Tuesday, November 05, 2019

Blind Item #8

Unlike the first one, the royal couple is going to be paid for the second documentary. The numbers are $3-5M each.

56 comments:

  1. Fat Markle and Harry *Eye Roll*

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2019/11/meghan-markle-for-president-documentary

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow.
    Sick.
    If I was the Queen - I'd cut them off too for this bullshit so I guess they need the money now....

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is just ridiculous no one watched the first doc and why is the Queen allowing this!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because MM has information about PA. She was there.

      Delete
  5. Crazy if true.

    Out of curiosity....are the taxes/ private earnings of the Royal Family made public ??? Anyone know...can't look it up right now, but, curious. lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes. And they do pay taxes. However now we are stuck in the Middle of a General Election, there's so many statements being made everything is an utter mess. Markle needs getting rid of ASAP.

      Delete
  6. They have been whining and throwing tantrums since the wedding. We know how they feel, how many different ways do they have to tell the public that they suck but at the same time milk the journalist to get a payday?

    What dumbass would pay them millions to hear them continuously lay into the public about their privileged plight? They just dig a deeper whole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The public finally realised that they weren't getting another Catherine. They got a Z List Narc.
      No one has seen the child "Archie" since the South African Tour/Documentary. Answers in my Reply Box. Either he is still in SA with the Spencer Family or in the USA with Doria. We have not seen her either. Both have disappeared.

      Delete
  7. People in shock because royals want to earn their own money. Folks this is a good thing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well, what with child sex trafficking rings being destroyed around the world, ports closed, and assets of those involved being seized, the "elite" gotta make a buck somehow

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's probably the Prince Harry mental health documentary with Oprah that was mentioned a few months ago. I bet Meghan has gotten involved. God forbid she lets Half-wit Harry do anything on his own. She constantly needs to be the center of attention.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Harry has been Markled. She literally has her talons into him.
      He looks terrible.
      Markle has no respect for the Royal Family. She has to be held back from walking in front of Catherine. H and M are Minor Royals and Markle hates it. The look on her face at times is pure vitriolic hate. Check out Twitter and the Daily Mail

      Delete
  10. U have 2 be shitting me...in my prom dress too

    ReplyDelete
  11. There was just an announcement that they're taking a break from royal duties. Looks like the blind from yesterday was true.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Gen, "But but all the tourist money they bring in!" 😥

    ReplyDelete
  13. The last Sussx documentary had terrible ratings in both the UK and the US - below 3 million viewers in the US. That's even lower than the 5 million Gayle King's Sussex documentary had in April.

    Why would anybody want an additional documentary from these nobodies? Does somebody need a tax loss? Is it a money-laundering thing?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Markle is Merching every thing.
      For someone who wants privacy. She can spot a camera at 100 yards. There always happens to be a camera. No matter where she goes, the Paps are there. Who lets them know? Markles Sunshine Sachs team gets on the phone to the Newspapers.

      Delete
  14. So.
    This wouldn't be... GRIFTING...
    right?
    Damned if U do and damned if U don't.

    ReplyDelete
  15. MM has earned that money. She is doing great things.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Fat Markle and the half-prince are so damned entertaining.

    Keep the blinds coming!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wonderful! The more these entitled grifters profit from their position and whine and complain (you don't have to wonder why our Founding Fathers gave us the Emoluments clause for this very reason), the more disgusted the entire world will be with the taxpayer grifters, The Royals. Abolish the lot of them!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Maybe folks should be asking how the palace intimidated ABC News into keeping quiet on Andrew:

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/amy-robach-abc-anchor-caught-on-mic-saying-network-quashed-jeffrey-epstein-story-fretted-access-to-royals

    https://theweek.com/speedreads/876458/abc-anchor-rants-against-network-not-running-jeffrey-epstein-story-leaked-video

    Even the journalists who want to be journalists aren't allowed to report on certain news.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Documents that can be found are redacted.
      Even the Solicitors names.

      Delete
  19. From the VF article myDogSmiles posted...

    'According to Lores Meghan would be “phenomenal” should she ever choose to run for presidency. “I first met Meghan freshman year. We were the newest members of the Kappa Kappa Gamma chapter at Northwestern..."'

    And I was like oh my god and she was like oh my god and I said as if! and she said she met someone from the British royal family who was unbelievably stupid like he could even be in our sorority!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Good for them.

    I'm confused- you guys do, or don't, want them to make their own money . . .

    ReplyDelete
  21. If I ever go to England it will be to see some old castles and the historic places. Could care less about the BRF.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Brayson - the Amy Robach disclosure is quite interesting. ABC feared not getting access to Wills and Kate, so may have spiked an Epstein/Prince Andrew/Clinton expose. Of course, both ABC and Robach are scrambling to make it sound the story was not quite ripe, but it looks like Project Veritas actually got something this time.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I would like to read a real book Harry writes recounting his childhood, CHarles and Dianna, etc. He knows more than we ever will. THAT's some coin of the realm shit.

