Wednesday, October 16, 2019

Blind Items Revealed #3

September 12, 2019

It can't be a regular charity gig to get the alliterate celebrity out of the house. She likes it when only people who are upper crust like herself will be there. Plus, she managed to grab something she has always wanted and won't give that up in the divorce.

Meghan Markle/Princess Diana's jewelry


51 comments:

  1. She's such a positive role model for young people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. So now she's Fat Thief Markle

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How is she fat? Or do you need glasses?

      Delete
    2. It's 'humour' apparently.
      But it sounds like pure douchery to me.

      Delete
  3. no way she escapes with dianas jewelry and her life. imo.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well was it the good stuff from D's rich boyfriend?

    ReplyDelete
  5. If I were William I'd be livid with my half wit younger brother. How the fuck dare he? Diana was his mother too, and have this deal or no deal, ex yacht girl, LA actress compare herself to Diana, have Harry compare her to their late mother, use their late mother force people to like her....I'd fucking never speak to him again.

    Having said all that, I very seriously doubt that she got her grubby greedy hands on anything, especially Diana's jewellery. Now way would that be allowed. I'd guess she had some pieces duplicated. Harry is stupid enough to do that for her 'as a tribute'. That pathetic arse-wipe of a half wit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @notalibtard I think that is far more likely unless it’s jewels that were given to Harry by his mother. He is a national embarrassment. All the blubbing before his speech about her pregnancy. This from a man who is supposed to be an advocate for mental health charities. Crying over his immense good fortune and massively privileged life. I hope William is distancing himself from this hypocritical and quite frankly cretinous behaviour.

      Delete
  6. Harry is so, so dumb.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Diana mirroring going on in the British tabloids between Kate and Megan looks like a school charade pagent. An expensive one no less. A shot for shot comparison on who wore it better- Kate in Pakistan, or Megan in Africa! It's not just the two princes who have a Diana obsession. It's like a sad remake of a sequel, that was getting tired and close to satire in the first place. They probably even like the Sex in the City movies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well Hello Sunshine Sachs employee! It’s raining in NYC, no?

      Delete
  8. Think harry had her put on moms jewelry before he bangs her. Moms pearls and tiara?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't even think she is allowed to wear Diana's jewellery, Enty. Another lie. All of Diana's jewellery she supposedly wears have been shown to be copies - the butterfly earrings, the bracelet. They don't even look like Diana's jewellery

    ReplyDelete
  10. Count, the pearls go on at the very end.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous10:11 AM

    It depends on the provenance of the jewelry. If it's from the Spencer side and not that valuable then maybe she can keep it for the kid and I can understand her wanting something, especially if she knows her royal days are numbered.

    ReplyDelete
  12. No way Meghan gets any original jewelry pieces that belonged to Diana IF she divorces Harry. That said, IF she leaves Harry, it will be with a cash payout of the worth of the pieces she has been allowed to wear, or, very good copies of the pieces.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Harry splashed out on a pearl necklace for her.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I'm gonna say Harry isn't smart but his lawyers are. Any jewelry she wears not bought by Harry given to her I would think would be considered "on loan" and not a gift if it was Diana's. I would even think if Kate divorces William she would have to return Diana's engagement ring.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Way to go, Fifty.

    Two years ago you were seen as affable, pretty much the most-loved welfare sponge in your worthless family.

    Now people realize you're 1) a moron, 2) a fool, 3) a hypocrite, and 4) see #1.

    ReplyDelete
  16. She doesn't have anything of Diana's. The Queen and William have made darn sure of that. the stuff that she wears that she tries to pass off as Diana's is all fake. So fake that they aren't even exact copies. She is evil.

    ReplyDelete
  17. lol, congrats to the British people who are apparently paying for expensive jewelry reproductions to prevent fatso Markle from stealing the originals!

    Good thing your economy is so strong you can afford this!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Enty really is brilliant. He getsa lot of hits when these first come out. Then he getsa lot when he reveals. As if they need a reveal at all. Bitch please.
    I just wanted to comment to point this out to all the mentalretards here who can't find a job or the jugaloos left u behind

    ReplyDelete
  19. Rosie, your harangues would be far more impressive and persuasive written in clear English.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Rosie, I thought his blinds about her yachting days were much more interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I can't tell if Rosie is using a racial slur or if she just doesn't know how to spell juggalos.🔥✝🤔🤡

    ReplyDelete
  22. Probably both.

