Blind Item #8
The PR people of the child molesting director have started being aggressive in their defense of him so he can mount some type of comeback. They have sent me multiple emails over the past two weeks under different names, but generally use the same argument which also shows it is all coordinated.
Woody Allen
ReplyDeleteOr Roman Polanski
Delete+1 Roman Polanski
ReplyDeleteSinger molested kids, as well, to add to the list
ReplyDeleteWoody Allen was never convicted of anything. The child welfare agency reviewed all the evidence and interviewed the family. Then they decided that Woody was not molesting his daughter. Polanski on the other hand is a convict and ran from justice.
ReplyDeleteWoody Allen is a scumbag and a molester. This I know and anyone “with a pulse” as well. He escaped a sentence in this lifetime ,but no others will be, trust.
DeleteWill he*
DeleteGlad to see Woody could join us.
DeleteI sense Singer....
ReplyDeleteAnyways Take Care Enty !
Roman Polanski threatening to sue some newspaper!
ReplyDeletesinger and his merry bunch of paid protectors. Nobody cares about WA and Roman keeps on using his beautiful wife's tragedy as an excuse. Singer paid the accuser off and gets away again. slippery Slimey Singer
ReplyDeleteI think Woody has given up at this point. Singer, I think.
ReplyDeleteA shame all these answers may be true. But Singer is the one with the blockbuster movies, so people will back him up. Allen and Polanski have loyal followings, it are unlikely to make others big$.
ReplyDeleteVictor Salva, to be different.
ReplyDeleteSinger. What a douche bag.
ReplyDeleteI cant wait until Woody passes and Soon Yi writes a book documenting the horrors of living with mental Mia.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that Woody & Soon Yi have had 27 happy years together while Mia is still bitter, crazy and alone shouldnt be enough revenge.
Woody doesn't need to make a comeback, he never went away. Polanski isn't coming back cuz he's facing jail time. I'm going with Singer for this one.
ReplyDeleteBryan Singer the narcissistic ways, these men really think they are invisible
ReplyDeleteIt could be Singer... doubt it's Woody Allen... but in all honestly is most likely Roman Polanksi... his American victim spoke out in favor of him (pressured by her mother) but a new girl now has accused him of rape. He just released his latest film about a French Jewish soldier called J'accuse. This is to be his HUGE comeback film...
ReplyDeleteThere's a chance it is Woody -- he and Amazon earlier this month settled that suit he brought over Amazon backing out of a contract for him to do four movies for them. They backed out over Dylan Farrow's longstanding allegations. The timing for PR mounting a renewed defense of him makes sense -- the settlement was about two weeks ago.
ReplyDeletePolanski is in the news too but for all the wrong reasons and PR would be defensive and reactionary rather than trying to jumpstart a comeback narrative.
What about that guy Gunn who worked for Disney?
ReplyDeletenot a child molester, just a victim of a right-wing troll campaign over some old tweets
DeleteWoody Allen weighs about a buck forty. Most teens, be they male or female, could kick his ass. I've only heard of one negative circumstance on Woody Allen and it was decided in court. Nothing since. This does not mean he is or isn't a pedo.
ReplyDeletePolanski hightailed it to France when the heat came down to avoid the heat of American media. He's protected in France both by law and media. Who knows what he has been up to.
Bryan Singer has multiple allegations of bad behavior following him. The form emails being sent aren't to protect Singer. They are being sent to protect his enablers.
Those who protect Allen? Well who knows? Those who protect Polanski? Well ya know? Those who protect Singer? You know.
They are scared!
me.......Woody raped children. Adults have an advantage over them through age. To think it is a regular fight between children and adults shows lack of understanding of pedophilia.
ReplyDeleteThis definitely sounds like Singer.
ReplyDeleteThere was ONE allegation against Woody Allen, and not for rape. So "Woody Allen raped children" is a baseless assumption.
ReplyDeleteAnd for God's sake, not buying into the popular narrative does not make someone a child molester themselves. Mia Farrow has proven herself to be an extremely vindictive person, in some instances frighteningly so. And there are enough inconsistencies in the alleged incident that Dylan tells about to make it questionable at the very minimum.
