Blind Item #7
In the next movie this permanent A list mostly movie actor/sometime director directs, look for the alliterate former actress to make an appearance. More than a cameo, less than a supporting role. She has argued her husband and brother-in-law were in a movie, so she should also be able to.
Ben Affleck and?
ReplyDeleteMegan Markle?
DeleteAlso today, Sparkles and ri ri are becoming bffs...this is getting good! I think she is encouraging this stuff now they are both in London
DeleteRiRi is black mixed with black. Why should they be friends?
DeleteI just love the fact that ri ri and sparkles together augments the crazy factor by about 10! It sounds like the plot for bad mums 3
DeleteWhat movie was Harry in though?
ReplyDeleteGonna check but I think it’s George Clooney/MM because they are “friends”
DeleteStar wars i think
DeleteGeorge Clooney and Megan Markle
ReplyDeleteNot Affleck, Clooney.
ReplyDeletePrinces William and Harry had cameos in a new Star Wars movie.
ReplyDeleteHarry and William were storm troopers in one of the Star Wars movies. There faces were not visible.
ReplyDeleteLet MM play a mailbox, then.
ReplyDeleteNot too far of stretch for her to play a big hole that many hands have been in.
DeleteI could see Meghan as a storm trooper. ;)
ReplyDeleteWhy are they allowing her to call the shots?!!!? Kate is going to be the Queen consort and never behaved so entitled or demanding. Me Again has somehow managed to get them to ignore all of their rules and let her do whatever she wants I don’t get it.
ReplyDeleteSparkles ia an a plus plus superstar in her owm mind only! She better enjoy the fame while it lasts
DeleteThis is what I get for not seeing any of the new Star Wars movies.
ReplyDeleteAgree Clooney/markle. This would be even more desperate logic than expected if she's citing the Stormtroopers! LOL!
ReplyDelete@Lauren - i doubt she is calling all the shots, but she is bringing to light how some of the rules are outdated, a little sexist, and just out right stupid. If anything, Harry marrying her is making the monarchy more modern which it desperately needs.
ReplyDeleteNo, no she isn't and no it doesn't. Quit being a weirdo.
DeleteMeghan is fixing nothing. And she is flouting traditions, not sexist rules.
ReplyDeleteHasn't she already been in movies we haven't seen yet?
ReplyDeleteFrom what I understand, she's been in SEVERAL movies that aren't ever going to be distributed at the local cineplex.
ReplyDeletewink wink nudge nudge
My guess is that the firm bought the yachting movies by now
Delete@Do Tell - traditions can be sexist. Traditions can be stupid and outdated. That's why royals can now marry divorced people and that is why Charlotte can now become queen if god forbid something happens to George.
ReplyDeleteBut, they aren't sexist or outdated, you nonce.
Delete@Meredith Comments in the DM are suggesting that MM crashed the trooping the colour. Which might explain why she was at the back of the crowd on the balcony.
ReplyDeleteMmhmmm... I bet it's all true.
DeletePersonally, I prefer to get my Intel from MediaTakeOut
Far more reliable than the DM
*eyeroll*
I get all of my secret royal Intel from the media take out! That site cracks me up
DeleteAre they going to cast her as a mattress?
ReplyDeleteA used mattress on a yacht or Brett ratners couch
DeleteYes, she came running down the Mall yelling HOLD THAT CARRIAGE while Kate told the driver to make the horse go faster. Unfortunately, MM was too fast for them and sprinted into the carriage like Magnum PI next to Harry, Kate and Camilla.
ReplyDelete"Why are they allowing her to call the shots?!!!? Kate is going to be the Queen consort and never behaved so entitled or demanding."
1. How the hell would you know?
2. Why are you dumb enough to believe this?
+111111111
DeleteRumour is that Nutmeg knew Clooney from her yachting days. They knew each other in the biblical sense. But then again, Clooney is bisexual if the rumours about Gerber are true. He went through a period of hooking up with Vegas waitresses so he likes more than one flavour. It's confusing to keep track of it all.
