This royal has shown no shame over the past week as he has made multiple public appearances despite knowing more of his rapes of underage teens are going to be made public.
I assume most everyone here saw the Trump/Epstein 1992 party tape. What was the standout from it for me was how much Epstein looked like a horny perverted troll. Go back and check it out--he just oozes sleaze. And the look on his face when he enters the party is beyond creepy
Prince Andrew of course. I saw something about the entire first slap on the wrist for Epstein was because of royal family intervention. Acosta was told to back off by the Feds. Hopefully Trump will not allow it this time although he seems to be friendly with the Queen. Maybe that's why she was as civil as she was to him, hoping to get her perv kid off the hook. Let's just chalk the royal family up to "The Original White Trash" and move on. I don't care about them any more. After QEII dies it's really over anyway.
Please. What would he otherwise do? Go into hiding aka admitting guilt and shame and avoidance? You have to tow the line, act accordingly. He may FEAR things are going to be made public but in all honesty no one knows how this is going to play out. Who will Epstein fry? Who does he have what on? This is all yet to be determined. Look at Spacey getting off.
Spacey got off because his accuser wouldn't testify and didn't want to give up his cell phone, likely because it contained evidence contradicting his planned testimony. IOW, faked up accusation. I think the accuser's mom was the one pushing this whole thing. Doesn't mean Spacey is innocent in general but he's not going to be guilty on that particular charge. Lesson to be learned: Check out the accusations before you move forward. Also, and especially in Epstein's case since there are a lot of potentially huge reputations at stake: Protect the legitimate accusers. These are powerful skeeves who will do ANYTHING to protect themselves.
Amartel, someone else said that they gave the phone to police, who erased it.
Not sure why it matters if the kid's mom wanted justice. It doesn't mean the kid didn't also. It's natural she'd feel protective, but people are trying to spin it as if the mom forced the kid to go to the cops. The crux is, did a crime happen or not.
We'll never know what all the evidence was, because the case was dropped.
"Protect the legitimate accusers."
Another favorite apologist ploy. Disparage accusers as lying while claiming to be totally for "legitimate" or "actual" victims. But they say this about every victim so...
@ Amartel. Allegations on other sites have it that a civil suit was finally settled and confidential and now the complainant has no reason to cooperate in a criminal trial. Do you know what happened? I don't. Just know SOMETHING did... and can.
People will believe what they want based on the accuser, and more importantly- who is being accused.
False accusations do happen but all victims deserve to have support and geniuine care when they speak up. And keep in mind, actual victims going on actual record is very different than Internet gossip and blind items.
False accusations happen all the time. I believe Spacey's a total skeeve but believing is not the basis for a system of justice. You need real proof. If your key witness can't show up in court and refuses to turn over evidence then you can't prove your case. The end.
@Gator right and wrong. Nothing will criminally happen to Andrew but I'm reading more and more comments from Brits who won't be supporting the monarchy once the Queen passes. Australia and Canada will both immediately pull away once she dies. Even elderly royalists have had their fill of the monarchy after Markle's debacles. I love reading the comments from Brits who say no more. Respect for the Queen is one thing but Charles is so disliked then pile on Andrew and MM's PR disasters.
Andrew would have had his engagements booked in hus diary months or even a year or two ago. Most of these are obligations passed down from Buckingham Palace. The only difference is he is getting more media coverage because of his links to Epstein. Andy has always had some shady connections, arms dealers, despots and basically anyone who has dodgy business dealings to fund a large yacht on which Andy can holiday and quaff champagne amongst scantily clad young women.
@Simon, she’s asking the full panel to reverse the 3- judge panel decision to unseal records in a separate defamation suit. Maxwell publicly called Giuffre a liar. It’s a defamation case. Granted, I have not read her briefs, but I think en banc panel will affirm the prior decision. They rarely overturn.
Has Andrew been alleged to have an encounter with someone younger than 16? I've heard of a 17 year old, but nothing younger. 16 is the age of consent in the UK.
