Blind Item #8
Proving again what a horrid person she is, unless you are an A+ lister or a billionaire, this alliterate former actress/play for pay one night stander wants nothing to do with you. Period. If anyone in modern times would say, let them eat cake, it would be her. There were a group of four or five students who are 10 or 11 on a field trip to Wimbledon who wanted a picture with her and she said she didn't have time and then had security move them away so she didn't have to see them. As in move them from the seats they were in to some out of her view.
Markle
ReplyDeleteI just skimmed a DM headline that talked about how she was there on her own time and no pictures. If even 1/4th of this stuff about her is true, just wow. What a bitch.
ReplyDeleteIf even a modicum of it’s true- how can QE2 not know.. I just don’t get how its happened(I know but I don’t lol)
DeleteI didn't see any mention of it being children on GMB and DM reported it as a bloke taking a self of himself.
DeleteStill it's a clear case of I'm special look at me / don't look at me.
Seems so
DeleteYou'd think Megan would be more appreciative of her situation.
ReplyDeleteSoon, she might be on the outside looking in.
@David, I agree, plus with all the bad press she has been getting, you'd think she'd go out of her way to be lovely to fans.
ReplyDeleteIs this a nod to my "Meg Antoinette" nickname I came up with??????
ReplyDeleteThia, all we know *for sure* is that her baby is fake even tho he looks super duper real. It's photoshopped.
ReplyDeleteRight guys?
She was in the second row of seats with no one in front of her. Once again, bullcrap.
ReplyDeleteShe was sitting with two of her "friends" 40 seats surrounding her were empty. She's as fake as a £3pound note!
Delete10 bob note, shurely?
DeleteThe bigger question is how did Harry not see this? Surely her true colors were showing before. I wonder how true this stuff is, but there have been an awful lot of stories.
ReplyDeleteThere is no end to her narcissism!
ReplyDeleteShe has that baby now, so the monarchy is stuck with her no matter what happens to her marriage.
ReplyDeleteOh Meghan...what I don’t get is the whole “but we want to be private citizens” grab. QE2 should just cut them off instead of having them get whatever they want but then pull the privacy card.
ReplyDeleteIt's OK, guys, Nutty Flavor assured us she'll be gone by Thanksgiving.
ReplyDeleteAnd remember, Enty says MM is a "horrible" person right about his podcast link about Jeffrey Epstein including all the details he couldn't, just couldn't, give beforehand.
Not wanting to pose for photos? Horrible.
Pretending to have inside information you didn't bother to provide to law enforcement: just another day in entertainment law!
it's Megan Toinette .... much cleverer
ReplyDeleteshe's a nasty low-rent cunt and harry doesn't have 2 braincells to rub together
She's a shitt y actress, too.
ReplyDeleteAll the world is a stage people. It's all entertainment.
ReplyDelete@Krab:
ReplyDeletePic showing rows of empty seats surrounding Meghan Antoinette:
https://twitter.com/PamelaHollar523/status/1148577150678839296
And yeah--horrid person--no photos.
ReplyDeleteCalling someone a prostitute on your anonymous blog? AWESOME.
But what else is new, every adult female in Hollywood is a yachter or former yachter and every adult male is a pedophile. Right, Enty?
I've got an idea, Enty: ramp it the fuck down and save your ire for really bad people. Not a former actress you don't like.
Or wait, when do we get the post about how MM is sex trafficking children and had both Anthony Bourdain and Chris Cornell executed because they were ON TO HER?
Oh Hi Meghan. How are you, dahlin??? You are such a diva, Dahlin. I know u miss your former Lolita express ridin life. But, dahlin, you are a Royal now...behave and order Take-away like the way you used the pilot to fetch you shit you dont need like hair extensions, lashes, cocaine etc. Oh wait you do need those. Nevermind. My bad. But, you catch my drift.
DeleteMeghan Markle Duchess Sparkle is about to get the Tower card and Ace of Spades
...
...
Fanny Farkle the fuckface
ReplyDeleteGood grief. @Krab...I can feel your spittle flying out of your mouth as you froth furiously & frantically thump your keyboard.
ReplyDeleteThis is a gossip site. If you want Markle hagiography, go elsewhere.