ReplyDeleteIt wouldnt suprise me at all if sparklers and George were a thing. Kinda random that they were invited to the wedding
Delete"traditions can be sexist. Traditions can be stupid and outdated."
ReplyDeleteWhich "sexist" traditions do you think Meghan is changing, the expectation that one dresses appropriately for official functions, or allows the Queen to get in a car first? Not hanging all over your spouse in public? Or changing the Queen's prerogative to decide which tiara or royal jewelry Duchesses get to borrow at their wedding>?
deep down the royal family are acting for the cameras
ReplyDeleteDiana was murdered and to this day they pretend it was a car crash
Dopey Diana was going to marry that wealthy muslim yachter and the firm could not abide
DeleteQuestion - was MM all about equality and feminism when she was yachting and on the hunt for a sugar daddy
ReplyDeleteSparkles made out like a bandit when she was a courtesan for mneuchin! I think she just lucked into dumb ol harry
Delete@DoTell -Where did I say she is changing anything? Reread what I originally posted and take a fucking pill and relax. Why is dumping on MM such a sport with some people. Geezus. Btw, royals should be able to close their fucking car door. that is a fucking stupid rule. and the women shoudl be able to wear whatever nail polish color they want.
ReplyDeleteThe fashion sense of the royals is extremely outdated and ugly and I am glad MM is bringing more modern dress to the family. There is nothing wrong with PDA if it is anything but deep throating each other or actually fucking. When the actual fuck did she try to change the queen's prerogative on anything? God you royalist are demented.
@Lulu is correct though I don't know if that means they had sex or simply move in the same circles.
ReplyDeleteMeghan also has plennnntttyyyy of documented connections with Bruce Ratner and that giant dufus - James Packer who was with Miranda Babyface for awhile I think before the fiasco with no-sex Mimi.
Rumor has it Meghan was one of Steve Mnuchin's hired hands when Mnuchin was in the LA entertainment business (google it) before he became in charge of White House Treasury Shit because of course.
I think it's cool so many famous fans have been allowed to play stormtroopers, that's pretty nice. A little fun, a little humanity in the world
'The fiasco with no sex mooriah' so true!
DeleteOooOOOoooo, well hello there JT0130 I recognize you.
ReplyDeleteAre you actually (RoFL) suggesting Meghan's eternally dark, poorly fitting, untailored clothing is an upgrade from Kate's impeccably tailored looks?
Meghan has often worn black (or deep navy) for daytime events (THE QUEEN, if anyone has noticed, prefers colors which Kate's wardrobe reflects). She has often worn oversized or poorly fitted, mismatched clothing. She has worn cream and white together more than once, I gasp.
Meghan has refused to wear proper hosiery on multiple occasions which is the first thing to strike me and wonder if something was "off." As an American, if you want to join the BRF, you learn everything up front (someone will even train you!) and I would toe the f'ing LINE. But not Meghan.
Also - her crown? That was not a Queen Mary borrow. She had it MADE and it's now available on MeghansMirror. Queen Mary's crown is similar YET has a wee crest above the central round which Meghan's crown did not have. Queen Mary's crown was also SHORTER IN THE TEMPLES and had different stone placement along the side sections.
Boo-MF'ing-YAaaaa ha ha ah - THE QUEEN has actually NEVER lent MM a single stone of the royal jewels including her rhinestone replica tiara. MM was even forbidden from wearing a tiara during a state visit in Fiji. Meghan is the red headed plastic baby birthing 42-y/o stepchild of the Royal Family's most recent bad idea.
MM does realize W/H were in costume with masks so one could not tell who was who....
ReplyDeleteYou cannot turn a yachting high class hooker into a housewife! Just send her overseas, have the firm buy her the 10 million mansion in Los Angeles that they have been hunting for and be done with her already
ReplyDelete@hunter - Oh nooo-- the horror!!! Dark colors during the daytime and bare legs. The scandal!!!. Princess Diana has done the same so just get off it. The BRF need enter the 21st century and resemble the women of their country. MM is not some revolutionary. Trying to dump on her fashion choices and her sexual past as if the BRF hasn't done worse makes it seem like she is Wallis Simpson and she is far from it. You royalists need to find someone else to clutch your pearls over. I can't believe she has such power over you all the grit your teeth in hatred.
