Sunday, April 07, 2019

Blind Items Revealed #3

March 31, 2019

So, what does the Palace do to the newspapers and tabloids in the countries they can't threaten when those tabloids talk about the royal affair? They did manage to shut down the naked photos years ago, but that was a little easier because it involved nudity. It will also be interesting to see if anyone says anything about her ex that she has seen multiple times over the past two years. The ex never lost his hair.

Prince William & Kate Middleton

75 comments:

  1. Unlike Rose, Kate’s ex isn’t bragging about it to his friends. Pretty dirty move by William to screw one of Kate’s friends AND their neighbor. You couldn’t shit a little further from home?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @bayareagirl
      Come again? The prince cheated on Kate with a friend and a neighbor?!

      Delete
    2. Not so. It's just Meghan's new PR trying to throw dirt over William and Kate to try to make Markle seem less sleazy. But the British aren't buying it.

      Delete
  2. I'd hoped that this generation wouldn't be as crackers as the last. Hopes dashed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Now MM has now dropped the royal Gyno/OB doctors, and the fake baby bump theory, long discussed here, has gone public. And not just in the comments, the Daily Express actually discusses it. By bringing out into the public, and decrying the royal pillow, they're giving credibility to the rumour. The comments on MM and Harry are record number. Not only is she disliked, but if it were true, Harry would be hated like Bernie Madoff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The pregnancy is going on forever, given that she was supposed to be three months pregnant in early October. Maybe the surrogate is causing difficulties one way or another. Meghan has lots of trouble with counting though...she is very dim under all the "double major in theatre sweeping" guff.

      Delete
  4. I would think that given the trauma of his parents' marriage, this would not occur. I really hope we are all wrong on this, but given the apparent "open marriage" of their social set.....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Prince William is in the tabs as have taken spy lessons, I hope those were very recent, for his spy-craft is weak.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I find this hard to believe. I think that Meghan is behind this.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Love the cuckoldry.

    ReplyDelete
  8. didn't think either of them had the time for shenanigens. does 'Revealed' mean it's a 1,000pct true??

    on a separate note, MM doesn't have to use the 'royal' doctors for her fake or otherwise birth.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Every royalty since the dawn of man has been unfaithful

    ReplyDelete
  10. "Decrying the royal pillow" 😂😂. Hilarious and scary at the same time...we're in the final countdown on all of this, so I sure hope they've got precision details for the moment labor begins. It sure seems like much of the operation has been winged, thus far. The suspicious part of me hopes that, at least for the poops and giggles of it all, someone is staking out the pregnant lady that is supposedly living in Harry and Meg's rented cottage, as well.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anna, yes she does need to use the royal doctors if she wants the child to be in the line of succession. If she doesn't, he/she won't get any of the royal benefits, and certainly will cast doubt on her pregnancy. Even the Sunday Times had an article about this today. I think the story is going to come out very soon.

    ReplyDelete
  12. @Hush, Based on MM’s all over puffiness, i’m pretty certain she is pregnant. I’m a former size 0 who carried 2 babies & went through similar physical changes. It’s not the kind of thing you can imitate with fillers.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous10:47 AM

    I have never seen the situation like it is now.
    Henry going to spiritualists;
    William apparently in some kind of special training / security training for past 3 wks;
    Phillip is clearly incapacitated;
    Theresa May cannot complete a Brexit negotiation.
    Is this all for real... or just distraction from something bigger..

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous10:53 AM

    Note ...353,000 babies are born DAILY on this planet.
    (source UNICEF)
    Stop the obsession with one pregnancy.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Agree @Bay. That face and her hands are so puffy. She's pregnant.

    ReplyDelete
  16. BayAreaGirl, no way she's pregnant. Absolutely not.

    ReplyDelete
  17. she's most definitely pregnant.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The Cambridge stuff is disinformation, courtesy Meg's new PR lady Sara Latham, a veteran of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign.

    Will may have had affairs, but this isn't one of them.

