This former A- list mostly television actress went behind the back of her significant other to make sure she controlled the news cycle. She felt it was her chance to be the person everyone spoke to and about and wouldn't have to share the "title," so to speak.
Rose?
ReplyDeleteRE Asia and the case
DeleteRose
ReplyDeleteAnd her binary lover!!
DeleteGender capitalist. welcome to 2018, where there’s a new and more societally accepted term for gender every week! Stay tuned!
DeleteGross. If there's a hell these people are on the way there.
ReplyDeleteI thought of Markle as the former actress talking to everyone and not wanting to share her "title" with Harry.
ReplyDeleteCould be!
Deletemarkle
ReplyDeleteI haven't seen any news about Markle - well anything major other than Harry seemed to be the center of attention at Hamilton (going up on stage/singing).
ReplyDeleteI would guess Rose since her partner did speak up about the Asia case.
How do you deal with a story where only one actor was worth his salt? Mourn Bordain.
ReplyDeleteMarkle. she's got a new interview coming out.that marriage is already in trouble
ReplyDeleteMarker?
ReplyDeleteMarble?
ReplyDeleteDang! Prune Harry wife!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete#metoo leadership: pillars of insight, credibility, and integrity.
ReplyDeleteSo stop saying they're all sad-sack aging casting-couch rejects.
Heather Bee your spelchek sucks even worse than mine.
ReplyDeleteHeather's on to something.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Sandybrook! I had to quit cause I was fighting a losing battle there. Lol.
ReplyDeleteI vote we change Megan Markle's name to Marble Marker.
ReplyDeletelol Low Key, full title would be "Marble Marker, Prune Harry Wife of Sussex"
ReplyDeleteThere we go, Ophelia!
Deletei think its sparky marky markle with it stating title
ReplyDeleteMM? Title makes sense , there has certainly been a PR war going in with her side of the family. But A- actress? Pre the royal association was she A- because she’s A++ now surely?
ReplyDeletecupoftea - enty never refers to her as A+++ but just as A- or lower former actress. idk if he's in denial or what haha
ReplyDeleteI found it odd how many articles are using headlines describing her long sleeved high cut dress as "sexy / daring mini dress". Maybe she's trying to get the focus on her rather than Harry sounding like an all around good time at Hamilton??
Markle also went without hose to the event. Showing off her bare legs in a short dress may have been her way of trying to get attention. Supposedly using her body is the only way she knows how to get attention.
ReplyDeleteMore victims that choose not to say a word for years like Db
ReplyDeleteMarkle's gone back to dressing like a Toronto actress. A tuxedo dress with mini skirt and bare legs is hardly 'duchess'.
ReplyDeleteFrankly I believe the whole wedding was fake. Why would one woman be allowed to break royal protocol, every time she makes an appearance? That is a hint to the world, imo.
All I know is that the Duchess of Yacht spends a LOT on her personal PR message.
ReplyDelete@Dannette -- "Duchess of Yacht" pretty much tells it like it is. Thanks for the laugh.
ReplyDeleteRainn - or Rain, i dunno - Dove sending texts with Asia admitting sex with underage Bennett to the cops, right?
ReplyDeleteMaybe going to a show/theater that's not a Royal Engagement, and is on private time, allows the Duchess to to without stockings. Hey, it's dark in the theater!
ReplyDeleteMM has always been B-something in Entyland, which is accurate. I think this is creepazoid Rose and her mentally ill girlfriend.
ReplyDeleteIn the pictures Harry looks very uncomfortable. I commented that it looked like they had a major argument. Royals aren't supposed to court attention. being royal is enough. She has zero class to not understand that in Britain. She is a smart girl, though. My guess is she is looking to get thrown out of the family now that she has experienced it and is not interested/bored. She has been to the high society events now and met all the older financiers with more wealth than the Royal family, more freedom, and more public/private sway and FUN. She's over it and figures she can get let go with a decent settlement so she doesn't need to work and will move onto a banker. Just wait. Harry is to dim/immature for her...I personally don't like her but I get her game.
ReplyDeleteInteresting theory, @Jessica.
ReplyDeleteFor me, the oddest thing is that Meghan Markle's clothes are never tailored properly. Even this most recent miniskirt outfit was puckering and gaping around the waist. This bad tailoring is an ongoing situation, from her ill-fitting wedding dress to the Wimbledon trousers that were so long they dragged on the ground to the weird oversize bathrobe-like thing she wore to a wedding.
If you're going for a rich next husband, don't you need to look your best?
It's not Markle she doesn't have the means to hire an in-person stylist, not rely on Jessica Mulroney who lives 5000 miles away.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete@Nutty_Flavor
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure she wears Mulroney's clothes. There was an earlier blind, about Henry paying Mulroney for clothes that Markle uses. It sounded just crazy enough to be true.
The media is reporting that Markle is taking a secret trip to Canada at the moment.
They are not looking like a couple right now. Not at Hamilton; not at all.
I agree, @Mercyprosperity. Harry looks miserable and is constantly playing with his wedding ring.
ReplyDeleteDid you see the video with Godfrey the other day? (He's a Nigerian-American comedian.) He's like, Harry's miserable, man. This chick is an actress from LA, this is the biggest role of her life, and she's just waiting for a baby and paycheck so she can leave him and go back to LA.
I can take or leave Godfrey's impersonations of the British Royal Family, but apparently it's not only us (and the Daily Mail's rabid commenters) who can see that something is seriously wrong.
mercy
ReplyDelete"A tuxedo dress with mini skirt and bare legs is hardly 'duchess'. "
It is "princess" however. Diana did the same. Di wore plenty of miniskirts, if 3 inches above the knee is a miniskirt to some.
@nutty_flavor
ReplyDeleteHer stylist is setting up the backend deals for expected % of sales figures then Meghan wears the clothes and they split the commission probably to accounts Jessica oversees. Henry's dad pays the regular rate for the one piece and Meghan pockets that as well.
I'm an American living in London, and I know these types. Honestly, I actually feel bad for Harry. He needed someone that really appreciated what he was giving that person. He has had a strange life. I don't think he ever thought she understood/stands that she has much more to lose in life than him and that alone will keep her climbing. He most likely assumed he was marrying and settling down to the quiet passive royal life and is learning hard and fast that isn't the case at all. The Queen will give him an ultimatum eventually if Meghan doesn't go on her own, because this narrative does not suit the family dynasty. He will pick the RF over Meghan, since it's his only way of life/source of support.
I doubt she will have kids with him. Britain is tough with child law, I think she is too smart to risk being perm in UK due to a child. Don't quote me on this stuff, but it's how I've seen other 'marriages' play out here in this exact crowd.
@Jessica Interesting info. At any rate, here's hoping Harry finds someone who suits him better.
ReplyDeleteHe loves spending time in Africa and apparently likes Black women (a photo of him in his university dorm room was released the other day, there was a poster of Halle Berry on his wall), so maybe an African wife is in his future.
It would be fascinating to see how people treated an African princess who was an honorable person from a nice family.
It's hard to tell with Meghan Markle - are her detractors upset about her race or her questionable past, bad behavior, and tacky relatives?
Megan Markle, for sure. She is always referred to as Duchess in the DM. A comment there noticed that Kate Middleton is referred to by Kate, not Duchess Kate. Another, named Sarah, quoted a blind from here on another article. Was that you @Sarahmakingitwork? Maybe Markle doesn't like sharing Duchess with Kate and is influencing the DM to address her as such.
ReplyDelete