    ReplyDelete
  23. All the pieces are real. They will probably go back to Harry and Archie if they divorce. Archie can give it to his wife at a later date.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Whatever it is, she’s creepily obsessed with calling me a Juggalo. But that’s ok because I always enjoy bringing up how she bragged about getting underage college girls drunk and sexually assaulting them, doing cocaine, and having sex videos on a bunch of her old phones. And of course, creeping on her poor child’s 8 months pregnant teacher. It’s actually amusing though, because she’s evidently alone and unwanted, and unloved by anyone except the poor hostage she adopted from some third world hellhole. Not like that poor child has a choice, bless his heart. It’s great to see someone with such a stellar character, who really has it all together, obsessing over someone with a great life. But that’s a theme with them, they also attacked Tricia and J, two other seemingly happy and well off people. Sad but also kind of funny because it’s so pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
  25. It's a desperate, filthy, and unlettered life, no doubt.

    Thank my lucky stars it isn't me living it.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Amen, J. Still frothing and spitting in the other thread as well. What a pathetic psychopath, projecting their issues on me. I guess maybe they just realized they’re gonna die alone and unloved. Oh well, not my problem 😂 but it is getting boring that they refuse to stop starting shit with me.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Another fake blind Enty. Meghan is not allowed to wear any of Diana’s jewelry. Even the wedding tiara was fake. You can look on Meghan’s Mirror where she sells some of the knock-offs. Everything about her is fake, fake, fake.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Anonymous3:39 PM

    +1 Astra and Aquagirl. HM banned MM from wearing any of Diana's jewelry long ago. Everything she wears are copies and actually very poor copies. Her Diana pieces are easily proved fakes. The Queen was not amused when MM tried to do her Diana 2.0 imitation and that's when all of Diana's jewelry was yanked from the Sussexes possession.

    ReplyDelete
  29. This could be jewelry that Diana left to Harry and which he, in turn, gave to Meghan.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Let's have some facts here please. (Ann you have been reading too many wishful gossip comments).

    Sometime after Diana's death Charles gathered the boys in to divide up her jewellery. William picked first, then Harry, then William until there was none of her personal jewellery left.

    William's first pick was Diana's Cartier watch, Harry then chose Diana's engagement ring and so on. Many years later William asked Harry if he could have/swap the engagement ring to give it to Kate and Harry agreed (he could have said no, as the ring was his personal property), hence Kate now wears the ring. There were around 50 pieces of Diana's 'real' jewels , she also owned a good few costume pieces that 'looked real'(she had fun fooling the press with them).

    A few smaller pieces were given to her goddaughters, some of these have since been auctioned off.

    Harry inherited quite a few pieces of Diana's personal jewellery, they are his to do with as he likes. No doubt he has given them to Meghan and if he has given them to her there is nothing anyone can do about it. In fact Diana’s will stated......
    "I would like you to allocate all my jewellery to the share to be held by my sons, so that their wives may, in due course, have it or use it. "I leave the exact division of the jewellery to your discretion."

    Meghan’s engagement ring was made with stones from one of Diana’s jewels(we don’t know which piece they came from) some people have suggested they came from Diana’s Sapphire and Pearl choker , no one has seen the choker since Diana’s death , neither Kate nor Meghan have worn it.

    The good news is that most of Diana's personal jewellery was relatively modest. All the big blingy royal things she wore belonged to the Queen and were returned to her on Diana's death. Diana did not own a tiara the ones she wore were owned by the Queen and her father(later her brother).

    The jewels Diana was given by foreign countries in her role as Princess of Wales belong to the nation, not Diana, she simply had the use of them as long as she lived. However wedding gifts did belong to her.

    I have no doubt that Meghan is now in possession of at least 20 pieces of Diana's personal jewellery. Harry is besotted with her, she wouldn't even have to ask for them he would have just heaped them in her lap.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Okay, between @emeraldcity and Enty: Meg got ahold of some of Harry’s personal share of Diana’s (likely ordinary type of) jewelry. Enty is saying that Meg will make sure that she retains it after the divorce.