    Also, dear never-seen-before-commenters here to boost the story, you're not fooling anyone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You know what cracks me up @Nutty? Hillary is one of the most vilified women in the world. So is this what Sara Latham did for her? Already it seems like Sara is hurting Meghan since every move since Meghan’s exit from public duties seems to have pissed everybody off and made Meghan more unlikeable.

      Delete
  19. Oh please, Meg can use any doctors/mid wives she wants...nothing to do with succession. Where do you get that hog wash from?! The comments of the Daily Fail? and the racist trolls?

    Wills was never very discret or smart, it's a good thing he's wealthy and doesn't have to get a real job. Kate has stuck around and put up with him & his wandering d*ck since college, and he finally put a ring on it cuz he would've gotten a ton of bad press if he didn't.

    The real source of the striff between Harry & Wills is his affair, bc Harry saw what Charlie's affair did to Di. It ain't Meg, despite what the racist trolls want the stupid to believe.

    ReplyDelete
  20. & here is Nutty with her conspiracy theories, she needs to stay at the DM with her multiple accounts basing Meg.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous11:53 AM

    Andi you need to read the UK news sites. The protocol for a royal birth has been released recently including each step of the process. One of those steps is for the ROYAL PHYSICIAN to head to Buckingham Palace and sign off on all the documentation that he was present at the royal birth. If Harry & Meghan wish to have their little girl proclaimed a royal then yes the royal physician needs to be present. If Meghan gifts Harry with his balls back and he gets his wish for no titles than Meg can splash away in her home birth pool with her doula.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is actually a brilliant way to circumvent the queen being the legal guardian of her grandchildren and great grandchildren. It is a weird rule considering the ones that are financially cutoff at certain age. That will aalso open the door for hervto be able to work even if it is the voice overs and stuff enty mentioned in other blinds. To support her daughter.

      Delete
  22. *calling prima donnas out on their bad behavior is rayyyycist*

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't see anyone here being racist? nor did I see anyone here accuse anyone else of such?
      Do, Tell: are you just getting the jump on being clever?

      Delete
  23. I always thought Kate liked Harry better than her husband. Every photo has them laughing together before MM came along.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Meg's trolls are just as high-class as their heroine. And curiously, they all seem to have poor grammar and poor spelling. Meg always attracts the cream of the crop.

    Anyway, I'd long been agnostic about the whole "is she really pregnant?" question; it didn't seem right to speculate about the contents of another woman's uterus.

    But Meg makes it so easy. Turning down the high-end facilities at the Lindo Wing in favor of an as-yet-unnamed provincial hospital; turning down the finest doctors in the country in favor of an as-yet-unnamed all-female team who will require an out-of-pocket payment.

    The delivery date that's never quite nailed down.

    The fact that no one in the family has congratulated her or Harry.

    The boozy trip to Amsterdam, the official trip to the Zika zone, and the ever-changing size of the amazingly light and flexible bump, which also allows her to bend down without straining and walk in very high heels.

    It doesn't look good. The question now - is there any baby at all? Even from a surrogate?

    And if there isn't, how long can they stretch the "due date"?

    They're already saying May, which means she would have announced her pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding just a couple of days after peeing on a stick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree on all points. But this is the one that got me
      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_vcBe9IjmU4&feature=youtu.be

      Delete
  25. So who is the ex Kate has been with that never lost his hair?

    ReplyDelete
  26. I think it was a sailing instructor she worked with in the on the break, waity Katey years. There was a pic from two years ago that came up, of her sailing in a regatta with him, after one of her kids was born. It's a plant, MM and her PR person are going through pictures of Kate and Wills friends to plant stories, and doubts. This will backfire on them.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I agree with Hush Hush.

    I think they have to treat Meghan with kid gloves for the moment because she's (at least publicly) pregnant.

    She can stretch that out for as long as she can, but then what?

    I don't think she ever really won over the British public - the $75,000 engagement dress was a poor start - but the hyper-expensive hyper-merching baby shower in New York, the embarrassing Morocco tour, and the theft of the "SussexRoyal" Instagram handle from a thoroughly ordinary British bloke have made things much worse in the past few weeks.