I am echoing @Em here - The UK (and US) sell arms to countries and conflicts all over the world. Andrew is involved in that. Epstein has arms dealer connections. Epstein likes to create blackmail scenarios. Is there any actual indication that Andrew was a willing participant in under age sex slavery? Or was he just tangled up in Epstein's blackmail attempts? Surely MI5/6 knows the truth. We’ve had the Queen’s answer, that she believes him. Was she right to? Did the intelligence services lie to her?
Jan 15. That's important to note and thank you for bringing it up. If the Age of Consent in Britain is 16 if all Andrew did was got massaged by 16 year old girls then everything he did is perfectly legal...and if the girl was shy of 16 by a few months...I guess we have try to look at it as if the girl was a few months shy of 18 here. Also, didn't all the girls sign up willingly to give massages for money? Honestly, if that's all that was going on in the jet plane then I'm not that upset about it. With all this going on and apparently everybody and their brother (and sister) into young stuff then we are going to have to move our outrage line a bit. I want to know who the real perverts, child traffickers, organ harvesters, andrenochrome users and evil people are. I don't care so much about what smarmy men do with teen girls who have the ability to consent. I don't care if the guy is married. I don't care if his wife was pregnant at the time. I don't care if his grown children are upset. I don't care if the guy "likes 'em young". I don't care if the guy is a creep as long as he's not abusing children. This is going to be so big and so creepy that we are going to have to draw a line collectively at condemnation.
Princess Diana's life and death was the beginning.......Prince Andrew's life will be the end of British royalty. It's time. If Prince Harry wanted to avenge his mother's death, his marriage to Meghan was perfect.Gotta' love the red heads.
@miss David while I agree with you in theory there is a REASON we have an age of consent. That means if you are younger than this you ARE A CHILD In the eyes of the law and unable to consent. We have to draw the line somewhere. If you fall below that line then you are not a consenting adult. You don't have the rights or autonomy to consent. It is why folks of a certain age don't vote or aren't tried as adults etc. We have lines drawn in everything, including sex. YES, Epstein being INTO teens isn't as disgusting as straight up pedophilia with 10 year old or 8 year old BUT he could just as easily have gone to universities to find 18 year olds, 19 year olds who LOOKED YOUNG. For whatever reason he chose to skirt this law and go underage and illegal. He probably got off on it.
Cheers to the person who brought up Salem, if only b/c you got my memory of high school history churning again. Inapplicable-absolutely-but interesting nonetheless!
@Unknown Trump supporters don't slobber. Actually there is no slobber left on the face of the Earth. You guys used it all on St. Barack of the Southside. Why was there no outrage for 8 years when Obama did nothing about Epstein? Why are you Mullah worshipers so upset it's all coming out under Trump? Go cuck yourself.
he still was the matchmaker for Trump. and don't kid yourself, I'm sure their are videotapes of Bill and Donnie on the island enjoying Teen party favors. why so angry Muss Davie? get some fresh air and do some breathing excercises. it's not like your related to either politican
We have a couple males here with a weiner complex too, Mike m. Ironically, one is a staunch Weinstein supporter. See cdan, there IS a connection to a tiny/mishapen penis and revolting behavior.
@Mischi My thoughts exactly. Getting all provinces to agree on getting rid of senate won't happen, neither will it be for what is really just a symbolic figure head. If we had to pay for them, it'd be different.
So many bot shill rape apologists in these blinds. Some can't even be bothered to think of a whole name.
Like everywhere else there is any whiff of an accusation about sexual assault. You are over doing it in this case and only making the subject look bad/worse.
Any half-decent lawyer will say that 16 is legal in the UK and the girl was 17 and force/coercion has to be proven...as some of the other commenters are saying.
What do you think the fishing expeditions have been about interviewing Spacey and everyone else. To see how far they can implicate other, BEFORE the big fish are gone after.
I hope the ghosts of Salem whirl out of their graves and bite you for daring to use them in this manner.
You know what would make life easier? If the rapos and their apologist buddies/bots/shills would be the first crew sent to space, in a ship that some drunken engineer designed. If they landed on a barren planet and stayed there, becoming the cast of Lord of the Flies in Space.