    My comment, is that I wonder which camp provided the blind. Is Meg’s camp boasting? Is it the BRF, aware and not pleased? Or is it on Harry’s behalf, that someone can see that something precious to Harry will not be salvageable after the divorce?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Didn’t Markle wear a large blue ring of Diana’s to her and Harry’s wedding reception?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Just googled and the blue ring Markle wore was an aquamarine. Pretty, but not one of the more expensive gemstones.


    ReplyDelete
  34. @Jan.....

    If Harry has gifted her Diana's jewels , which he has a perfect right to do and is probably true, I don't think he is likely to get them back in the event of a divorce.

    I did say Diana's jewellery was relatively modest, but that is compared to the Royal jewellery she Diana borrowed. Down the track if Meghan decided to auction off the pieces we do know Harry collected they could bring in as much as half a million dollars , not so much for their intrinsic value but because of their provenance (i.e. once owned by Diana).

    As Enty intimated yesterday his information seems to be coming from camp Meghan. I don't think the RF family would care in the least what happened to Diana's jewellery. William maybe 'that hussy has her claws on my mummy's jewels' but anyone else in the family no.

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Mango

    That aquamarine ring has an estimated auction worth of around $75,000 on artnet (a company dedicated to auction valuations and sales prices). Probably worth around $10,000 without the Diana provenance.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Emeraldcity - how would you know such personal details, like what Diana's will would say and how her jewellery was divided amongst the sons?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I sent off for a copy of Diana's Will when she died. Royal Wills are normally private but Diana's wasn't which was highly unusual but she'd had her HRH taken from her so maybe that is why her Will was published by the British Press at the time & how I got my hands on a copy too.

      Delete
  37. That was not Diana’s aquamarine ring. MM’s was a knock-off. They are 2 entirely different rings. MM is a con artist.

    ReplyDelete
  38. M is a greedy con artist, sly & slippery. She's already managed to grab Diana's
    stunning diamond pave Butterfly Earrings without anyone being the wiser


    Fall, 2018 M was photographed wearing the original diamond pave 18K earrings.
    Fall, 2019 she wore Replicas (rougher finish * deeper wing shapes) at Work
    Style presentation. Not convinced? check photos. Maybe Doria has the originals
    stashed away in LA They are gorgeous, but even if M fell in love with the orig.
    earrings she could never wear them and pretend they're replicas.

    C L E V E R G I R L ,

    ReplyDelete
  39. The family jewelry stays in the family. She may be allowed to wear them but when push comes to shove they will be returned to the family. Period.

    She is a very stupid girl if she thinks
    she can away with it. The drug addled thing doesn't realize who and what she's dealing with. Accidents can and do happen.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Anonymous9:51 AM

    They are using a double, who is a good 10-12 yrs younger than original Markle.
    But go ahead with your cognitive dissonance.
    God forbid the truth might upset someone.

    ReplyDelete
  41. @not a libtard

    You can find Diana's will on line quite quickly.

    The will was made public because it actually contained a major legal error, something which applies to normal people but not to members of the Royal family. That error allowed the executors to challange parts of it and make some amendments to the boys trusts and gifts to the godchildren. The will was out there so everyone could see what it said if it became a media issue later, no one but a few royal enthusiasts picked up on it and was never mentioned in the press.

    ReplyDelete
  42. @emeraldcity Whoops. Sorry. I didn’t mean to direct the comment *to* you. Just attribute your information. I say whoops and sorry, because, plainly speaking you are a source of quality information and I don’t want to waste your energy up with chit-chat. Somehow what I wrote sounds bad when I write it. Sorry, again. Thank you for your comment. I appreciate every single comment you give. Take care.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Someone is going to end up killing this bitch. Don't cross the syndicate.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Here in the UK we have a law which protects heirlooms. It's complicated because even something ordinary like a cooking pot can be an heirloom, as well as a priceless work of art. Let's use an example: suppose Charles bought Diana a pretty bracelet for her birthday. He bought it as a gift, so legally it is hers, and can be passed on in her will. But if he gifted her a bracelet that had been worn by his grandmother (for example), it could be classed as an heirloom and could not be passed on. There are many reasons for forming an attachment to something, e.g. monetary or sentiment, and the decision to determine heirloom status normally rests with the giver. If he presented her with a bracelet that is owned by the nation, it is UK property in perpetuity and Meghan won't be taking it with her when she goes. HM is a wise old bird and knows all this, that's why Meghan has had to resort to copies.

    ReplyDelete