Sunday, December 09, 2018

Blind Item #5

Some palace intrigue. Apparently sides have been drawn and this next in line is joining forces with the alliterate one we all know to try and get extra time or any time as top of the pile.

94 comments:

  1. I am completely confused by this one....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Charles and Meghan for him to do what exactly?

    ReplyDelete
  3. So Prince Charles and Markle are in cohoots together. Ok Enty.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi DM'ers! 😘 How has your Sunday football been today, cover your bets at Ladsbrokes ok?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Prince Charles! Maybe the next blind can be them having an affair! Of course,then he will have to kill her! Good digger fail! Bad fan fiction.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I thought "next in line" might be Beatrice. She is next in line after Harry (disregarding her father, Prince Andrew) and her current partner is somewhat scandalous.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So CHarles is siding up with Markle, so that he isn't skipped over for WIlliam to take the throne on Elizabeths death....just how will Megan help with that exactly?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats what I understood too. There has been a lot of talk about him having to abdicate soon, due to bad press

      Delete
  8. Golddigger fail stupid autocorrect. Hey,every time I write stupid autocorrect comes up as a word suggestion!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I’m guilty of reading the DM and no one is on Markle side. They have been relentless in bashing her and no one from the Firm is defending her.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think Elizabeth has vowed to outlive Charles to spare England of him being King and that whore he has as Queen.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sparkle just lost ANOTHER aide today. The proof that she's difficult and no one likes her is in the pudding.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Or whatever title she advances up to when he is King Charles

    ReplyDelete
  13. QE and Charles are both staunch monarchy. Charles knows his mother will not step down, she will stay as her father did till her death. I don't believe Charles needs anything from MM other than her to just make Harry happy and keep him from causing royal scandal. Why would he have to join forces with anyone. She is only married to his spare, who btw now is 6th in line.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I hope the Duchess of Cardboard keeps popping out kids until menopause just to keep knocking him down the line.

      Delete
  14. Unlike her early yachting career, when the steamy piles dropped onto her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You fool J. It's so obvious that you would love the very thing you claim to abhore. If someone offered you a stack of cash you'd happily let them shit on you. I'm sure you'd do it for free ninety free.
      I mean, I shit on you every time I respond to your silly posts, soo.... Thanks

      Delete
  15. Anonymous10:15 AM

    Charles & Meghan? I know Charles likes her but the only thing to come from this alliance would be the end of the monarchy. She's absolutely despised and Charles isn't much better if DM is a demographic model.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Nutty_Flavor,Beatrice is not at the top of the pile. And has no power. Plus the only real ammo even in fan fiction, that M&M has is Andrew's nasty "secrets". That's B's Daddy so no.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This is completely absurd.

    It’s a hereditary monarchy. No one can be skipped over or try to get “extra time at the top of the pile”. It doesn’t work like that. Charles will be King when HM dies. When Charles dies, William will be King. When William dies, George will be King. It always makes me laugh when people say “Charles should be skipped in favour of William”. Erm, no....that’s impossible.

    Markle can’t influence anything or help Charles in any way. She’s probably sucking up to him like mad, but there’s no way he’d favour her over any member of his real family for any reason.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oh...and Markle won’t move up to anything when Liz dies. William will become Prince of Wales...the Sucksexes will stay exactly where they are. They really are quite irrelevant in the scheme of things.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Charles and William don't get along that great and supposedly Charles likes Meghan.

    ReplyDelete
  20. So what are they going to do—kill the Queen? This blind is ridiculous!

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Donmack,you leave out the what ifs? Only an adult can be King/Queen. What Happens if William dies young? His child won't be of age.All Hail King Harry and Queen Megan!?

    ReplyDelete
  22. You guys literally don't know what you're talking about re the line of succession.

    And I think "top of the pile" means "popular."

