Thursday, July 11, 2019

Blind Item #1

This former A- list mostly television actress is not only breaking the terms of a restraining order by seeing her abuser, she is also paying for his defense.

19 comments:

  1. Rose McGowan/Weinstien?

    ReplyDelete
  2. If it's Hayden, she's really got a thing for it... crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. #empowered as hell!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Who abused H-pants? Can someone slowly and vividly describe the details of the abuse? I have been too busy for fapping since monday and could use the help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Use your imagination and go from there

      Delete
    2. I need some reality. Thats why i been grooving on mostly homemade porn. New fave search terms are Meth Whore, Coke Whore and Desperate Teen.

      Delete
  5. Rose is paying for Weinsteins defence?? Suuure. Do you even know how to fricking READ. Comprehension is not your strong suit is it? As long as you're 'first'. FFS IDIOT.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Its Hayden P for sure. Really sad.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hayden for her boyfriend, but she's really low on money herself

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ya know a whore is a wreck when her golddigger scholarship plot blows up in her face when the dude takes the kid.

      Delete
  8. Isn't there reports that Hayden doesn't take proper care of her daughter? Something about not living with her and having other people care for her, etc. If that's true, then it's something of a stark comparison if she'll pay for her abuser's defense, but won't take personal care of her child.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I believe the child is being cared for by the Ukie giant's mother. H-pants said to have a bad case of post partum depression.

    ReplyDelete
  10. she actually likes being slapped around???

    ReplyDelete
  11. I highly doubt she likes being slapped around. She just is in a cycle and continues to repeat it over and over with these bad relationships. Maybe she doesn't think she's worth more.

    ReplyDelete
  12. You can only violate a restraining order if you are the restrained party. So if it's Hayden, she's not breaking the terms of the restraining order since she is the protected party and not the restrained party.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It will weaken her case though, because the courts will look at that and if contacts her back, and has proof she contacted him first, and was the one who initiated contact or kept contacting him, then she's going to have a tough time convincing the judge she needs it, bc how scared can she be if she keeps contacting him after getting the order and he hadn't contacted her since the order.... Seems rather strange that if she requested the order, and it was granted, why make contact? That's your out, girl, take it and Gooooo!!!

      Delete
    2. Ohhh, Nooooo... We are at that point now?!! Where comments have to be approved?! Ughh, that sucks!! Thanks to the bleepity bleep bleeps coming here and being total bleeping bleeps!!!
      I haaate comment approval... I try to proof read, but I'm a "yacker" and sometimes it takes too long to go back thru in the tiny type box, so I post it, then read it whole, and edit if need be... Now, all my mistakes will be out there for God knows how long before I realize it's published! Lol! Oh well, now everyone will see my horrible typing skills, and my even worse spell correct misses. 😉😲😳😬 Plus, who doesn't like instant gratification, lol! And, I believe Enty said he doesn't like having to do this, bc it takes too long... So I took that to mean comments could sit for a while before it's published, and then everyone has already moved on, or the blind was revealed already before your comment gets published. Total bummer. Thanks for ruining everyone else's experience, doxxers!! So not necessary!!

      Delete
  13. Anonymous12:16 PM

    actually, in some states, both parties are subject to the terms of a restraining order.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days