I told you many months ago that the sex tape existed that has the alliterate former actress turned married celebrity. That has now been confirmed by an A list celebrity sex tape broker who has seen the video and is publicly speaking about it.
Is it a sex tape or a porno, though? Is it sex for real, or is it from when she had a sideline before Suits? I doubt that awful calligraphy paid any bills. Basically, was she paid or not, haha. There's got to be more than one.
But what will this really mean for the BRF? You cant say that QE didn't know this already.... They made a huge deal about the pap that got he pic of Kate's breasts...Can you imagine?
As we learned from the Colin Farrell sex tape-unless both parties sign off it can't be released so I'm not sure who this broker is going to sell it to. More like blackmail
Meghan Markle. Even better German television has been discussing the porn tape. Buckingham Palace will not be amused when they have to publicly dismiss it's existence. I thought Harry had paid off all these indiscretions before the marriage. Looks like he missed one.
Eek. Somehow this is going to get sweeped under the rug for Meghan.
Sidebar, if the narcissistic couple have a girl and name her Diana I will have to move far far away where there is no phones and Internet and live w my llamas and stay far far away from any pop culture news.
Oh Nutty, just read your blog. I had no idea that “Family Guy” writer was a meme maker. 😂 I was just thinking about how much I miss watching that show the other day because, “SHUT UP, MEG.” 🤣
I think the Royals, like Enty, have known about this video for a long time. There is a reason it is becoming public now. What that reason is, isn’t clear.
Maybe Markle wants to get it out there before she becomes a mother.
Or maybe someone on the Royal side is ready to take her down for good.
Nutty - oh how I hope your last point is fact about someone trying to take her down for good. This meglomaniac has had it coming for quite some time and frankly, she has brought it all upon herself. I don't know how someone's narcissism is so great they think they can win against The Firm. She is nuts!
She’s petite. Should have a reasonably tight box, no? Even after years of yachting there’s the pussy lip tuck surgery. I’d watch it. I like to see a tight box in action
Yay, popcorn please. Nobody looks worse in this entire melodrama than Harry. He used to be the boy everyone loved, now he's just a pathetic laughing stock, stumbling 3 steps, in servant manner, behind this below average cable actress/suitcase girl.
Nutty it can also be that BRF won't allow a divorce and the public existence of a sex tape (supposedly showing dear Duchess servicing some guy while on her knees) might force their hand. I say it's time the Duke of Gloucester was called out of retirement to do some of his finest work. Oh and do you happen to know who Ron is in Torontopaper's post? Loved your latest blog post. too.
"Darling, interesting what you are preparing. You should inform yourself about treason and the consequences. By the way how did your conversation go? I guess you are angry with Ron?"
@Unknown, I don't know if they really want the Duke of Gloucester to take her out right now - too suspicious. They just want her out of the way and they want her quiet.
It's probably too dramatic, but the idea of treason charges is interesting. If they had Meg on tape or in text fantasizing about getting rid of (or overthrowing) the Cambridges so Harry could reign, that would qualify. Some of her sugars on Twitter have been dreaming about this - suggesting that the countries of the Commonwealth could be persuaded to support the Sussexes over the Cambridges for the throne.
"Ron" is Ron Burkle, owner of a large percentage of Soho House and a popular Bill Clinton playmate. Burkle's personal plane used to be referred to as Air F@@k One.
@Scandi, glad you enjoyed the Janetti account. He can be hit and miss but he gets it on the nose every once in awhile. Also fun to watch Meg's furious fans tie themselves into knots in the comments.
@TinyDancer1, I think the news about Andrew is so old that it's no longer shocking. Unless something new comes out, I think it's already "priced in" that Andrew is a perv. Nobody particularly respects him. But that doesn't mean he can't use whatever influence he has left, particularly with his mother, to launch Beatrice and Eugenie's royal careers.
It is quite funny to see people get so invested in personal life stories of these royals and then they get all furious.
Personally when I trash these Meghan Markle threads it’s never really because I give a rats ass about her (I probably gave more shits about her when she was on “Suits”). But only because I used to think I dated an Englishman between 2013–2014-ish and during that time (and after) I bit my tongue and played nice and never said anything nasty about Britain—so I’d bite my tongue to respect his feelings. Then, I found out I was catfished (likey by an American) so I come here to blow off some steam and make-up for lost time for all that time. (He seemed like he cared a great deal about being in those circles.)
🎊 Now I’m just GOING WILD trashing these royals!!!! 🎉 I’m just glad I don’t pay taxes to these people.
Although I have to say I think I dislike teh guy I’m your blog post (the guy with the stepson—I hope the baby’s Mama keeps the son away from the wedding). I think I’m a bit angry at that situaition (but MAYBE I’M JUST PROJECTING because I personally would never marry a guy with children from a previous marriage for my 1st marriage/first real adult relationship).