    You could argue that a clever press handler - perhaps Geidt - has been allowing her to exhibit how awful she is in order to neutralize the "r" card when she eventually gets turfed out.

    Lots of African and African-diaspora ladies out there with beauty, intelligence, and class. Let's hope Harry finds one of them for Wife #2 - if a woman like that would even be interested in his sad little self.

    ReplyDelete
  28. @BayAreaGirl - you said " It’s not the kind of thing you can imitate with fillers"

    You can't imitate it will fillers, no, but you CAN imitate pregnancy with steroid injections. I believe Beyonce did this with her first during the last month of her pregnancy. They cause the face to bloat, legs hands feet to swell up. It is a result of the steroid type, my dad's wife was on them for a legit health issue and boy did she swell up mega big time but you can take less and swell up just a bit.

    So yes, this is possible and frequently done among the faking moon bump set, google it.

    ReplyDelete
  29. @notagoodscreenname, google Rose Hanbury. MM might leaked the info but it looks legit. Rose was bragging to her friends. MM is not AMI, she does not have the resources for this kind of disinformation. The palace’s uncharacteristically heavy hand is also suspicious.

    ReplyDelete
  30. @hunter, wouldn’t that kind of defeat the purpose of trying to maintain your body? I doubt steroids won’t give you the same puffiness effect because they’re affecting different mechanism. I was on progesterone throughout the first trimester and people who didn’t know me, couldn’t tell I was pregnant until 7 months. Not unless I wore something tight around the belly. My own mother demanded to see the ultra sound because she couldn’t believe I was that far along. 🤷🏻‍♀️

    ReplyDelete
  31. I may be the only person who thinks MM is genuinely pregnant and this blind about a Kate and/or Wills affair is idiotic. Heh.

    ReplyDelete
  32. @BayAreaGirl, I guess @hunter meant corticosteroids. They will make you puffy and swollen, a larger dose will effect in having a so-called 'moon-face.' Once you finish taking it though, your body will return to its original shape in a short time.

    Also, it can make you emotionally unbalanced, sometimes even paranoid.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous2:54 PM


    Saw the video , where stomach is swinging left right left right...
    Come on .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nobody who has seen that video, from International Women's Day, could ever think she was genuinely pregnant. The bump sloshed about like a boat on the high seas, always listing towards the left. .

      Delete
  34. @Rosie, exactly my point. It was sarcastic and in response to a couple of previous posts.

    ReplyDelete
  35. These people don't have JOBS. They get into trouble because of all the free time on their hands. Now that Kate's had her children, she might start going off the rails, too. Maybe not. Hope not. She always seemed like the only one of this crew (other than the Queen) who was halfway sensible.

    ReplyDelete
  36. It is true that steroid injections can cause puffiness. I’ve had them myself and can attest to that. No idea if steroids are used to suggest pregnancy or if MM is pregnant or not and I really don’t care about that. One thing I do know is Prince Harry has massively fallen from public favour in the past six months. Once he could get away with practically anything, now people are shaking their heads laughing at him.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I’m sorry, but the conspiracy theories about MM’s pregnancy seem silly to me. 😂 No one ever questioned Kate’s pregnancy & that woman still has an amazing figure. Great genetics.

    ReplyDelete
  38. MM is definitely pregnant, no question there.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Hunter, your dad’s wife had Cushion’s disease.

    ReplyDelete
  40. CUSHING’s damn autocorrect

    ReplyDelete
  41. Royals get the most comments on this site, which is like every other site. Royal team uses their content as a commodity. Every business does it. Apple blocks writers and outlets that publish leaks. Housewives trade gossip about others for stories about their products.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Meghan is pregnant, she has had 'pregnancy face' for awhile now.

    I cannot believe that she is injecting steroids to fake the look.

