Sunday, November 25, 2018

Blind Item #2

The wheels move slowly in the weekly tabloid world. The times, they are changing for this alliterate former actress turned A+ list celebrity. They are sending out trial balloons through some of their outlets that are challenging the official timeline of when she split with one guy and started dating her current husband. Within the next few months they will accuse her of cheating. Will they ever accuse her of getting paid to date her current husband? They probably won't go that far.


85 comments:

  1. Megan Markle Sparkle again

    ReplyDelete
  2. +1 Tricia and we don’t need the tabloids to tell us

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She is attractive and Harry needed/qas expected/ to get married and get lost. He doesnt have the protagonist role, its Wills spot so the further away he is, the best!
      I think they will separate sometime soon, i give them 5 years max. She wont adapt, will want to xome back to the US and live a celeb life. I am sure. You have to be brit to handle that boring restrictive life!

      But Frogmore cottage looks awful by the way, servants home, seems like a pubishment really. Wasnt that Pakistani servant of Queen Victoria and his family living there? Just quite normal place for a royal. Shoudl have been given a proper house. Even Fergie and Andrew got a mansion

      Delete
  3. More than the gossip about this woman, I find the psychology and politics much more tantalizing. Why did the British Royal Family allow Harry to marry her? What's the attraction for Harry to marry a dumpy woman with such obvious imperfections? Why is she behaving the way she is? And, it's not just a story about someone cheating on someone else, it's her ambition and how she uses people to get what she wants, and how people go along with it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think its Harry giving a big Fuck You to the royal establishment for what they did to his mother amongst other things. The fact that she prolly gives good head is a bonus .

      Delete
    2. Harry never forgot what the firm did to his mummy. Hence the naked Nazi pictures in Vegas and marrying a nubian hooker from south central los angeles! The invictus games are his bullet proof get out of social jail free card

      Delete
    3. You are an idiot. The nazi picture and the naked vegas pictures were totally separate and years apart.

      Delete
  4. Paid to date her current husband...I am confused???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. MM was a yacht girl when she met Harry.

      Delete
  5. I just cannot figure out why he married her. The yachting thing will surely be mainstream at some point. I just don’t get it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I completely agree with you Mischi.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I've heard of judges and other men in power falling for their favourite prostitute and marrying her but when your standard of living depends on your family the way it does with Harry, why drag in the girl of the night? And what makes her so sure that Harry will always do her bidding the way she seems assured of? Ok, he might have thrown a few tantrums but all the BRF had to do is make them wait and the bloom would be off the rose, as they say. Why help them rush through a royal wedding and a big tour in Australia? They knew what she was and how she operated.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Really? the current sotry is she was set up on a blind date by a friend. Now she was Yachting when he met her.....oh geesh.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The "blind date" was pay for play.
      I vote we extradite her back to the US.

      Delete
  9. Anonymous9:18 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Mischi, they allowed her to marry Harry coz the Queen has very old and frail and doesnt have the kind of energy it would take to overrule her grandson. 15 years ago she would never have allowed this marriage to take place, but now she probably doesnt give a damn, as she is not the future queen.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't begrudge her how she met him or makes her money, if I had the cash I'd consider paying for a high quality gorgeous woman like that.
    The problem is she just seems like such an awful, icky human

    ReplyDelete
  12. The reason why he married her & the reason why she acts the way she does is because she’s got NPD. They’re very good at ‘love bombing’ their victims & drawing them in. Once they get what they want, their personality changes and their true self emerges. This is the same reason why Depp married Heard. And I remember thinking the exact same thing when both engagements were announced....why is he marrying her? Both of these women targeted these guys for a long time. They were not accidental meetings. They study their victims so that they can mimic their likes and dislikes and pretend to have a lot in common, making it seem like ‘love at first sight.’ Once they meet their targets, they reel them in (through sex, feigning similar interests, etc. Remember MM saying that in Botswana she and Harry decided that they were going to change the world?) They then use and discard their victims, leaving broken hearts & chaos in their wake.

    As to why the Royal Family allowed it, there are many theories ranging from they had already gotten married in Botswana to they were going to use the R card if the Queen refused, to Harry is a spoiled brat and has been given everything he wants since his mum died, to he was going to blackmail them if they refused.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1. You nailed NPD perfectly. That’s the answer to a lot of celeb stories today. Once you understand NPD, the stories make more sense. Poor Harry. I’ve got family members with NPD. It’s scary af.

      Delete
  13. The problem at this point isn’t so much ”Was she a hooker or not?”