I think many people who get furious about celebrities on gossip sites might be projecting too but they’d never admit it.
I’d like to know what these people’s live stories are.
I remember one of the doxxed women You blogged about was so ill she needed an oxygen mask and Meghan stans tried to get her electricity cut off. She’s probably just bedridden and doesn’t have much to do.
Epstein is going down. Could be bad for Andrew. https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/02/21/politics/epstein-case-ruling-doj/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
Won't believe it until it's released somewhere. And it had better be more than a hummer, millions of women have their own videos out there. It's going to be crazy times when easily accessible advanced facial recognition technology is available to the public.
@Sunshine, there have been many guessesd about TorontoPaper1, but no clear identification. Markle has discarded many people along the way, so the possibilities are endless. Could also be a clever troll account. Burkle was being discussed elsewhere before TP mentioned his name.
Whatever you think about Meghan wanting her to be killed is sick. Even if everything reported is true it's in no way comparable to Andrew being a paedophile. It's relatively easy to make fake porn films look at all the fake celebrity ones out there I saw a guy on a documentary make a pretty believable one from 3 still images of a face using a app he didn't need any expertise.
The Duke of Gloucester has been the dirty tricks guy for the BRF for decades. I believe he and Prince Phillip worked as a team to keep deniability for the Queen. Although Charles retired the Duke but now has no one in that position to deal in the dirty tricks matters. When I posted I meant dealing with her issue NOT killing her. I in no way meant to physically harm the woman. They need to separate Meghan from the family before she completely destroys all good will. Currently Harry's popularity has taken a major hit and now we are seeing more calls for a republic.
Nutty thanks. That was me posting as Anonymous. I'm having Blogger software issues today. I just couldn't place Ron in Meghan's circle.
I think the Royals, like Enty, have known about this video for a long time. There is a reason it is becoming public now. What that reason is, isn’t clear.
The way gossip mongers and MM herself need to see this is as LUCKY and given she made it when she was an up and comer, maybe a yacht girl, married to a producer... looking to better her ACTING career. She is lucky there isn't more. Realistically she was vetted by the RF and yet STILL the marriage happened. With family troubles, her past, nude scenes, yachting gossip, being American, being mixed race... she passed al the traditional STODGY hurdles none the less. At this point, they are going to protect her, not throw her under the bus, so long as Harry loves her and she is carrying Royal babies. Wait and see how it plays out though. I suspect she is dangerous in that IF she leaves the family she would most likely to (and threaten to) be a whistleblower with insider info and make a FORTUNE on bashing the family, spilling secrets and skeletons, as her next 'career' move. Think she is already trying to leverage this. That being said, the monarchy is a dying entity. They ought to embrace MODERNIZATION in staying relevant and still justifying getting paid. Kate being a commoner who was classy... then MM being an AMERICAN commoner with mixed heritage etc... are all "evolutions" they royals need to hang onto their last threads of mainstream appeal/interest/power.
something big is on the horizon .. for weeks there has been a slow steady stream of celebrity leaked Nudes and teasers. more so than usual and are being presented in a way to tease but draw maximum interest.rumor has it may been the magnitude of the 2014 leak
I don’t think the BRF will protect her. Besides her past, she refuses to observe royal protocol which is like a f/u to the Queen. Harry’s popularity is dropping, and he looks miserable the majority of the time (except when he’s not with her.)
I initially thought that they accepted her into the family because of the ‘R’ word, but now I’m beginning to think he was blackmailed. Supposedly there are tape recordings from yachts and my guess is that there are probably also a lot of sex tapes out there; maybe even including Harry and Meghan in a threesome with a guy. Whatever it is, I’ve never seen an engagement and wedding rushed so quickly. If it was just a few naked photos and one sex tape, he could say he didn’t know about it, throw her under the bus, and get the marriage annulled. But if he’s implicated—oops!
I'm sure MM will be fine with it as long as she can sell pay per view on her merching site. If it does not exist, she will whip one out to put up there before her 15 minutes are up. Maybe she can start a new genre, Moonbump fetish porn.
Aquagirl, I never said I would “NEVER marry a guy with children from a previous marriage”, I said:
- I don’t want my FIRST MARRIAGE to be with a man with children from a previous marriage - I don’t want my FIRST REAL relationship to be with a man with children from a previous marriage - I don’t want to LOSE MY VIRGINITY to a man with children from a previous marriage
Maybe later in life when I’ve had a child of my own and I divorce, I can mix families with someone.