SD Auntie...so what if he was matchmaker for Trump with age appropriate women? You're so desperate for anything. Yeah look for the splinter of connection with Trump but ignore the lumberyard of connection with Clinton. TDS is real.
mike m, real question. What's it like over using cliche terms like "TDS" ? I do everything in my power not to join groups or sound like a parrot, so I wouldn't know. But I see that phrase used here a lot- (T)rump (D)erangement (S)yndrome and you're as good as any to ask. Is it that your types don't know what else to say, or do you feel like it's effective to use?
TDS is recent phenomenon that came to fruition on November 8th 2016.
It might be a cliche in your eyes but others look at it as a widespread hysteria that formed that day.
All these bozos threw everything thing they could at President Trump and every time he escaped their mostly unsubstantiated nonsense they moved onto their next manufactured outrage immediately,targeting him or those close to him.
Just look at the Mueller Report and how they moved right onto something else after it turned out to be an Obama/Clinton attempted coup.
Whenever I personally have tried to have a conversation with someone who has TDS I could tell right away that everything they believe they learned from Boob Tube,
The script is very predictable.
The predictable behavior manifest itself in to such a psychosis that people identify with their hatred of Trump, that is what they are known by TDS.
I have never seen such an insane outpouring about one person ever in my lifetime, and I was around for Nixon.
With such a tepid response it appears you have no logical rebuttal to my answer to your question. You resorted to hyperbole and innuendo, just as I suspected.
They are collecting who knows what, so the ones who will be protected will stay protected, whether that means not proceeding full steam, or knowing where to step without dragging in the wrong peeps.
They waited til Savile was dead to out him.
There has been no seismic shift in the world, hashtag movements or not.
I wish it were so.
In this case, so far, I do not see where a law was KNOWINGLY broken.
Prostitution is legal in the UK I think? (Procuring isn't.) And 16 is legal in the UK?
I am surprised this all is being resurrected at all, but I really doubt any world leaders will be peeping through stripey iron.
@hushhush and Mischi, We Canadians do pay for them. Every time they come to Canada, we foot the bill (as does the other Commonwealth countries when they visit them.). When we remit our taxes at the end of the fiscal year, it's to the government (the Queen!) Her picture hangs in every government office/building at every level of government throughout the country. QEII is the head of state, not a figure head. Big difference. She has ultimate dominion via our Constitution. Our entire legal system is based on British law. She (the Crown Corp) owns all the provinces and territories. Land grants may have been extended to settlers to settle the lands, but, (provincial) governments have recently been revoking "ownership"/grants these past couple of decades by "mere" declaration. i.e., Land farmed for generations which could be sold/cashed in for retirement by the operators, were "undemocratically" declared environmental green space by provincial governments (so control switched back to provincial government/queen,) rendering the parcels worthless to the "owners" b/c they can no longer be sold to, i.e., developers). The Governor General is HMTQ's rep while she is not in Canada. They open Parliament on her behalf each year (note so does QEII in the UK). Which, if she was so neutral, why is QEII opening Parliament? She's not. She just chooses to appear to the people that she is not meddling/her presence is merely ceremonial. She actually runs the damn show. She has the power to dissolve parliament ("democratically" elected house of representatives,) if things aren't going "as planned". In a real democracy that would not happen; and, she has (via the GG) numerous times. HMTQ is above the law because she is the law of the land. She could commit the most heinous crime and never be investigated or arrested because everyone in "authority" at every level works for her (every oath is taken in the name of the sitting reign ergo everyone takes their marching orders from her). We are the ones existing under the rule of law (the queen) and are granted a license via local, provincial or federal gov'ts to do simple things such as drive a car, a boat, operate a radio, build a house/addition (permit), what have you. That is her permission. We are merely subjects (sheep). Truth.
Prince Albert
ReplyDeleteScotland yard sniffibg around randy andy
DeleteRandy Andy
ReplyDeleteAndrew?
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew....duh
ReplyDeleteObviously Prince Andrew
ReplyDeletePrince andrrew
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew. "Randy Andy" earned that nickname.