    ReplyDelete
  43. no way Meghan is pregnant. She only looks like she has a full face because she lost so much weight for the wedding. Now she is back to her normal self.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Please. Get a new source Enty. This one is trying to burn you.

    PS, My uncle's hairdresser's cousin said that QE2 is having an affair with a junior footman from the Spanish royal family. It's long distance. It's love! For realz everybody!!!!

    I just made it up, but now that it is in written form it is now magically the truth! Spread the word all.

    ReplyDelete
  45. @tatty.....sometimes typos are more accurate

    MM has cushion disease!

    Re the steroids , remember Daniel Craigs puffy face of a few months ago, it was caused buy corticosteroids used to treat injuries he had suffered on the previous Bond set. Puffy goes away a few weeks after you stop taking them.

    @Abdi......by law a member of the privy council must be present at the birth to verify the child is "of the body". There are a dozen doctors who are privy council members. Variations of the law have been around since the middle ages only "a child born in lawful wedlock and of the body" can be placed in the immediate line of sucession. The original idea was that children often died in child birth and it was to prevent a substitue being slipped in. It was not uncommen for royal wives to be barren, once again it was to prevent 'fakes' taking the throne. The barren wife was simply replaced.

    Now if Harry and Meghan have gone the surrogate route (there is absolutely no way this could be hidden from 'The Firm'), even though the child is 100% MM and Harry DNA the child would not qualify as 'being born of the body' (i.e the body of the lawfully wedded wife) the child would be considered as being born of a mistress, ergo not eligible to take the throne of the UK.

    Now titles in general (Duke, Earl, Viscount etc) don't come under the same scrutiny and because of the Salic Laws still in place in the UK , male babies often 'appear' after a long marriage filled with girl babies in order to keep the title in the family. This 'official observation of the birth' legal requirement applies only to the Monarchy.

    ReplyDelete
  46. You aren't a journalist, Enty, but here is a quote from an article in the Guardian:

    "In 1993, Randall felt he had been entirely misled by an off-the-record briefing from (Lord) Clive Hollick, then embroiled in a boardroom battle at Mirror Group newspapers.

    Randall was furious and retaliated by writing a public condemnation of Hollick. He subsequently wrote about why he identified a confidential source:

    "When we accept off-the-record briefings, we enter into a contract of confidentiality with the source and we therefore publish in good faith.

    But if we find that we have been deliberately lied to, then any obligation of confidence is removed. Sources have to know that the threat of exposure hangs over them."

    There has never been a better description of the unwritten code that exists between a journalist and a source over the trade in information. He was absolutely right to burn his source in such circumstances."

    https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2014/jan/02/telegraphmediagroup-sundaytimes

    Bottom line, Enty is to stop accepting blinds from Lainey. It wastes everyone's time.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Attention go is preggo, her hubby is a uber Chuck, Wills seems like the same kind of cold shitbird as his pappy, and Waity wonders what she bothered to wait for.
    Charles is the King Cuck, married to that grim domineering old broad who revs his engine, the only likeable one, Phillip, is as nutty as a shithouse mouse these days, and Theresa May is as useless as tits on a boarhog.

    ReplyDelete
  48. @Meana......

    William is a well known hound in aristocratic circles, no one cares, William cheated on Kate before they were married and I would not be surprised if he still does, but he would pick someone 'in the circle' to cheat with because they know the rules.

    Lady Rose well knows the rules, she has spent her life growing up in 'the circle' but she has been indiscreet and the 'affair' whether it was with Rose or someone else became diner party gossip.

    Make no mistake Rose is in deep do-do within that group. Now as for Kate I think she dosen't really care, she has the Crown in site and 3 children to seal the deal for all time. We all know she can play the long game and knows how to make the lemons work for her.