This sounds like Bryan Singer and the gay mafia. Gafia.
ReplyDeleteUnknown, or should I say Soon-Yi, you are not telling the truth. Welfare did not decide that Woody wasn't molesting his daughter. What the hell? State’s attorney Frank Maco announced that while he found “probable cause” to prosecute Allen, he was dropping the case because Dylan was too “fragile” to deal with a trial. Mia Farrow agreed with the decision. To protect her daughter from more sexual assault from her father.
ReplyDeleteOh and to downplay the real trauma of sexual assault by saying "It wasn't rape!" is degrading and despicable. Please crawl back into your hole and out of here with your half-truths and defense of a monster.
Me is right. There are hundreds of men who know about Singer. Maybe they attended a party or even worked as the help at a party. Some played the game and were rewarded with great success. Some were discarded and returned back to wherever they came from and now live normal lives. Some willingly participated and just went on with their lives. Nobody associated with Singer wants the entire truth to come out. My feeling is that they will stop at nothing to keep the information private.
ReplyDeleteOh look, "You don't agree with me so you must be one of the family!"
ReplyDeleteLame and pathetic tactic, which indicates a lame and pathetic person.
Moses also grew up in that house, and has said that Mia physically abused him more than once. He also has pointed out that there were disparities in Dylan's recollection, such as things she claims to remember actually being located in a different part of the house, not the attic.
And rape is not the same as inappropriate touching/molestation. To say that it is is degrading and desopicable to people who actually have been raped.
Disgustingly, Dylan "there is only room in this family for one victim and that's ME" Farrow attempted to diminish things that Moses said as either untrue or saying things along the lines of "Moses's abuse wasn't THAT bad".
Perv Woody. He's 45 years younger than Soon-Yi....
ReplyDeleteWhy were you such good friends with JEFFREY EPSTEIN Woody? You were at the first dinner for him after he got out of prison the first time. Why is that Woody?
Piece of shit Polanski.
ReplyDelete@Unknown:
ReplyDelete"There was ONE allegation against Woody Allen, and not for rape. So "Woody Allen raped children" is a baseless assumption."
I won't defend Woody Allen nor will I accuse him. Here's my reason:
Hollywood is INFECTED with these folks and they work together in concert. Partial truths leak thru the press and the dedicated sickos (rapists and pedos) need their donkey to pin the tail on in order to deflect away from themselves and on to someone else. Preferably on to someone the viewing public will readily accept as evil. Enter Woody Allen and Harvey Weinstein...
Woody: Mia Farrow is not and never has been an in demand commodity in Hollywood. She has worked with Polanski and knows the ropes. She latches on to Woody knowing he's the epitome of the creepy Jewish uncle stereotype. With Sinatra's child in tow, they adopt. Woody gets berated and ends up crying on the shoulder of the barely legal adopted girl.... BOOM! Woody is the evil one responsible for all of it... It goes to court and Woody carries the burden. It has to be him! Look at him! The actual culprits walk. Mia Farrow is praised and receives press favor for her effort. Sinatra's offspring moves into "journalism". So sweet...
The guy (Woody) wears water wings in the shower so he won't slip down the drain.
Harvey: Harvey is essentially given control of Hollywood. Why? Because the powers that be desire to control the narrative for political purposes. They know Harvey is a butt ugly fat bloke who couldn't get laid if you dropped him with a pocket full of benjamins and a bag of weed into an women's penitentiary. He uses the casting couch to indoctrinate all mountable young starlets. Those who Harvey turns are then weaponized against upcoming male talent. The women who refuse... well they move away from Harvey toward independent film. The males who are battered do the same. What do the powers that be do next to further clamp down on folks avoiding the road block? They place the requirement of winning an Oscar on Harvey's shoulders. You must pepper Harvey's ass with kisses if you want the award.... and the award means recognition, tons of good press, and more prestigious roles. Now Harvey has a stable of weaponized males and females (those who have been turned/sold their souls)... they attend parties... new talent has to show for the paparazzi... and they gang up on the up and coming young talent. Gays, straights, etc. drop the worst down on the new kids on the block. This cycle keeps the top at the very top and controls the political narrative. The powers that be want you to adore these people so you will in turn bite off on the propaganda they are jamming down your throat.