ReplyDeleteRandy Andy
ReplyDeleteRandy Andy
ReplyDeleteRandy Andy, of course
ReplyDeleteI assume most everyone here saw the Trump/Epstein 1992 party tape. What was the standout from it for me was how much Epstein looked like a horny perverted troll. Go back and check it out--he just oozes sleaze. And the look on his face when he enters the party is beyond creepy
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew the Perv
ReplyDeleteOh, randy Andy, you will never learn, will you?
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew but I think he’s looking to soften the blow with this public image publicity push
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew. I wonder how they're gonna blame it on Meghan😊
ReplyDeletePrince Harry. Thats how he met meagan
DeletePrince Harry. Thats how he met meagan
DeletePrince Andrew. I wonder how they're gonna blame it on Meghan😊
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew of course
ReplyDeleteIt would be more noticable if he didn't make appearances if the rumours are about.
ReplyDeleteThis is what Royals do, make appearances, it's not some weird hobby.
Prince Andy!
ReplyDeleteEpstein's buddy, Prince Andrew
ReplyDeleteRandy Andy
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew obviously.
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew
ReplyDeleteAndrew.
ReplyDeleteAnd probably 60+ Saudi royal douches, but we'll never hear about most of their victims seeing as the dead cannot testify.
To easy
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew
ReplyDeleteRandy Andy. He has no shame!
ReplyDeleteKeep payin' for them, Brits.
ReplyDeleteKeep bowin' and curtsyin'.
Give them huge palaces rent-free.
If one of them goes to a tennis match, don't look at her.
They're better than you are.
Randy Andy, as it were
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew?
ReplyDeleteDid everyone see Ghislaine filed appeal to keep the docs sealed today? If it is granted we may never find out
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew of course. I saw something about the entire first slap on the wrist for Epstein was because of royal family intervention. Acosta was told to back off by the Feds. Hopefully Trump will not allow it this time although he seems to be friendly with the Queen. Maybe that's why she was as civil as she was to him, hoping to get her perv kid off the hook. Let's just chalk the royal family up to "The Original White Trash" and move on. I don't care about them any more. After QEII dies it's really over anyway.
ReplyDeleteThey're treated no differently to how your President and first lady are treated, @J.
ReplyDeletePlease. What would he otherwise do? Go into hiding aka admitting guilt and shame and avoidance? You have to tow the line, act accordingly. He may FEAR things are going to be made public but in all honesty no one knows how this is going to play out. Who will Epstein fry? Who does he have what on? This is all yet to be determined. Look at Spacey getting off.
ReplyDeleteStifle, Viking Song. This is no time for your idiocy.
ReplyDeleteI just realized that enthusiasm quotes is not getting by the moderators. lol
ReplyDeleteAndrew at the British Open.
ReplyDeleteSpacey got off because his accuser wouldn't testify and didn't want to give up his cell phone, likely because it contained evidence contradicting his planned testimony. IOW, faked up accusation. I think the accuser's mom was the one pushing this whole thing. Doesn't mean Spacey is innocent in general but he's not going to be guilty on that particular charge. Lesson to be learned: Check out the accusations before you move forward. Also, and especially in Epstein's case since there are a lot of potentially huge reputations at stake: Protect the legitimate accusers. These are powerful skeeves who will do ANYTHING to protect themselves.
ReplyDeleteAmartel, someone else said that they gave the phone to police, who erased it.
ReplyDeleteNot sure why it matters if the kid's mom wanted justice. It doesn't mean the kid didn't also. It's natural she'd feel protective, but people are trying to spin it as if the mom forced the kid to go to the cops. The crux is, did a crime happen or not.
We'll never know what all the evidence was, because the case was dropped.
"Protect the legitimate accusers."
Another favorite apologist ploy. Disparage accusers as lying while claiming to be totally for "legitimate" or "actual" victims. But they say this about every victim so...
@ Amartel. Allegations on other sites have it that a civil suit was finally settled and confidential and now the complainant has no reason to cooperate in a criminal trial. Do you know what happened? I don't. Just know SOMETHING did... and can.
ReplyDeleteSamantha, life would be a lot easier if those who do indeed lie about sexual misconduct stopped doing so.
ReplyDeletePeople will believe what they want based on the accuser, and more importantly- who is being accused.