    ReplyDelete
  23. No....a child can be King/Queen. If William dies & George accedes as a child, there would be a regency. Harry & Meghan (like she’d still be around anyway!) would be Prince & Princess Regent. For Harry to ever be King, Charles, William, George, Charlotte & Louis would all have to die or abdicate.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Guesser, for Harry to be regent for George, Elizabeth, Charles and William would have to die in the next 13 years, and that Parliament would vote for Harry as regent over let's say Andrew, Ann or even Edward. that is more than unlikely.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Harry will never be King. There are 5 people standing in his way. This isnt the middle ages where people die all the time. Besides, what do you really gain? It isnt as if the King has any real power. They are a constitutional monarchy which means the Parliament really holds the power. Meaghan is lucky she is a Duchess and keeps her tiara and title. What more really could anyone legitimately expect.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I don’t understand how an allegiance to MM gets Charles extra time. At what?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Kate would probably be regent. Not that it's likely.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Meghan doesn't have a tiara. If she went to an event where tiaras were worn, she'd have to borrow one from HM.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I think Charles is happy Meaghan is so disliked, takes the heat off of Camilla. Maybe thats his angle.

    ReplyDelete
  30. (Unless HM gave her one. She gave Diana the Cambridge Lovers' Knot as a wedding present, for example.)

    ReplyDelete
  31. Kate could not be regent. She is royal by marriage, not by blood. If William died, George wojuld be King, and Kate would be King Mother.

    ReplyDelete
  32. +Donmack. There have been plenty of minor kings. George's mom, Kate, would be his guardian but Harry would be Regent. Let's hope that never happens.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I think Charles was seriously traumatised over the disaster of his marriage to Diana. He still hasn’t recovered in populatity, and probably never will. I think he loves Harry enough to be desperate not to see the same thing happen to him...so he’ll be making nice with Meghan as much as he can.

    ReplyDelete
  34. kate could be regent.
    charles is probably trying to diffuse the tension among the kids /spouses by eing friendly with megs.
    if megs and harry break up, megs has lots of dirt for the gossip columns. its messy the the firm / monarchy and he knows that.
    if the kids spouses keep up their current leaks , its messy for the firm / monarchy with all the dirt gossip.
    he’s probably trying to contain it before it all gets out of hand

    But the people love gossip, if it were all roses at the monarchy it would be extremely boring

    ReplyDelete
  35. Oh I'm loving these! So much better than reading about some random rapper you Donte care about hooking up with a instrgram model engaged to a b list actor.......But confused by this one, Charles and MM buttering up the Queen to abdicate? Or build more bombshells that may finish the dear lady off?? It's shaping up like an episode of the Tudors or Dangerous Liasons

    ReplyDelete
  36. Well I see that the "Royals" didn't have enough gossip so lets pill it on and use MM for the blinds. This is all BS. MM is living it up and people are so butt hurt that why not make-up stories and put her down. She is laughing all the way to the bank, palace, and everywhere else. Some people are so sad.

    ReplyDelete
  37. I agree with Jane - there is probably a lot of Royal dirt we don't know about, which is what makes it valuable.

    As a commenter said yesterday, any proof that the Royals were involved in Diana's death would be troublesome. Even Meghan saying, "Harry believes his mother was murdered" would make big waves.

    More info Charles' drinking, trouble within his marriage to Camilla, William cheating on Kate, Andrew's involvement with underage people of either gender, Andrew pimping out Beatrice or Beatrice pimping out herself could all harm the firm. All of the above are just rumors now - sometimes Enty rumors - but confirmation would be unpleasant.

    Finally, while Philip has been given a pass for his less-than-PC utterances because he is 97, suggestions that someone else in the Royal family was not in line with the prevailing political orthodoxy would be deadly.

    If you're reading, Meg - and I assume you are, because you have nothing much else to do these days - I'd advise you to take a big check to be quiet and then make your next husband a nice Russian billionaire.

    Otherwise your next "humanitarian" trip could be your last.

