Sunday, June 30, 2019

Blind Item #3

The alliterate former actress sent out invitations to only A+ list celebrities, including dozens she has never met before, in hopes of luring them to that life event she is hosting.


55 comments:

  1. Megan Markle's kid's baptism

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bring me some Oprah across the pond me again!

      Delete
  2. 3-2-1 til some prize comments

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder if this crowd thinks she'll bring the fake baby Darren doll?
    That one that is so life-like that they so mischievously faked us out with?
    Wait. Is Devonte Hart on the guest list?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There.
    Got that out the way for y'alls

    ReplyDelete
  7. PAGE VIEWS PAGE VIEWS!

    Hello DMers!

    ReplyDelete
  8. How long till the firm banishes them to Africa? Thought it would be done by now. Also, how long will the public there tolerate this constant PR barrage? This girl is doomed: trying to be something she's not. From what I understand the public at large over the pond don't really like/tolerate anyone who isn't going to occupy the throne. I give it about 3 more years and Harry will being straying. He has his kid.If Meghan gets pregnant too soon after C-section, she'll encounter medical problems. Body isn't designed to withstand it all and the babies suffer medically (born too soon, etc)

    ReplyDelete
  9. They were at the ballgame yesterday

    ReplyDelete
  10. I figgered since they showed at the baseball game yesterday and treated like they were very special by famous athletes we'd get something here today about her.

    ReplyDelete
  11. There was a similar blind in regards to invites for her wedding too.

    Honestly, the BRF is how I felt about the Real World (seasons 1-13). I would want to do it for about a week for the cool house, location and perks. Then would want to get back to normal living without the scrutiny.

    ReplyDelete
  12. >From what I understand the public at large over the pond don't really like/tolerate anyone who isn't going to occupy the throne.

    Wrong, they love Princess Anne.

    And now cue the comments about how MEagain doesn't have any friends, etc, because that's something they know about. And the usual outrage over the 400 million pounds they spent on Frogmore Cottage, blah blah blah blah, which is so much more than the £4.5 million Kate and Wills spent on their KP apartment. Oh but that's different because they're going to be the king and queen, in theory, so it's OK to blow millions on an apartment.

    And also FAKE BABY. And the queen isn't attending which is a huge snub except she didn't go to Louis' either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Queen was sick and couldn't make it to P Louis' christening...it was widely reported in the British Press and many were concerned about her health.
      Re the renovation costs...
      First, KP is an official Royal Residence, the cost for W and K's refurb was £1m which also went on structural work to preserve what is in fact an historical palace belonging to the nation. KP has areas bith inside and out open to the public. Frog Cott is heading towards £3M already and isn't a building of national importance like Frog House.
      M and H were offered an apartment at KP which would have cost nothing for security as that is already in place for the whole of KP. Now, the taxpayer will be funding extra costs on top of the refurb all because H and M wanted a separate court...which, it turns out, the Queen has forbidden.
      M likes to spout on about humanitarian causes whilst spending our money on two new orangeries, a floating yoga floor and a tennis court....all things these two millionaires could have paid for themselves. The cost of this would have housed some of our homeless ex servicemen and women. They bleat about wanting privacy yet like to take from the public purse.
      So yeah, right now many of us are pissed off with H and M for being a pair of blatant hypocrites.

      Delete
  13. Meghan looked good,no puffy face this time. She needs to work on her likeability, if she was as into charitable works as her revamped profile indicates,that should be easy.😎

    ReplyDelete
  14. she will never be likeable, some people just don't have that natural charisma, that charm that makes people fall in love with them

    other people impress over time with their genuineness and sincerity

    she doesn't have anything that people like, nothing whatsoever, that's why nobody has anything nice to say about her

    ReplyDelete
  15. There is no end to Sparkles narcissism. Hope the celebs all say no like Reese.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Is a baptism something to which you send scores of invites? I thought it was closest of family and friends? Whatever, she's the rebel duchess.

    ReplyDelete
  17. So Rosie, what's the over-under on Enty revealing or not revealing the Devonte Hart blind on Thursday?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can only hope he reveals it! Unless Devonte is still in hiding, then Enty's reveal may jeapordize his safety!

      Delete
  18. Anonymous11:12 AM

    I'd say the Royal family has let the couple know how they feel. Not only isn't the Queen going but reports are saying neither is Prince Phillip or Prince Charles. Grandpa can't make time to show up? I'm looking forward to seeing who from the family actually does make an appearance.

    I read on multiple UK sites and I have to say the comments are growing nasty. What's interesting is now it's not only get rid of MM and Harry but more calls for ending the monarchy and/or only supporting the direct heir to the crown. There's great love for the Queen but when she's gone all bets are off.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Prince Charles and Camilla *WILL* attend, as per the Daily Mail.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Originally the Christening was supposed to be July 4th. Now they’re saying ‘The Weekend.’ Charles & Camilla will be in Wales this week; not sure when they’re returning.

    @Ann: you’re right; the comments are getting worse. MM & PH’s behavior and overspending make everyone look bad. People also think HM has lost the plot since she doesn’t seem to be reining them in.

