stole...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous6:58 AM

    This kind of behavior makes zero sense unless you consider two possibilities:

    It’s an arcane plot to destroy the BRF
    Or
    MM is just an amazingly unintelligent shithead, which is redundant... a simple shithead works.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It sucks what Markle did to Jen Meyer. So wrong. Jen SHOULD be able to post pics of people wearing her jewelry, no matter who they are.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why didn’t MeGAIN go after the other brands that posted pics of her in their merch?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Why did they say it was unsafe for MM, for the pics to be online? Like pics of her online, make her unsafe? Kinda late for that!

    ReplyDelete
  13. @ Lauren - someone in the Firm did go after ?H&M for featuring Archie in one of their outfits.
    These are the only two that I am aware of blatant merchandizing.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think Enty is wrong here. I think the call came from Buckingham Palace, not Meghan. She’s out in LA trying to make deals, and they’re trying to keep her from merching the family name.

    Liz is trolling Meg at the moment, anyway. Last night at a reception Liz wore the rarely-seen Vladimir tiara with all its emeralds. That’s the tiara Meg wanted so badly for her wedding but was told “no.”

    Liz even wore it with a white dress.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This level of shade is off the charts! Excellent move.

      Delete
    2. 😁😁😁😏🇬🇧👑

      Delete
    3. I think you are correct, BP ordered the pics of MM be removed, MM knows she's been caught out & now that she cannot profit from Meyer she has no more use for her....Noted Catherine was shimmering in jewels given to her by HM while HM wore the Tiara that MM threw a tantrum over. Letting MM know she is out in the cold.

      Delete
    4. Agree completely with you here nutty! Markle got caught with her hand in the cookie jar and lost her little side gig! Queen definitely trolled Markle wearing that giant green tiara and a white dress and putting Camilla and Kate in a bunch of jewels too. Pretty obvious what the message was! Don’t mess with Liz!

      Delete
  16. Jennifer Meyer IS serious Hollywood and everybody wants to be her friend, presumably for the reasons listed above.

    VERY short-sighted move on MM's part. You never want to piss off the cool people if you can avoid it, it's just dumb.

    ReplyDelete
  17. HOWEVER - it occurred to me the publicity could be from Jennifer Meyer herself - to broadcast all this, for her own publicity.

    Buckingham Palace would never release this story. It's possible the story released by MM was also as a favor to Meyer for coverage - hard to know.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Anonymous8:59 AM

    This blind is wrong. I agree with Nutty. Buckingham Palace shut down Jennifer Meyer's photos and merching agreement with MM. MM is working it currently cutting deals with as many people as she can while she's still attached to the BRF. TP posted that Markle was denied entry into Canada within the last week. So I'm expecting the shit show to get really interesting over the next few months. First up? Is Markle allowed back into England after the holidays are over?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Oh Meghantoinette! You’re such a class act. Ol Wallace and Gromit mouth ass. I’ve seen better legs in my chicken coop. Guess I have to go see if this jewelry is as ugly as I expect it to be....

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anything to distract from Andrew.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh DO fuck off. The British papers are full of Andrew and nothing about old Meg.

      Delete
  21. I agree with Nutty, as well.
    Excellent trolling of MM via Liz wearing the emerald crown denied to MM for her wedding... loools.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous11:50 AM

    Meghan Markle needs to be careful especially considering how badly She want's to still be apart of Hollywood.

    And Pissing Off Jennifer Meyer who has a lot of Friends in Hollywood and is Hollywood Royalty Herself is definitely not going to help Meghan in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I'm kind of not believing she was denied entry into Canada. On what basis???
    I mean she is an incredibly entitled bitch, but denied entry seems odd.

    ReplyDelete
  24. @Tricia13 I've worked in the jewellery biz for years, and neither Me&Ro, nor Jennifer Meyer started that trend. As a matter of fact, Jennifer's designs were almost dated when they came out. The company I worked for was no trend setter, and we had already been selling those designs for over a year.

    ReplyDelete
  25. @Jules: I agree. I think Jennifer M. is quite mediocre as a designer. Whatever success she’s had is due to her last name and her friends (such as Jennifer A.) constantly wearing and promoting her brand.