    ReplyDelete
  38. There would have to be an Act of Parliament naming Kate (in advance) as regent if George succeeds as a child, or William becomes incapacitated. If there isn’t one, then it will be the next adult in line of succession. Prince Philip would have been regent if HM had died when Charles was small, but that took an act of parliament and was specific to them. Highly unlikely it would be Kate.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Anything can happen - particularly when Sparkles is around - but the chances of the Queen, Charles, and William all biting the dust in the next 13 years don't seem large.

    That said, Fergie always said she believed Beatrice would be Queen some day.

    If the same meteor that took out the others took out Andrew as well, and Harry was unable to be regent for some other reason (like fucking off to LA with his fame-hungry wife), then perhaps Beatrice could serve as Princess Regent until George or Charlotte was ready to rule.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Okay - I read on the DM that when Elizabeth reaches the age of 95, she will enact a regency, where Charles will be king except in name only.
    Should William succeed as King after Charles, and his children are still of a minor age, a regency will be set for each of them until they are 18 years of age.

    Harry and Sparkle are stuck.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Any truth to the rumor that Meghan is sleeping with William?

    ReplyDelete
  42. The only context I can see this being accurate in is that maybe Charles is siding with Meghan & once the baby is born he will be given "preference" as Grandparent of choice? Grandpa of choice is a no brainer considering her grey matter deficient father. Charles has been pretty much sidelined as a grandparent by Will & Kate in favor of her family. That's all I got. In any other context it's BS as the throne is hereditary and not a popularity contest.

    ReplyDelete
  43. @j I don’t think William would touch Megawhore with Dims dick if you paid him there’s rumors that William can’t stand the sight of sparkles she disgusts him that’s why he was trying to talk sense into Harry about her but Harry isn’t called Dim for nothing he’s a spoilt child and very low IQ

    ReplyDelete
  44. Tom Markle is a 70-year old drunk whose best days are behind him.

    Prince Charles is a 70-year old man who "likes a tipple" and whose best days are....I don't know.

    But Charles has definitely has the best stylist and PR team.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At first glance Thomas Markle did look messy. But the more I pay attention the more I think that's just exactly what they WANTED you to think. And I don't think he's a drunk at all. He's admitted to drinking a little, even partying with coke back in the day... So that makes him- NORMAL. MM is looking really bad after all these sweet cards to her father are coming out, thanking him for making her who she is. If it's true and he's sacrificed for her while the mother(saint doria) was MIA, then she's far worse than I thought. It takes an exceptionally terrible person to betray their own parent who took the time to lovingly sacrifice and raise them

      Delete
  45. This is probably the silliest blind I've seen in the last two years since I found CDaN. MM has absolutely no influence on anything. She isn't capable of helping Charles with anything. I can see that he likes her but that doesn't mean shit. Also there is no way that old dingbat Liz is giving up the throne til she croaks.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Maybe Meghan has convinced Charles that she can help him improve his profile among younger British citizens, particularly those that are not ethnic English, Scottish, Welsh, or Northern Irish. It doesn't mean it's true - but it's not hard to imagine that she could persuade a man with Charles' fragile ego.

    One last note about Beatrice: she is the highest-ranking adult royal who has not been caught up in the Sparkles mess.

    The Queen, Charles, William, Harry, and Prince Andrew all play roles in the Meghan drama, and so did Eugenie, albeit unintentionally.

    But not Beatrice. That might be useful someday.

    ReplyDelete
  47. "Next in line" can mean other things besides next in line for throne. Like people in media, business, sports, etc. It could mean Camilla since she will be the next queen, but i cant believe an already unpopular camilla woulf hitchnher wagon to sparkles.

    ReplyDelete
  48. As with the yachting blinds, she is not the bottom. (I know. I know.)

    ReplyDelete
  49. Huh? I read this as Prince Charles has joined forces with MM to persuade the Queen to abdicate so Charles can have more time as King--or any time at all. It's laughable that MM would have any influence at all.