Now... Who sucks up to Harvey? Meryl and Oprah. Meryl does it for POWER. She wants all the awards and she does not want anyone stealing her limelight. She'll turn a new chick over in a second. Not only for herself but for all those who kiss her ass for favors. Oprah is at the very least a tool. She sucks up to the Democratic party that controls Hollywood and she sold her soul to gain a TV network. The payment to the powers that be is due monthly and she pays with pushing young unaware talent towards Harvey.
Now go back and look at the pictures...
Doobie doobie doo... Winter is coming Meryl... Oprah. Who's ass were you kissing in Haiti Oprah?
Singer. I can think of $1billion+ Oscar winning reason's why he'll direct again.
ReplyDeleteSteven Spielberg....
ReplyDeleteOr hasn't he been exposed yet?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteMia Farrow formerly married to Andre Previn. Previn's ex Dory wrote a song about being molested in an attic. Fast forward: Mia is a woman scorned and needs a story about Allen to punish him. She claims daughter molested in an attic. Prosecutors don't have the evidence to convict and cover their asses with "dylan too fragile" excuse.
ReplyDeleteIt makes me want to vomit the way people are defending Woody ‘Wood for his daughter’ Allen. This is the man that one year is bouncing his adopted daughter on his knee and the next, placing his boney ass between her knees. If Mia is bitter, what would you expect when you partner marries the child you parented together. GTFOH. I think Allen got off easy in the court system and with Mia because a lot of momma bears would be wearing his shriveled junk as a charm bracelet had he gone after their daughters in such a manner.
ReplyDeleteAllen never parented Soon Yi, he never lived with Mia, and as Soon Yi has said, he was never a father figure to her. Andre Previn was her father.
ReplyDeleteMia never had a problem with Woody being around ANY Of her kids, including 3 year old Dylan, until Woody left her for Soon Yi. She in fact wrote glowingly of him to the court for Dylan's adoption, which was not that long before things fell apart.
It's pretty fucked up that Mia went and changed two of her kid's names because she was that pissed at Woody. Why mess with a kid's identity? And Ronan, I think, is on his third first name. It's also fucked up that in 2007, with minor kids at home, Mia offered herself up as a replacement for a Sudanese rebel leader who was hiding in a hospital, so that he could leave the country. She is not exactly a rational parent.
Mia and Andre Previn adopted Soon Yi, not Frank Sinatra.
ReplyDeleteI never have understood the "Woody is the good one Mia is the bad one, or the Woody is the bad one, Mia is the good one, " argument.
ReplyDeleteTo me, it's always been obvious that there IS no good one of the two. In my mind they are both awful human beings who were once together.
Also, this blind is about Woody.
Unknown. That is untrue. If you read the court papers, it says that Mr. Allen accompanied Mia and the children on multiple vacations that were considered family vacation in which Allen was clearly their mother's paramour. Since W&M were in this relationship for so long and went on these de facto family vacations together, in addition to spending time together, the children would have viewed Allen as a father figure, not a possible paramour. To indicate that the adoptive relationship bonds are not as deep as biological bonds is dangerous and the reason many adopted children are molested. Thankfully, most people understand this. The suggestion otherwise is PR for Mr. Allen.
ReplyDeletemolly ' he raped a child'
ReplyDeleteyou are psychologically ill, Woody Allen did no such thing, and he was never accused of such thing
you are a very dangerous person, the kind who will happily watch an innocent man go to jail, just so it fits your sick and deranged agenda
Please don't be Singer, I can't take any more crappy X-Men movies in the world.
ReplyDeleteAmerican lynch mobs are the worst.
ReplyDelete"We're the best! We have the best laws and amendments and everything!"
Then turn around and claim to KNOW who is guilty of what, based solely on their over-stuffed appetites for stories about people who wouldn't give them the gum off the soles of their shoes.
Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
The problem is, there are too many wingdings sitting on juries and voting to send innocent people to prison. Because jurists "know." People with souls just "know" who's guilty, and who's not.
May these hysterics all one day face a jury of their peers.