But I feel like because I’ve never had those experiences, I’d like them to be all about him and me (no baby mama breathing on the back of my neck, no chidren to reject me, etc). I want my first experiences to be as uncomplicated at possible. And I really feel like I deserve to experience that. It’s not something you can experience twice. I don’t want to marry a guy and the first thing that’s thrown at my face is an established family by someone else. I don’t think I’m being selfish at all for not wanting that responsibility.
Sorry for the delayed response, THERE ARE SO NANY COMMENTS!!!!
For those who like totally unsubstantiated but highly entertaining gossip, there is a tweet going around today that reads:
"So apparently a 'heavily pregnant woman' has been spotted at the Cotsworlds pad of H&M. Also H&M have said that they won't be needing the house after March. Join the dots. #Meghan Markle."
@Nutty: I remember reading that they were giving up that house, but don’t remember reading a specific date. Supposedly now she’s giving birth in the Lindo Wing, after all the talk of a home birth. We’ll see. If they did want to take her out permanently, I’d predict death during childbirth; since she’s not actually pregnant. And nobody could speak up about this since they’d have to admit that she wasn’t ever pregnant. And, no, Leanne. I’m not wishing death on her.
Ron Burkle also connected to Clooney & Gerber. They used to have their CasaMigos Halloween parties @ his house.
@kiki71: they won't protect her if they want to use the tape as an excuse for divorce, look what happened with Sarah Ferguson - when the RF wanted to get rid of her they leaked the toe sucking pics,
Nutty they still owe two years worth of lease payments on that Cotswold house. While they aren't moving in they still have a two year lease to honor. None of us thought about where they would hide a heavily pregnant woman if they are using a surrogate. That house would be an ideal hideaway as it's secluded.
@Ann: I remember reading that they were giving up that house. I thought that it was related to the fact that so many pictures were being published that it wouldn’t be private anymore, but I could be wrong.
@Aquagirl they did say that but they also were saying Meghan was concerned about drones flying overhead taking photos because she wanted to sunbathe topless after the baby was born. Like you can't already see Meghan's t*t photos at thousands of internet sites? Please.
@Ann: I didn’t read that. OMG. So funny, I can’t even venture a guess as to how many photos are already out there! Maybe she needs to work on her tan and get back in shape for yachting? (Which one of us should tell her she’s also going to have planes flying overhead at 🐸more?)
Make no mistake, folks, they WILL protect her, at least initially. She is one of them now so they rally AND/OR they would squash it to then be able to wield power over her, get her in line, knowing full well in the event of a divorce it could THEN be dropped. For now, they are trying to minimize the damage to them ALL. It's an institution and how she behaves, is, how the public in turns sees how they are exposed and/or how they spend their allowance and fortune..... this all reflects back on them so long as she is IN and bearing a royal title having royal babies.
Anyone else notice the dropped-on-Friday-night-UK-time news that the Queen has brought Sir Christopher Geidt to manage Meg and Harry?
This is a major f@@k you to Charles, who maneuvered mightily to get Geidt removed in 2017 from his position as the Queen's private secretary.
The Queen (and probably Philip) clearly thinks that Charles cannot handle Markle, and she's right.
Also, with the possible disruptions of Brexit coming up - there was a huge protest on the UK motorways yesterday, with trucks/lorries doing an intentional go-slow - the last thing you want to be in a time of civil unrest is an out-of-touch Royal family.
I think the tape will be used as a diversion to take away any heat from Andrew/Epstein ties. Burkle connection is what makes me lean towards this scenario. Where the tape was procured from? God only knows.
What was that comment re: tape in Germany? Wasn't Harry just in Berlin?
If/when the tape is released, the initial PR spin will be it is a "fabricated tape" with a suggestion of technology is so advanced... some person with malicious intent can produce any kind of disgusting video they desire and their target can be any figure in the public eye that they choose. Wouldn't be surprised if MI5/MI6 is called in to investigate.
The Duke of Gloucester is needed to help minimize the damage after the release of the tape and to keep Megs from lashing out in an unladylike manner. She doesn't know it yet, but she's about to get a crash course in dignity and decorum. The offer will be dangled as a life line and she will take it. She will heel.
A reformed Megs will emerge after her maternity leave. A new mum, fiercely protective of her new baby and her privacy, she will act her little heart out as a victim of online bullying who wants nothing more to console young girls and boys who have been cyberbullied. Megs has to be brought low in order to be reborn in the public sphere. She will attempt to humbly promote herself as a survivor and compassionate champion for victims like herself.
As we all can guess, she can only keep up this act can only last for so long. The mask will slip.
As for the baby- my guess is that it is a girl which will be named Victoria Frances (and probably called something gender neutral like Frankie) and born on April 1st. (I know, April Fool's Day)
Or it is twins--one of each and the boy will be named Arthur Spencer and go by Spencer. (She won't be able to leave Diana out of this).