ReplyDeleteFalse accusations do happen but all victims deserve to have support and geniuine care when they speak up. And keep in mind, actual victims going on actual record is very different than Internet gossip and blind items.
False accusations happen all the time. I believe Spacey's a total skeeve but believing is not the basis for a system of justice. You need real proof. If your key witness can't show up in court and refuses to turn over evidence then you can't prove your case. The end.
ReplyDeleteAmartel, Weinstein too. I have no doubt he's behaved very very bad sexually, and has probably committed crimes.
ReplyDeleteHowever the simpleminded can't see that obvious opportunistic liars like Asia Argento make it all the more likely people like him will walk free.
And those who say we should believe all accusers... tried that already, in Salem.
Nothing will ever happen to Andrew, that's the disgusting part of it. The British royal family is immune to everything.
ReplyDelete@Gator right and wrong. Nothing will criminally happen to Andrew but I'm reading more and more comments from Brits who won't be supporting the monarchy once the Queen passes. Australia and Canada will both immediately pull away once she dies. Even elderly royalists have had their fill of the monarchy after Markle's debacles. I love reading the comments from Brits who say no more. Respect for the Queen is one thing but Charles is so disliked then pile on Andrew and MM's PR disasters.
ReplyDeleteI doubt Canada would ever pull away from the marnarchy.
DeleteAndrew would have had his engagements booked in hus diary months or even a year or two ago. Most of these are obligations passed down from Buckingham Palace. The only difference is he is getting more media coverage because of his links to Epstein. Andy has always had some shady connections, arms dealers, despots and basically anyone who has dodgy business dealings to fund a large yacht on which Andy can holiday and quaff champagne amongst scantily clad young women.
ReplyDeleteSo, is enty planning on posting the Bohemian Grove list or?
ReplyDelete@Simon, she’s asking the full panel to reverse the 3- judge panel decision to unseal records in a separate defamation suit. Maxwell publicly called Giuffre a liar. It’s a defamation case. Granted, I have not read her briefs, but I think en banc panel will affirm the prior decision. They rarely overturn.
ReplyDeleteHas Andrew been alleged to have an encounter with someone younger than 16? I've heard of a 17 year old, but nothing younger. 16 is the age of consent in the UK.
ReplyDeleteI am echoing @Em here - The UK (and US) sell arms to countries and conflicts all over the world. Andrew is involved in that. Epstein has arms dealer connections. Epstein likes to create blackmail scenarios. Is there any actual indication that Andrew was a willing participant in under age sex slavery? Or was he just tangled up in Epstein's blackmail attempts? Surely MI5/6 knows the truth. We’ve had the Queen’s answer, that she believes him. Was she right to? Did the intelligence services lie to her?
I wonder what the truth is.
Thought y'all didn't believe none of this stuff. I was just a whacky conspiracy nut huh...
ReplyDeleteYou are.
DeleteBut people have known about prince Andrew being a skeev long before you were spamming these posts, weirdo.
Jan 15. That's important to note and thank you for bringing it up. If the Age of Consent in Britain is 16 if all Andrew did was got massaged by 16 year old girls then everything he did is perfectly legal...and if the girl was shy of 16 by a few months...I guess we have try to look at it as if the girl was a few months shy of 18 here. Also, didn't all the girls sign up willingly to give massages for money? Honestly, if that's all that was going on in the jet plane then I'm not that upset about it. With all this going on and apparently everybody and their brother (and sister) into young stuff then we are going to have to move our outrage line a bit.
ReplyDeleteI want to know who the real perverts, child traffickers, organ harvesters, andrenochrome users and evil people are. I don't care so much about what smarmy men do with teen girls who have the ability to consent. I don't care if the guy is married. I don't care if his wife was pregnant at the time. I don't care if his grown children are upset. I don't care if the guy "likes 'em young". I don't care if the guy is a creep as long as he's not abusing children.
This is going to be so big and so creepy that we are going to have to draw a line collectively at condemnation.
Princess Diana's life and death was the beginning.......Prince Andrew's life will be the end of British royalty. It's time. If Prince Harry wanted to avenge his mother's death, his marriage to Meghan was perfect.Gotta' love the red heads.