    It’s that she’s developed a fan base, particularly among young women of color (not all of course, just some) who still see her as a “breath of fresh air” and “modernizing the monarchy.” The New York Post has a glowing story in today’s online edition along these lines. Most of the Twitter and Instagram comments on stories about her are some version of this too.

    If Meghan leaves on bad terms, she could damage The Firm’s reputation with these young women in particular. Meghan could present herself as bullied and excluded, in particular by Kate, and suggest it was because of her skin color. Very bad for the royal brand.

    What they need to do is destroy her credibility with the group of people who currently love and support her. Showing HER to be a racist would be one way – after all, she has a mostly white friend group and seems to be interested only in white men.

    Showing her pregnancy to be inauthentic is another way to destroy her credibility. I think most people would accept her using IVF or a surrogate, but her arched back/fake bump routine – if it is exposed to be fake – makes her look ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I've heard some very bad things about Harry. He's a self-entitled prick who treated staff badly at a restaurant in Australia and made a scene, then threatened the manager with violence if he said anything. So, not so sweet. Also, I heard he's not very endowed equipment-wise.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous9:35 AM

    When Harry met Scary

    ReplyDelete
  16. Krab's gonna need a lie down after this thread. 😂😂😂

    ReplyDelete
  17. Lainey who runs Laineygossip.com is a friend of Jessica Mulroney who is Meghan's BFF. Lainey used to go on and on about how she hated people who yelled at the staff, but makes up excuses for Markle doing this. It's actually quite enlightening to see how she twists the truth to kiss up to Markle. And now she's on about the rift between Harry and William being due to William's dislike of being upstaged, rather than to Markle's obvious narcissism. All this to say, Nutty, that I think you're very right about that. It's sad that young girls see Markle as someone to emulate because of race. They should find a more positive role model - someone who has accomplished something due to merit, not sex.

    ReplyDelete
  18. MM the gift that keeps on giving! The potential dating of the chef and prince at the same time can be very easily stitched together by looking at the Chef and MM instragram timelines. Very loved up pics and comments in May 2016. June 2016 first confirmed dating with Harry (as confirmed by them both). Another story is H&M first met the year before when the chef catered for an Invictus Games fundraiser in Toronto for HArry and numbers between H&M were exchanged then. Who knows? Put your hand on heart if you were dating a guy and a handsome prince asked you out...and offered more than just s *sha g , would you go for it? I would lol!! ;)

    ReplyDelete
  19. Believe it or not there isn't a long line of truly quality women wanting to marry into the royal family.

    Vanity Fair did a large article back in the day about William. When he had split with Kate, he proposed to a number of women that he had crushes on, and they all turned him down. Kate was his perennial Plan B, cause all the women he knew who had good careers and came from good families didnt want that fishbowl existence. Kate, with her social climbing parents, was the only one interested.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @Aquagirl she is textbook NPD, now that she has a ring on it, the isolation phase from family and friends begins

    ReplyDelete
  21. Look at all the comments for this already! We will be getting a daily dose of Megan for the DM'ers every day from now on.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The reason the "royal" family allowed Harry to marry the mixed race escort is because he's not actually Prince Charles's son and the whole thing is an enormous joke/insult on the public. This whole thing will ultimately be a disaster and she'll probably end up dead. No matter how gifted a witch she may be, MM's in over her head.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We really need a proper dna test on old harry. The firm was never going to let Diana marry the muslum anyway, maybe undercutting the hooker with a heart of gold is par for the course

      Delete
  23. I don't think there are some big conspiracy theories behind his marriage. It's more Occam's razor: dumb, gullible, spoilt idiot, meets manipulative, conniving and opportunistic d-list actress, who cries him a river about her terrible family, racism in the industry and gives decent head. He sees himself as saviour, knight in shining armour to her damsel in distress.
    His older brother is well respected, has always made appropriate and intelligent choices, especially considering the responsibilities he will one day inherit.
    Harry the half-wit wanted to one-up Wills by marrying a woman who is neither white, nor expected, and found this one, so he an appear cool and woke. He is too stupid and self absorbed, not to see how this shallow and vain decision is backfiring in grandiose proportions.

    The RF's 'acceptance' of her, is not evident. I believe he threw the mother of all temper tantrums, and since he's not getting near the throne anyway, they probably thought they would let him humiliate himself like this, rather than him walking off to LA with all of their skeletons in his carry on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So The Windsors isn't too far off then.

