December 9, 2018
Some palace intrigue. Apparently sides have been drawn and this next in line is joining forces with the alliterate one we all know to try and get extra time or any time as top of the pile.
Prince Charles/Meghan Markle
Some palace intrigue. Apparently sides have been drawn and this next in line is joining forces with the alliterate one we all know to try and get extra time or any time as top of the pile.
Prince Charles/Meghan Markle
The real royal family is chained in the basement of Buckingham Palace! When are we going to get a blind about that Enty?
ReplyDeleteIt's true. What we actually see are reptilian simulacra.
ReplyDeleteOh man, I'm kind of missing the crazy ass commenters we had who actually believed that shit.
Hi DM'ers!! 😁 😁 Shouldnt you be making your mince pies for Christmas by now?
ReplyDeleteI really don't know anyone who is excited about having Charles as king. He's not a strong or decisive man.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I think he's done some good stuff, such as the Prince's Trust for at-risk young people. He also puts a lot of emphasis on sustainable building and I like his new initiative to preserve the British pub, many of which have closed in recent decades.
But King Charles? Yeah, not really. William seems OK for the job.
1) I don’t understand this BI
ReplyDelete2) They’re both outsiders -no one likes him For how he treated Diana and no on likes her because she’s fake as fuck.
Well this certainly explains who's financing the positive MM articles. Charles and Meghan partnering are like the blind leading the blind. I have my popcorn and a front row seat and I'm going to enjoy every minute.
ReplyDeleteDoes she make-believe and call him "daddy," like Harry does?
ReplyDeleteMaybe it just means she is going to give him favored grandparent status? Charles seems very sensitive/jealous of the strong bond Kate's parent's have with William's children. I totally understand why the Middletons are more in the mix with the grandkids, they don't have to stand on formality...and surely are capable of putting toothpaste on their own toothbrushes, unlike Charles. I think the Middleton's are just more hands-on grandparents. Meghan letting Charles be more involved with her baby will improve his optics.
ReplyDeleteI think Camilla is going to keep an eye on MM, and not let her take advantage of Charles.
Shame. I actually don’t mind Charles. I like his charitable work, which includes environmental preservation.
ReplyDeleteCharles was ahead of his time with environmental preservation. I do like the work the Prince's Trust does too.
ReplyDeleteHe's just hopelessly out of touch.
Also, MM makes Camilla likable! That could be the biggest reason.
ReplyDeleteOh how you people so easily forget and or choose to be ignorantly so heaping any praise at all on that monster Charles considering his best buddy Jimmy Savile ran a train on the UK's top politicians for YEARS with child sexual extortion rings strewn throughout Parliament that has still as of yet seen the light of day in terms of Justice, but don't you worry, it's comin'!
ReplyDeleteThere could be blind after blind about Andrews daughters having to pimp themselves out to wealthy men to live the lifestyle or his own very close ties to hedge fund manager and lolita island owner Jeffrey Epstein, Les Wexler and the rest of the israeli extortion crew, but it doesn't make a difference how intertwined your fantasies are with the royal family and some artificial reality you've created around them because of the conditioning.
I don't understand why Enty is implying Miss Markle has ANY bargaining power within the royals considering how easily they got rid of Diana, and she was pedigreed.
Right on Solo!!! +100000
DeleteThese know-it-all comments are laughable, as if you're an insider and know what Charles and Camilla are actually thinking. And don't believe all the bullshit you read in the DM. They're just using MM as click bait and you fall for it every time.
ReplyDeleteWrong choice of who to try to manipulate.
ReplyDeleteSupposedly (as in I don't believe everything I read) William restrcted access to the children from Charles when Charles wouldn't give him all the money he wanted to renovate Anmer Hall.
ReplyDeleteCharles isn't all in with the Atlantean tendencies that constitute Crown behavior. He's like a Fredo Corleone who doesn't know his family's in the mob.
ReplyDeleteWas reading about how MM has pressured Harry into not joining his family for their Boxing day pheasant hunt. It must kill William to see how whipped his brother is. If MM was really anti-hunting, she wouldn't married a guy who is a hunter. Let alone a family that is also into sport hunting. So much for healing a public rift.
ReplyDeleteDiana didn't like hunting either. So what? "whipped" and "pressured," love the misogyny.
ReplyDeleteIf he term pussy-whipped is good enough for Pauline Kael, it's good enough for me.
ReplyDeleteLet the Puritans say uxorious.
I knew it was Charles, because he hates the fact that William, just like Diana is much more popular than himself. Charles and William do not have a close relationship and his lack of access to the Cambridge babies really bothers him, but he is also not close to Camilla’s grands, she has retained her own estate where she spends time with her children and grandchildren.
ReplyDeleteCharles has never really liked small children and has said so on many occasions.
William will never forgive Charles for taking Dianas HRH in the divorce, because as the Mother of a future King, how could she not be HRH, and curtseying to her children and ex husband was a humiliation that Charles made sure she suffered.
Charles will be King, no matter what, there is no abdication or skipping the line in the British monarchy.
Diana died at the hands of a drunk driver, and because she was not wearing her seatbelt. If Diana had retained her HRH she would have had her Royal Protection Officers, and would have been securely seat belted while being driven by her RPO’s Al Fayeds security would have never been allowed to drive her under any circumstances, another reason William will not forgive Charles.
