Blind Item #5
Posted by
ent lawyer
at
10:00 AM
Labels: blind item
Crazy Days and Nights is a gossip site. The site publishes rumors, conjecture, and fiction. In addition to accurately reported information, certain situations, characters and events portrayed in the Blog are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Information on this site may contain errors or inaccuracies; the Blog’s proprietor does not make warranty as to the correctness or reliability of the site's content. Links to content on and quotation of material from other sites are not the responsibility of Crazy Days and Nights.
Cookies & 3rd Party Advertisements Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on your site. Google's use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to your users based on their visit to your sites and other sites on the Internet. Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy. We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit https://www.networkadvertising.org/managing/opt_out.asp.
29 comments:
Banksy shredded his piece of art at an auction
Publicity stunt. Clever guy, but it's a shame we live in an age when art is mostly shit.
Jonathan Rhys Meyers for the actor??
it is supposed to be Bristol artist Robin Gunningham, it is known to be called Rob among yhose who know him personally. Definitely from bristol. But some think is Massive Attack singer
Brilliant statement. I loved it.
I'd like to say Banksy has jumped the shark but this latest gimmick was definitely legit--possible commentary on how much his own work is garbage? Or how the art gallery biz has turned into a vehicle for money laundering? That patrons are idiots?
Has to be someone else. Met him and he is a lost drunk, not much other than looks and no social awareness.
Trust fund wanker trolling other fuckwitted puddle jumpers.
Thought enty meant Banksy looked JRM. No way I think he is capable of being an artist. He barely can act anymore with his alcohol issues.
IMO that was pretty awesome.
+1
Bansky represents the old left wing social awareness type. The debate is between Robert del Naja (massive attack singer and artist) or Gunningham. Perhaps enty meant del Naja, it is a three named artist who also made films.
@J
"it's a shame we live in an age when art is mostly shit."
In EVERY age the art is mostly shit. In retrospect, we are just seeing the crème de la crème of all the different types and epochs. Sure, there are clusters of great artists (this is talked about in the excellent Quebec film The Barbarian Invasions) in eras like The Renaissance or during the Impressionist phase. But even then there were a larger number of mediocre or just plain bad artists as well that are forgotten.
We now see the best of every era in the past while living in the cacophony of expressions of the present, which has ALWAYS be the case.
Banksy's stunt was spectacular. I hadn't paid any attention to him before, but this was genius and hilarious. Although the purchaser should get their money back if they want.
He trolled rich people, which is hilarious. Although the shredded art might be worth more now.
Plot-kun, the difference is that in the Renaissance most artists had to follow a specific technique that they were taught by their masters. You didn't just pick up a paintbrush and a canvas because that stuff was expensive back then. Canvases had to be reused many times so there's a lot of lost art we'll never see because it was painted over. There wasn't a huge amount of room for individuality. You can tell a Raphael from a Michelangelo. But they are pretty much painting the same sorts of things. a great deal of it was religious iconography and portraits of rich people and royalty. And you sure as hell better paint those richies and royals looking as attractive as possible if you want to get paid and keep your reputation. If that duchess has a wart on her nose then you better not let future generations find out by painting it.
Now there's less direction and people do what they want. Although they still follow trends. Like hideous Tumblr style art and bad anatomy ridden anime style.
My husband is an artist, and I actually Love Banksy, We have a piece of his artwork, well a copy of a piece of his artwork on our wall. It is our favorite style. Loving my new city artworks, we now have the worlds largest 3D mural just a block from my home and its amazing! I also loved this gimmick. Though I still believe that the real art is still in the frame, and another copy piece was put in front to shred, to show his point that art should be free.
He should have used a cross shredder lol.
Amateurish stunt--the K Foundation (KLF) did it better in the 90s when they stapled 1 million pounds in cash to a board and sold it for $500,000. They also filmed themselves burning a million pounds. Let's see Banksy do that.
Sacha Baron Cohen.....
@adrastia
That is all true, but there was still a wide range of styles even in the Renaissance, especially comparing country to country or even region to region.
There were less supported artists then, as far as we know, but there were also less people and shorter lives. We don't know much about the folk art or the lesser artists. There might be a portrait in a castle done by some unknown artist of the time, but he was forgotten. So are the artists of many alters and churches. I've seen lots of those over in Europe. At the time, if all one knew was those inferior artists, one might also say that art is mostly shit, just like J does about this age.
People might be doing what they want these days, as you say, or they might be just as programmed as the painters of the Renaissance without even knowing it. Maybe it isn't patrons who are prescribing the limitations but our culture itself in it's media forms. Also, film has taken over a huge portion of the visual arts medium and artists have to wrestle with that, one way or another which can render their art meaningless or poignant, but they still have to address it.
Loved it.
He or a confederate must have been at the auction with a remote control.
I don't think the buyer will be asking for a refund, Bansky just doubled it's price with tha stunt. As for art and garbage my favourite quote comes from Andy Warhol...... 'Art is what you can get away with'
DDL??!!
Enty, Banksy has already been outed by goldie, it's robert from Massive Attack. If you haven't already got a copy of one of the 90's greatest albums, go seek out 'Blue lines' now.
I think Enty meant to say that. Robert del Naja is a three word and he is an artist but also an actor of his own videos.
That is if money means anything anymore. In the 80s it was a great deal, but now there is a different social awareness
I can't believe anyone paid that much for what looked like an artsy Hallmark card.
I went to school with Banksy.
Post a Comment