Thursday, December 20, 2018

Blind Items Revealed #2

December 13, 2018

The alliterate former actress turned A+ list celebrity apparently has a Twitter and Instagram account under a fake name she uses to take shots at people who take shots at her.

Meghan Markle

45 comments:

  1. So what's her name then

    ReplyDelete
  2. So what's her name then

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wait,I have to get popcorn.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi DM'ers! 😘 Meghan too if you show up under a fake name. 💕💕

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wish I could install a filter on my computer so I would never see any news about her or the fucking royals...

    ReplyDelete
  6. ha ha. I don't think the Queen has a secret IG account to take potshots at people who take potshots at her.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Royal press correspondents claim that her personal Instagram’s reactivation was a glitch. My guess is that she intentionally reactivated it and then was made to shut it down when the staff found out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A glitch? How convenient because that just happens everyday right? Lmao! I would be more inclined to believe she activated it to delete some of her dad loving posts because they don’t fit the narrative she has been selling since before the wedding.

      Delete
  8. I think that she reactivated it herself or had someone else do it on her behalf in order to delete some of the entries she had praising her father.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Clapping back at her haters is one thing, but there is also some gruesome stuff coming out of the Meghan support squad.

    People saying they hope the Royal journalists who cover Meghan drop dead of a heart attack (that was a young female attorney based in New York, with her own name and photo on her account!), people saying Kate is wrinkly/decrepit/lazy, people saying they hope William and his kids all expire so Meghan can be Queen.

    If some of the really ugly stuff can be traced back to Meghan....that would be bad.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm beginning to think more and more that Meghan has a serious psychological problem apart from narcissistic personality disorder.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well, that's nice and petty.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous9:41 AM

    +1 Mischi.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Nutty_Flavor - it's the same with so many fandoms. I've seen death threats from crazed fans of Cumberbum's wife, I've seen One Directioners froth at the mouth about this one's girlfriend or that one's girlfriend, I've seen friendships irrevocably broken because two people liked the same pop singer.

    It's a fascinating and terrifying social study. If I were a sociologist, I'd write a dissertation.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Zebra, you should read the crazy dissertation that Lainey wrote about Meghan today! As though Meghan was some sort of genius in PR! and she goes on about how the wedding planned by Meghan (of course) was such a hit! It's laughable the lengths that Lainey goes to to try to defend a crazy woman! or maybe Lainey really believes this! In either case, it's a fascinating expose of insanity.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Lol! Girl, you have better things to do.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Zebra, very good point. This is the first time the Royals (or maybe any Royals) have really had to deal with contemporary fandom culture.

    I disagree with people who say "the Queen has it all under control".

    I don't think anyone has it under control, not the Queen, not Meghan, not the palace staff, not anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  17. hahaha, this is sooooooo not the first time the Royals have had to deal with celebrity culture or fandoms....Nutty must be 16 & not even old enough to remember when Wills & Kate got married, not to mention Chuck & Di, Andrew & his GF's including Koo, and Fergie...

    Knew something was going on when suddenly her IG account was active again...meaning she logged in with her old credentials, instead of setting up new right off the bat...

    Here come the trolls threatening death

    ReplyDelete
  18. Charles and Diana and Fergie and Andrew are very lucky the internet wasn't up and running during their heyday.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Do Tell is right. Can you imagine?

    This MM kerfluffle is nothing new. The Royals have been whackadoo for centuries. We just get to see it more now.

    And crazy fans are nothing new. Ever heard of Beatlemania? Or even further back- the funeral of silent film star Rudolph Valentino. "His funeral was, in a word, insane. First, inconsolable fans began overwhelming the New York police. The Smithsonian reports that the crowd outside of the funeral home totaled more than 100,000 people. Eventually, a riot erupted as the mourners fought to get one last glimpse of the “Latin lover."

    There's nothing new under the sun.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Or even further back, the craziness over Alexandra, Princess of Wales when she married the future king in 18963? It rivaled the craze over Diana. Women copied everything she did.

    And really, the people here--who've alleged MM is really a man, not pregnant, diagnosed her with all kinds of mental illnesses, swore that they're not racist but hate MM because of some made up reasons like the look on her face--are hardly the ones to point fingers about other people being crazy. You all sound utterly deranged most of the time.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Oh, crikey.

