Friday, January 11, 2019

Blind Item #4

Our favorite alliterate actress turned A+ list celebrity doesn't just have one private social media account, but several. They all follow her best friend.


77 comments:

  1. Why is Jessica whatever her name is giving advice on fashion and beauty when she looks like a chipmunk with all those fillers

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mulroney is just the worst. Plastic face, plastic shoes, no fashion sense.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If true she'll eventually get found. Her mega-fans will sniff this out until they die

    ReplyDelete
  4. What if her best friend is herself?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Replies
    1. So you’re on a gossip site and you don’t get that people are gossiping? Bless your heart.

      Delete
  6. Mulroney is a thirsty fame ho, nothing more.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I can't wait for the tell-all book that will reveal how much of Meg nonstop and overwhelming PR was done by professionals and how much was done by Meg herself.

    A lot of it is pretty clumsy and wastes a lot of energy taking aim at Duchess Kate - which is like, did anyone ask for that?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I read that thousands of people cancelled their memberships to the National Theatre after Meghan was appointed as royal patron. Don't know if it's true but they would keep it quiet even if it were. There are also rumours of Camilla leaving Charles, and the papers actually asked Clarence House about it. It was denied.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Camilla has been MIA since before Christmas. It's hard not to wonder if she is suffering from more than just the "bad cold" as advertised. Hopefully not.

    ReplyDelete
  10. That patronage was announced on Kate's birthday. How typical.

    ReplyDelete
  11. MD Anderson: a very small percentage of social media fashionistas and influencers are actually knowledgeable enough to give fashion advice. It's a 'job' for women who have no talents, but possess bucketloads of narcissistic tendencies.

    I just love the Meagain Sparkles show. We're only at season 1 but there is abundant amusement and entertainment for years to come.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Something is brewing at BP but I cant believe that this woman MM can do that much destruction in under a year.... Many people greater and smarter then her have tried, I really would be shocked, but then again I didn't really think Harry would have married her.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yeah, that was amazing, wasn't it?

    It was "mistakenly leaked" on Kate's birthday, just like Meg's supposed pregnancy just had to be announced at Eugenie's wedding.

    Well, Meg may regret the NT patronage. Highly-trained British actors must be some of the cattiest, snobbiest people on the planet. They will be vicious behind her back while smiling placidly to her face.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well in this case it will only come back to bite them in the ass, not only for their racism but elitism. She did work as an actress, after all; she's seen Hamilton at least three times (no surprise) and hobnobs with both the cast and Lin Manuel Miranda. I know they think they're above her but one wrong snub could haunt them and destroy any shot one of them might want in Broadway or in Hollywood depending on who hears and is personally offended.

      Delete
    2. So now not liking someone “of color”, makes you racist? Lol come on.

      Delete
  14. I feel she used every tool in her tool box Expensive PR firm, rampant social media, Dad Markle, Canadian connections, se*uality, etc to get Hector in that Palace door. Do not underestimate her tenacity. Someone this determined, will continue to be determined

    ReplyDelete
  15. If that's true, you have to wonder when the family fixer shows up.

    The Windsors (aka the Saxe-Coburg-Gothas) specialize in survival.
    They're not going to let some California 'ho take them down.

    ReplyDelete
  16. And where is the scandal?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Meh. Andrew's misdeeds are already pretty well known, or guessed-at.

    Everyone's seen the 2001 photo of him with his arm around 17-year-old Virginia Roberts, who is accusing Epstein. The photo ran in the Sun again in December 2018. No one would be shocked to hear Andrew was involved with more teenagers, girls or boys.

    Andrew is already the least-liked member of the Royal Family, according to a recent poll.

    ReplyDelete

  18. Whoever is currently dressing her, is not a friend.
    Let's choose a form fitting knit dress... when wearing a fake appendage underneath?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Page views are down this week huh Enty? HI DM'ERS!!

    ReplyDelete
  20. They were friends with JS, also.
    I despise him so much, I can't even type the name.
    Demonic, imo

    ReplyDelete
  21. dont alot of famous people have ghost IG, Twitter and FB accounts? Regular people do, so not one bit surprised about this. Its MM and why should she not have accounts? Im sure other Royals do too.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I don't think the other Royals use their accounts to attack fellow members of the family.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Megan Markle let it go and live your life.. There will always have some for or against you, that’s life and you chose this role to play, so play by their rules..If not you will be all alone.. Harry won’t be able to help you at all.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Narcissists are known to triangulate.

    If they can't win someone over, they will hurt you by attempting to turn others against you.

