Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Blind Item #5

An inside look at the A- list reality star with a side gig's empire. Yes, the revenues increased in 2018, HOWEVER the cost of acquisition was way more than the revenue generated. They are trying to keep revenue numbers high so they can get someone to buy their crap product. The original product was good but that was just a huge markup on an existing already good product with a name slapped on that differed from the manufacturer. The other stuff is crap and people don't come back which is why to increase revenue you have to spend so much. Oh, and that nonsense about social media posting. It is an algorithm, not an actual number that is paid. If it was an actual number paid, there would be nothing but paid postings 24/7 for a week and then we would never hear from the family again. 


18 comments:

  1. Kylie rebranding ColourPop

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'ts obvious kylie and kim sales are low because they constantly post. if it was selling itself there would not be CONSTANT posts. No one is buying their makeup.

    ReplyDelete
  3. #suckerborneveryminute

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kendall is the only one who does not look completely plastic (although she has had work done) in the entire family.. The plastic look has to only be a NY/LA/ Miami thing because In everyday society....it looks weird as hell. In a 100 years those cities will probably look like the Capital City in the Hunger Games for sure. I just cannot imagine anyone looking at the Kardashians and thinking I want to look like that! besides maybe Kendall.

    ReplyDelete
  5. TeeHee@U as a NY’er I can confidently say the plastic look is not preferred here. I see some of the most beautiful woman in the world here every day, and I rarely see duck lips ...

    ReplyDelete
  6. This entire family lies about everything. It is nauseating. And I want to smack anyone who actually buys their crap.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Justpaige....well that makes me feel better. LOL However, some of the reality shows I have seen probably makes me think it is more common than it is there. But, alas, they are probably more Hollywood than NY anyways. Duck lips are awful lol.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Who wants to look like a Kartrashian skank aka a street heaux? Can someone explain this??

    ReplyDelete
  9. +1,000,000,000 @parissucksliterally

    ReplyDelete
  10. What goes up, must come down. The crash of the Kartrashian empire should prove to be spectacular.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't think Kourtney looks very plastic. Certainly not like KYLIE and KHLOE who may have even passed KIM in that regard.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Can't be sure I trust my reading comprehension, but did this blind mention a way of making them all go away?😃

    ReplyDelete
  13. Some Kardash and their makeup line.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Vita - yes Lol if they were paid per social media post.

    ReplyDelete
  15. NY is way less plastic, but you do see “work” on a certain set of ladies who lunch, but that’s probably anywhere. The work is less in your face, and doesnt include huge inflatable tits and lips in the playboy style.

    Re: kardashians, I despair we’ll ever be rid of them, in the year 2050 they’ll be modeling their KylieKim (TM) Head Transport Devices and KhloeKong (TM) Scented Air Displascing Personal Jet Pax.

    ReplyDelete
  16. So much makeup is made overseas with questionable and often toxic ingredients. I don’t trust the Kardashians (or any of them tbh) with quality control. I’m eagerly waiting to find out what idiotic product will be the modern day version of ceruse. Will it be self tanner? That would be hilarious!

    Fools and their money....

    ReplyDelete
  17. Why would they disappear after a week straight of paid postings? If anything they'd NEVER go away then because even a trillion dollars would never be enough for these greedy sows.

    ReplyDelete