Saturday, November 24, 2018

Blind Item #3

Once again, this three named actress continues to amaze with her ability to make her own demands look like it is someone else causing all the issues in getting a third installment of a movie made. Does anyone really think that trashed actress is indispensable to a third film? You don't think they could find a niece or something and write the other person out? It is all about the money demands of the three named actress.

26 comments:

  1. Sarah Jessica Parker

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chloe Grace Moretz and Kick Ass 3

    ReplyDelete
  3. but probably SJP and making Kim Cattrell look like the baddie

    ReplyDelete
  4. horse-faced POS SJP blaming Cattral for no sequel when she just wants more $$

    SJP is washed up, Sex In The City is an aging relic of the 90s. Nobody cares.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kim Catrall is done, and I dont blame her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Problem is, she’s not allowed to be done. SJP won’t let this die and move on. It’s beyond ridiculous now. This is pretty much the only career SJP has so she’s grasping for straws. Kim doesn’t need this BS. She’s got a career. And talent.

      Delete
  6. I think it is Sarah Jessica. Put Tiffany Haddish in the role of Samantha- now that would be hilarious! Highest ratings ever for that tired series.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It actually might be kinda cool if they tried to make a new generation SATC. I know they did try, but I mean a good one this time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I can’t stand Sarah J Parker or her acting, Kim was the showand Boney ass Sarah thinks she was the star..
    Kim part was worth watching and LMAO on her antics..They don’t need a third installment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. My brother and my ex used to love watching SATC with me because they thought Samantha was freaking hilarious.

      Delete
    2. Oh hell yeah. Agree 100%. My hubby and son watched the show for Samantha. She was the star and had all the best scenes.

      Delete
  9. They shoulda stopped at one movie as a wrap-up of the successful TV series. They could have all gone on and had a positive legacy.... Now, nobody cares and NOBODY wants to see SJP's ugly mug on ANY form of media.

    She needs to go become a Walmart greeter in some remote, off-the-beaten path, backwoods town where she could be a big deal to the local chamber of commerce. (No offense to Walmart greeters, backwoods towns, or their local chamber of commerce)

    That bitch is Spent....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The second movie was such an embarrassment. And SJP still can’t let go.

      Delete
  10. I can't even imagine another Sex and the City movie. It's just sad, old and tired at this point. As with all of the other revivals. Even the shows I do adore *looks at you Gilmore Girls*, the revivals SUCK. Stop.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't even like SITC that much but Kim was the best . Maybe I just don't like SJP that much, the last movie she did I liked was Footloose.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Actually listening to a podcast about this at the moment and did think- why couldn’t they make a movie without Kim? Maybe because she’s right and she is the favourite and should therefore earn the same as SJP

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don’t think it could be SJP because despite what people think about her, she actually would be indispensable to a 3rd film. No one would see SATC3 without Carrie Bradshaw, bc the only people that would care about a 3rd movie are the diehard fans.

    ReplyDelete
  14. As bad as another "Sex & the City" movie would probably bomb, it would do even worse with no horseplay.

    But please: No more. The first movie was barely okay, and the second one horrible.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I was in high school when the show was on so I used to watch it because, you know, everyone else did too. I vaguely remember the first movie being okay but I was about 19 when I went to see the second one and it was an absolute horror show. A third?! Are you fucking kidding me? SJP is a terrible actress, her character is insufferable but also, that fucking annoying ginger one is all involved in politics now so who the fuck wants to pay to watch her? Pussy hat wearers, I suppose. And no Kim. It's already a sinking ship and it's not even started sailing.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Stfu sjp you have no movie with no Kim and god bless her for that because shows over and we don't need another damn movie!!! I'm a fan and I don't want another movie. Quit trying to make fetch happen because you can't maintain your career after satc. You have all the money in the world chill out learn to live your life off a screen

    ReplyDelete
  17. I not sure why enty is still running with this whole "SJP is the devil" storyline. 8 different actresses, producers and writers have come out and said that Kim Catrall was the one with the unreasonable demands and was the one who DID NOT show up for pre-production before filming of the 3rd installment of SATC began. The other 3 actresses were there. I guess since SJP is the bigger name more people will be enticed to comment on it than if Catrall was fingered as the "bad apple". Sorry but I'm not buying it. A producer and writer came out this week and clearly said Kim was the problem. He gave specific details, specifics. I'm sure there are documents and records to prove what he said. I wish enty would stop with the nonsense. I'm not sure why enty feels a need to create a conspiracy or false narrative for every blind item instead of just reporting the truth. Sorry but I don't believe that 10 different people working on the SATC3 production got together to spin the same story about Kim Catrall. I totally believe she is a diva and wanted more money. Look at all these people in these comments hating on SJP. No matter how she looks, she became a style icon because of SATC and has multiple, lucrative side businesses. Whether you like her face and her acting or not, she was cast as the star of that show, plain and simple. And no one can change that fact, not even Kim Catrall. I liked Kim's character but she was not the star of the show. Sometimes you have to take what you can get. I'm sure they offered he millions upon millions to do SATC 3. Now she is doing nothing but sitting at home waiting for her phone to ring. Plus she is aging and there won't be many more roles out there for her, a sad but awful truth of the acting business. Unfortunately I believe that Kim had started to believe her own hype which can be dangerous. And also now that the truth has been circulated about Kim's diva behavior, less people will want to work with her. She is only hurting herself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The actors who have come out in favor of SJP haven't done much since or had success in anything else, they need the money and SJP has the power, as a Producer, to make it happen. SJP IS the evil one here not Kim.

      Delete
  18. SJP, why the long face?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Adults making comments about a woman's face being long, comparing her to a horse- one comment after another after another is such a fucking riot. . Do they each think that THEIR comment is original and the rest are all copies? The joke has been the equivalent of a poo joke my kid told at 4 at this point-same level.
    There's been a break from this story and Enty is capitalizing on brining it back by pitting the two against each again. Right up in originality with said poo joke. Two women pulling each other's hair out.
    Give me a fucking break. Was the day that slow? The George Clooney story (?) etc. Everyone in Hollywood is secretly gay. I get it. Move on.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Sarah Jessica Parker is the exact same as Julia Roberts but Kim Catrall is a pedo supporter

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days