And the issue, dear, is not that she didn’t want photos, but that the children had to move seats so she didn’t have to look at them.
Farkle is vapid & disgusting. Her day of reckoning is definitely coming. The RF won’t put up with her low class, diva antics for long. The woman was never famous in America. She was a d list actress on a lower rated minor cable network show. She connived her way to Harry. She is USING him. She is tarnished already, way worse than Sarah Ferguson.
ReplyDelete+1,Unknown
ReplyDeleteHey Krab, go the fuck away. You’re annoying.
ReplyDeleteBut Krab is right tho. Does that bother you?
DeleteIt does me as well. I absolutely hate that Krab is right on about this...
Simon .......there has been speculation as to whether Harry was Prince's or not. But of course, Royals can't spill the beans or it would make them look even worse.Have read that when one of Diana's bodyguards met sudden death, Prince informed Diana right before she was to appear in public. Would love to know which body guard it was.....did he have red hair? Just wondering........... Would guess Markle has some borderline personality qualities.....very self destructive people but often charming when they want to be.Maybe there is a curse somewhere in this most unusual tale.
ReplyDeleteSupposedly James hewitt who was an army captain or something and played polo ..and he's ginger.
DeleteThe speculation is because , since time immemorial, the BRF have not carried their own children , it's not new. A courtier, sometimes of noble blood, is chosen for that task. A lot easier in the old days obviously. If you want to do further research, investigate why QE2 is not of noble birth, but of a scully maid, and thus not a legal Regis. I believe there is still an outstanding court case from an Australian chap
DeleteMe-Me was smart to conjure up her anchor baby to have Royal ties for life. Despite everyone thinking Samantha Markle was the evil sister, Me-Me is proving to be the truly vile one. Samantha was bang on the money about her sister.
ReplyDeleteIf Meghan had any sense she would jump at an opportunity to look good in public. Apparently, she has none.
ReplyDeleteI could see her being Borderline. I think she roped Harry in by spinning him this tale of poor little girl who had to work her way up from nothing. She made sure he did not meet her dad or any one else who would not back up her obvious stories/ lies to Harry. They also spent a lot of the time in Montreal which is away from Hollywood and London so his friends or connections could not chime in all the time. AKA isolate your victim.
ReplyDeleteAlso, there are countless stories not on this blog about how horrible she is. Like all over the internet on legitimate news sites. For example, spending millions and millions of outfits and house renovations and $22 million on a lavish wedding, but, then now demanding privacy. I just do not think she cares anymore how she looks because she has got that heir as mentioned above. As soon as Archie was born all pretenses were completely dropped even though she lacked them to begin with.
ANd, I loved Suits and watched the first 4 seasons but HATED RACHEL (MM character). It made FF through Mike because she just is not good.
@molly. Yea, there were always those rumors that Harry was fathered by Hewitt. He denies it but i will say, Harry doesn’t look much like Charles.
ReplyDeleteHarry looks just like Charles and even more like Philip.
ReplyDeleteAnd tough shit, I'm not going anywhere. You'll just have to have your little hate-fest for a woman you don't know with me spoiling your fun. Seriously, if you need to call her a "nasty low rent cunt" based entirely on your credulous reading of a gossip site, seek help, because you need it.
@teehee
ReplyDeleteSo YOU were the one watching that show!
Lol @ her moron husband.
ReplyDeleteuhhhhh....no comment. hahaha
ReplyDeleteoh, who am I kidding. I think Gabriel Macht is awesome. (His character Harvey and Donna was the only reason I watched for as long as I did)
I still think it is funny they replaced MM with Katherine Heigl! It is actually amazing that Heigl managed to replace someone even more than demanding than she! LOL
@Krab...I didn’t call anyone a “low rent cunt”. And you are nowhere near important or interesting enough to spoil anyone’s fun. You’re just a bit of a prat, that’s all.
ReplyDeleteAnd it is quite sad to watch you go into hysterics defending someone who’d have security remove you if you got within smelling distance of her. But I suppose empty lives and minds need to be filled with something...so have at it, loser.
This is a different Unknown than the person above. And the amount I care about Markle is minimal. But I'm not sure anyone on this site should be throwing stones in glass houses about empty minds and lives needing to be filled with something, lol.