"So apparently a 'heavily pregnant woman' has been spotted at the Cotsworlds pad of H&M. Also H&M have said that they won't be needing the house after March. Join the dots. #Meghan Markle."
I don’t believe this to be true. The real surrogate is probably handcuffed in the basement.
- I don’t want my FIRST MARRIAGE to be with a man with children from a previous marriage
@ Scandi - Love how your planning on the possibility of more than one marriage 😂
Yes, I do-- but unlike Jussie, the BRF (including PR+staff) have thought of all of the possible scenarios this sex tape can play out and they are experts in driving the media to accept their preferred outcome.
I also believe the BRF knows ALL of the secrets that Megs has so far tried to conceal or cover up. Does Megs know they know? Probably not. She thinks she is the smartest person in the room.
If s_ _ t hits the fan on the Epstein/Andrew connection (or any other BIG scandal is leaked implicating a senior member of the BRF) then they won't hesitate to give the nod and allow the Megs Sex Tape to hit the press and throw her under the bus to change the narrative.
Megs has totally underestimated her opponent (HM & BRF).
Megan Markle
ReplyDeleteThe broker-Joe Francis?
DeleteOr Rick Saloman? A new category-A list sex tape brokers lol
Nutty, new blog post, please!!
ReplyDeleteCelebrity Sex Tap Broker is either the best or worst job title.
ReplyDeleteUhm is that like a literary agent for sex tapes?
DeleteI find it difficult to believe there's only one tho
ReplyDeleteWhat a career choice.
ReplyDeleteMother must be proud.
Is it a sex tape or a porno, though? Is it sex for real, or is it from when she had a sideline before Suits? I doubt that awful calligraphy paid any bills. Basically, was she paid or not, haha. There's got to be more than one.
ReplyDeleteMegan tossing salad
ReplyDeleteYou’re just begging for someone to throw in a nasty vegan joke aren’t you? 😂😂😂😂🤣
DeleteToo bad I can’t think of one right now. 🥗
Anyway I would rather eat vegan FOOD (yeas meaning no cheese 🧀) for the next 365 days than spend 24 hours locked-up with a vegan PERSON.
Me too Scandi. Eat whatever you want but fgs don’t lecture me about my damn dietary choices! Why do they do this?!
Delete“Why do they do this?!”
DeleteBecause they’re craving BigMacs and McNuggets.
"Celebrity Sex Tape Broker"
ReplyDeleteIs the Exchange in NY or Chicago? Are shares publicly traded and can you invest in Futures or Options?
I'd watch it.
ReplyDeleteWe complain about A list you tube stars,now we have A list sex tape brokers lol😂
ReplyDeleteBut what will this really mean for the BRF? You cant say that QE didn't know this already.... They made a huge deal about the pap that got he pic of Kate's breasts...Can you imagine?
ReplyDeleteAs we learned from the Colin Farrell sex tape-unless both parties sign off it can't be released so I'm not sure who this broker is going to sell it to. More like blackmail
ReplyDeleteI learned about the legalities of sex tapedom from Enty’s podcast. He said the same thing, both (all?) parties have to sign off.
DeleteDang if I just majored in something else instead of international law, I could’ve had a steady income as a sex tape lawyer by now... ⚖️💰
they can sell it on the dark web
ReplyDeleteMeghan Markle. Even better German television has been discussing the porn tape. Buckingham Palace will not be amused when they have to publicly dismiss it's existence. I thought Harry had paid off all these indiscretions before the marriage. Looks like he missed one.
ReplyDeleteEek. Somehow this is going to get sweeped under the rug for Meghan.
ReplyDeleteSidebar, if the narcissistic couple have a girl and name her Diana I will have to move far far away where there is no phones and Internet and live w my llamas and stay far far away from any pop culture news.
😂
DeleteLlamas are cute! 💛
Delete+1000
DeleteMaybe they won't dismiss its existence? That would be interesting. I personally think they are at their wits end with her.
ReplyDelete@Jennifer, there is indeed a new blog pos. Distractions are being moved into place.
ReplyDelete(The blog is accessible via my profile.)
Oh Nutty, just read your blog. I had no idea that “Family Guy” writer was a meme maker. 😂 I was just thinking about how much I miss watching that show the other day because, “SHUT UP, MEG.” 🤣
Delete👏🏼 Priceless.
DeleteI think the Royals, like Enty, have known about this video for a long time. There is a reason it is becoming public now. What that reason is, isn’t clear.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Markle wants to get it out there before she becomes a mother.
Or maybe someone on the Royal side is ready to take her down for good.