    ReplyDelete
  50. The only thing I can too imagine is Charles and Meghan. he is too staunch old school. Then again, he is HATED by the public and his mother might step over him and hand it to PERFECT William. Perhaps the only thing these two have in common is NOT watching this. Charles wants to be king. Or does he? Perhaps Meghan smearing Kate and William a bit (since they are snubbing her) helps Charles' cause. Still, don't see Charles going against his entire family for a 'new' outsider. Perhaps Meghan is smart enough to befriend the OTHER scandalous outsider CAMILLA and then go about pecking away her father in law/husband THIS way.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Nutty_Flavor, you really need to step back a bit. You sound pretty unhinged. Suuuuuure, I'll just bet Meghan is reading an obscure gossip site, and if so, she'll certainly take your advice.

    As for the "Sparkles mess" some of you are a little too up your own ass. Seriously. The average Brit doesn't know nor care about made up Enty blinds.

    ReplyDelete
  52. As far as Meghan being a yachter who was defecated on, lets all agree that there are different tiers of yachters.

    1) Will do ANYTHING (water sports, and worse) for a BIG check by the perverse mega-rich spenders (middle eastern sheikhs, oil barons, or your just plain run of the mill tycoon).

    2) Is up for a free vacation fucking/sucking on a lavish yacht (or tropical island), with all the free booze and high quality drugs s/he can hoover down because, you know, that sort of behavior doesn't count when you are high or drunk. Also, being in that rarefied atmosphere gives the yachter the opportunity to meet and schmooze with Hollywood movers and shakers so they can lever themselves for parts, or to meet a wealthy benefactor who is up for having a beautiful girlfriend/boyfriend on their arm who knows the sexual ropes and who will accept lavish gifts (as payment, but s/he pretends they are just gifts). Bonus points if the wealthy benefactor has a title.

    I think Meghan falls in the latter. There are probably a few more tiers, so feel free to chime in.

    The only maneuvering Meghan is probably doing these days is trying to repair her reputation and possibly trying to get Harry to get the queen to give their offspring a royal title. You can't tell me that she wouldn't LOVE to be the mother of a little Prince or Princess. Meghan is well aware that HRM changed laws to let Kate's children born after George have the titles of Princess and Prince.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How were Andrew and Edward named Prince? What rules were changed?

      Delete
  53. Well, Krab, your general credibility on this issue is pretty low. Weren’t you recently telling me that using the word “court” to refer to the Cambridge and Sussex offices showed my lack of knowledge? I referred you to that day’s Daily Telegraph royal coverage, which used the word “court” in the headline.

    CDAN blinds are frequently referenced in the DM comments, which are monitored by the Royals’ teams, and quoted on Twitter, Tumblr, and Facebook, which are no doubt also part of their social listening programs. The Firm is a business.

    Meghan, meanwhile, is a self-obsessed starlet who lives for publicity and reads every word written about herself. I’m sure she has been here, and since she currently has no Royal engagements, she is probably here right now.

    Once again, you have no idea what you’re talking about, although that’s never stopped you before.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Here for the comments

    ReplyDelete
  55. Also lol, you’ve got to live Fergue’s optimism; Beatrice will never be queen 😂

    ReplyDelete
  56. Keep telling yourself that, Nutty. I'm sure it helps a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Okay a little Royal info.... the Queen is not allowed to retire or step down. The magazine's that print that do it for s and g's. Charles will become King in my when she passes. Edward was allowed too because he married into and all he did was back off of a lot superfluous organizational ribbon cutting.
    You guys know this it's not hard. No King or Queen born of the blood has ever done that, ever. In any country.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Also Charles isn't going to alienate his children. Either of them. He would try to play intermediary and bring the boys close again if in fact they are at odds.
    But who would ever have thought that brothers didn't want to be neighbors all their life and it has to be weird for William and Kate because Harry isn't the 3rd wheel anymore. But it's a good thing for them.
    Plus two sister in laws not getting along? Well color me surprised that has never happened in the whole wide world. If the palace was really against this it would have never happened. Your kidding yourselves if you think otherwise. Too much pressure for a then pregnant future Queen who was sick as a dog and a bride who was getting attention like she never has.
    I think they will be fine.
    Eugenie has always been jealous of Kate. The Queen may like her more than Eugenie and Beatrice