ReplyDeleteThat is a monarchy for ya.
ReplyDelete@Simon: I don’t think they’re stuck with her. She clearly has no maternal instincts so I can see her leaving the baby with Harry & moving back to the US as long as she gets paid.
ReplyDeleteRe: Wimbledon: She was totally out if it that day—just wasted. Her friends were babysitting her & she looked as if she had no clue as to what was going on. Also, nice dress code—jeans at Wimbledon.
Actually, Count, Kate was there a couple of days before Meg and sat surrounded by a crowd, and didn't object to phone photos being taken either.
ReplyDeleteMarkle apparently had her security detail move away anyone she thought might be taking a photo of her, including a guy taking a selfie with the court in the background and a lady journalist taking photos of Serena.
She was also drunk off her ass and had to be held up by her frumpy friends, but that's a story for another day.
Sure, Nutty. There are decent ones, but they can never make up for the damage of the bad ones.
DeleteWill you be doing a write up on your blog about the exif data? Exif results show the christening photograph was taken on 8th May 2019 and later 'created ' on 6th June. British journos are being urged to investigate and print this info.
Delete@molly, the bodyguard who died was Diana's lover, Barry Mannakee, if you want to have a little look at him.
ReplyDeleteWell, the shits hit the fan today with the revelations that the edif and metadata connected to the christening photo in the green room at Windsor show the date it was taken to be 8th May 2019. The same day as the baby reveal, by the same photographer.
Work that one out....
Yeah, Meg forgot that little detail.
ReplyDeleteApparently on the earlier photo, the one with the Queen and Prince Philip, all the metadata had been erased.
Google front page is Markle at Wimbledon and Piers Morgan tying himself in knots over it.
ReplyDeleteThis could be exaggerated but it doesn't *look* good in the midst of a cloud of secrecy to attend a public event and deprive citizens of rows of seats so you won't be bothered (or for any reason.)
Get a big screen and stay home then.
Honest question: do the royals by blood do that? I don't remember any of them going to a public event and doing that. There is a video of PH at a basketball game letting a random toddler eat his popcorn.
The open vitriol in the press seems extreme (or is beginning to.) The Daily Mail could almost change its name to The Daily Markle. I'm not judging or complaining. Just noting it.
ReplyDeleteI don't recall this level of flak in the press toward any royal who had just had a baby. Even with Sarah who they gave a very hard time to, and even with Di who they never let alone, and ran pieces about how thin she was (with Sarah they commented she was too fat, so clearly either way they were going to have a go at them), they hit pause when her babies were new.
Some say this type of press treatment reflects the courtiers' feelings and their shelf life at the palace. Then again I doubt anyone marrying into the royals would be given an easy berth by the press.
@Samantha - no the royals don't do that, indeed they have a Royal Box on the main court.
ReplyDeleteThe metadata is huge, this is the first I've heard of it, haven't been on the internet today but that's super juicy.
As an American, it annoys me that she COULD have chosen to be awesome but she just didn't. At all. She could be so awesome if she were all the things she said she was, I think she's quite pretty but nope she's just a terrible selfish void of a human.
Just so we all know the Daily Fail is just that. Pure bull.
ReplyDeleteGive it a few years and she might have a car accident...
ReplyDeleteLmao at all the people posting like they know her. From the very beginning she has been treated horribly by the media. As a person with feelings I cant say that I would try any harder, if I were being trashed everyday. What incentive does she have to try and change it at this point? Minds are already made up.
ReplyDelete@Samantha I have my strong suspicions as to why the media has been savaging her, because there IS one very big difference between her and the other royals but I'll keep that to myself.
ReplyDeleteSparkles is disgusting. I cannot believe the picture with all the empty seats. Unfbelievable.
ReplyDeleteAt least Sparkles is getting the proper publicity.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/meghan-markle-branded-childish-after-17676634
Nutty, yes erased, but not from the pic on Getty. Shows the same date , 8th May 2019.
ReplyDeleteThat was one hell of a long photo shoot, lol. All wrapped up, done and dusted while Doria was in town, a few months ago.