ReplyDelete@hunter - Kate attire makes her look 20 years older and she is aging like a grape sitting in the sun. I understand why she may hate MM, but the rest of you need to chill.
ReplyDeleteKate isnt that bad! Maybe 10 years older. .:)
Delete@Drewholthaus - sad really. Any yachter you can flip the hustle into marriage must be amazing in bed.
ReplyDeleteMneuchin is still in love with her! Her body is first rate, and she must have learned all the tricks from ratner who has slept with more starlets than Harvey
DeleteTrumpo turned Melania into a respectable housewife. You never hear any female models/actresses attacking her because most have hustled for money. I wonder if Melania/Meghan ever crossed paths on the Yachting Circuit?
ReplyDeleteBtw Marla maples is yachting now so sad. Nothing sadder than an aging desperate hooker
Delete@&Lt> -- its what these men want really. They eventually cheat on the good girls so why not marry the whores. Wills is doing it to Kate. Rumor is Rose was a former yachter too. Marrying a guy in his 60s was her way out.
ReplyDeleteThe goal is to marry a semi sane yachter like Melania not the batcrap crazy one like sparkles! :)
DeleteI think you meant rode in on Camilla.
ReplyDeleteForget the wrong colored clothea and hosiery. The crimes are financial—using her photo ops to “merch” products, getting free clothes then charging Prince Charlea for them, overspending, an expensive PR, pap-fest baby shower in NY that was a no no. Then there is all the money spent on PR to create a global brand for herself by leveraging off the royal family. As part of the RF, she was supposed to be part of the royal family brand which is about public service not sell, sell, sell. She clearly had an end game which was to get in, clean up and get out. But they are onto her grifter ways. It’s no that she was yachter ho, she is a fame ho.
ReplyDeleteSparkles is pluckier than i thought but the firm is on to her grifting ways now. Its gonna get a lot harder and making movies with Clooney is not the best move
Delete@JT0130: The REASON why Royals are not supposed to close their own car door is in case something happens, their security can immediately get the person back in the car. IT’s for SAFETY! So no, it’s not a stupid rule. As far as public PDA, they are WORKING, so it’s TOTALLY inappropriate. Have you ever worked with a couple? I have (several in fact), and they’ve never touched each other while working, because again, it’s INAPPROPRIATE. How often have you seen HM & PP holding hands?
ReplyDeleteAs far as the clothing issues: a) She always looks like shit the way she dresses (guess it’s due to the merching), and b) the BRF has rules. If you don’t want to follow them, then don’t marry into the family. Quite simple, really.
@JL - A c-list actress can not wield that much influence of the BRF. They all have merch. I was in London in January. Harry and MM do not have more merch than Wills, Kate or George and especially not more than the queen. I as in the gift shop of the palace and Harry and MM's merch was barely noticeable. Who gives a fuck if she had a baby shower. She is married to the spare. Not Wills. Let her celebrate being a mom at 37. Harry and MM should have the ability to break away from the rigid protocols. There is no way she is leaving him, I bet she will get pregnant again in no time. I hope they pull off moving to LA and focusing on the producing partnership with Oprah. They need to be able to live and not have to put up with the royal stuffy rigid bullshit. The BRF should be more charismatic than they are.
ReplyDelete@JT, bu Merch I mean being paid to wear clothing and jewelry, much like the Kardashians. If she wanted to be a Kardashian, she should have married someone else. What fool narcissist enters into a system with rules and traditiona and thinks she’s going to change all that? I hope she moves to LA and kardhasians her heart out. I seriously doubt Harry will go with her.
Delete@Hunter: +1 on all of your comments
ReplyDelete@JL: +1
@Aquagirl -- she doesn't have to follow them. And the more she breaks the more the rules look ridiculous. That safety rule sounds like a last minute detail, meaning if shit goes south, the security fucked up and it is too late. MM dresses fine and appropriate for her age. Kate looks like she wears her mothers suits. Just because she is a mom of 3 doesn't mean she needs to look so matronly. That dress she wore to the state dinner with Trump had the color and look of used mop. Who ever does her makeup need more lessons cuz she cakes on the eyeliner and mascara.