Nutty - oh how I hope your last point is fact about someone trying to take her down for good. This meglomaniac has had it coming for quite some time and frankly, she has brought it all upon herself. I don't know how someone's narcissism is so great they think they can win against The Firm. She is nuts!
ReplyDeleteShe’s petite. Should have a reasonably tight box, no? Even after years of yachting there’s the pussy lip tuck surgery. I’d watch it. I like to see a tight box in action
ReplyDeleteYou need a tight box for your small penis, no doubt
DeleteYours is as big as a house? Windsor castle? My condolences. The echo must be quite severe. The echo must be quite severe.
DeleteYay, popcorn please. Nobody looks worse in this entire melodrama than Harry. He used to be the boy everyone loved, now he's just a pathetic laughing stock, stumbling 3 steps, in servant manner, behind this below average cable actress/suitcase girl.
ReplyDeleteNutty it can also be that BRF won't allow a divorce and the public existence of a sex tape (supposedly showing dear Duchess servicing some guy while on her knees) might force their hand. I say it's time the Duke of Gloucester was called out of retirement to do some of his finest work. Oh and do you happen to know who Ron is in Torontopaper's post? Loved your latest blog post. too.
ReplyDelete"Darling, interesting what you are preparing. You should inform yourself about treason and the consequences. By the way how did your conversation go? I guess you are angry with Ron?"
Ron Burkle - majority owner of Soho House
DeleteSupposedly it's her blowing a photographer, which is just about as predictable as it gets with her.
ReplyDeletehttps://21stcenturynationalist.com/2019/03/22/secret-meghan-markle-sex-tape-offered-for-sale-online-video/
ReplyDeleteThe YouTube account Farkle Family Wars has some funny videos of her being heckled by reporters.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteLove it when people call BaRF “The Firm” like the John Grisham novel.
ReplyDeleteIt’s so sinister-sounding...
@Unknown, I don't know if they really want the Duke of Gloucester to take her out right now - too suspicious. They just want her out of the way and they want her quiet.
ReplyDeleteIt's probably too dramatic, but the idea of treason charges is interesting. If they had Meg on tape or in text fantasizing about getting rid of (or overthrowing) the Cambridges so Harry could reign, that would qualify. Some of her sugars on Twitter have been dreaming about this - suggesting that the countries of the Commonwealth could be persuaded to support the Sussexes over the Cambridges for the throne.
"Ron" is Ron Burkle, owner of a large percentage of Soho House and a popular Bill Clinton playmate. Burkle's personal plane used to be referred to as Air F@@k One.
The BRF will never let this get out. Something will happen
ReplyDelete@Scandi, glad you enjoyed the Janetti account. He can be hit and miss but he gets it on the nose every once in awhile. Also fun to watch Meg's furious fans tie themselves into knots in the comments.
ReplyDelete@TinyDancer1, I think the news about Andrew is so old that it's no longer shocking. Unless something new comes out, I think it's already "priced in" that Andrew is a perv. Nobody particularly respects him. But that doesn't mean he can't use whatever influence he has left, particularly with his mother, to launch Beatrice and Eugenie's royal careers.
It is quite funny to see people get so invested in personal life stories of these royals and then they get all furious.
DeletePersonally when I trash these Meghan Markle threads it’s never really because I give a rats ass about her (I probably gave more shits about her when she was on “Suits”). But only because I used to think I dated an Englishman between 2013–2014-ish and during that time (and after) I bit my tongue and played nice and never said anything nasty about Britain—so I’d bite my tongue to respect his feelings. Then, I found out I was catfished (likey by an American) so I come here to blow off some steam and make-up for lost time for all that time. (He seemed like he cared a great deal about being in those circles.)
🎊 Now I’m just GOING WILD trashing these royals!!!! 🎉 I’m just glad I don’t pay taxes to these people.
Although I have to say I think I dislike teh guy I’m your blog post (the guy with the stepson—I hope the baby’s Mama keeps the son away from the wedding). I think I’m a bit angry at that situaition (but MAYBE I’M JUST PROJECTING because I personally would never marry a guy with children from a previous marriage for my 1st marriage/first real adult relationship).
I think many people who get furious about celebrities on gossip sites might be projecting too but they’d never admit it.
DeleteI’d like to know what these people’s live stories are.
I remember one of the doxxed women You blogged about was so ill she needed an oxygen mask and Meghan stans tried to get her electricity cut off. She’s probably just bedridden and doesn’t have much to do.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteEpstein is going down. Could be bad for Andrew.