ReplyDeleteMegs is making Charlie her new Dad, probably even calling him Pa like Harry, getting sympathy from Charlie for her real Dad & half Sis and the crap they pull in the tabs. She's trying to get him to favor her over Kate, if not Harry over Wills.
ReplyDeleteThe firm was never going to let diana marry the muslim
DeleteCurlySueZu there has been a most recent abdication in favor of an American divorcee, in case you forgot. However, Charles would never abdicate and Elizabeth would never name William over his father.
ReplyDeleteOh, you are absolutely right and DUH, ha ha I can’t believe I forgot about Edward and Wallis, it was a huge shake up and QE2 and the QM blamed her Fathers early death on having to ascend the throne.
ReplyDeleteHuge mistake and I appreciate you pointing it out, thoughtfully
Yes, I agree Andi Megs is playing Charles just like sne has Harry. It’s so sad for Harry, but it won’t stand the Queen will not let Megs continue to pull the limelight away from William and Kate.
ReplyDeleteI loved Diana and seeing Harry taken in by Megs and all her lies is especially heartbreaking , because you know Diana would have never let her near Harry.
is the DM the Daily Mirror or Daily Mail?
ReplyDeletethanks!
I'm beginning to enjoy Enty's Meghan click bait.
ReplyDeleteYou people are hysterical!
A bunch of very sick trolls .. hysterics too lol
DeleteIt's not true -- Wills has complained that Chaz doesn't spend time with the kids, not the other way around. As far as Chaz thinking Megula represents some kind of higher power, okkaaaaaaay.
ReplyDelete@modsquad, Fredo Corleone was the smartest character in Godfather series. When everyone else was busy dying or killing each other, Fredo was banging cocktail waitresses two at a time! Now thats a sign of a visionary, why have one if you can have two!
ReplyDeleteThe future king gets less time with them than Princess Kate‘s parents, Carole and Mike Middleton.
ReplyDeleteThough some in Charles’s inner circle question why he doesn’t get as much time with his grandchildren as Kate’s parents do, the Prince of Wales himself sees the situation more logically.
“He is pragmatic about it,” a royal insider tells PEOPLE in this week’s cover story. “He is accepting that a daughter gravitates toward her own family.”
After Prince Louis was born,
Prince Charles still has not seen his newest grandson, four days after he was born.
He is currently in Scotland on holiday and will not see the baby until today at the earliest, the Mail can reveal.
There have long been rumours of tensions between Charles and William, particularly over how much he and his wife, the Duchess of Cornwall, get to see his grandchildren.
The couple were at Birkhall, their private Highland home, on Monday when Kate, 36, delivered the baby.
FWIW, it's been a long, long, looooooong standing tradition in the British Royal Family that the relationship between the ruling monarch and their heir are, at best, somewhat strained, and frequently are downright adversarial. It's definitely been going on since the Hanovarians took over after Queen Anne's death in 1714 (George II and Queen Caroline were delighted when their heir Frederick died as a young man; AFAIK, though, they didn't have any real issues w/their grandson George, who became George III), and the only exceptions have involved female heirs: William IV didn't seem to be bothered about young Princess Victoria, and George VI and then-Princess Elizabeth were actually very close. Victoria and her heir Edward VII were always at odds, however, and, well, we know about Elizabeth and Charles. *sigh* Given this history, it's not outside the realm (joke, and it stays) of possibility that the current heir and his heir might not be the closest of relations. When the family business is based on waiting for Mum or Dad to buy the farm before you can actually take over and get to work, well...
ReplyDeleteSunnykm, it is the Daily Mail.
ReplyDeleteSo Prince Charles is trying to make the public like Meghan Markle? Dont waste your money. She is the next Fergie. She wont last and if she manages to last she will be miserable.
ReplyDeleteMy guess is that she and Charles enjoy the same 'substances'.
ReplyDeleteI love that photo of Markle and Mulroney at some party, hair extensions in one big mat, eyes bugging out of her head.
That's your `Duchess`. LMAO
We're so pretty oh so pretty...... Vacant!
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/HxcdmPcoc_k
I don’t think Charles is helping himself by attaching to Meghan.
ReplyDeleteShe’s been getting beat up by the media even before they got married. People hearing that she made Kate cry, a woman who has been in the royal circle for 17 years and has almost nothing negative said about her? Bad.
Telling everyone she was pregnant at Eugenie’s wedding then leaving? Bad.
Having three employees leave in her first six months? Bad.
Regardless of how her father behaves... if he dies while they are still estranged, which seems likely, she will never come back from it. No press releases or photo-ops with Charles, Harry, and the baby will compensate for it. The public will always remember her father doing interviews begging to reconcile and her icing him out.
The problem is, instead of recognising her own behaviour MeAgain and Harry keep pulling out the racist card. I watched Suits (for gabriel) and I didn't know of her as coloured until I saw her mum. Even then it was such a something nothing. Poor William and Kate. I really like them imagine having to deal with this shit in the papers.
ReplyDeleteWhat gets me about the Diana drunk driving death is that she could have most probably would've had a fighting chance of survival if the crash had happened in the States or the UK. I mean the French took 2 hours at 20mph to get her dying self to the hospital. In the US its be scoop and dash and in surgery within 15 minutes. Transfusions asap and whatnot. But no one wants to talk aboutvtaht.
ReplyDelete