      Delete
  24. @cup: she wasn’t just dating Corey, she was living with him. And she pursued Harry and manipulated the situation (even hiring a PR firm in London to increase her notoriety) until she was finally able to get a ‘blind date’ with him. That’s totally different than ‘dating a guy’ and having ‘a handsome prince ask you out’ on every level.

    ReplyDelete
  25. People are still perpetuating the myth that Harry is illegitimate when he looks EXACTLY like Phillip when he was young? Please, gtfo with that and that other ludicrous hypothesis that Depp was somehow targeted.

    ReplyDelete
  26. And nothing is bulletproof.

    ReplyDelete
  27. >Krab's gonna need a lie down after this thread. 😂😂😂

    I'm fine, thanks, I just don't care that much. The more we comment, the more Enty makes up more posts on the subject.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Prince Harry has very strong Windsor features. The older he gets, the more he looks like Prince Charles. I believe he is Windsor through and through.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree. Just because of his ginger hair, doesn't make him her ginger lovers son.

      Delete
  29. @sandybrook, it must be compensating for a therapeutic void because the passage of time doesn't appear to diminish the need for relentless vicious venting.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Markle is in their bloodline (the Saxe -Coburg -Gothe line). The name 'Windsor' was made up around 1915 by the King, to make them appear more Anglo. They are German .

    ReplyDelete
  31. Harry looks exactly like Charles and Phillip.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Must agree with Mischi - Harry is no angel. An acquaintance and he were once both at the same wedding. The acquaintance looked around to notice that both Harry and his date were MIA. Yep. Harry is used to getting exactly what he wants, when he wants, and could care less about any overlap. Regardless of how they went about doing it, they both landed their dream roles. The royal machine will keep it all in check.

    ReplyDelete
  33. It’s really not okay to prostitute yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Totally agree @hiyosilvergirl, and I'd bet the house that Harry has had *far* more sexual partners than Meghan, despite his being younger.

    I have no realistic idea if Meghan has yachted or not, but even if she did, does Harry trading on his royal status to bed women with a groupie mentality make him any different, or better? I think not.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I agree about what does it matter. Does anyone here really think a sweet kind innocent woman would marry Harry?? She is his match, like it or not. He seems happy.

    Btw, I think she is really pregnant. Her boobs are larger and she looks pregnant to me.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I send my best wishes and prayers to the Queen, William and Catherine. If something happens to them- say a terrorist attack the responsibility should be placed on the dukes of banana bread.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Tatty, no he doesn't seem happy at all. That is the single most popular remark about them in the UK

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think they're both vile humans and deserve each other. My fondest wish is that they'll both be outed for being assholes and dragged through the mud for my personal enjoyment.

    ReplyDelete
  39. @ Mischi - Meghan may be a LOT of things (most of them unsavory) but she is not dumpy.

    BTW, in yesterday’s MM thread about her banishment to Frogmore Cottage, someone posted a link to a blog, http://madaboutmeghan.blogspot.com/2018/11/kensington-palace-confirms-sussexes.html. Talk about paid shills! Lots of comments about how warm and wonderful Markle is, followed by lots of glowing posts complimenting and agreeing with the other commenters on their posts.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Mango - the reason that Meghan looks so awful in clothing is that she has a boxy torso - she has no waist. She has no curves as well, as her bust is almost flat. She has no calves and her legs in tights look horrible. Her feet are really, really big and deformed - in some pictures, it looks like she might have had a sixth toe removed. She has bunions as well as deformed toes. Her ski jump nose and manly jaw look weird. She has moles all over her face and her hair is just a mess. Her smile looks like a rictus and her eyes are beady. If you look at her face in the pics on the balcony on Remembrance Day, you will see that her face is very asymmetrical - one eye is bigger and higher than the other, her smile is also crooked and even her ears aren't lined up. One is higher than the other. She is not a very attractive woman without makeup and false eyelashes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would give both kidneys, right now, to see what mischi looks like.
      I mean, really
      I've been critical of that tubby blonde that is a "comedian" and a couple people came out of their seats to scream what do I look like??! (spoiler: better THAN THAT)
      ... But Megan Markle dumpy?
      You better be an 11.5 to say it..