ReplyDelete@miss David while I agree with you in theory there is a REASON we have an age of consent. That means if you are younger than this you ARE A CHILD In the eyes of the law and unable to consent. We have to draw the line somewhere. If you fall below that line then you are not a consenting adult. You don't have the rights or autonomy to consent. It is why folks of a certain age don't vote or aren't tried as adults etc. We have lines drawn in everything, including sex. YES, Epstein being INTO teens isn't as disgusting as straight up pedophilia with 10 year old or 8 year old BUT he could just as easily have gone to universities to find 18 year olds, 19 year olds who LOOKED YOUNG. For whatever reason he chose to skirt this law and go underage and illegal. He probably got off on it.
ReplyDeleteCheers to the person who brought up Salem, if only b/c you got my memory of high school history churning again. Inapplicable-absolutely-but interesting nonetheless!
ReplyDelete"Hopefully Trump will not allow it this time although he seems to be friendly with the Queen."
ReplyDeleteRight, Trump cuck. Keep slobbering over that little fantasy.
read somewhere that Pervstein is a "really" small guy...
ReplyDeletePrince Andrew
ReplyDelete@Unknown Trump supporters don't slobber. Actually there is no slobber left on the face of the Earth. You guys used it all on St. Barack of the Southside. Why was there no outrage for 8 years when Obama did nothing about Epstein? Why are you Mullah worshipers so upset it's all coming out under Trump? Go cuck yourself.
ReplyDeletehe still was the matchmaker for Trump. and don't kid yourself, I'm sure their are videotapes of Bill and Donnie on the island enjoying Teen party favors. why so angry Muss Davie? get some fresh air and do some breathing excercises. it's not like your related to either politican
DeleteWe have a couple males here with a weiner complex too, Mike m. Ironically, one is a staunch Weinstein supporter.
ReplyDeleteSee cdan, there IS a connection to a tiny/mishapen penis and revolting behavior.
Canada will not pull away because the Constitution will have to be re-written and it was almost impossible the last time it was done.
ReplyDelete@Mischi My thoughts exactly. Getting all provinces to agree on getting rid of senate won't happen, neither will it be for what is really just a symbolic figure head. If we had to pay for them, it'd be different.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think we broke ENTY....LOL
ReplyDeleteSo many bot shill rape apologists in these blinds. Some can't even be bothered to think of a whole name.
ReplyDeleteLike everywhere else there is any whiff of an accusation about sexual assault. You are over doing it in this case and only making the subject look bad/worse.
Any half-decent lawyer will say that 16 is legal in the UK and the girl was 17 and force/coercion has to be proven...as some of the other commenters are saying.
What do you think the fishing expeditions have been about interviewing Spacey and everyone else. To see how far they can implicate other, BEFORE the big fish are gone after.
IF they are gone after.
J, buy a vowel you bog standard rapologist shill.
ReplyDeleteI hope the ghosts of Salem whirl out of their graves and bite you for daring to use them in this manner.
You know what would make life easier? If the rapos and their apologist buddies/bots/shills would be the first crew sent to space, in a ship that some drunken engineer designed. If they landed on a barren planet and stayed there, becoming the cast of Lord of the Flies in Space.
Rosie - Lol
ReplyDeleteSTD auntie, Billy Clinton spent a lot of time with epstein and his crew, your TDS is out of control.
ReplyDeleteSD Auntie...so what if he was matchmaker for Trump with age appropriate women? You're so desperate for anything. Yeah look for the splinter of connection with Trump but ignore the lumberyard of connection with Clinton. TDS is real.
ReplyDeleteWell we will see. who will be worse? Big Bill or dunce Donnie?? can't wait for the Trial. heads will roll...
DeleteSTD, your enamoring of a documented serial predator just solidifies the extent of your TDS
DeleteBig Bill, lol!
well its not like BC is good looking. LOL.
Deletemike m, real question.
ReplyDeleteWhat's it like over using cliche terms like "TDS" ?
I do everything in my power not to join groups or sound like a parrot, so I wouldn't know.