Unknown: Possibly! Hope not.
ReplyDeleteWho was sitting next to MM, btw? None of the stories even hazard a guess.
There is a photo in one version of the story, of MM leaning over to chat with a little boy.
ReplyDeleteYes, @Unknown...stop it. Your sly and rather desperate remarks are repulsive and say more about you than anyone else here.
ReplyDeleteA few days ago the future Queen went to Wimbledon, sat amongst the crowds and accepted being photographed.
Markle shows up yesterday...has several rows around her cleared (while people queue up outside because they can’t get seats) then has security tell people who aren’t photographing her to stop photographing her.
And you think the only reason she’s disliked is because she has slightly more melanin in her skin than the rest of the family?
Don’t be such a damn bigot. Having an opinion about someone based purely on their skin tone is dehumanising. You are a racist.
And to the “Daily Fail” cretin above you...it wasThe Times & Telegraph that actually broke the story. But you don’t seem like someone overly interested in facts much.
ok.. that is a bitch move if true. shame on her...
ReplyDeleteI’m convinced @Krab is Markle. You only see her walking sideways to post a ‘shame on you for trashing Meghan’ post, when there is a Meghan blind.
ReplyDeleteYep, you got me. I am in fact MM, and I'm gonna have you locked in the Tower. Think I can't do it? Watch me. MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
ReplyDeleteThe Sparkle blinds are actually some of my favorites. I find the RF really interesting, but that's what this site is here for...to pique the interest of everyone. I hate the housewife blinds...couldn't tell you who's who from what to what, but some of you love them. I see them and move on because that's my choice. It's a guilty pleasure, these blinds...and if they are here to paint a fantastical picture of someone whom I will never meet, then sobeit - I am all in! We are all also entitled to our own opinions. The MM blinds are not gonna stop, nor are the housewife blinds. If you hate them, go to the next. No big deal. Also, someone had mentioned that Randy Andy had gay rumors...what if he was diddling the kids then with a group of men that were rumored to be his lovers, but were actually other pedos? Just a thought...
ReplyDeletethe only thing Meghan is guilty of is being a real mediocre c list actress. the rest is fan fiction.
ReplyDeleteOn the exif data of the baby christening photo:
ReplyDeletehttps://gofakeyourselfmeghan.tumblr.com/
Yeah, yeah, so bite me if I give an anecdotal account (though it was also referred on DM) but I do know two people with those assigned seats in that area where the cunt and her two fat biddies showed up to Wimbledon. And yes, they were indeed moved elsewhere BECAUSE of Markle's entourage. Apparently she didn't want any "lessers" around her? Those few and far between faces you see are her assistant and RPOs. Unlike Catherine who has no problem sitting in the stands and enjoying the event with everyone. Meghan is a piece of shit.
ReplyDelete@Snatch & Ladders, @Hunter: I found the Exif data last night. The ‘Christening Photo Shoot’ was done at 10:56 pm. Interestingly, William’s watch said 10:55, so perhaps he and Kate were in the original photo. (Maybe that’s why he looks so pissed.) Charles & Camilla definitely photoshopped in as they were out of town then. This is HUGE, because it just proves that everything around this ‘birth’ has been a total lie. So far, by my count, there’s been one doll & 3 babies. The ‘Darren’ presentation doll, the Father’s Day Photo ‘baby’, the ‘baby’ in the Black & White Photo with H&M, and the ‘baby’ on Meghan’s lap. Hmmm. And people still believe nothing strange is going on?
ReplyDeleteMarkle was not with two friends at Wimbledon.
ReplyDeleteIt looked more like the palace sent the equivalent of Mrs. Patmore, and Daisy to babysit Markle.
Phoenix: LOL!!
Can't wait to settle in and view all these comments. But I do feel the need to point out to @Rosie that you're the only one still yammering on and on and ON about how there's no baby. Again, most of us have always been quite sure there is one. There was some speculation around the edges, but realistically there was no way for there not to be a baby. We simply don't believe that Markle is the one who carried it. What is wrong with you that you still cannot comprehend that?
ReplyDeleteIt was sarcasm, @OKay
DeleteAs a matter of fact, I think it's disgusting how the females (and, like, two males) here refuse to believe that
MM is a mother. So what if she didn't give birth? Who cares if it's a surrogate??