    ReplyDelete
  59. Charles playing savior to Megs, to help burnish his popularity and thumb his nose at William who has always had a much pricklier relationship with Charles than Harry.
    Charles has publicly complained about his access to Wills family.
    William was quite upset with Charles for stripping Diana of HRH in their divorce, granted it was the Queens decision but it was well documented that Charles pushed for her to be stripped of it. Unusually the Palace put out the statement that as a Mother to the heir to the throne Diana would still be considered a part of the Royal Family and keep her title of Diana, Princess of Wales. Stripping Diana a Mother to a future King of HRH status meant she had to curtsey to both her ex husband and her sons.
    No such statement was ever made for Sarah Ferguson, designating her as a part of the Royal Family, even though she was Mother to two blood Princesses.
    William immediately told his Mother, Don’t worry Mummy, when I am King I will give it back it to you.
    I think the blind is just that a jab to William from petty AF Charles, who has never redeemed himself to William who had hoped when Diana died she would have had her HRH returned.

    ReplyDelete
  60. "J said...

    Unlike her early yachting career, when the steamy piles dropped onto her."

    I heard those rumors, too, but never understood how this depraved act was a "thing", until I saw as recent episode of "Sally4Ever" on HBO (excellent show), and in the show (spoiler alert) a married director that Sally wants to hook up with so she can get better acting roles, takes a wet dump on her face. I mean, he is straining to defecate on her face! OMG- so Markles received that, too, as pay for play. How low can one get?

    ReplyDelete
  61. "Redhead66 said...

    I think Charles is happy Meaghan is so disliked, takes the heat off of Camilla. Maybe thats his angle."

    Ah, this makes sense to me!

    ReplyDelete
  62. Okay a little Royal info.... the Queen is not allowed to retire or step down. The magazine's that print that do it for s and g's. Charles will become King in my when she passes. Edward was allowed too because he married into and all he did was back off of a lot superfluous organizational ribbon cutting. You guys know this it's not hard. No King or Queen born of the blood has ever done that, ever. In any country.


    @ Jennacheryl - King Leopold III of Belgium abdicated in favor of his son, the heir apparent. It doesn't happen often, but it has happened.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Love you Nutty_Flavor- you bring the truth and I don't believe anyone who tries to discredit you. Instead I just ignore their posts.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Can we all agree this is likely a made up story?

    ReplyDelete
  65. Some of the misunderstanding here is kind of stupendous, most notably the assertion that Sparkles will somehow "move up" in the hierarchy, or that she has access to some incredible top secret info. It's the other way around -- all her top secret info is starting to come out in dribs and drabs. While her mother abandoned the family, her father sacrificed a lot for her, and she kicked him in the teeth; she is not a nice person.

    Don't know about this blind; if she is trying to align herself with any of the Yorks, GOOD LUCK.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Every one is doing a really good job of explaining the ins and outs of the title/precedence /succession system in the UK, one slight error Kate would not become King Mother, though George could make it so if he choses to. QEII’s mother was called Queen Mother because she was a Queen in her own right (Queen and Mother of a Queen) strictly speaking she should have been known as Queen Dowager but she didn’t like that name and they settled on Queen Mother never again using her given name Elizabeth because of the confusion it would cause with QEII. If by this point Catherine has been made Queen Consort , William is deceased and George on the throne she would be known as Catherine,Queen Dowager or The Dowager Duchess of Cambridge.

