Blind Items Revealed #4
November 29, 2018
Because murder has no statute of limitations, police have reopened an investigation into these murders from over two decades ago. Every single one of you and your parents and grandparents knows about these murders. Apparently there was an accomplice.
OJ Simpson
Because murder has no statute of limitations, police have reopened an investigation into these murders from over two decades ago. Every single one of you and your parents and grandparents knows about these murders. Apparently there was an accomplice.
OJ Simpson
Say what??
ReplyDeleteJoe Simpson?
ReplyDeleteThere was always a rumor that OJ's oldest son helped him commit the murders.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if OJ can be tried on some different but related charge.
His son. He either did it and OJ covered for him or OJ did it and his son helped him.
ReplyDeleteApparently there was a different killer who needed his protection and took a fall for his son. Although somebody from Radar asked the Melendez Brothers who are experienced in this type of stuff and they think OJ is responsible.
ReplyDeletecause they couldnt use the money and time for something more relevant. I got mugged and it was basically, sorry to hear that, you sure I have to write all this down?
ReplyDeleteSame here, galoise. I got mugged twice while living in Boston and the police couldn't been more apathetic. And I was beaten in the foyer of my apt bldg the 2nd time. Muggings aren't near as important as getting a famous killer.
DeleteSaw this article when searching on Twitter: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7845330/oj-simpson-murder-guilty-documentary/
ReplyDeleteThe Martians did it! But it was covered by MIB who framed OJ Simpson!
ReplyDeleteHow about the police investigating the number of people of who protested @ Ferguson that have mysteriously ended up dead? or going after wall St. criminals or war mongers/torturers in Washington? nope the celebrity case that made us look foolish 20+ years ago.
ReplyDeleteI hope the truth finally comes out...whatever it is.
ReplyDelete@yepthatsme http://www.openminds.tv/wp-content/uploads/I-am-not-saying.jpg
ReplyDeleteTake those issues up with the FBI and the Justice Department, longtime. Local crime is for local police and there is nothing wrong with them going back over it if they think someone still needs to be brought to justice.
ReplyDeleteRegardless of any statute of limitations, OJ cannot be tried again. It would be double jeopardy.
ReplyDeleteThis isn't about OJ being tried again. There have always been rumors his oldest son did it.
DeleteHe couldn't be tried for their murders again, but he could be charged with something else.
DeleteHe could be tried on a different related charge. That would not be double jeopardy.
ReplyDeleteIt's not reasonable to equate a crime and police response that took place in a different state to a double murder that did take place there and the LAPD's decision to look into a possible at large murderer in or around their city.
ReplyDeleteSupposedly the son, who Nicole believed was semi stalking her. She told someone she believed he was peeking, in her windows. Supposedly spying for O.J., but perhaps he was interested in Nicole. She cancelled a dinner party, at his resturant, the night she was killed. He bragged about being the chef for the meal. Hours later she was killed. I can't see O.J. taking the rap, for his son, but that has always been the rumor.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHow old was this son? I didn't know OJ had a son of murderin' age at that time.
ReplyDeleteI was also confused after returning to the US after years abroad to see Jessica Simpson was a huge star. She was so... white and her dad was so black, I was like wow, genetics.
murders were faked, same as the manson murders. hoax. check out miles mathis' essay about OJ. it may just open your eyes
ReplyDeleteSo if there was 'conspiracy to commit murder' is that a different charge altogether than murder and OJ could be re-tried? Curious. Double Jeopardy only applies to exact charges right?
ReplyDeleteOJ cannot be tried again but his son Jason has never been charged. Unless he can be charged as Jason's accomplice! That's different. Incredible.
ReplyDeleteTrue -OJ murders was a staged hoax -theater. Just like the Cosby thing
ReplyDeleteDouble Jeopardy, OJ was found not guilty by a jury of his peers. He can't be retired.
ReplyDeleteHe can be tried on a different charge as was pointed out, as in conspiracy or obstruction.
ReplyDelete@ cat- I’m with you having a hard time believing O.J would take the rap for his son, just because I imagine his ego has got to be gigantic.
ReplyDeleteDouble Jeopardy would attach not only to the principle charge (murder), but any potential lesser included offense (which would include conspiracy to commit, manslaughter,...).
ReplyDeleteDidn’t the woman who OJ almost crashed into fleeing the murder scene say that she recognized him and that he was alone?
ReplyDeleteI can believe the son may have been involved but maybe accessory after the fact. I seriously doubt OJ would take a fall for anyone.
ReplyDeleteThis doesnt make sense. If there were really no STATUTE, why wouldnt they have investigated it again IMMEDIATELY in the 1990s after the verdict and brought it to trial AGAIN. After he lost the Civil Suit, why not bring it back to trial in 1999 all over agian
ReplyDeleteThis BBC documentary totally changed my opinion of everything I was told about the case.
ReplyDeleteBottom line - LAPD didn't follow up on numerous other leads including that of his son. ....who had a history of violence....to women....with knives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QG5CPhGoT3M&feature=youtu.be
You all should check out Brian Hess' videos on YouTube or his website, www.ojsimpson.co - he actually went back and found archival video that was never on the internet. Some really shocking stuff even for me, and I thought I was well informed at the time. Changed my mind! For 30 years I thought OJ clearly did it. When you actually look at the timeline though, and the almost complete lack of blood evidence...
ReplyDeleteI don't know if it was Jason (who was 24 at the time and mixing anti-psychotic meds with alcohol) but I don't think it was OJ.
Before we get too excited, could we just get the kid to try on the glove? Because if it don't fit... let's not bother.
ReplyDeleteOJ wrote about having an accomplice in If I Did It. I don't recall the details -- actually, I'm pretty sure OJ said the person was the killer, not him. And I don't recall thinking he meant the person was in any way family.
ReplyDeleteI always suspected Al cowlings was more invovled than Just the trip down the freeway
ReplyDeleteIt is not double jeopardy if they go after the accomplice. My first thought twas the guy who drove the white bronco.
ReplyDelete+1 @jeff splatford
ReplyDeleteTo: Never could be any other way
ReplyDeleteThe murders are fake? Where do you get these goofy idea? Next thing you know, you will telling us that Walt Whitman never existed!
Pimp mama kris kardashian helped robert hide the weapon! Lol
ReplyDeleteSee that's the comment I deleted - the one where I said it was Pimp Momma Kris all along!!! lol!
ReplyDeleteBut then y'all were getting serious and I felt bad.
Oj would not take a fall for anyone. He did it and AC helped. His son is too much of a loose cannon to be an accomplice
ReplyDeleteI can't see Jason doing it alone and then OJ taking the fall. OKay so OJ and his son did it together and OJ took sole responsibility.. I can see that.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bitchute.com/video/46DCKvUGkF1l/
ReplyDeleteReally people do not be afraid of the truth.
Regardless of statute of limitations, the constitution protects against double jeopardy.
ReplyDelete"Regardless of statute of limitations, the constitution protects against double jeopardy."
ReplyDeleteThe limitation is on the crime; this suggests a new, non-OJ, non-double jeopardy suspect is in play.
I've always thought it was highly probable he was taking the fall for his son, too.
@Chillip - just think for a minute what that would mean. OJ would go from being (almost) universally disdained to respected - if not revered - for laying his life down for his son.
ReplyDeleteI remember that they couldn't eliminate the possibility that OJ's son was involved. It was simply decided that he wasn't and he was kept far enough from the lights that I couldn't form an opinion on it.
ReplyDelete