    I think Kate is following the Queens example, the Queen didn't care about Philips philandering...in her own words "I know he needs a lot of entertaining", QEII knew Phil was going nowhere if he was allowed his outlets. The Queen only ever minded when the 'affair' became public gossip and I think that's why Kate is upset and on her own quite but icy rampage against Rose. Rose and all 'the circle' will get the message that's why 'legal action' was threatened (specifically to put the frightners on anyone repeating the rumour)

    In many ways this was Diana's life as well, Diana knew the rules of the game even at 19 years old, her own mother played them frequently and Diana herself my not have been Earl Spencers daughter. But Diana's emotional neediness and insane jealousy of Camilla, prevented her from looking at the situation with such a practical eye as the Queen. Diana could have had it all if she had an once of pragmatism after all she didn't care about Charles' other mistresses , in fact she was good friends with one of them and promoted her clothing line , knowing full well she was on/off bedmate of Charles. (Lady Tryon - known as Kanga to 'the circle')

    If Diana had become friends with Charles and pursued her own life with discretion she could have lived a very long life as the Princess of Wales and seen her boys grow to manhood while maintaining all the privledge and power to do good that went with her position.

    ReplyDelete
  49. MeAgain is discovering the difference between US and UK media and attitudes. While the US media is placated by certain "agreements", the UK media is notorious for not giving a flying fig - especially when it has to do with the royal family. Uk citizens are really protective of anyone trying to be overly precious and/or self absorbed. Megs should have been briefed on this by her courtiers, if she had and just ignored all the advice, she deserves all this. If she wasn't - well maybe this was intentional.

    I am starting to think she has something over Harry that the RF doesn't want out - and that is why her shenanigans are tolerated - for now. It will be very interesting to see how things unfold over the next 12 months or so.


    ReplyDelete
  50. @Krab I second your opinion. Her nose has swollen, she’s got “back fat” and her face is puffy. None of these HAVE to happen when you’re pregnant, but they can and normally do. She’s too vain to pretend to have these issues.

    ReplyDelete
  51. I don't believe these conveniently timed stories about Will & Kate. They have 3 children under 5 - they are busy as fuck.

    As for Sparkle's pregnancy, 2 things make go hmmmm:

    anyone who has ever been pregnant knows that it is fucking IMPOSSIBLE to squat in 4 inch heels, with your legs together at 8 months pregnant. Yet amazingly, Sparkles has done this countless times, as recorded on film and photographs. She must be some sort of acrobat contortionist.... And also there's this hilarious video of her stomach moving side to side, like a balloon, while she walks in a black and white dress.

    Of course the dress is a summer dress and her legs are bare - in January in London, like the classy lady that she is. Only streetwalkers are classier.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Oh yeah, as for the lonely echo-chamber that keeps yelling 'waycists':

    Your beloved mixed race Sparkles, describes herself as 'Caucasian', therefor completely ignoring her own mixed heritage. Yet it is conveniently used as a pawn to shut people up, when criticising her revolting character. The same exact parallel happens when she ignores her own father who got her where she is today, while rolling out her absent mother, when convenient, who did not even bother showing up (wasn't invited?) to her own baby shower). THAT'S motherfucking racism.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I have to agree with Jan 15.

    I think Enty got catfished on this one; he's admitted that his royal sources are not good, yet royal blinds are the most popular item at the moment.

    So somebody dangled this in front of him and he bit.

    Kate is the primary parent for 3 kids aged 5 and under. Nanny or no nanny, she must be exhausted at the end of every day.

    I highly doubt she has energy left to be running after some chap with a full head of hair.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Royal blinds are so popular (not just here but on every media and gossip outlet) because Sparkles is so highly unlikeable. She has turned the RF into the Kardashians and a real life soap opera. Everything she does is (mis) calculated and wrong, she can't get it right, and it's hilarious to watch. Instead of Harry elevating her to a level above suitcase girl, she is dragging poor Dim Wit into the abyss of popularity with her.
    It's entertaining, almost unbelievable and utterly fascinating.

    10/10 for entertainment factor

    ReplyDelete
  55. Markle is not even trying really hard to appear to be pregnant, apart from wearing that huge wobbly fake belly. She has the same twig like legs, the same stripper walk, the same tiny boobs, the same ability to squat down on her 6" heels with 9-month belly disappearing into thin air. Then standing up without assistance. She is a complete fraud. She must have something very serious on the RF because she is getting away with treating them, and the British, with complete contempt.