Deletehttps://www-m.cnn.com/2019/02/21/politics/epstein-case-ruling-doj/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
You're up early, shitforbrains
ReplyDelete@nutty nice blog! 🥂
ReplyDeleteWon't believe it until it's released somewhere. And it had better be more than a hummer, millions of women have their own videos out there. It's going to be crazy times when easily accessible advanced facial recognition technology is available to the public.
ReplyDelete@Unknown, @Nutty, just looked up Torontopaper. Very sinister and also amusing. Any tea about who runs this handle?
ReplyDeleteLol...
ReplyDeleteThe skeletons in their closets, are far worse than Markle's skeletons.
You also told us about a "tween" who has sex tape w/a German Shepherd. Must've been b.s., since there's been no "reveal."
ReplyDelete@Sunshine, there have been many guessesd about TorontoPaper1, but no clear identification. Markle has discarded many people along the way, so the possibilities are endless. Could also be a clever troll account. Burkle was being discussed elsewhere before TP mentioned his name.
ReplyDelete@Chillax Thank you!
ReplyDeleteWhatever you think about Meghan wanting her to be killed is sick.
ReplyDeleteEven if everything reported is true it's in no way comparable to Andrew being a paedophile.
It's relatively easy to make fake porn films look at all the fake celebrity ones out there I saw a guy on a documentary make a pretty believable one from 3 still images of a face using a app he didn't need any expertise.
Kevin Sheet for the broker/producer
ReplyDeleteHow would the Duke of Gloucester be used to "take her out"?
ReplyDeleteThe Duke of Gloucester has been the dirty tricks guy for the BRF for decades. I believe he and Prince Phillip worked as a team to keep deniability for the Queen. Although Charles retired the Duke but now has no one in that position to deal in the dirty tricks matters. When I posted I meant dealing with her issue NOT killing her. I in no way meant to physically harm the woman. They need to separate Meghan from the family before she completely destroys all good will. Currently Harry's popularity has taken a major hit and now we are seeing more calls for a republic.
ReplyDeleteNutty thanks. That was me posting as Anonymous. I'm having Blogger software issues today. I just couldn't place Ron in Meghan's circle.
@Nutty - ITA with your comment-
ReplyDeleteI think the Royals, like Enty, have known about this video for a long time. There is a reason it is becoming public now. What that reason is, isn’t clear.
ReplyDeletealliterate actress = MM
sex tape = MM
married celebrity = MM
The way gossip mongers and MM herself need to see this is as LUCKY and given she made it when she was an up and comer, maybe a yacht girl, married to a producer... looking to better her ACTING career. She is lucky there isn't more. Realistically she was vetted by the RF and yet STILL the marriage happened. With family troubles, her past, nude scenes, yachting gossip, being American, being mixed race... she passed al the traditional STODGY hurdles none the less. At this point, they are going to protect her, not throw her under the bus, so long as Harry loves her and she is carrying Royal babies. Wait and see how it plays out though. I suspect she is dangerous in that IF she leaves the family she would most likely to (and threaten to) be a whistleblower with insider info and make a FORTUNE on bashing the family, spilling secrets and skeletons, as her next 'career' move. Think she is already trying to leverage this. That being said, the monarchy is a dying entity. They ought to embrace MODERNIZATION in staying relevant and still justifying getting paid. Kate being a commoner who was classy... then MM being an AMERICAN commoner with mixed heritage etc... are all "evolutions" they royals need to hang onto their last threads of mainstream appeal/interest/power.
ReplyDeletelol.
ReplyDeleteMarrying her was the best demonstration of Harry's exquisite judgment since he put on a nazi outfit.
Totally plausible that MM could’ve have made a sex tape, Less plausible that she did and nobody’s shopped it around until now.
ReplyDeleteBRF will deny it, "thats not her" ala RKelly victim and parents. It worked for them.
ReplyDeletesomething big is on the horizon .. for weeks there has been a slow steady stream of celebrity leaked Nudes and teasers. more so than usual and
ReplyDeleteare being presented in a way to tease but draw maximum interest.rumor has it may been the magnitude of the 2014 leak
I don’t think the BRF will protect her. Besides her past, she refuses to observe royal protocol which is like a f/u to the Queen. Harry’s popularity is dropping, and he looks miserable the majority of the time (except when he’s not with her.)
ReplyDeleteI initially thought that they accepted her into the family because of the ‘R’ word, but now I’m beginning to think he was blackmailed. Supposedly there are tape recordings from yachts and my guess is that there are probably also a lot of sex tapes out there; maybe even including Harry and Meghan in a threesome with a guy. Whatever it is, I’ve never seen an engagement and wedding rushed so quickly. If it was just a few naked photos and one sex tape, he could say he didn’t know about it, throw her under the bus, and get the marriage annulled. But if he’s implicated—oops!
