Saturday, December 01, 2018

Blind Items Revealed #3

November 24, 2018

Once again, this three named actress continues to amaze with her ability to make her own demands look like it is someone else causing all the issues in getting a third installment of a movie made. Does anyone really think that trashed actress is indispensable to a third film? You don't think they could find a niece or something and write the other person out? It is all about the money demands of the three named actress.

Sarah Jessica Parker/Kim Cattrall

19 comments:

  1. She's nauseating.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It wouldnt be the same without Samantha. The only character that mattered. The only fun and entertaining in the whole series. In fact Carrie could stay out and whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The first movie was budgeted at 65 million and made more than $415 million worldwide.

    The second one was budgeted at $100 million and made more than $294 million worldwide.

    So maybe the studio's PR people should stop trashing *both* actresses and creating a PR feud to blame anyone and stop crying poormouth.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And I say that as someone who could take or leave Samantha and not care either way. She was a supporting character who was there as comic relief.

    ReplyDelete
  5. this whole sex and the city franchise is so tiiiiiiired.

    put SJP out to pasture, please. its 2018.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nobody wants to see this sequel, the last one was terrible. Kim is right to not want to do it, she doesnt like SJP, its not going to help her get other roles, so why waste her time?

    ReplyDelete
  7. SJP knows this is it, she needs to make bank. Never did like her...

    ReplyDelete
  8. They were going to kill off big in the next one so i am glad it will not be made

    ReplyDelete
  9. There's such a relentless drumbeat on this message on this site - and it's so uninteresting as a blind - that I suspect either Enty has a gripe with SJP or this is a paid-for message.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Kim is in her 60's, she's just beyond done with playing a sexpot and the just beyond ridonkulous storylines they give her to get back for not sucking SJP's a$$. They really could change her story line to something decent to get her back if they wanted or just write her out, saying she's working in London or whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  11. They want to have 12 year old Brady send dick pics to Samantha. Think if better storylines for Samantha and give her a new hunky guy. Leave the dumb kid out if it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh my GOD, has no one boiled up that ragged old bundle of bones for glue yet?

    As if anyone wants to see her mangy old frame galloping around in skimpy net and frou-frou. Just no.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don’t care who’s responsible, but I’ll be eternally grateful if they never make another SATC. Both movies were abysmal. Was such a fan of the tv series, and the movies were beyond embarrassing and corny. Awful.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Kin Cattrall is an actual actress who has played many roles, in England and overseas, on stage and screen, while SJP seems desperate to cling to the only character she is known for -- a one-note character based on an already-tired-in-the-1990's NYC gossip column. Why should Kim be responsible for propping up her pale career. Plus, SJP has awful, awful fashion taste and stupid eyeliner. (There. I said it.)

    ReplyDelete
  15. Why is SJP so desperate for another boring SATC? Or is she desperate for money. Besides she is not a beauty or fashion icon.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No one wants to see these old bitches

    ReplyDelete
  17. Cantrell is right. SexII was a pile of crap in which she came off as pathetically horny. SJP came across as hideously ugly wearing stupid get-ups. As usual. The whole plot was idiotic from start to finish. Atrocious movie. No one wants to see haggard old SJP having Big's baby. Gag.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Known for only one role? Hocus Pocus and Square Pegs lol!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wait, this blind is saying that its not Kim holding up the production, its SJP demanding too much money?

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days