    I wouldn't be surprised if Markle tried this at Kensington.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Does anyone know who the brunette woman in the background of the Andrew Virginia Roberts photo is?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Not sure why people are obsessed with Megan Markle, but it is amusing to watch them have fits.

    ReplyDelete
  27. it's true that Meghan's face, arms, legs and feet are slim but her ass is a mile wide. She looked like T Rex yesteday with her thin, weak and very long arms dangling in front of her as she hunted down a piece of apparel for some poor woman used as a prop for her publicity stunt. Going to a poor woman's charity which gives out free clothing in over $7000 of clothing bought specifically for this event was like farting in people's faces. Oh, and can Lainey have her tongue stuck any higher up Meghan's ass? I laugh out loud at all of the excuses Lainey comes up with to excuse Meghan's bad behaviour.

    ReplyDelete
  28. What I can't stand about MM is her thirst for attention, leaking news when other royals have birthdays or weddings is tacky as hell, like are you really that desperate? So pathetic and yes, I do believe she'll fuck up her patronages because she already has, she was actually joking about how a woman didn't liked the purse she recommended for her to use it, like duh! Who would want to look like MM with her ill fitting clothes and her muddy bronzer and her to strong blush? I actually laughed out loud when I saw that one of her patronages was styling women for work interviews, first of all what does she know about it? since all the success she's gotten has been on her back, not by actually doing any other effort, so yes, I totally believe this is only the beginning for the MESS Markle will become, girl is just too stupid to function if involves doing something other than giving face, posing for your life and giving someone a bj, this will end badly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She is horribly dressed. Her figure is extremely unfortunate, but I’m sure someone somewhere could figure out how to dress her in a way to accentuate any positive attributes and camouflage any negative ones? But they don’t. She looks like what a corporate boardroom in an evil globomegacorp would look like, if it came to life. Bland, boring, depressing and ugly. Completely devoid of any likable qualities. I really struggle to see what anyone would find attractive about her, based on her looks. If she was a yachter, that’s probably what gets the men, but who wifes up a whore? You don’t make a ho a housewife! Poor dumb Harry.

      Delete
  29. Poor Meghan
    https://radaronline.com/exclusives/2019/01/prince-harry-wife-meghan-markle-social-media-obsession/

    ReplyDelete
  30. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  31. @Mischi - I can't find any reports... the UK press/tabs that typically have unflattering reports about her mention the patronage, but nothing else :-\ Where'd you find it?? Thx!

    ReplyDelete
  32. They probably paid the client to stand there and humor Markle.
    (Just as they bus people in, to wave flags at your weddings...)

    ReplyDelete
  33. To people saying that MM can't be pregnant because her arms and ankles aren't swollen - mine weren't in either of my pregnancies either. I looked normal but had a goiter on my front,so i don't think this can be the strongest evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Whoa, Nelly. Britain's finest actors shun a cable actress (supporting roles only) and game show model and that means they're racists?

    I've said it before and I will probably say it again, but a white blonde Deal or no Deal Girl would have never gotten this far. The very people who adore Markle would have been tearing Debbie-the-Briefcase-Girl-From-Texas to pieces if she'd married Harry.

    Markle's (half) ethnicity is an asset as far as the NT is concerned, probably her only asset.

    It's also an asset for one of her other patronages, the ACU (Association of Commonwealth Universities.)

    Of course, there she and her Bachelor's Degree will be surrounded by brilliant Phds from India, Africa and the Carribean, and they'll probably make fun of her too.

    What terrible racists they must be!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes any white person is a racist if they dislike any non white person for any reason. Even legitimate ones. But if non whites dislike whites simply for their skin color (extremely common), that’s ok and justified and understandable, even to the point of violence. How many racially motivated attacks do we hear about on whites? Yet they’re never considered hate crimes because white people deserve it. But say you dislike a person that happens to be non white, well that’s a hate crime!

      Delete
  35. No one knew I was pregnant with my daughter until my 7th month, when she dropped and the belly became glaringly obvious.

    My face didn't get bigger, nor did my ankles or legs. Not until I was in the final stretch of my pregnancy, mind you. As in, week 36.

    She very well could be faking the pregnancy, but the evidence thus far is weak...

    ReplyDelete
  36. Bec, what are you referring to about not being able to find it.

    I read some comment that said that the memberships to the National Theatre were being cancelled by hundreds or not thousands. But haven't found it anywhere else. They would keep that quiet.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I would have anon. accounts with all the bitchiness around MM. We are all anon. on here, so not sure what the deal is.