I sure don't. But ohmy clutch yo pearls, nutty/aqua/Hunter sure believe this baby is photoshopped lol
So I troll.
And @Krab (Last one, I swear!) You defend Markle FEROCIOUSLY on this site. You are ALWAYS here to deny, put down and generally besmirch the blinds about her. Yet, you never defend anyone else in this way. Why is that?
ReplyDeleteKrab is Meghan. Krab you absolute rotter
DeleteI'm trying to understand the constant Markle bashing. What am I missing?
ReplyDeleteCrabs been on here posting off and on forever🙄
ReplyDeleteThey're not MM.
What’s the difference between play for pay vs pay for play again?
ReplyDeleteThe baby looked cute, each of the royal family’s facial expressions were all pretty funny and seemed to be smirking/omg’ing and someone is trying to bring padded headbands back in!
And why did Meg’s wear jeans to Wimbledon?? There are somethings you just don’t do. She has to have a ton of pretty sundresses to wear and throw on the white blazer over it. Just odd!
She just does odd things!
Chillax, i never heard of a difference. P4P = pay for play = Whore
DeletePnP = party and play = Bartering Sex for Drugs
Sorry Samantha, but that’s bullshit. The UK press were fucking HIDEOUS to Diana, throughout her marriage and beyond. Press pieces I’ve read on MM are largely fluff/positive pieces. Sure, the reader comments aren’t great, but that’s on MM. She needs to be better at getting people on her side - it’s not difficult. Hint: writing “positive” messages on bananas and dishing them out to prostitutes isn’t the way to go.
ReplyDeleteRosie, you used to be interesting, funny and insightful. Now, you are just boring and complain endlessly. Take break or do what you have to do. I'm sick of the "clutch my pearls" comment. It's old. Spend that time off coming up with new material.
ReplyDeleteI LOVE the fucking Markle Sparkle blinds, or whatever she's called now. People go absolutely apeshit!!
The metadata info is fascinating. Carry on basement nerds! Expose all...
She does seem to be a cunt.
low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt low rent cunt
Harry, wherever you are, you done fucked up. But thanks for taking her off our hands. For the time being. When you get sick of her, drop her off at Epstein island or somewhere.
Mrs.Libnish thankyou, you're right.
ReplyDeleteI am all of those things. However, you've never been interesting, funny, nor insightful.
See: lowrent lowrent lowrent.....
As a matter of fact, you're another reason this place has become the cesspool it has.
Suckit
Long time lurker. I love reading markle blinds, and used to love reading the comments. It's been so toxic from both side lately. Anytime someone doesnt disagree, they're either racist or pretending to be markle. I dont like the housewives or athlete blinds, so i just scroll past them. Spare me the free speech bs, grow up. Dont like it, then dont read it and attack anyone who disagrees with you. Stop spoiling the fun. People can wear as much as tin hats as they wish to, this is a gossip site after all. Wtf you expecting, some hard cold facts like this is a science project?
ReplyDeleteChillax, I am all about bringing padded headbands back. They really are flattering. Especially for the older head of hair. Thinning a bit? Throw on a headband and fluff it out. Thought you could go one more day without a shampoo? Headband. In patterns, fabrics and colors they can take a modern turn on hats/fascinators. Go Kate!
ReplyDeleteAs for Sparkles, the majority of subjects cannot stand her, she epitomises the worst and most crass of a celeb star, something the great British public despises
ReplyDeleteKnow your market ffs
DeleteOnce again I'm being attributed with something I've said the OPPOSITE of.
ReplyDeleteSomeone else whose name I've never seen is going directly for the brand-newbie (me) -
"Sorry Samantha, but that’s bullshit. The UK press were fucking HIDEOUS to Diana, throughout her marriage and beyond."
I have said at least twice that the press gave Diana and Sarah a very hard time when they were new brides. (I even went into some detail.)
I was just coming in to reiterate it, in fact.
I won't insult you back. It is just not worth it.
They weren't "hideous" to Diana they were obsessed with her to the point they literally drove her to her death. I can see why her sons would distrust the press.