      Edit: *amy shumer

      Delete
    2. Hahahaha +1 rosie

      Delete
  41. @Gualise hit the nail on the head!!!!! Isolation. After marrying isolation is the second step. I really don't believe there to be a rift between Wills and he. It's Kate. She's extremely jealous of how she was treated by the Firm compared to MM. I project MM mom to move there, probably into the guest house, soon.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I've thought about this a lot. I believe it stems in his true parental heritage. They love him; William would never allow him to be outed, but since he has no royal blood, his bloodline is of little consequence. Its tolerated because it doesnt really matter.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Look, most Brits don't want the Monarchy 'modernised' and we don't need some foreigner claiming to be a 'breath of fresh air' in it. If we wanted our institutions changed, we'd do it ourselves. She is losing what popularity she had, as she constantly ignores the rules and protocols. That's not 'livening' up the Monarchy - that's being damned disrespectful of over a thousand years of history and tradition. The yachting and merching are minor irritants, unlike the weirdness around the pregnancy and the fact that she's still boozing and whatever else she does. Something is rotten in the state of Markle. And with Harry - some of us reckon he basically threatened to do something awful if HMQ didn't let him have his way in this. Silly boy - she'll gently make him rue the day he did that.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Oh, and PS - we don't want her mother bypassing all the rules and regs and just moving here either. There are business women who've been trying to fulfill the conditions for years, and the last thing we need is some shady 'yoga instructor' just slithering to the head of the cue because her daughter drops her drawers for the Royal Ginger Whinger. She has no sills/talents that would benefit the UK, so she should be allowed to visit, not to move here.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I agree she is nothing without the false eyelashes and the wig, and she doesn't have a clue how to dress to flatter her bad figure. None of that would matter if she had not fallen into the "let's monitor and control every internet word written about me" trap. Such a loathsome personality and affect she has -- never ever ever trust a Narcissist, and never believe a word she says.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Most people have asymmetrical facial features! Lol, perfection doesn’t exist.

    Harry is smiling in all photos, and I do not believe he is faking it. He looks genuinely happy.

    Markel is beautiful.

    ReplyDelete
  47. New article, explains everything: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6427495/The-REAL-reason-Harry-Meghan-moving-away-William-Kate.html

    ReplyDelete
  48. Maybe the Princess has "Snappin Gyro".

    ReplyDelete
  49. tatty, you need to have a second look. He looks downtrodden and miserable. Everyone says so.

    Rosie, I am 6 foot 1, female, and 135 lbs. People tell me that I have a very nice face but, I don't trade on my looks. I work in High Tech. I stay away from players and only date nice guys. I don't expect a man to bring me wealth. I want to do that on my own. Learning about embedded programming today and taking a break.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmmm well then....I'm sure youre not a toad. I just don't think MM is "dumpy"
      Lena Dunham, now that's a dumpy gal

      Delete
  50. Both William and Harry have male-pattern baldness, which is inherited through the father's line.

    The only actress to have a perfectly symmetrical face was Elizabeth Taylor. Both sides of her face matched perfectly.

    90% of the people commenting here think it's the Jerry Springer show with all membes of the BRF.

    90% of the people commenting here have insider information on the BRF.

    ReplyDelete
  51. IMO Meghan is lithe & quite beautiful. I suscribe yo the ridiculed idea that she was the best thing tvhat could have happened to the Royal family. I imagine it to be not uncommon for very wealthy men to marry their favorite escorts or yacht girls. She gives every appearance of doing an exceptionally graceful job of presenting a patient, pleasing face to the public.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Volt61, beauty, of course, is in the eye of the beholder, but remember those scientific studies that show that people find symmetrical faces to be the most attractive because it shows that the person is healthy and therefore a good partner for reproduction. And her face is quite asymmetrical. Her heavy makeup usually hides this.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Promiscuous, manipulative American divorcée marriess a Prince of the realm. Where have I seen that before and what could possibly go wrong?

    ReplyDelete
  54. it looks like it has started - TMZ releasing picture today of Meghan straddling her ex

    ReplyDelete
  55. Allegedly the Royals were also thrilled when the Duke of Windsor ended up with Wallis Simpson. He was bisexual leaning more towards being gay and they were more than happy to get rid of him.
    If there is something in MM's background they know all about it. Whatever the reason she was accepted as a good match for Harry.

    ReplyDelete
  56. +1 aquagirl and the NPD assessments. Women like MM and Amber know how to play "the game". Amber had the advantage of the growing metoo movement to legitimize her role.

    ReplyDelete
  57. As much as I dislike MM, I do think she's attractive, in a common sort of way. If you go to Top Shop on Oxford Circus you will see a thousand Sparkles. They all look like that. She's nothing special, just a nice looking, run of the mill girl. But she does not have calves, which I find annoying. Her legs are atrocious. Bella Hadid also is calve-less. Their legs look like toothpicks, very unshapely. I also don't like Sparkles' nose. Cheap nose job.