    I am more concerned with Philip and Camilla. I hope they are both ok, they have been missing for a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  38. @ClareJanes - The brunette woman could be Ghislaine Maxwell (the daughter of press tycoon Robert Maxwell.) She is known in those circles i.e trafficking and is a friend of Prince Andrew.)

    ReplyDelete
  39. I really can't understand how the blinds about the royals, no matter how bland or inane, draw so many comments. Can someone explain that to me?

    ReplyDelete
  40. @Huckle, UK CDAN readers and other fans of the Firm.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Camilla had an event in Scotland today and appears to be fine.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Thats good news Nutty. I am so enjoying the NT patronage by the Suitcase Girl haha.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @Huckleberry:The DM likes to post stories about her because they draw a huge amount of clicks and comments. Usually derogatory.
    MM is good for business I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Anonymous5:45 PM

    Markle is a product now. She is Pepsi, she is Taco Bell. A brand.
    If you want my guess, she was probably a 'product' for a very long time
    Long before Henry.
    Take that any way you want.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Not all preggo's have swelling. That is a myth.

    ReplyDelete
  46. I don't know that I understand. True she has no swelling, not even on her face. I mean you can't see even an iota of change, but if she's not pregnant then how can they explain a baby?

    ReplyDelete
  47. I don't get people who don't understand the Markle story's appeal.


    A low-talent thespian and grifter, and probably an experienced whore, has made her way into one of the world's most famous families.

    Once there, she disregards all their age-old rules of protocol and deportment, while trying to grab as much fame and money as possible for herself and set herself up for a glittering career.

    Shocked, the family fights back with old-world tactics - like putting her in embarrassing manor homes (Frogmore Cottage, the servants' quarters) and giving her patronages that highlight her shortcomings (Bad actress = National Theater. Never finished college = Association of Commonwealth Universities. Abandoned dog = Animal charity. Trashy fashion = Clothes for homeless women.)

    It sounds like a comic novel by a great British satirist, but it's real, and nobody knows the ending yet.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ehhh, it was more interesting and original when Charles II was having an affair with Nell Gwynn. He wasn’t stupid enough to marry her though. And yes he was a reigning monarch and so the situation isn’t exactly the same, but at least Nell was funny and likable and the common people liked her. Harry couldn’t have found someone more like her? At least she admitted she was a whore and didn’t try and play the innocent virginal saint role at 37 and after a few failed marriages.

      Delete
  48. Right, @Nutty? I, myself, am waaay too fascinated by everything Markle. I am so impressed with the shade the Queen throws. I just wonder if Meggles really gets it. The pic Andrew posted after Christmas services was on point. Completely blocked her out! I am so loving this. I heard her beagle died after its legs were broken when it got run over by her car. Another thing I noticed is the looks she gives Kate when she is unguarded and her mask slips. It's scary, really. Kate is everything she will NEVER be and she knows it.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Cuddlebutt, you're right about the looks Markle gives Kate. Very scary. What's also scary is how her fans attack Kate. Especially Lainey, who has been jealous of Kate forever. In fact, Lainey is jealous of any white person. She thinks minorities are entitled to take over the world, for what reason, I don't know. Her jealousy of Kate borders on the pathological and she was only too happy to post nasty insider details about Kate. If Meghan is 10% as disgusting as Lainey, she must be despicable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obviously because she’s part of the Coudenhove-Kalergi NWO group, that are pushing white genocide. Didn’t you get the memo that whites are evil, racist, and deserve to be at best, bred out, and at worst, exterminated? Markle seems to be an enthusiastic devotee of this agenda. She’s NWO personified, even her clothes scream “bland, boring faceless corporate drone”. They’re going to use her to push the agenda, and she’s absolutely thrilled to do it. Of course she loathes Kate and William and their children. I have noticed that many mixed people hate white people with a special kind of virulent and dangerous hatred. It’s not PC to say it, but that’s how it is. I hope William and Kate watch themselves around her and especially their children.

      Delete
  50. I'm not even a particular fan of Kate (though I'm liking her more and more because she isn't so obviously infatuated with herself and so in-your-face) and I think it's intriguing how MM thought she could just swan in and out-shine Kate, a native Briton who is beautiful, demure, and married to the heir to the throne. Bitch, please!

    And after all the ridicule she's gotten for constantly cradling her belly, I just can't fathom why she keeps doing it. I guess this little social climbing narcissist just cannot help herself.

    ReplyDelete
  51. @ Nutty - I thought she did graduate from Northwestern? I just googled and reports say she matriculated in 1999. And LOL @ your comment about her patronages. Spot on.






