now you know why there have been so many stories in the media about 'deep fake videos' the past few months. theyre trying to get ahead of what they know is coming,
I always knew it worked both ways. I worked under video audio surveillance going back to the 80s and was never happy about it, but at least I knew I was on camera. I was a bar manager, circa 85,6 and the insane club owner lived across the street and watched me all the time while he did coke.
BUT as I said this shit works all ways, no one is really immune to it. You can't walk down the street without being recognized by a camera.
Re the royal ripper theory - If they wanted to just get rid of a dirt poor girl a prince allegedly got in a family way - they didn't have to go to all that trouble, which also called maximum attention.
The so-called "nobility" used to knock up servant girls all the time. Rape, often enough. They wouldn't go too far outta their way to silence a victim because.... It was commonplace.
@herbert Arnold...Good point. When one of these recordings finally breaks about someone big enough, they are just going to tell us this is the first "deep fake" to be used on the public...when in reality it's probably real. I just don't know if PA and the British Royals are considered that "big" to roll out the first deep fake scam for.
There is no "deep fake" technology - all manipulation and fabrication of video can be detected. Sounds like you already know that, but for anyone who doesn't? "Deep fake" is what the "elite" will try to claim when video of the crimes against children become available for public viewing. That's why Obama has been priming the pump, running around telling everyone to beware of "deep fakes", and to not believe VIDEOS.
The krauts that have squatted on the throne for over 300 years are just a distraction while their Venetian overlords rob the world blind. The name you want is Breakspear, one of the unseen clan that are currently relocating to southeast Asia where slavery is still going strong and natural resources are easy pickins'. The world of Randy Andy is all scripted bullshite to keep hoi polloi clutching their sphincters in righteous indignation.
The end goal is you quit supporting his lifestyle. No more public money available to Randy Andy. No more security. No more anything on the taxpayers dime. I know you have it in you Brits you just need to suck it up and put your foot down.
No it doesnt. If i breed hogs, i dont need the sow's consent for the boar to stick his corkscrew cock in her and fill her with a coke can's volume of jizz.
Anyway, anyone that goes out specifically looking for women (or anyone else) to rip apart in the most disgusting way possible, that is someone dealing with a mental disorder that is compelling them to do it, royal or not, who is driven to do it. Mental illness affects the rich and the poor.
Oh, I don’t wish it on him at all. I just wonder how the Royals think they’re going to get out of this without ruining the entire franchise.
Markle and her husband can be sent into exile, but what can they do with Andrew?
Anyway, I see Bea’s wedding venue has been moved to Italy, and I assume her rich groom will pick up the tab. This is not a good time to ask the British taxpayers to finance Andrew’s daughter’s wedding.
Eh, the prince as Jack the Ripper has been firmly debunked. He wasn't even in England for most of the murders. The have narrowed it down to some Polish butcher with schizophrenia who lived in the area and some other guy with a penchant for violence. Then there's Patricia Cornwell who thinks it's the artist Walter Sickert.
Isn't it a shame that those that at the top have lied about so much for so long that we cannot believe a word they say?
I would not doubt that Albert Victor was Jack the Ripper. There are some nut cases in that family. Remember there was nothing like the internet in those days and the royals could say whatever they wanted to say and people were expected to believe it. Just because a few well placed people said AV was somewhere else does not mean that he was. There had to have been smoke for this rumor to have developed fire in the first place.
She made a decent case that he trolled them with some letters (the paper printing lot was very small), but, I wasn't convinced by the rest.
He did sound like a real piece of work, though, in other ways.
Speaking of the letters: forensic experts claim that at least some of them were written by reporters. I recall wondering why or how he would've had such calm, even penmanship. The theory is that papers wrote some of the letters so they could increase readership, and it worked.
@Gator ......not all of them get away with their misdeeds, Lord Louis Mountbatten is the prime example. The family and the establishment may close ranks around them but there are still people who know the truth and will act if the opportunity arises.
herbert arnold said... now you know why there have been so many stories in the media about 'deep fake videos' the past few months. theyre trying to get ahead of what they know is coming,
^^^THIS^^^
Last year the Deep Fake stories started in earnest when the infamous "Hillary & Huma" video was supposedly about to ooze its way out of the dark web. Then the Deep Fake news disappeared just after the the video was determined to be bs. Now its back out the second we hear about Epstein's video evidence being made public or in the possession of the Feds.