    Jennacheryl.....The queen is allowed to retire and can abdicate any time she likes, Edward VIII abdicated 11 months after he was proclaimed king ,he was never crowned king because he bolted before the coronation could take place . However the Queen will never abdicate she made a solemn vow that she would remain Queen and serve her people until her dying day as her father had done.

    She may choose to retire and Charles will become regent ‘Monarch by Proxy’ but I that would be likely only of she was too ill or frail to carry out her duties.

    Some commenters still seem to think the Queen can decide to skip Charles in favour of William, she has absolutely no say in who follows her , it is set in stone , if Charles survives her he become king. There are only three circumstances where William could be made king immediately after Elizabeth’s death

    1. Charles is no longer alive
    2. Charles gives up his succession to the throne before the Queen dies.
    3. Charles is proclaimed king and immediately abdicates in his sons favour .
    All these choices depend on Charles not the Queen.

    However there have been countless predictions by psychics, astrologers and prophets since the day he was born that he will never become king.

    As for the blind, it makes little sense. Except that Charles is very soft hearted where Harry is concerned and may be making an effort to calm the troubled waters having a quite word behind the scenes , taking Megs side may be the only way to calm Harry down and heal the rift. Charles is not the most astute man at judging people he has had some very dicey friends over the years and can be easily duped but Camilla gets most people’s numbers pretty quickly , she will have the measure of Megs be it good or bad, I think Camilla is the one to watch regarding Charles' relationship with the DofS.

    ReplyDelete
  67. All the BRF, with the exception of Harry, consider Markle to have cooties. Big time cooties.
    That's why they are moving her an hour outside London, to a galaxy far, far away.
    The BRF gave Markle the benefit of the doubt by giving her a beautiful wedding.
    They know exactly who she is.

    Another personal assistant quit? Wow. Markle will not be beloved like Diana, because Markle is an outsider who doesn't know her manners and doesn't bother with royal protocol.

    Got all that Megs? You have cooties.

    ReplyDelete
  68. Anonymous7:13 PM


    Her 'father' is back in the tabloids today.

    Her father paid for college with "the Lottery"?
    Uh huh...

    ReplyDelete
  69. I think this reads as Charles is siding with MM in hopes of getting MM To the top of the “pile” of public support. She seems to be getting hammered in the press recently. I read this as Charles is coming to her defense.

    ReplyDelete
  70. "I am also fully aware of the challenges of being able to afford this level of schooling for many people around the world – myself included.

    "It was through scholarships, financial aid programmes and work-study where my earnings from a job on campus went directly towards my tuition - that I was able to attend university.



    @ mercy - MM’s tution at an out of state, private university had to have been enormous. Her father made good money and won hundreds of thousands of dollars in the lottery, yet MM professes that she paid for uni on her own. She’s lying.

    ReplyDelete
  71. I’d fuck MM so hard. Hell...I’d fuck Harry so hard. Love me some ginger. Back in the 90s I had Di so might as well have both the boys too.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Next in line upwards is Prince Louis, who is a baby, and downward is Prince Andrew for a few more months until Harry's baby is born. Otherwise next in line is Charles who doesn't need Markle for anything. He buys her clothes and the food she eats.

    ReplyDelete
  73. I think everyone is reading way too much into the ‘next in line” detail.

    I think this is about Prince Harry and Meghan; Hart is the next in line, in their family order. I think this blond is stating that the palace is going to continue to leak negative stories about alliterate MM, and Harry is going to make a public stand showing his support for her.

    This new media attention would put Harry “on top of the pile”, meaning that Harry’s PR would rise to the top. He would come out looking like a valiant knight, defending his woman. And he’d come out on top of William/Kate, who will look like the mean ones.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry for the typos! It’s late :)
      Blond=blind
      Hart= Harry

      Delete
  74. @purejuice: she eats?