    @Vita: Yes, it’s usually a small group of invitees.

    ReplyDelete
  21. MM. Has PH met these A+ list celebutards? Maybe that’s why she sent invites, cause they’re friends of his?

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Guesser: Meghan looked horrible. Still wearing padding under her clothes, bad wig, botoxed forehead, too much bronzer, etc. She acted even worse—talking to herself, blocking the camera shot of the team so that they had to ask her to move multiple times, doubled-over in laughter like an insane woman over nothing funny. She definitely seemed drunk or high. She wasn’t supposed to be there. Only PH was.

    ReplyDelete
  23. @Meredith: Yep. Looked like she was wearing a diaper.

    ReplyDelete
  24. The Queen isn't going because she's up in Balmoral and she stays there. As I said, she also didn't go to Louis's christening, so stop with the "The RF is making it clear they hate her" bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I would bet the monarchy doesn't last past Charles. No one likes him anyway and he's just going to be an old man. People feel love for QEII but not Charles.

    ReplyDelete
  26. This blind doesn’t make sense. If MM and PH really wanted to keep the chrstening totally private, as reported by the UK media, then why would she invite A+ celebs she doesn’t know to the event?

    Is she playing cat and mouse agan with the media, and hoping for some thing like her baby shower, where the paps and media were out in force getting shots of her and the guests? And PH is on board with allowing his private citizen kid to be pap-bait for her fame -honess?

    Maybe she’sgonna ask some of those A+ celebs she never met to be the godparents. !

    ReplyDelete
  27. It's going to be "private" unless you're a celebrity, even one she hasn't met, lolol. She is pretty transparent.

    ReplyDelete
  28. The dress looked like something you would wear to a job interview, not a baseball game. She should have worn a flowy sundress and some cute sandals or sneakers. (At least she wore flats and not heels.) Other than that, I thought she looked good.

    ReplyDelete
  29. "From what I understand the public at large over the pond don't really like/tolerate anyone who isn't going to occupy the throne."

    No in general we like all the royals, they are relatively harmless provided they do the job they are being paid to do. The sensible ones realise there is a contract between them and the public. They are allowed the privilege of being royal because of the wishes of the British people.

    MM and Harry are taking the piss with their extravagant expenditure and wanting a "private life" at the same time as chasing celebrity. Speaking as a royalist if the BRF do not get rid of these too sooner rather than later the entire BRF can get lost as well.

    I don't care if it is only £1.25 or whatever, we pay royals to behave like royals and represent UK plc. They are effectively government ministers without porfolio or senior diplomats. As representatives of the people working royals should behave a certain way. MM and to some extent Harry are not pulling their weight. The longer this goes on the more likely I and other royalists are to start getting Republic memberships and writing to our MP's about having a referendum on the Monarchy.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Is anyone else side eyeing Omid Scobie's exclusive story that thoughtful Harry went to NYC based Lorraine Schwartz to alter Meghan's engagement ring? And it was a surprise? I would be surprised if Harry even knew of Lorraine Schwartz! The original ring was made was made at Buckingham Palace by Cleaves, the Queen's Crown Jeweler! Not to dis Lorraine's craft, but a hallmark from Cleaves has far more intrinsic value. It makes no sense.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I think what I wonder most is

    What Does Crow Taste Like?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Because either ALL of You
    or
    Three of Us
    Are gonna eat it here real soon.
    If it's US,
    I suggest a red to compliment it.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Even worse, sparkles is on her THIRD nanny for little Archie. ffs

    https://www.wmagazine.com/story/prince-harry-meghan-markle-baby-archie-nanny

    ReplyDelete
  34. @ aqua girl where do you see all this? The snippets I find online don't find her blocking the team or directed to move or acting drunk or high.

    ReplyDelete
  35. With there being only 39 comments, I seriously thought this was Lilo! 😆

    ReplyDelete
  36. @kiki71: There’s a clip in the DM article. It’s before the game. She is talking to the team and they have to ask her to move so that they can take photos. And then she’s hugging the Red Sox player who might be related to her from 250 years ago. Both teams gave gifts for ‘Archie’ (onesies with the team logos) and when she holding the Yankee one she’s doubled over, laughing hysterically for no apparent reason.

    ReplyDelete
  37. That outfit she wore to the game looks like she’s wearing padding around her hips, the dress is so I’ll fitting and her tracks were showing.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Supposedly The Archbishop of Canterbury is Baptizing Archificial. But he will be away from July 5-9. Oops, MM always forgets the details.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous6:47 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  40. The Daily Mail stated there would only be about 25 guests at Archificial's private baptism. If this is about MM she must be hosting another event like a house warming party to show off the millions UK tax payers spent.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Kate and Wills apartment at Kensington was lived in by Princess Margaret for over 40 yrs and the apartment definitely needed redong.
    It was also found to have asbestos and the removal of it greatly contributed to the costs of their renovations.

