Monday, April 22, 2019

Blind Item #10

Those wedding earrings made an appearance at the Easter service after not being seen since the actual wedding itself. Guess that means the cheated on more senior princess is not going anywhere.

45 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Of course she’s not going anywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh Enty, this is so Tumblr.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And Smegs, F.U. We know you are watching, you vicious twisted troll.

    ReplyDelete
  5. yeah...I still don't believe that story, it was too conveniently timed and smells like a smear story by Cringe & Ginge, that's why they're being banned to Africa. Everyone's had enough of their bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed! If there was truth to it it would have spread like a wildfire like Charles affair did.

      Delete
  6. There's also the theory that the reason they brought Meghan on was to make Kate look so much more regal.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As far as the cheating, yeah right like royals never cheat, it's practically an expectation.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kate doesn’t need Smarkle to make herself look more regal, and it’s clear that she was not welcomed into the family, so no, they didn’t ‘bring her on’ for that reason. I also don’t believe the affair story.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am naive. i honestly believe that William, on seeing the pain that this father's philandering caused, would not do this in his own marriage. And I was happy to see the earrings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My thinking too. Wouldn't want to cause the same kind of pain his mother went through.

      Delete
  10. Every paycheck English folks take home is a bit smaller because all this fuckery is on their tab.

    Jolly good!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Why do the weddings earrings, which were a gift from Kate's parents, "mean the chated on senior princess is not going anywhere"? Makes zero sense.

    And of COURSE she's not going anywhere. I very much doubt Wills cheated, too.


    >i honestly believe that William, on seeing the pain that this father's
    > philandering caused, would not do this in his own marriage.

    Yeah, I thought that about my ex and his dad too. I honestly believe there is a cheating gene now.

    ReplyDelete
  12. sorry about your experiences krab.

    ReplyDelete
  13. People tend to do what they learned, even if they say at one time or another, that they will never do that. Whether it is drinking, drugs, putting up with a violent person, or becoming a violent person, behavior is generational. It takes a really strong person to end family dysfunction, and that starts by being truthful about family life.

    I haven't heard anything at all about earrings or William supposedly cheating, at this point in time. I guess this "news" didn't make it to Belgium.

    ReplyDelete
  14. There is no fidelity in these arrangements because they are all illegitimate. Wills is the bastard of Di and Juan Carlos of Spain. The spare is the bastard of that royal cab driver or whatever that father/son lookalike sperm donor is. These public sock puppets are not the real power. They are employees. Actors for photo ops. Charles is A: a fag, and B: so inbred his blood would spawn epically deformed 'tards. The only child of her majesty is Prince whom she whelped for Sammy Davis jr. You can look that up.

    ReplyDelete
  15. If MM wasn't welcomed into the family, there never would have been a wedding. That's how the RF rolls....DUH

    ReplyDelete
  16. Don't forget that Enty has practically told us that Smeg is dropping the tips. Again, F.U., Meghan, yours sincerely, The UK.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @ Gator, Ginge probably married her in Botswana. Prior to the big shindig. Makes sense. Send them back to the love nest and see how she survives once Adam Bidwell gives the idiot a good shake.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Gator: Duh, yourself. Did you see the look on the RF’s faces at the wedding? From HM on down. No smiles, no looking at the bride, everybody staring down at their programs. This was not a happy occasion. The wedding was FORCED to happen, the question is why.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yes, aqua, I saw Prince Charles, who seemed very happy and at ease with her and her mother. How do you know it was forced? Do you know them personally? Don't bother answering. The Brits who comment here and in the DM love to tear others down (and come up with the dumbest nicknames- Nutmeg! MeAgain! Sparkles!) to make their own miserable selves feel better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Gator: Meghan has had the nickname ‘Nutmeg’ since way before she met Harry. Watch her appearance on the Craig Ferguson show where she talks about her nicknames.

      And I’m not British.

      Delete
  20. A year ago you were all drooling over this woman.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Re. Royal children.....Brice Taylor , in her book, Thanks for the Memories, about Presidential models. ..or Mkultra , high priced hookers who are mind controlled ..and in her case a first class spy, says she and pres. Raegan got together to make a baby.A boy... Queen took the baby for the good of humanity. Well, I apologize for the way out little story and disjointed run on sentence......but Prince Andrew and Brice Taylor have very distinctive facial features. Also very similar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As soon as anyone mentions MK Ultra I move on to the next blind. You guys are nuts.

      Delete
    2. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra it's real, brainlet

      Delete
  22. The Brits didn't come up with Nutmeg, she happily owned that, pre-Harry.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Link for reference on the earrings: https://www.brides.com/story/kate-middleton-rewears-wedding-earrings-for-easter-sunday-service

    ReplyDelete
  24. Oh Enty, what crock you spout! Those earrings have been worn at least twice since W&K got married......google is your friend!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Enty, even after you yourself admitted to Maggot making up all these rumors, you then go ahead and post another one. How much is she paying you? I’m American and was the victim of an abusive relationship and after years of therapy, I learned to recognize the warning signs.

    Once she appeared (had never heard of her or watched Suits) I had her number. So far I’ve been spot on. Good to know the thousands I spent were helpful.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @J - Your comment made me laugh! I love it.

    Every paycheck English folks take home is a bit smaller because all this fuckery is on their tab.

    Jolly good!


    ReplyDelete
  27. If Meghan is reading, New Zealand loves ya ignore these trolls haha

    ReplyDelete
  28. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Before Kate married William after waiting for him to sow his wild oats, she was told to expect him to cheat on her. He is just like his father and his grandfather. What his mother went through doesn't outweigh his sense of entitlement as the heir to the heir.

    ReplyDelete
  30. @Amartel No we weren't.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Kate wore the earrings last in 2016 at the Order of the Garter ceremony.

    This stuff from MM is so low and why is she not bothering to do her research before trying to smear Kate?

    Desperation, much

    ReplyDelete
  32. Kate has what she wants and cheating has always been part of it, William cheated on her quite a few times before they were married and she didn't bat an eyelid. Chelsey (Harry's long term GF) complained to her about it and Kate pretty much said it was the Royals and that's what they do and have always done and she had to get used to it. Kate is following the Queens lead, side pieces are side pieces and not important.

    The only reason the Rosebush story got traction is because Rose was blabbing and it became dinner party gossip, so Kate has frozen out Rose Chumley.

    If Diana had been as pragmatic as Kate she would still be alive and still be Princess of Wales.

    @J.......the Royals could be consigned to the dustbin tomorrow and it would't make one bit of difference to UK taxes, the government would just waste the money on something else.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yes, because waity Katie who is built like a 12 year old boy would never be cheated on....lol

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What sort of 12 yo boys do you play with I wonder.

      Delete
  34. Oh for f*cks sake. Her Markleness is a 37 y.o. divorcee about to drop a baby. She is huge. She is old. She is not hotness nor coolness. She is old and lukewarm and she will not get more attractive. No-one gives a shit if she's sent off to Africa - and she'll be even older and less relevant by the time she returns.

    There's a pretty future queen and a grasping wannabe who's being sent away. Wallis the 2nd. Yuck.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Wait, I thought Wills was the product of a threesome with Albert of Monaco and Princess Grace (Kelly).

    ReplyDelete
  36. Lol Gordon Scott

    I also think it's the cheating that led to the fight by the brothers. If you notice in the pics at least, P.H and P. Kate are still cool and MM sometimes looks like she feels bad for Wills a little bit. These two brothers are close enough to raise concerns to one another like hey did e aren't you rushing into this thing.
    Keep in mind Prince H played the field a lot more than Wills did.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days