    She should put that bug in his ear or up his butt or whatever he likes. I would.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Most here seem to want her to just permanently disappear. There is not one thing this woman could do right to make the majority of the commenters here happy.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I believe in and I'm worried about global warming. And yes, I'd like someone who fights global warming by having royal kids who will consume like mad, by flying private jets a few times per week, by traveling with a hairstylist, a bunch of land rovers, and a separate plane containing a hundred journalists to go the fuck away.

    The only thing she does which is remotely good for the environment is wearing Hillary's hand-me-down muu-muus.

    ReplyDelete
  26. For a 10% fee I'd be glad to perform a tax audit on these people, although I'm sure all "appearance fees" are being properly reported!

    ReplyDelete
  27. @MountainMama I would be so happy if Smirkle jumped into an active volcano, or were abducted by aliens in a space ship and never heard from again. She is a psycho - just look at her evil facial expressions- and that annoying voice. The voice of a psycho.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Speaking of MM and volcanos......Where is the evil, Lord Xenu when you need him? ; P

    ReplyDelete
  29. They should do a reality show!

    ReplyDelete
  30. This all ongoing distraction from the Prince Andrew grossness. They are saying "hey look over here" (hands waving)

    ReplyDelete
  31. Time to decide if they are private or royal.

    Either remain working royals supported by the public,be honest, attend engagements appropriately dressed/groomed, sober and without private camera crews OR independently on their own dime. Many members of the royal family earn their own livings AND behave like royals.

    Another propaganda piece????? Who is paying for that garbage. I didn't watch the others, won't watch this. Saw too much on social media etc. If we ignore those two adult children, maybe they will go away.

    Using Africa as a backdrop to whine about their entitled lives was a discrace. They should refund the British public for the public funds expended on that disastrous tour.

    Real feminists and independent women are disgusted with Ms. Markle.

    Any creature who made her way in life casting couching, marrying trading up divorcing and now taking her husband's title and status is not a feminist by definition. Real feminists don't have porn videos.

    FYI, time for the royal to get with the times and begin drug testing and DNA testing.

    Tired of seeing that woman high as a kite, wig skewed, crazy eyes... blabbing about empowerment and finding a voice. She has nothing meaningful to say. She should shut up!

    There are many more accomplished people doing meaningful work more worthy of our attention.

    ReplyDelete
  32. The story may not have been spiked by the BRF....
    perhaps it was because in addition to Randy Andy...it would have exposed Slick Willy.
    Which puts Hillary's presidential run in jeopardy.
    I don't think bill gives a shit about who knows what about him...but she does.
    No doubt, the royals could spike the story...but so could the clintons.

    oh and INB4 "orangemanbad"

    ReplyDelete
  33. Wow Royal blinds have so many comments !

    ReplyDelete
  34. I just want to know why people keep calling her fat. She cant be no more than 160lbs .

    ReplyDelete
  35. Beloit, she's 5 foot 3 max so that makes her 40 lbs overweight.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Is she seriously setting herself up for a run for office. the hubris knows no bounds.

    ReplyDelete
  37. She makes AOC look qualified for a presidential run.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Pont de l'Alma can't come soon enough!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Hey I want AOC to run, might be nice to get more presidents who aren't in their 70's and white.

    ReplyDelete
  40. My husband is an AOC fan, however I have a dear black friend that says the only answer to the atrocity of our current POTUS is a handsome, straight white man who is under 60. I love you Bernie but you are just too long in the tooth. I prob would still vote for you unless I though Elizabeth has a real shot.

    ReplyDelete
  41. https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1200041/kate-middleton-news-popularity-poll-prince-william-meghan-markle-prince-harry-royal-rift/amp?__twitter_impression=true

    ReplyDelete
  42. MM and her handbag.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Well, Daily Mail ran a story about PA's underage young lady problems in Jan. 2015, so I don't think the palace quashed the Epstein story. More likely Hillary or the DNC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Buckingham Palace has WAY more power than the Clintons. Are you kidding? The Royal Family has practiced intrigue for a thousand years. That crew makes American big shots appear as amateurs.

      Delete
  44. It's really hard to believe anyone with a brain is going to pay the Half Wit and his Grifter Wife 3 to 5 million dollars each for another documentary. They are as boring as hell, along with their cringe worthy behavior.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Oh PUHleeeeeze, its so obvious whats going on there. The Queen sent Megs n Harry off to Murica to create controversy, mayhem, and to sell papers (and a narrative). They are certainly NOT on the outs. More part of a shrewd calculated plan on the part of Lizzy to detract from Andrew's bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Anonymous3:45 PM

    If Andrew Windsor hurt someone, then question him and put him to trial. Just like any other human being on planet earth. He needs to be held accountable.
    There are plenty of complaints coming forth about him.... not only Virginia.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days