ReplyDeleteThey did criticize Diana openly about her weight, and ran unflattering stories gossiping about alleged eating disorder, affairs, right down to quoting surreptitiously made/gotten audio (as they did with Charles/Camilla.) The press really don't treat any of the royals well with the exception possibly of the ruling monarch and consort.
There have been "gay rumors" about all of HM's sons over the years. Frankly it's nothing new in royal gossip either and I'm uninterested in it as such. People speculate about the private, including sexual, lives of the famous, titled, and royals and always have.
There was also speculation about Prince Edward and his wife using IVF. So that type of thing isn't new either.
What I did notice is that there typically is a rosy period around the time a royal has had a new baby, and that hasn't been the case with Meghan. It also does seem a bit more mean spirited more akin to how the press treated Sarah, than how they treated Diana, who the press seemed to have an unhealthy obsession with. They didn't care about her, which was evident in the reportage. But they didn't "loathe" her either.
They never seemed to like Sarah or Meghan. I've heard more than once over the years that this reflects the inner staff and/or courtiers' (to use an old fashioned word) feelings about that person as they could be the ones feeding these tidbits to the press.
In this Wimbledon case I noticed Meghan did talk to a little boy who had approached, and yet no one's commenting about that. This is politics and someone else could be manipulating things to make her look bad/worse. Question: who and why.
It's ridiculous I'm being pegged by some as critical of her and others as worshiping her. I'm simply commenting on whatever is there. I think she needs a new PR firm or to listen to the one she has, and I think she and PH might want to be a bit more politically defensive. With this many "knives out" as they say, for Meghan, they can't afford a single slip up.
The type of thing PH does, similar to his mother's ways, of being one with the people or making it seem so...that's more the type of image MM needs but...it's been PR disaster after disaster and she's only been in the family a year or so.
Now someone comment on how long the comment is. Just scroll if so.
We’re going to have to agree to disagree. They hounded Diana. The amount of negative tabloid coverage she received was immense. She got a slight break after the “there were three of us in the marriage” interview, and then she was made a martyr in death. The British tabloids are not a facet of UK culture.
ReplyDelete(And for the record, I’m no Diana Stan. Just saying how it was).
That's fine TwoDots. But "agree to disagree" and @ing me with "that's bullshit" are not even distant cousins.
ReplyDeleteEspecially when I wasn't even saying what's implied. I never said they didn't "hound" her (see above lengthy post for a fairly lengthy description of "hounding her.") I never said Diana caught a break. The point I was actually making...whoosh.
I want to comment on the stories not be part of them. I haven't even been here a week. Lol
As an English citizen, I have to say this is pretty unlikely a bunch of schoolkids had front row seats at Wimbledon, unless their parents are all fookin oligarchs. I wouldn't be surprised if they just bought out that whole row.
ReplyDeleteAlso, don't buy the guy 'taking a selfie'. Really? Mm okay hun.
I do wonder though. Why doesn't everyone hate Kate on here as much as MM? I think she's much more unbearable. Can't stand the perfect wife facade, and her parents obviously shoved their kids in all the right schools to marry the right people. Makes me sick.
There was one photo of a man with his phone aimed directly at Duchess Meghan, but they asked a woman not to take pix. I'm still confused on that one. They said she had a seat behind the Duchess, and was trying to photograph the match/Serena. So they were afraid of her taking a photo of the Duchess' back, but, a man aiming phone at her and a little boy approaching was OK?
ReplyDeleteDoesn't make a lot of sense. What if the story isn't even true.
I'm just glad I'm not a citizen of the UK so my tax dollars aren't going to this gaslight-fest a.k.a. the Monarchy.
ReplyDeleteWe want to live a normal life! But give us your money so we can spend it on renovations to our big fancy house! But we're not going to really be living there anyway! Look how pregnant I am! But don't ask me unapproved questions about the baby or ask to see the baby after he's born or express any unapproved interest in the baby and how dare you suggest I couldn't legitimately do a full limbo at 8 months without support! Pay attention to my public outings! But don't take photos of me unless it's through approved channels or I get a cut of the money! We deserve privacy but only on our terms and through the usage of your hard-earned dollars! I could go on and on.