I’ll bet the Palace heads are concerned because there’s a new different kind of Sherrif Trump in town. They don’t know what he’ll do/allow. We’re living in a new day they’re not use to. Things are heating up. I’ll bet they’re praying truths aren’t told.
Unknown said... I’ll bet the Palace heads are concerned because there’s a new different kind of Sherrif Trump in town. They don’t know what he’ll do/allow. We’re living in a new day they’re not use to. Things are heating up. I’ll bet they’re praying truths aren’t told.
Agreed but IMO they are mostly worried about the PR fallout, and possibility that people will wake up and finally get it through their heads that any kind of "royal" is an anachronism in today's world.
I still don't think they can touch the Prince legally, they have already banned him from traveling to the US, that is about as much as they can do to him.
Prince Andrew
ReplyDeleteHey Brits, congratulations on paying this guy's way!
ReplyDeleteMaybe you can shell out to renovate one of his mansions again this year!
Prince Andrew is running out of LUCK.
ReplyDeletenow you know why there have been so many stories in the media about 'deep fake videos' the past few months. theyre trying to get ahead of what they know is coming,
ReplyDeleteObama is on that same deep fake talking points tour. He needs to cover his ass for what's coming for him.
DeleteNothing is going to come of this, the royal family members always get off scot free, it's disgusting.
ReplyDeleteI always knew it worked both ways. I worked under video audio surveillance going back to the 80s and was never happy about it, but at least I knew I was on camera. I was a bar manager, circa 85,6 and the insane club owner lived across the street and watched me all the time while he did coke.
ReplyDeleteBUT as I said this shit works all ways, no one is really immune to it. You can't walk down the street without being recognized by a camera.
By the way protesters in Hong Kong pulled down a facial recognition camera on a pole and destroyed it. Things are heating up!
ReplyDeleteExcellent! They need to do that with ALL of the cameras
DeleteJack The Ripper was rumored to be a member of the BRF. Specifically, Queen Victoria's grandson, Prince Albert Victor.
ReplyDeleteNot the Prince. He was just the one who knocked up the Catholic broad. Freemasons killed the whores who knew.
DeleteGator......The Curse, "All the plans of the dark ones to hurt others backfire back on to themselves, their enemies are blessed.".......so we'll see.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe the Ripper was anything exotic.
ReplyDeleteThere are multiple Ripper books. The royal theory seems the least plausible to me.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteRe the royal ripper theory - If they wanted to just get rid of a dirt poor girl a prince allegedly got in a family way - they didn't have to go to all that trouble, which also called maximum attention.
ReplyDeleteThe so-called "nobility" used to knock up servant girls all the time. Rape, often enough. They wouldn't go too far outta their way to silence a victim because.... It was commonplace.
DeleteIt isnt rape if they are your property
Delete@herbert Arnold...Good point. When one of these recordings finally breaks about someone big enough, they are just going to tell us this is the first "deep fake" to be used on the public...when in reality it's probably real. I just don't know if PA and the British Royals are considered that "big" to roll out the first deep fake scam for.
ReplyDeleteThere is no "deep fake" technology - all manipulation and fabrication of video can be detected.
DeleteSounds like you already know that, but for anyone who doesn't? "Deep fake" is what the "elite" will try to claim when video of the crimes against children become available for public viewing.
That's why Obama has been priming the pump, running around telling everyone to beware of "deep fakes", and to not believe VIDEOS.
Yup. Don't believe your lyin eyes.
Deleteexile this man and along with good for nothing daughters.
ReplyDeleteThe krauts that have squatted on the throne for over 300 years are just a distraction while their Venetian overlords rob the world blind. The name you want is Breakspear, one of the unseen clan that are currently relocating to southeast Asia where slavery is still going strong and natural resources are easy pickins'. The world of Randy Andy is all scripted bullshite to keep hoi polloi clutching their sphincters in righteous indignation.
ReplyDeletePayseur
DeleteThe end goal is you quit supporting his lifestyle. No more public money available to Randy Andy. No more security. No more anything on the taxpayers dime. I know you have it in you Brits you just need to suck it up and put your foot down.
ReplyDeleteCJ - that makes it automatic rape, because "property" cannot say no or consent, it has no voice or rights.
ReplyDeleteNo it doesnt. If i breed hogs, i dont need the sow's consent for the boar to stick his corkscrew cock in her and fill her with a coke can's volume of jizz.
DeleteDo Tell/CJ - I agree w/ Monkeyweather; there is a long standing tradition of 'royal/noble bastards.'