But I see that phrase used here a lot-
(T)rump (D)erangement (S)yndrome
and you're as good as any to ask.
Is it that your types don't know what else to say, or do you feel like it's effective to use?
Plz W/B
TDS is recent phenomenon that came to fruition on November 8th 2016.
ReplyDeleteIt might be a cliche in your eyes but others look at it as a widespread hysteria that formed that day.
All these bozos threw everything thing they could at President Trump and every time he escaped their mostly unsubstantiated nonsense they moved onto their next manufactured outrage immediately,targeting him or those close to him.
Just look at the Mueller Report and how they moved right onto something else after it turned out to be an Obama/Clinton attempted coup.
Whenever I personally have tried to have a conversation with someone who has TDS I could tell right away that everything they believe they learned from Boob Tube,
The script is very predictable.
The predictable behavior manifest itself in to such a psychosis that people identify with their hatred of Trump, that is what they are known by TDS.
I have never seen such an insane outpouring about one person ever in my lifetime, and I was around for Nixon.
"I could tell right away that everything they believe they learned from Boob Tube,
DeleteThe script is very predictable"
you don't even see how ironic this is.
..tell us, where did YOU learn that term? The boob tube?
Mmm hhmmm
With such a tepid response it appears you have no logical rebuttal to my answer to your question.
DeleteYou resorted to hyperbole and innuendo, just as I suspected.
A suspect that was grooming, trafficking and raping underaged females was denied bail even after offering up his fortune.
ReplyDeleteSome here say there was no such thing, the young ladies where doing this willingly.
I really hope you don't have any children. Sick!
No heads will roll.
ReplyDeleteThey are collecting who knows what, so the ones who will be protected will stay protected, whether that means not proceeding full steam, or knowing where to step without dragging in the wrong peeps.
They waited til Savile was dead to out him.
There has been no seismic shift in the world, hashtag movements or not.
I wish it were so.
In this case, so far, I do not see where a law was KNOWINGLY broken.
Prostitution is legal in the UK I think? (Procuring isn't.) And 16 is legal in the UK?
I am surprised this all is being resurrected at all, but I really doubt any world leaders will be peeping through stripey iron.
@hushhush and Mischi, We Canadians do pay for them. Every time they come to Canada, we foot the bill (as does the other Commonwealth countries when they visit them.). When we remit our taxes at the end of the fiscal year, it's to the government (the Queen!) Her picture hangs in every government office/building at every level of government throughout the country. QEII is the head of state, not a figure head. Big difference. She has ultimate dominion via our Constitution. Our entire legal system is based on British law. She (the Crown Corp) owns all the provinces and territories. Land grants may have been extended to settlers to settle the lands, but, (provincial) governments have recently been revoking "ownership"/grants these past couple of decades by "mere" declaration. i.e., Land farmed for generations which could be sold/cashed in for retirement by the operators, were "undemocratically" declared environmental green space by provincial governments (so control switched back to provincial government/queen,) rendering the parcels worthless to the "owners" b/c they can no longer be sold to, i.e., developers). The Governor General is HMTQ's rep while she is not in Canada. They open Parliament on her behalf each year (note so does QEII in the UK). Which, if she was so neutral, why is QEII opening Parliament? She's not. She just chooses to appear to the people that she is not meddling/her presence is merely ceremonial. She actually runs the damn show. She has the power to dissolve parliament ("democratically" elected house of representatives,) if things aren't going "as planned". In a real democracy that would not happen; and, she has (via the GG) numerous times. HMTQ is above the law because she is the law of the land. She could commit the most heinous crime and never be investigated or arrested because everyone in "authority" at every level works for her (every oath is taken in the name of the sitting reign ergo everyone takes their marching orders from her). We are the ones existing under the rule of law (the queen) and are granted a license via local, provincial or federal gov'ts to do simple things such as drive a car, a boat, operate a radio, build a house/addition (permit), what have you. That is her permission. We are merely subjects (sheep). Truth.
ReplyDeleteHe cant be jailed, can he? Has to have diplomatic immunity and surely would get a pardon in England. So who cares? The bimbos were paid, right?
ReplyDelete