    ReplyDelete
  52. @Mango. It isn’t clear whether or not she actually graduated from Northwestern. Her General Hospital credit comes in what was supposed to be the fall of her senior year. After that she went to Argentina with the embassy and then left the embassy to go to Spain, reportedly with an older man. Maybe she came back and finished her degree, but no one seems to be able to confirm that. There have been some graduation pictures, but she’s not wearing the official Northwestern gown in them.

    ReplyDelete
  53. It would also be interesting to know how her Northwestern experience dovetails with her reported (annulled) first marriage to a fellow Northwestern student.

    I’ve also heard some talk that if she has a degree it’s just an ordinary communications degree instead of the joint theater/ international relations degree she keeps talking about.

    Markle has really made extensive use of the “right to be forgotten“ that the EU imposed on Google. You can petition Google to delete certain information about you, and a lot of Markle info seems to have disappeared about the time of the engagement announcement.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Meghan Markle is up to something, probably multiple somethings but for right now I'd like to draw your attention to this website I stumbled across the other day.

    Meghan's Mirror: http://meghansmirror.com

    It is a website ALL about MEghan and appears to be updated magically after each appearance she makes. It offers the brand name items (clothing, shoes, accessories, make-up) she wears with pricing and a link to buy. No doubt this site is run by one of her friends and they split the profits from the items purchased through the Meghan's Mirror item links.

    You can browse by: look, year, color, style, MM's favorites under $100 AND a new "Royal Baby" section.

    I applaud her marketing skills, but as a member of the BRF, one must exhibit dignity and decorum. This is straight up merching. How can she get away with this?

    Also, does anyone know the handles/names of her social media profiles mentioned in this blind? I guess I can search by checking out JM's social media. I do know that MM does have several aliases for the Daily Mail comment section. :)

    ReplyDelete
  55. Jessica Mulroney is the daughter-in-law of one of Canada's former Prime Ministers. As in who gives a shit.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Kate is probably very sweet but imo. awfully boring as in Stepford Wife. Bred for the role I guess. MM is a complex older woman from a much more ordinary background. I wish folk would give her a chance.

    I suspect at a dinner party MM would be more interesting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So women that live a more traditional lifestyle must be boring? I guess you can only be interesting and have a personality if you’re “complex” and have been married multiple times, with a screwed up family and god knows what else? Oooooookay then.

      Delete
  57. They’re going to have to produce a baby though. Where is it going to come from? Stolen from a third world slum? Do they have a secret surrogate? I remember the gossip that she’s supposedly infertile, is it a donor egg and her sperm in a surrogate? Why would Harry want an old divorced woman that’s at the end of her childbearing years anyway? He always said he wanted kids, why choose her?

    ReplyDelete
  58. Take a deep breath there @ Astra Worthington.

    @ annie too - MM is making me realize that I like my royals bland. Just STFU, wave, and don’t be an ostentatious consumer of luxury goods.

    ReplyDelete
  59. LOVE your comments @astra worthington! You rock! Look forward to more of your interesting observations on the skanky ho with the pillow shoved up her tight dress- not to mention the ridiculous butt pads. I think Smirkle has a surrogate somewhere ready to pop and Harry the dim wit is so pussy whipped he does everything Smirkles commands. #SAD

    ReplyDelete
  60. Anonymous5:40 PM

    @elisa

    Surrogate. There was a comment a few weeks back "Baby arrived two weeks ago"; I tend to believe it.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Anonymous5:51 PM

    @Nutty

    The story in DM, on Boxing Day. "Kate takes her such and such and goes hunting with the guys..."
    Then they published a decade-old photo of Kate in hunting gear. Implied it was a current photo.
    I believe that crossed a line. I really do...

    ReplyDelete
  62. "Matriculated" means ENROLLED, not graduated. I have yet to see photos of Smeg at her college graduation ceremony, in Northwestern's traditional purple robe. There are pix of her in a white robe with a "1995" tag on the tassel, thought to be her HS graduation, but explained away as middle school/junior high grad, and in a black robe that was supposedly the actual HS graduation.

    Astra has some good points, why such an old choice for a man who wants children, why was he looking in that direction? No one in his circles knew any women in their late 20's? But since Harry's reputation is that of a cheater, maybe it took a pro to agree to marry him and look the other direction. I guess time will tell regarding the patronages and how they will show up Smeg's total unsuitability for the job, thereby neutralizing the race card when the inevitable crash-and-burn comes to pass.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If she graduated HS in 1995 there’s no way she is 37. I graduated in 1997 and I’ll be 40 this year.

      Delete
  63. @JenniB39 Uh oh, the hated class of '97 (I graduated in '98).

    ReplyDelete