    ReplyDelete
  56. IF she was 12 weeks pregnant on October 15 (the announcement), then she is today 37 weeks pregnant. This is the length of a normal pregnancy, which can go to 42 weeks. 38-40 weeks considered term.

    IF she was 8 weeks on October 15, well, that makes her 33 weeks today. We could have another 7 or so weeks to go.

    This is not the longest pregnancy in the world.

    We haven’t seen her squat in a while. We haven’t seen her in a few weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  57. LOL at Markle being 8 weeks on October 15.

    Would that explain why she had an NBA regulation-size basketball under her dress in Australia on October 23?

    Whether or not she's really pregnant, the woman is a hopeless attention-seeker.

    ReplyDelete
  58. This blind is utterly fake news and I've lost a bit of respect for Enty in printing this just for click bait. Smirkle has a pillow stuffed up her dress. I'm not even sure if there is a surrogate about to give birth. Smirkle is bat shit crazy and a total attention whore. She is even worse than I first imagined. She just wants attention for herself and she will walk over anyone to get it. She paid for this ridiculous story and no one believes it and no one likes Smirkle. She is a joke and a laughing stock. Just go over to Twitter and check out @Torontopaper1 for some fun with Smirkle. If Smirkle did use a surrogate the baby won't be in any line of royal succession. Does she really think she can fool officials into thinking that she gave birth to a surrogate's baby? Crazy Smirkle is going to try. Hi Meg!

    ReplyDelete
  59. Not every woman turns into a bloated cow two fisting pizza and ice cream when they’re pregnant. Especially with their first kid. I didn’t even show until I was 7 months. Keep on pluckin’ that chicken.

    ReplyDelete
  60. I've had three kids. I've always been petite but with every pregnancy I've put on 40-60lbs and my feet and ankles swelled horribly! That's the part that makes me question her pregnancy, is her ankles. Not an ounce of swelling. In those heels, that pregnant and no swelling? I don't believe that for a second. I also buy the steroid theory. My daughter has Leukemia and we have seen steroids frequently in her treatment. They are awful, cause weight gain quickly, and also make my daughter very moody and unstable. I don't buy this girl is pregnant.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Can someone please post a link to the video from International Women's Day and her bump looking like a water balloon?

    ReplyDelete
  62. @ThingsIToldYou - @JL posted it here earlier. Here is the video with the swinging bump:

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_vcBe9IjmU4&feature=youtu.be

    ReplyDelete
  63. I had twins and gained about 29 pounds. Never swelled until the very end.

    I think so many people are so fat these days that they think all pregnant women two fist pizza (as stated above), swell up like Jessica Simpson and look overall like a cow the entire time.

    I personally think she was more than 8 weeks pregnant on October. I’m just saying we have a timeline from an imminent birth to at the most 7 more weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  64. @CookiesMom......a surrogate birth would not negate 'The Grand Opinion of 1717' the Monarch is the legal guardian of his/her grandchildren. No one is disputing the fact that the child is Harry's (well I'm not) it just means the child can't be in line for the throne if Meghan does not deliver the baby herself.

    Regarding 'TGOP of 1717' the official wording only stipulates 'grandchildren' not great grandchildren because they were as rare as hen's teeth in 1717. So until the law needs to be enforced no one knows what will need to be done.

    If Megs and Harry's marriage should go belly within up in the next 10 years (I give the Queen at least that long to live) then there might be a legal wrangle, but once Charles is King it kicks in automatically with full force and both William's and Harry's minor children are his to command. The law has never been enforced full throttle, apart from the time when George I took full possession of his sons children and forbade the parents from seeing them ever.

    However, now that there is feisty foreign born mother in the mix who will certainly make a fuss if things go badly, then who knows what might happen. I think that something like that might be the only thing on earth that could make the Queen abdicate in Charles' favour.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days