    "Beatlemania" doesn't compare with contemporary fandom, with its immediate access to celebrities via social media and its lack of gatekeepers.

    When William and Kate married in Spring of 2011, Twitter had about 50 million users, primarily in the US. Now it has about 326 million users all over the world.

    During previous Royal eras, mass media was primarily a one-way affair. Not any more.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @Nutty you didn't seem disgusted in a past Meghan blind when people were wishing she would be killed by the royal family, so save the faux outrage. People were calling Kate lazy long before Meghan, I don't agree with them she obviously wants to spend time with her kid's, but before that it was all about her being waity Katie and stories of her sister profiting off of her royal connection and articles when her parents advertised anything remotely royal themed. They both get criticised for the way they look wrinkles, being thin or whatever other nasty things people want to say, they will always be pitted against each other Meghan's copying Kate because she wore a coat, Kate's copying Meghan by wearing trousers it's pathetic journalism meant to rile people up.

    @Krab I couldn't agree more the hatred is ridiculous so many comments about her smile, touching her hair, touching her bump or heaven forbid looking or touching her own husband. There's less hated on the blinds about rapists and murderers.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I've been skipping your comments for years, Leanne, so I'll just continue to skip this one.

    As soon as I see your name I just scroll on by. Same for Krab.

    ReplyDelete
  24. That's great, Becky. Maybe you could also stop mentioning it every single comment thread too, mmmmmmmkay?

    ReplyDelete
  25. I was really worried that the person who produces one blind item a day about Meghan was sick as there was no blind about her for a couple of days. Glad to see the writer is feeling better now.

    And glad to see too that the former birthers have found a new target with a person in a position of authority and prestige that clashes with her horrible personality and her multiple lies, and not at all her skin color. Congratulation, birthers! Now, have a few more inbred (but white) babies in God's name.

    ReplyDelete
  26. How would you know this? You wouldn't, made up stocking filler.

    ReplyDelete
  27. The queen has seen it all. She’s lived thru the great depression/slump, world war II, the wallis simpson /abdication affair, her sisters , kids, relatives escapades and divorces, the trends and cultural shifts within thse 90 some years. Meghan is a blip in her book. Harry is sixth in line to the throne so chances are slim he’dmake it to the top spot.

    ReplyDelete
  28. All of Enty's blinds regarding the Duchess of Blah have turned out to be true.

    ReplyDelete
  29. What MM blinds turned out to be true?

    ReplyDelete
  30. No they haven’t

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Which ones turned out to be incorrect? Pick any blind about the Duchess of Blah and I'll cite a corresponding item in the British press reporting what she did.

      Delete
  31. That she smuggled cocaine though an airport in July. Lol

    ReplyDelete
  32. C'mon Enty, put some more effort into it. You're getting lazy with these blinds.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Not to worry that certain insta postings were scrubbed, as well as Her Blahness' wonderful literary blog Tig -- the internet never forgets.

    ReplyDelete
  34. She must be a busy girl. Shots are being fired from all sides lately.

    ReplyDelete
  35. @Nutty You're depriving yourself. The comments from those two are, if nothing else, entertaining.

    It's not just Enty. People frickin' magazine is running a story about tension between the Duchesses. Stories are pouring out all over the place, and one has to wonder exactly why that is. (For clarification for the tunnel-visioned, no, it's not because she's black.)

    ReplyDelete
  36. JFC look at all the racist misogynist trolls, congrats you just showed why none of the royals have SM accounts.

    This is a gossip blog, it's supposed to be fun.

    Some of you (Nutty) need some serious medical intervention ASAP.

    ReplyDelete
  37. People don't get shit talked about if there isn't anything about them to shit talk. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  38. OMG if this comes out, it'll be a HUGE story.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anonymous3:23 AM



    The photo of Markle and Mulroney up in Toronto is revealing. Hair extensions matted, eyes bulging out of her head, Mulroney helping her to stand.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Yes on Twatter her name is Anne Boleyn and on ig her name Sussex squad it’s pathetic that she gets nasty with people on social media and threatens them I can’t wait until she’s gone

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days