I'm sure MM will be fine with it as long as she can sell pay per view on her merching site. If it does not exist, she will whip one out to put up there before her 15 minutes are up. Maybe she can start a new genre, Moonbump fetish porn.
ReplyDeletesearch Your Mom's house podcast, Episode 490 on youtube, at around 3:03:00 he is Kevin Blatt is talking about the tape
ReplyDelete@Scandi: just curious, why would you never marry a guy with a child from a previous marriage?
ReplyDeleteAquagirl, I never said I would “NEVER marry a guy with children from a previous marriage”, I said:
Delete- I don’t want my FIRST MARRIAGE to be with a man with children from a previous marriage
- I don’t want my FIRST REAL relationship to be with a man with children from a previous marriage
- I don’t want to LOSE MY VIRGINITY to a man with children from a previous marriage
Maybe later in life when I’ve had a child of my own and I divorce, I can mix families with someone.
But I feel like because I’ve never had those experiences, I’d like them to be all about him and me (no baby mama breathing on the back of my neck, no chidren to reject me, etc). I want my first experiences to be as uncomplicated at possible. And I really feel like I deserve to experience that. It’s not something you can experience twice. I don’t want to marry a guy and the first thing that’s thrown at my face is an established family by someone else. I don’t think I’m being selfish at all for not wanting that responsibility.
Sorry for the delayed response, THERE ARE SO NANY COMMENTS!!!!
Great blog, Nutty!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe Sex Tape Broker interview, wherein he claims to have seen MM’s video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8MK7a5tuMgg&feature=youtu.be
ReplyDeleteThanks, Aquagirl.
ReplyDeleteFor those who like totally unsubstantiated but highly entertaining gossip, there is a tweet going around today that reads:
"So apparently a 'heavily pregnant woman' has been spotted at the Cotsworlds pad of H&M. Also H&M have said that they won't be needing the house after March. Join the dots. #Meghan Markle."
Probably a satire or troll. Unless it isn't.
@Nutty:
DeleteI remember reading that they were giving up
that house, but don’t remember reading a specific date. Supposedly now she’s giving birth in the Lindo Wing, after all the talk of a home birth. We’ll see. If they did want to take her out permanently, I’d predict death during childbirth; since she’s not actually pregnant. And nobody could speak up
about this since they’d have to admit that she wasn’t ever pregnant.
And, no, Leanne. I’m not wishing death on her.
Ron Burkle also connected to Clooney & Gerber. They used to have their CasaMigos Halloween parties @ his house.
@kiki71: they won't protect her if they want to use the tape as an excuse for divorce, look what happened with Sarah Ferguson - when the RF wanted to get rid of her they leaked the toe sucking pics,
ReplyDeleteThey say Weinstein did like make videos of his various girls without their knowledge.
ReplyDeleteThe "broker" in Your Mom's House, says it was a woman from Canada who called him. Wonder if it's Torontopaper?
ReplyDeleteEnty told us last August there was a tape being peddled. Is this the same one or is there more than one?
ReplyDeleteNutty they still owe two years worth of lease payments on that Cotswold house. While they aren't moving in they still have a two year lease to honor. None of us thought about where they would hide a heavily pregnant woman if they are using a surrogate. That house would be an ideal hideaway as it's secluded.
ReplyDeleteI’m here for the potential porno titles.
ReplyDeletePegging Meghan, anyone?
Brilliant idea, Heatherbee!😂😂🐝
ReplyDelete@Ann: I remember reading that they were giving up that house. I thought that it was related to the fact that so many pictures were being published that it wouldn’t be private anymore, but I could be wrong.
ReplyDelete@Aquagirl they did say that but they also were saying Meghan was concerned about drones flying overhead taking photos because she wanted to sunbathe topless after the baby was born. Like you can't already see Meghan's t*t photos at thousands of internet sites? Please.
ReplyDelete@Heatherbee- I'm going with- On Bended Knee.
@Ann: I didn’t read that. OMG. So funny, I can’t even venture a guess as to how many photos are already out there! Maybe she needs to work on her tan and get back in shape for yachting? (Which one of us should tell her she’s also going to have planes flying overhead at 🐸more?)
DeleteMake no mistake, folks, they WILL protect her, at least initially. She is one of them now so they rally AND/OR they would squash it to then be able to wield power over her, get her in line, knowing full well in the event of a divorce it could THEN be dropped. For now, they are trying to minimize the damage to them ALL. It's an institution and how she behaves, is, how the public in turns sees how they are exposed and/or how they spend their allowance and fortune..... this all reflects back on them so long as she is IN and bearing a royal title having royal babies.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if TorontoPaper is someone from Soho. Hard to say since MM has ghosted so many people in the past.