ReplyDeleteHi Meghan
Delete@Lauren: If you think she’s calling all the shots, watch some clips from TTC. She tries to follow HM out the door to the balcony, and Camilla blocks her. PC & PA stand on either side of HM. MM still tries to get in front, & P. Anne practically body checks her to keep her from getting near HM. The 3 of them form a protective ring around HM. Then Jack (Eugenie’s husband) blocks her as well. MM winds up in the back row (in the corner) next to PH, who basically ignores her except for telling her to shut up and turn around (twice.) She’s been frozen out, so she just stands there talking and laughing to herself and then pretends to cry. Very well-choreographed!
ReplyDelete@JT0130: You might want to learn the definition of ‘merching’ because you clearly have no clue as to what you’re talking about (as per usual).
ReplyDeleteAnd if you think security shouldn’t try to save someone if ‘things go south’, you obviously are not aware of the # of security guards who have taken a bullet to try to save their client.
Finally, MM can move to LA, but she won’t have the financial benefits of the BRF anymore. And BTW, he’s going to leave her. Soon.
Yeah, totally sounds like Meghan is the one being silly as people are practically body checking her. Hopefully she will move back to the US and let the media focus on Prince Andrew's vacation habits instead.
ReplyDeleteI cant believe randy andy is still begging to go back to the usa! Hes got a serious sex addiction problem
DeleteBlogger JT0130 said...
ReplyDelete@JL - A c-list actress can not wield that much influence of the BRF. They all have merch. I was in London in January. Harry and MM do not have more merch than Wills, Kate or George and especially not more than the queen. I as in the gift shop of the palace and Harry and MM's merch was barely noticeable.
I don't post often, but I need to address this.
There is a difference between the merchandise associated with the BRF in general and MM's "business model".
In the first instance, the merchandise actually supports the UK's economy. It's third party manufacturing touristy trinkets and cups and saucers, and coins, etc., for "us" to purchase. They (the BRF) does not earn a living from it. Whereas in the second instance, MM's business model is all about her, a la an underground economy/"sticking it to the man". Those who enable her, get their (publicly funded) cut.
I rarely watch entertainment reporting shows, but I tuned in last week to Entertainment Canada (I think it's called). Ben Mulroney is co-host. I think every time MM's name is mentioned, you can hear him flush the toilet. I'm sure he is crapping his pants that his wife (and he by extension) is associated with that interloper.
just saying.
All so true. Think Clooney, Oprah, Gayle and Serena are in the same boat or soon will be.
DeleteSoon she will be LA’s problem. Enjoy you Angelenos.
Ojs house in Brentwood is for sale!
DeleteOJ's house was demolished years ago. Whatever stands on the plot now is not the house he lived in.
Delete@Brayson: MM is a narcissistic sociopath, and clearly things have been getting worse. Would you want her standing next to your mother? I wouldn’t. The reason why I mentioned this is because I’ve never seen her family form a protective circle around her like that & it was obvious that there was a great deal of tension on that balcony. And MM just stood there smiling & talking to herself.
ReplyDelete@Meredith: There are some clips on YouTube. As soon as they open the balcony doors, she tries to rush out after HM. Then you see her being pushed out of the way. Also notice PW & Kate & family are FAR away from them.
Blogger JT0130 said... She is married to the spare. Not Wills. Let her celebrate being a mom at 37. Harry and MM should have the ability to break away from the rigid protocols. There is no way she is leaving him, I bet she will get pregnant again in no time. I hope they pull off moving to LA and focusing on the producing partnership with Oprah. They need to be able to live and not have to put up with the royal stuffy rigid bullshit. The BRF should be more charismatic than they are.