ReplyDeleteNothing to kvell about.
Long before DNA. The nobles could choose to acknowledge or deny.
It could be, btw, why I'm not plotzing over the Andy stuff. What's new?
It wasnt just about a bastard, it was about a catholic being inline for the throne.
DeleteAll I said is that it was a rumor.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, anyone that goes out specifically looking for women (or anyone else) to rip apart in the most disgusting way possible, that is someone dealing with a mental disorder that is compelling them to do it, royal or not, who is driven to do it. Mental illness affects the rich and the poor.
Andrew travels a lot. Helicopter crash?
ReplyDeleteThat is a horrible way to die. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.
ReplyDeleteWell, what's Andrew supposed to say? "Oh right, ya got me?" Of course he's gonna deny, deny, deny until it blows over.
ReplyDeleteOmfg this blind really brought out the A-team Hahahaahahahahaa
ReplyDeleteOh, I don’t wish it on him at all. I just wonder how the Royals think they’re going to get out of this without ruining the entire franchise.
ReplyDeleteMarkle and her husband can be sent into exile, but what can they do with Andrew?
Anyway, I see Bea’s wedding venue has been moved to Italy, and I assume her rich groom will pick up the tab. This is not a good time to ask the British taxpayers to finance Andrew’s daughter’s wedding.
Eh, the prince as Jack the Ripper has been firmly debunked. He wasn't even in England for most of the murders. The have narrowed it down to some Polish butcher with schizophrenia who lived in the area and some other guy with a penchant for violence. Then there's Patricia Cornwell who thinks it's the artist Walter Sickert.
ReplyDeleteIsn't it a shame that those that at the top have lied about so much for so long that we cannot believe a word they say?
ReplyDeleteI would not doubt that Albert Victor was Jack the Ripper. There are some nut cases in that family. Remember there was nothing like the internet in those days and the royals could say whatever they wanted to say and people were expected to believe it. Just because a few well placed people said AV was somewhere else does not mean that he was. There had to have been smoke for this rumor to have developed fire in the first place.
Swishy - did you read her book?
ReplyDeleteShe made a decent case that he trolled them with some letters (the paper printing lot was very small), but, I wasn't convinced by the rest.
He did sound like a real piece of work, though, in other ways.
Speaking of the letters: forensic experts claim that at least some of them were written by reporters. I recall wondering why or how he would've had such calm, even penmanship. The theory is that papers wrote some of the letters so they could increase readership, and it worked.
royal keeps digging himself further into a hole = Prince Andrew
ReplyDeleteaudio and video recording = Epstein island
@Substance D - Never seen a sphincter necklace...
ReplyDeleteThe fucker will get away with it. Evil bastard. He should do an Epstein.
ReplyDelete@Gator ......not all of them get away with their misdeeds, Lord Louis Mountbatten is the prime example. The family and the establishment may close ranks around them but there are still people who know the truth and will act if the opportunity arises.
ReplyDeleteherbert arnold said...
ReplyDeletenow you know why there have been so many stories in the media about 'deep fake videos' the past few months. theyre trying to get ahead of what they know is coming,
^^^THIS^^^
Last year the Deep Fake stories started in earnest when the infamous "Hillary & Huma" video was supposedly about to ooze its way out of the dark web. Then the Deep Fake news disappeared just after the the video was determined to be bs. Now its back out the second we hear about Epstein's video evidence being made public or in the possession of the Feds.
What happened to Mountbatten was brutal. They took out not only him but a twin son and someone else too.
ReplyDeleteThat wasn't how the IRA (blamed for the attack) normally would work, was it?
But, I obviously don't know a lot about it all.
I’ll bet the Palace heads are concerned because there’s a new different kind of Sherrif Trump in town. They don’t know what he’ll do/allow. We’re living in a new day they’re not use to. Things are heating up. I’ll bet they’re praying truths aren’t told.
ReplyDeleteUnknown said...
ReplyDeleteI’ll bet the Palace heads are concerned because there’s a new different kind of Sherrif Trump in town. They don’t know what he’ll do/allow. We’re living in a new day they’re not use to. Things are heating up. I’ll bet they’re praying truths aren’t told.
Agreed but IMO they are mostly worried about the PR fallout, and possibility that people will wake up and finally get it through their heads that any kind of "royal" is an anachronism in today's world.
I still don't think they can touch the Prince legally, they have already banned him from traveling to the US, that is about as much as they can do to him.