    To anyone saying that Kate is jealous of that - you're dreaming! Kate is respected and very well liked. She has truly made her place in that mess of a family. Some d-list actress, who has been there for 5 minutes does not threaten her.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Do I remember reading somewhere that Prince Andrew and Megs didn't hit it off at all?
    If anyone is going to out Megs alleged scandalous past I think Andrew and probably Fergie will have a hand in it.

    Stop with the Harry is not Charles' child nonsense his face is pure Mountbatten/Windsor, ginger hair runs in Diana's family one sister has bright red hair the other sandy red hair, look at pictures of Diana in her early teens and you will see she has red-brown hair, Diana was not a natural blond.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I read too that yorkie Andrew didn't like miss banana bread. Even before she decided to announce her pregnancy during his daughter's wedding.

      Delete
  59. Interesting point about Andrew and Fergie.

    Fergie has been allowed back into the Royal fold recently, after decades outside of it.

    She even held a charity event in Kensington Palace the other day.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Well, Yorkie Andrew probably has her number. As a friend to Jeffrey Epstein, he knows a lot about the underworld and probably a lot about her friends at Soho House and Soho Farmhouse.

    It would be interesting if Andrew and Fergie had been promised a route back into the good graces of the Royal Family for helping to dispense with Meghan Markle.

    It would be even more interesting if Prince Philip was somehow behind this. He was the one who was so adamantly opposed to Fergie - supposedly Andrew and Fergie had been waiting until after Philip's death to remarry, but he is hanging on valiantly so far.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Also, it occurs to me, Prince Andrew was recently sent to Australia to on a "surprise" "unannounced" tour, presumably to undo some of the damage Harry and Meg did on their visit down under, including royally pissing of the Australian Governor General, who got stuck running the Inviticus Games on his own while they toured Fiji and Tonga.

    Ironic if the last generation's bad-boy second son has been assigned to take down this generation's bad-boy second son.

    ReplyDelete
  62. MM is pretty basic looking, but thinks she is a 10. I wonder what the Mulrony girl's part in all this was. She looks a bit sketchy herself. I am wondering if all the press right now is the Palace trying to distract from the scandal of Beatrice's new boyfriend. He left his fiance and toddler for her a couple of months ago and are now talking about a quickie wedding. Sad really, and even though Beatrice is far down in the line, if Charles suddenly croaks, Andrew becomes the new Prince of Wales. The Queen must certainly be concerned.

    ReplyDelete
  63. "Cottage" is not an accurate description of Frogmore.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Lulu, I think that if something happened to Charles, William would be the new prince of Wales.

    Diana always said she did not believe that Charles would ever be king.

    And Fergie, for what it’s worth, always said Beatrice would one day be Queen.

    That would require a bloodbath, but stranger things have happened.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Andrew will be Prince of Wales after William, George, Charlotte, Louis, Harry, any of Harry's children.

    Also, there are rumours that Harry is gay and/or bisexual and was sent to a program to straighten him out. maybe that is why Meghan appeals to him.

    And, there are two buildings called Frogmore - Cottage which was the servant's quarters with a total of 10 rooms, and House which is actually quite nice.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Arg, I was wrong about Andrew becoming Prince of Wales. Still, the Queen is not going to be happy with Beatrice's new boyfriend bringing more scandal.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Do not underestimate the British monarchy. They let Harry marry who he wanted because a. He's James Hewitt's son so they don't care and b. To permit a mixed race marriage made it look as if they were moving with the times.
    But she is already being ousted to Frogmore Cottage (burial place of the other American and where Queen Victoria house her Asian 'Munchi').
    They sidelined Fergie and they will do the same with Meghan. They will move to America shortly where they will just be a celebrity couple and she will dine out on her title.Watch and learn!

    ReplyDelete
  68. Harry was born on 15 September 1984. Diana did not meet James until the summer of 1986, and the red hair, gossips so love to cite as proof is, of course, a Spencer trait.

    ReplyDelete
  69. So, the name of the personal assistant who quit because of Meghan’s temper has been released. She is Melissa Touabti, who is French and previously worked for Robbie Williams. Toubati is an Algerian name, or at least a North African name. It seems that Meghan may have been bullying another woman of color.

    ReplyDelete
  70. @mischi re Lainey- this makes so much more sense now.

    ReplyDelete