ReplyDeleteThere is something you need to understand about a narcissist, in particular this one. PH *completes* MM. Or *her* version of what being regal is. Enter PH's reality. As you astutely pointed out, he is the spare. He inherited a little more that PW from his mum because PW will inherit the commonwealth and all the regal privilege that goes along with it. I don't know what Princess Diana thought, but being a mum myself, I would hope my PoW would take care of his younger sibling. If left to her own accord, MM will blow through everything PH has in his coffer (if she hasn't already,) and ultimately that will leave PH and MM at PC's/PW's mercy. PH has acted like a spoiled brat, ignoring everyone who had his best interest at heart. Best to let him hit the wall and he has done that in dramatic fashion. In the end money and privilege talk. It's all he knows. He doesn't know how to "live the dream" (wake up every day at 6:00am and put his pants on one leg at a time and commute like the rest of us have to do.) Do you really think they'll be better of in LA? Doing what? The circuit? Do you not remember Fergie going that route? That career crashed like a lead Zeppelin. You need to look back on the staged highlights of these two. With the exception of the church wedding and the lunch that followed everything else was staged. Tell me what you do NOT see:
Staged:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Abmvay9-rk
Compared to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el-aQzuhQl4
Planted:
the articles I have gone back to read about it only depict what would happen and only depict stock photos of Frogmore. (There appears to be a common theme here!) Safe one. From People magazine. It reads like bad fiction (because it is?):
https://people.com/royals/prince-harry-meghan-markle-private-reception-speeches/
The (never before released) pic on their first anniversary depicting them watching fireworks. No one else is in the photo.
The official "portrait" of Archie with family looks staged and photoshopped.
A f is a f even if it's an expensive f. Her kind of b.s. gets tiresome very quickly. She looked like she had a gun held to her back when they were showing off Archie to the press for the first time. She seriously looked like a deer caught in the headlights. She was not in the driver's seat, imo. Her mask has been ripped from her face and she is now learning to march. If she ends up in LA, it's solo.
@Nic: Good summation. I’d also add that she & Jessica Mulroney are the owners of ‘Meghan’s Mirror’, although they have other people running it.
ReplyDeleteRe: Ben Mulroney, don’t know if you saw pics of him & wife recently. He was in London, then his wife flew to London with their daughter. They flew back separately, and she looked like she had been dragged through the hedges. The trip clearly didn’t go as she thought. Who knows what happened when she was there? Didn’t look like someone who had visited her BFF & a newborn.Then there’s a photo of the Mulroney’s together in bed back in Toronto & they’re not even talking to each other, they’re watching TV. I think when the shit hits the fan, he’ll have to go to daddy to try to help them make a deal.
@Nic: +1 to your second post. There’s no way that Harry is going to LA with her. And I doubt she’ll get a settlement. They offered to pay her off to cancel the wedding, telling her that was the only chance she’d ever get. First she said yes, then she changed her mind. Still remains to be seen if the BRF will press charges against her. But she does have the IRS waiting for her in the US, (for her merching on her old blog & her tax deductions (travel, restaurants, etc.) for said blog which was basically set up as a way to fund her lifestyle, as well as her current merching. I’m quite sure Trump would be happy to help.
ReplyDeleteQuestion.
DeleteHow do you know they offered to pay her off to cancel the wedding?
I want to know how much exactly
Delete@ Aquagirl, I think daddy has been working behind the scenes longer than we think. Canada is only big on the map but Brian M. is very connected here and there, and there. I feel sorry for Ben M. I remember watching a video after PH's/MM's wedding when Ben arrived to the lunch reception and how his little girl ran to him/how much he wanted to hug her up. His wife seemed really indifferent. I wasn't impressed with his wife trying upstage (everyone) when she walked her daughter up the steps to the church. She was swaying her hips like, "lookie me"/Pippa wannabe. The network community is very small in Canada. I couldn't help but notice when watching Ben's pan-faced reaction to "tomorrow's" MM story, that he couldn't sign off fast enough. I was not aware of the Mulroney's (separate) trips to the UK and I have not seen those pics you're talking about. Definitely a worthwhile google for me. tia
ReplyDelete"FYI, Meghan and Harry have already had visits from the Queen and Prince Philip as well as Prince Harry's brother Prince William and his wife Kate Middleton—but it looks like Jessica is the first of Meghan's friends to meet sweet li'l Archie."