    Princess Margaret had a chefs commercial kitchen in the apartment as she didn’t cook and also entertained frequently. Kate and William live a child centered more modern life, where they do cook wirh their family and two kitchens were created in the remodeling.
    One for entertaining and the other for family cooking and dining.

    Megs stock is sinking faster than the Titanic, will be surprised if she can get any celebs to show up for the annouced “private christening”

    One that she is begging celebrities who have no connection to her, to attend.

    ReplyDelete
  42. The baby is from a sperm donor; hence Harry's comment, "Is it even mine?'
    That's why the baby is not being shown, to avoid comparisons between the baby and Harry.
    And, it was carried by a surrogate. Too much Something's rotten in Denmark about the whole thing.
    BTW: Markle is a trollope.

    ReplyDelete
  43. To be fair the baseball player is actually her cousin, damn complicated this liniage thing but he is her 3rd cousin once removed. Once removed means they are one generation apart.

    That said I'm a 5th cousin twice removed to the Queen, 5th cousin in various degrees to to Charles, William and Harry as well, through the Queen Mother's Scottish line, sounds impressive but I bet hundreds of thousands could claim that same lineage. It means nothing really except I could go up to Prince Charles and hug him and say in all honesty I'm your cousin (if security hadn't tackled me to the ground first). A bit like 20% of the population in Kentucky claiming some genuine family link to Abraham Lincoln or his wife. Including Rosemary, Nick and George Clooney. The further you go back the more likely you are to be related to someone royal or noble,especially if you have European ancestry. Hell if you go far enough back the Queen is said to be a direct decendent of the prophet Muhammad(figure that one out).

    Adam and Eve are to blame for it all.

    Easy ready reckoner for degrees of realativity.


    http://www.flora-and-sam.com/pages/RelationshipChart.htm

    ReplyDelete
  44. its called hormones and not drunk or high. and its worse when your as old as Sparkles.

    ReplyDelete
  45. New blog post:

    "Why bother with a baptism at all? Questions for the Sussexes"

    Click on my profile name to access, or go to:

    https://nuttyflavor88.blogspot.com/2019/06/why-bother-with-baptism-at-all.html

    ReplyDelete
  46. She is tacky AF. It's pretty hilarious to watch to be honest. I think Harry's probably regretting it as we speak. And no, it's no because she is mixed-race, it's because she is a nasty famewhore.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anonymous5:29 PM

    I'm not a believer in 'christening'. I don't believe that a particular vat of water, and somebody chanting, is gonna send me to heaven.

    I doubt Markle believes it either, considering that she has professed four religions in her adult life.

    She's just up for another party. That's what she does best.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Why was Meghan elegant and slim during the pregnancy but after the baby was born, her face got puffy, and her body got thicker? Did she take hormones so she could breast feed?

    ReplyDelete
  49. I think these comments are hilarious. Commenting as if they're flies on the wall knowing and seeing all. Knowing everything FOR SURE about MM. Depending on rags to get information or their Insta, confirming she's this and that because she didn't wear a flowery dress. Its crazy man. So heavily invested in someone who doesn't even know you, and you don't know them. Judge much?

    I'm ambivalent about MM, although I've always liked Prince Hot Ginge. Who cares if they're the rebels of the world and MM faked her pregnancy? There are worse things to comment on, however I fully admit it, I always love MM threads because I do love reading the hysteria over her over the most stupid things. But y'all carry on, don't mind me, you do you.

    ReplyDelete
  50. But BlissBoo you are judging too. It's kind of a circle jerk of entertainment.

    They are in the British royal family so of course anything unusual will be discussed.

    No one remembers what it was like for Diana or Sarah? They gave Sarah a very hard time in the press. If the internet existed when both married, I can't imagine what the internet would've done with them both. It wouldn't have been nice.

    Obsessing over everything royals do is as old as royals are. It isn't all vapid either. Some revolutions began with gossip about royals.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @Unknown, you're right. I shouldn't have wrote "Judge much?" I was judging the people and the craziness of the situation that they think they know these people. They aren't privy to jack shit.

    I agree, the Royals, their scandals and way of life have been talked about for centuries. I'm 51, I remember perfectly well about Diana and Fergie, ESPECIALLY Diana. I did like her, but I could tell she had her issues too. Not by any anonymous source, but her looks (depressed) and wearing her heart on her sleeve. I guess that's what made her "real" to others "the people's Princess".

    As for Fergie, I'm sure the Internet would have basically rolled her so hard she would commit suicide and no, I'm not joking. Social media truly is the bane of western civilization. In the beginning it was GREAT. People were SO nice and civil to each other because we all loved being on-line with this new and exciting thing called the Internet and the fact that we could "talk" to people so far away! Wow, what a concept man! lol Now its ME ME ME SEE ME WATCH ME ME ME ME. Let me snap a selfie because you need more pictures of ME ME ME. I'm so beautiful (even though I'm insecure inside), I need validation and "likes" ME ME ME.

    Yes, I remember, and I'm glad it was an "easier" time although Diana had a different monster on her back. The starting of the "paparazzi" and gossip rags.

    ReplyDelete