I slept through several Harry Potter movies I was forced to watch. I watched all three Hunger Games movies while wide awake so my vote is for Hunger Games.
Easily Harry Potter. Better acting, better story, better special effects. Still it's like comparing apples and oranges, Hunger Games is more in the Twilight genre/age range.
Harry Potter...(I was a primary grade teacher) years before the movies started, those books got early elementary kids so excited about the idea of reading, and got older students excited to read. It was fun to see students from kdg to 8th graders dressing as characters for Halloween. Even my mom enjoyed them, God bless her!
Harry Potter? How many ways can I say a huge No. Magic wands ...roller coasters at Universal...action figures... Sequels... Entire aisles of goods at toy stores....What a wonderful KaChing of massive profit for billionaire JK Rowling. Working class parents are supposed to pay for it. A "book of spells" ? For little kids? I can't even process it.
HARRY POTTER THERE IS NO DEBATE HERE
ReplyDeleteNeither unless JLaw gets nekkid in Hunger Games eventually
ReplyDeleteWhat Sandy said!!!
ReplyDeletePotter
ReplyDeleteHarry Potter
ReplyDeleteNoggle Stones
ReplyDeleteNeither, the 'His dark materials' books blow both out of the water. Now that's some rich,intelligent,well written fantasy for young readers.
ReplyDeletePortnoys complaint
ReplyDeleteneither!!
ReplyDeleteLord of the Rings!!
i honestly have never seen Harry Potter or The Hunger Games (and don't want to).
ReplyDeleteHarry Potter. No question.
ReplyDeleteHarry Potter, no contest
ReplyDeleteWtf is the correlation??
ReplyDeleteThey both start with H??
smdh
THE SILMARILLION by TOLKIEN!
ReplyDeletePlease! Potter by a landslide.
ReplyDeleteHarry Games
ReplyDeleteno, really - MCU Avengers
You’re going to hell
DeleteI've never seen either.
ReplyDeletePotter.
ReplyDeleteI slept through several Harry Potter movies I was forced to watch. I watched all three Hunger Games movies while wide awake so my vote is for Hunger Games.
ReplyDeleteI'd love to fire a flaming arrow up J Law's port of egress but those school girl pleats make me do the Kramden stutter each and every time.
ReplyDeleteEasily Harry Potter. Better acting, better story, better special effects. Still it's like comparing apples and oranges, Hunger Games is more in the Twilight genre/age range.
ReplyDeleteHarry Potter...(I was a primary grade teacher) years before the movies started, those books got early elementary kids so excited about the idea of reading, and got older students excited to read. It was fun to see students from kdg to 8th graders dressing as characters for Halloween. Even my mom enjoyed them, God bless her!
ReplyDeleteHave never seen either.
ReplyDeleteThe Harry Potter were sustained excellence on acting and production. After a brilliant first film, the Hunger Games turned into dreck.
ReplyDeleteTaylor & Burton - "The Comedians"
ReplyDeleteNeither never saw any of them and I’m still not interested
ReplyDeleteHarry Potter fo sho.
ReplyDeleteHarry Potter? How many ways can I say a huge No.
ReplyDeleteMagic wands ...roller coasters at Universal...action figures... Sequels... Entire aisles of goods at toy stores....What a wonderful KaChing of massive profit for billionaire JK Rowling.
Working class parents are supposed to pay for it.
A "book of spells" ? For little kids?
I can't even process it.
"Three the Hard Way" or "Black Caesar." I don't do HP, LOTR or HG. Never seen any of them.
ReplyDeleteHARRY POTTER!!!! The books, the movies, the Potter-lore, the Potterverse.
ReplyDelete