ReplyDeletehttps://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a27567263/jessica-mulroney-visiting-meghan-markle-archie/
Wow, there's a backhand for you. Just a quick sample of the same 'ol, same 'ol, b.s. reporting. But this one takes the prize, in my books. Note the writer doesn't refer to PH's reps as family or MM's in-laws (extended family). I wonder if JM will correct the record like Megan's other friend did about visiting.
If this was true JM would be posting "evidence" on her social media accounts like crazy. BM must have flipped his sh!t and I bet his ever promoting wife was like, "What? I can't control what [they] think or write. blink, blink/smirk"
There are few opportunities to redeem one self. JM should take this opportunity and correct the speculative record.
I can only find footage on the balconey, where PH appears to tell her to turn around. Now what I find funny is you have a known escort customer PA in front of MM, and for all we know he knew her before she met PH; may have hired her for a trick. PB gives her a mean side glare, and when in LA PB is also rumored to turn tricks to make some spending money. I did not see the rugby player guy married to the princess (Zara?), but he also has blinds claiming his is a massive cheater.
ReplyDeleteSince they are always under media scrutiny, it would seem to me the easiest way to cheat would be with someone in their immediate circle. I wonder if PH has balled Waitey Latey. Who leads this bunch? Mr. Tampongate himself.
When you see pictures of Charles and Camilla at official functions, you might not be able to forget the details of "Camillagate," aka "tampongate." As they carried on a romantic relationship from the 1970s and into their marriages to other people, a flirty conversation between Camilla and Charles was caught on tape and published in 1992. The tapes included an exchange in which Charles said he wanted to be Camilla's tampon:
Charles: "Oh god. I'll just live inside your trousers or something. It would be much easier!"
Camilla: (Laughs.) "What are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers?" (Both laugh). "Oh, you're going to come back as a pair of knickers."
Charles: "Or, God forbid, a Tampax. Just my luck!" (Laughs.)
Camilla: "You are a complete idiot!" (Laughs.) "Oh, what a wonderful idea!"
Needless to say, it was embarrassing for Princess Diana and the royal family, as well as Charles and Camilla.
Where's Nutty? I want her take on this!
ReplyDelete@JT0130……..unfortunately the Salic Laws still apply in the UK, they were all set to change them if Williams first born was a girl but as George arrived first they just decided to keep the status quo. All 16 Commonwealth Countries would have had to agree to it first and then it would have also opened a can of worms regarding general title inheritance laws which still go to a male relative if the deceased has no son. So George and Louis would have to exit stage left before Charlotte could be Queen.
ReplyDelete@ hunter Crown? There is a big difference between a Crown and a Tiara, no one wears a Crown in GB but the Queen. Meghan did indeed wear a tiara that had once belonged to Queen Mary, there is no disputing that , it was mentioned in an offical palace memo. It is called The Queen Mary Diamond Bandeau , the central element was a brooch gifted to Mary for her wedding. I think you are confusing it with pictures of the Maria Feodorovna Diamond Bandeau which Q, mary also owned and wore. The Queen has a bottomless pit of tiaras and these are both quite minor ones.
See the full history here and a video of Pss Margaret wearing the second one with a central sapphire. They look quite similar in shape and size.
http://orderofsplendor.blogspot.com/search?q=queen+mary
http://orderofsplendor.blogspot.com/2018/05/tiara-thursday-marie-feodorovnas.html
JT0130 - "she's great, she's changing traditions"...5 seconds later "where did I say she changed any traditions".... ok there 'non-demented' beacon of reason and logic.
ReplyDeletenobody gives a flying fuck about Sparkles' nail colour, and yes bare legs in January in London is hooker-territory. Street hooker, to be precise, for easy access. Not just on her, but on every woman, especially those skanky girls stumbling drunk out of clubs in early morning hours, vomiting all over the pavements. They always have bare legs, no matter how freezing.
Spakles' level is gutter-height. scribbling mundane and primitive feel-good slogans on bananas for hooker's lunch boxes - that was my favourite. She actually thought they'd appreciate that and admire her for her heartfelt generosity.