    ReplyDelete
  75. I agree with you Checking it out. I thought it was Charles because there was an article on DM today about how he has a photo oF MM on display. It is strange he is supporting her as it is rumored Camila does not stand her. Why would he do that? Maybe because Harry does not want to ditch her even though there are numerous bad publicity about her and coming. Either way, I think whenever Harry wants to divorce her MM can make HM her ally and it would not change his mind.

    ReplyDelete
  76. "The Queen is not allowed to retire or step down.....No King or Queen born of the blood has ever done that, ever. In any country"

    Abdication is done regularly in the Netherlands, right across the Channel from the UK.

    Queen Beatrix abdicated in 2013 so her son Willem-Alexander could take the throne and lives in retirement.

    Her mother Juliana abdicated in 1980 so Beatrix could take over, and lived happily in retirement for nearly 25 years.

    Her mother Wilhelmina abdicated in 1948 so Juliana could get the throne.

    Not to mention Spain's Juan Carlos abdicating in 2014.

    So....might want to stop getting your Royal information from Buzzfeed.

    ReplyDelete
  77. Lots of abdications in Asia, too, and in the Ottoman Empire (which includes present-day Turkey)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_monarchs_who_abdicated


    ReplyDelete
  78. "I thought it was Charles because there was an article on DM today about how he has a photo oF MM on display. It is strange he is supporting her as it is rumored Camila does not stand her. Why would he do that?"

    It was on display in the public section of his living area, where it would be seen by as many people as possible.

    It's part of the Royals' "We did everything possible to make her feel accepted and at home" PR campaign, which might or might not involve inviting Doria for Christmas.

    ReplyDelete
  79. I agree with emerald city: watch Camilla. That woman is no simpleton, and Charles listens to her.
    This is all a storm in teacup frankly. Maybe Maybe Charles sat down for a friendly chat and a cup of tea with Sparkles, so Harry would quite his temper tantrums. Or perhaps he invited her to one of his fancy allotments to speak about cabbages because Harry cried that nobody was spending any private time with her.

    None of this means they're 'joining forces'. It's ridiculous to assume Sparkles could do anything for Charles. She's heinous and despised and for good reason, by pretty much everyone she comes in contact with.
    So maybe Charles really is as stupid as Harry, but Camilla isn't.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Great comments, especially the ones explaining the succession - thank you. This blind is misleading. I have a different take. I believe it could be about Harry joining forces with Meg, to get some time at the 'top of the pile'. It doesn't necessarily mean to be "King". Not long before Harry's relationship with Meg became public, he spoke about having a limited time to make an impact before George and Charlotte [now Louis] grow up to be the future of the monarchy. This is the feud going on and what many suspected about the dim Ginger one: he's dumb as a doorknob, petulant and very jealous of his brother as heir to the throne and his family. This is driving his behaviour, which, unfortunately, included marrying narcissist MM, who will also destroy him.

    ReplyDelete
  81. William and fergie

    ReplyDelete
  82. @Nutty_Flavor I would agree with you if it wasn't for the timing of this article and this blind. It could very well be the case, but when there was the release of Charles' bday photoshoot there was no single article on DM solely saying that he had a photo with Meghan. It was mostly about William and Kate photos or their kids photos and in the very last paragraph would be a PS there is a photo way in the back of Harry and Meghan wedding. So, I think it is weird why now and not then? Maybe I am overthinking.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Only reason Charles would be helping her is to use her. He still has pretty dismal approval ratings, especially for a future king. Only reason he gives her any help is to win the approval of minorities in Britain. The minute he's shown it isn't working (or if/when there's a scandal she's involved in), he'll throw her to the wolves. He's going to look out for number one. His legacy is at stake. He's not going to risk looking stupid for someone he's known for less than two years.

    ReplyDelete
  84. William and Harry have always been very close, and with Kate, they were the Three Musketeers. The factor that came in, and split William/Kate and Harry apart is Meghan Markle. She has vile cooties.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days