ReplyDeletePreghan!
ReplyDeleteIt'll be interesting to see if the tape is ever made public.
Maybe they’ll throw Meghan and her sex tape out there and hang her to dry to distract from Andrew.
ReplyDeleteAnyone else notice the dropped-on-Friday-night-UK-time news that the Queen has brought Sir Christopher Geidt to manage Meg and Harry?
ReplyDeleteThis is a major f@@k you to Charles, who maneuvered mightily to get Geidt removed in 2017 from his position as the Queen's private secretary.
The Queen (and probably Philip) clearly thinks that Charles cannot handle Markle, and she's right.
Also, with the possible disruptions of Brexit coming up - there was a huge protest on the UK motorways yesterday, with trucks/lorries doing an intentional go-slow - the last thing you want to be in a time of civil unrest is an out-of-touch Royal family.
See: 1789, 1917.
“See: 1789, 1917.”
Delete👏🏼😂😂😂🤣🤣
I’m so glad I wasn’t sipping my drink when I read that, I would’ve choked to death.
🍿🥤
I think the tape will be used as a diversion to take away any heat from Andrew/Epstein ties.
ReplyDeleteBurkle connection is what makes me lean towards this scenario. Where the tape was procured from? God only knows.
What was that comment re: tape in Germany? Wasn't Harry just in Berlin?
If/when the tape is released, the initial PR spin will be it is a "fabricated tape" with a suggestion of technology is so advanced... some person with malicious intent can produce any kind of disgusting video they desire and their target can be any figure in the public eye that they choose. Wouldn't be surprised if MI5/MI6 is called in to investigate.
The Duke of Gloucester is needed to help minimize the damage after the release of the tape and to keep Megs from lashing out in an unladylike manner. She doesn't know it yet, but she's about to get a crash course in dignity and decorum. The offer will be dangled as a life line and she will take it. She will heel.
A reformed Megs will emerge after her maternity leave. A new mum, fiercely protective of her new baby and her privacy, she will act her little heart out as a victim of online bullying who wants nothing more to console young girls and boys who have been cyberbullied. Megs has to be brought low in order to be reborn in the public sphere. She will attempt to humbly promote herself as a survivor and compassionate champion for victims like herself.
As we all can guess, she can only keep up this act can only last for so long. The mask will slip.
As for the baby- my guess is that it is a girl which will be named Victoria Frances (and probably called something gender neutral like Frankie) and born on April 1st. (I know, April Fool's Day)
Or it is twins--one of each and the boy will be named Arthur Spencer and go by Spencer. (She won't be able to leave Diana out of this).
Anyway, this is all conjecture on my part.
HOLD ON, THROWAWAY321! 🤨
DeleteAre you saying that this whole sex tape thing is essentially an elaborate Jussie Smollett manoeuvre?!
Am I understanding your post correctly?
YES/NO?! I need to know!
I hadn’t thought of that possibility but it explains The Firm’s chill... 🤔
Delete"So apparently a 'heavily pregnant woman' has been spotted at the Cotsworlds pad of H&M. Also H&M have said that they won't be needing the house after March. Join the dots. #Meghan Markle."
ReplyDeleteI don’t believe this to be true. The real surrogate is probably handcuffed in the basement.
- I don’t want my FIRST MARRIAGE to be with a man with children from a previous marriage
@ Scandi - Love how your planning on the possibility of more than one marriage 😂
Mango, darling, I’ve had a divorce lawyer lined-up before I even signed up for my dating site account. 🍸
DeleteI'm loving these comments on the Duke of Gloucester. I hadn't heard about him before, and this is fascinating stuff!!
ReplyDeleteAs for Preghan's baby, I'm going with Eleanor if it's a girl. Not sure for a boy, but I don't think they'll go as fully traditional as Arthur.
The Duke of Gloucester is actually the highest ranking member of the family who is not directly descended from George VI, Queen Elizabeth's father.
ReplyDeleteHis father was George VI's brother Henry. He's 26th in line to the throne.
@Scandi Sanskrit
ReplyDeleteYes, I do-- but unlike Jussie, the BRF (including PR+staff) have thought of all of the possible scenarios this sex tape can play out and they are experts in driving the media to accept their preferred outcome.
I also believe the BRF knows ALL of the secrets that Megs has so far tried to conceal or cover up. Does Megs know they know? Probably not. She thinks she is the smartest person in the room.
If s_ _ t hits the fan on the Epstein/Andrew connection (or any other BIG scandal is leaked implicating a senior member of the BRF) then they won't hesitate to give the nod and allow the Megs Sex Tape to hit the press and throw her under the bus to change the narrative.
Megs has totally underestimated her opponent (HM & BRF).