'Oh look how much I care about the environment' only to fly 5 minutes later privately to NYC to throw herself a half a million dollar baby shower her own mother did not even attend.
'Oh look how much I care about people, here children with terrible illnesses, have my used flowers, and make sure you pose in front of them for photographs so I can post them on social media' .
She's just a self serving imbecile, with the IQ of a fruit fly. She needs to pay her make up artist to say nice things about her, because nobody else will. You have to be pretty much borderline slow to fall for her obvious self indulgent narcissistic bullshit......or you have to be Harry.
Comparing radiant Kate to suitcase girl MM, is like comparing a Lalique vase to a toilet.
ReplyDeleteExactly. Waity katie is the future queen and some yachting courtesan is not going to get her off her game
Delete@Nic:
ReplyDelete"She looked like she had a gun held to her back when they were showing off Archie to the press for the first time. She seriously looked like a deer caught in the headlights. She was not in the driver's seat, imo. Her mask has been ripped from her face and she is now learning to march"
This so much! She didn't even hold the baby. Her own baby! Why did nobody comment on that? That was so strange to me. Harry was holding the baby, like that's normal, but it's not normal. She should have held it. I supposed teetering on her heels was more important to her. She looked very very uncomfortable and Harry did not look relaxed either.
Babies are for the nannies!
DeleteI love these comment threads on Sparkles.
ReplyDelete@Aquagirl, you always educate us on some new relevant point.
@Unknown, how hilariously true. All evidence is out there in black and white. Yet some people like to play the fool. The heart wants what it wants.
Where the fuck is Nutty?
kiss kiss motherfuckers
We are supposed to believe that she had Prince Harry's son a few weeks ago. You'd think he would be cherishing her, and the family showing her some affection. Instead he looked furiously angry with her, almost spitting out "turn around" when she tried twice to talk to him. The others practically pushed her away when she tried to place herself behind the Queen on the balcony. They seemed ready for her. Something has turned them all very publicly against her. The fake baby fiasco? Her seedy past?
ReplyDeleteI think its the needledss grifting from the royal purse
Deleteher fake smile is becoming painful and he has clearly lost his patience
ReplyDeletehttps://honey.nine.com.au/latest/meghan-markle-national-anthem-trooping-the-colour/b9d92e4f-403f-400a-8898-c248f41d393b
@Juliet, Maybe the paternity test wasn't a thumbs up.
ReplyDeleteBlogger Juliet Scott said...
ReplyDeleteWe are supposed to believe that she had Prince Harry's son a few weeks ago. You'd think he would be cherishing her, and the family showing her some affection
They did. They let her sit in a coach with [them] and attend TTC. And it's interesting that you said, "You'd think ... the family showing her some affection." It reminds me of how surprised the BRF was about the peoples' reaction to Princess Di's 'death'. Completely clueless about how much affection the mass felt for her and how much they despised their indifference. ("Good riddance to bad rubbish!"). I think what we've witnessed at the end of MM's pregnancy and postpartum is their "affection"/"compassion". No one likes anyone who bullies a pregnant woman or new mum. [This] is about managing the masses and appearances.
@Unknown... I would be wanting to hold my baby, too. Whatever [it] was, [it] wasn't hers. She had no real maternal connection to 'the baby' PH was holding. And you know what? If it were me, I'd still want to hold [it]. Whatever nurturing instinct in me I have would demand it and I would be reaching for [it].
@Unknown:
ReplyDeleteShe looked very very uncomfortable and Harry did not look relaxed either.
So true! PH was like, "Uh, wah?" "Erm, er, (insert sick smile)". Kind of shows baby's face. Sick smile.
Their predicament actually makes me sick for them.
Re stockings. When she does wear them, she punches a hole through the leg and has "runny hose". It's like she's never worn hose before. Somebody gift her a bottle of clear nail polish, please. And advise her to pack a second pair of hose in her handbag.
Oh, and I keep forgetting to comment on the blind!
ReplyDeleteWasn't QEII part of some James Bond thing for the Olympics? I know it's not a movie, but it was "entertainment". haha!
Monarchy are stupid and outdated.
ReplyDelete