    ReplyDelete
  26. On what grounds might she be denied entry to canada? Party favors. ..

    ReplyDelete
  27. Anonymous2:15 PM

    The reason most of us assumed (besides the BRF issuing the request) is that she failed to pay her taxes when she worked on Suits. MM has a history of failing to pay her taxes. She fought the US IRS and lost over back taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Any of you LA folks know what Hollywood makes of Markle? I think it's absurd that JayZ and Beyonce, John Legend, Serena and Oprah are celebrating her for marrying into the European Imperial Royal family of inbred hemopheliacs that for centuries raped the entire black and brown world for their natural resources.

    Throughout her life, Markle made a point to associate with white people, tried to appear Caucasian and dated, screwed, married and used white men. Her Tig was Martha Stewart lite. On the other hand, her white trash family she came by honestly.

    Her "humanitarianism" and "philanthropy" were social climbing and gold digging. Horrible actress appears to be a horrible, vain, thirsty bitch. WTF?

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Jules interesting info. The first time I actually saw that style of jewelry was from a place called Mia & Company, then it seemed the same thing was everywhere under a company called Me & Ro

    ReplyDelete
  30. According to the Blind Gossip site, to get around the palace protocol of not accepting gifts, Meghan and Jennifer had a side deal for Meghan to pay for the jewelry up front, and then be quietly compensated for wearing the pieces. Jennifer capitalized on the arrangement by using Meghan's pictures, but it was noticed and shut down by the royal family. Meghan can’t admit she had a side deal, so she had to let the family take legal action against Jennifer. Jennifer can't say anything or it would make both her and Meghan look bad. So they both had to comply and be quiet. According to BG, Meghan will definitely find a way to make it up to Jennifer.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Notice how this blind totally mischaracterized what Meghan did to Jennifer. I've mentioned it before - you can't believe a thing you read here about anyone in the British royal family. The writer(s) always have the knives out for them.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Hey Angie, you’re right. This blind is totally mischaracterized. What Meghan really did is knock-off Jennifer’s products. They’re on Meghan’s Mirror. The ‘Mummy’ necklace, the turquoise ‘bar’ earrings. I didn’t bother to look thru the whole Etsy site but those two items are definitely listed (and obviously for a much lower price than Jennifer’s line.) So she they had a side deal AND Meghan knocked off her line?

    ReplyDelete
  33. I don't know anything about Meghan operating an Esty site or marketing her own line of jewelry, if I'm understanding you correctly, and find it hard to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  34. If you find it hard to believe, than you must be naive. Meghan’s all about merching and she’s been doing so since before her engagement. The site is Meghan’s Mirror which lists & links to everything that Meghan wears. There’s also a knockoff line of jewelry, including her ‘wedding tiara’ and her ‘aquamarine ring as worn by Diana’ that are linked to the site and sold through Etsy. This is just one of MM’s many side gigs.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Anonymous6:14 PM

    Here's the link to Diana's aquamarine ring that is selling on Etsy

    https://www.etsy.com/listing/624736410/meghan-markle-inspired-aquamarine-ring?source=aw&utm_source=affiliate_window&utm_medium=affiliate&utm_campaign=us_location_buyer&utm_term=3657&awc=6220_1576203090_bcc41648ad83e21f8a3919dedd466df2&utm_content=136348

    Here's the link to the entire line of merchandise on Etsy. Note it includes MM's name. Meghan's receiving a cut of the sales or she would have aggressively gone after this Etsy seller like she did those Ebay sellers.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I did a bit of Google Search sleuthing, and determined there are several Meghan's Mirror sites, all of which sell pieces that are described as "inspired" by articles that Meghan has worn, but nowhere did I find an indication that Meghan herself is in any way associated with them.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Oh! Did Markle do something stupid, uncouth, and totally classless? Really?

    ReplyDelete
  38. Canada is also pretty hardcore about DUI or DWI, if she's got one that's been buried from the press, that may be the reason for denial of entry.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous2:26 PM

    @Aurelie let's not forget she also submitted charges to Prince Charles account for reimbursement. So she was double dipping and earning money two ways every time she wore an item. Now let's see if she declares the income on her taxes.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days