Tuesday, August 07, 2018

Blind Item #2

About a decade ago, this actress was A+ list in her corner of the entertainment world. At that point, she rebuffed this disgraced producer and he got his revenge by releasing a series of pictures that would rock the world. Apparently all is forgiven or she got a nice big check because she did a huge favor for the producer and his family.


49 comments:

  1. Weinstein and ?
    Kristin Stewart?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Was that when the pix came out of her and the director?

      Delete
    2. What was the favor?

      Delete
    3. Not her-it’s Hugeons.. she just wore Marchesa

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Sounds good time wise
      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nude-cyber-images-of-some-50-female-stars-stolen/

      Delete
  3. Not sure I K-Stew: it was 2012 when the affair happened and the pictures broke.

    ReplyDelete
  4. That explains the fluffy dress.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wasn't there a blind about him derailing Hudgens career by releasing those pix because she stood up to him?

    ReplyDelete
  6. There was a blind that he accosted her at the Oscars and Zac Enron intervened. Then the pics were released afterwards.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What a surprise.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This makes me like Zac Efron a lot more

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Same here Tricia.

      Delete
    2. Here’s the blind on the other blog about the incident... gives me a lot more respect for Zac Efron if it’s true. Glad HW didn’t manage to blacklist him.

      https://blindgossip.com/tougher-than-brad-pitt/

      Delete
  10. All these hypocrites. Disgusting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. anyone think kstew banged weinstein?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Marchesa dresses are still as ugly as ever.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "Rocked the world" though? That seems a bit of a stretch for some nudes. I'm not real uptight about that stuff tho, so probably shouldn't set the bar to my standards

    ReplyDelete
  14. Marchesa is not guilty of Weinstein's crimes. It's utterly pathetic that people are scapegoating her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh please. Nobody wanted to wear that crap. She knew they were being forced to wear her designs.

      Delete
    2. She was complicit. I know because she's a white woman you automatically deem her as innocent, but no, she had her hand in his schemes and lies. Even if she didn't know everything about what he was doing, she at the very least heard the rumors and did nothing to stop him. You are being willfully obtuse if you believe otherwise.

      Delete
    3. She's not guilty for the "sins" of her husband, but I agree with nonya in that she is/was complicit and thqt doesnt make her a great person either.

      If her husband assaulted me, I damn sure wouldnt be wearing her clothes if she still supported him publicly or privately.

      Delete
  15. Hudgens and her wearing the marchesa gown.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Rosie riveter, Vanessa was underage and had a "good girl" image,it was a big deal at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Plus she was coming right off of HSM series which is a kids movie so it was a big deal at the time

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oh come off it Viking.she knew what her pig of a husband was doing and how he was forcing women to wear Marchessa clothes (which she doesn't actually design btw). I don't belive for one second her sob story .you marry a pig and roll in shit with them don't expect to walk away smelling of roses

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1
      Georgina was complicit. She and her business benefited from the marriage and his crimes.
      Or does anyone think she fell in love for his personality?

      Delete
  19. Hi Viking Song! What’s new in white supremacy land?

    ReplyDelete
  20. All the wives are fucking complicit. They take the money. And either ignore or directly participate in abuses. They're coven. Every. Single. One. Especially that ugly-wrinkly-lezbo-witch-Capshaw. There's a red-scarf and doorknob in her future...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All wives are not complicit. You know it’s possible for your partner to live a completely different life and not know until it’s too late?.... I’m sure she only thought he was cheating, she didn’t know he was allegedly raping women

      Delete
  21. Anonymous9:18 AM

    AgonyAunt said...

    All the wives are fucking complicit. They take the money. And either ignore or directly participate in abuses. They're coven. Every. Single. One. Especially that ugly-wrinkly-lezbo-witch-Capshaw. There's a red-scarf and doorknob in her future...

    Lol, here I go quoting Agonyaunt again... I like the way she thinks.

    You're exactly right, I wonder how many aftermarket and discounted items are flowing Miss Markle's way now since that black market channel has opened?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hooookay! Would our female CDAN'ers please indulge my need for a reality check please ...

    WHICH OF YOU CURRENTLY HAS, ONCE HAD, OR WOULD EVER HAVE NAKED PICS OF YOURSELF ON YOUR CELL PHONE?!!! (I am WAAAy beyond an age where that even I would want to see pics of myself naked on a phone, but even at my best (which was smokin') - that woulda been a definite nope from me.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The wives who aren't complicit are stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  24. It was a very big deal when Hudgens pictures dropped. The HSM movie was everywhere and she was held up as a "good girl" icon.

    Considering what we know about Kenny Ortega, Hudgens pix could've come from any number of people.

    Weinstein's wife, like Cosby's wife, like the woman who had Bryan Singer's baby---all of them are complicit.

    More talk of creepy Kate Capshaw's coven would be good. There is a network of evil women just as bad as the men, but so far they've mostly skated. The lack of coverage of the ongoing Weinstein trial, and how Asia Argento's name is being left out of it as his lawyers tear her claims to shreds, is yet another sign this whole thing was concocted.

    ReplyDelete
  25. I always rather liked the theory that the fappening wasn't hacking many cloud accounts but rather a singular hack of Weinstein's personal stash.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Dahling

    The female celebrities didn't necessarily store naked pictures on their cellphone. The hackers didn't have physical access to the actual phones. They were sending this stuff to their boyfriend or companion, especially when they had to spend months apart because they had to shoot a project in Georgia or Canada, then deleted it from their phone. Either they had a copy created on the cloud (usually with iCloud) that wasn't deleted at the same time they did this on their phone, or the hackers actually hacked into the account of their significant other.

    Celebrities had usually created their iCloud account long ago, along with security questions ("What is your mother's maiden name? What was the name of the street where you grew up?", etc.) that ended up to be public knowledge years later when they became stars and there was so much interest in them. They didn't think about changing them. And their partners didn't see any reason to be targeted, so they didn't suspect anything when there was some phishing attempt on their account.

    There were at least two single guys, now in jail, who were obsessed with celebrities, minor or major, and managed to collect the content of dozens of accounts. They started from personal e-mail addresses, then sent requests to the hosts and fake e-mails, which sometimes gave them access to the full login and password. They would download everything in bulk, then trade it weeks later on some private boards in exchange for bitcoins. Then, collectors would try to get all the sets, with some inside trading, until some disgruntled guy who had been promised a great set of so-or-so through a trade, was disappointed, and started to post his collection on some more public boards, so the values of these sets would drop to nothing, for everybody playing this game.

    There's also no reason to suspect that the Lawrence or Hudgens leaks came from some targeted operation mandated by Weinstein, especially as Weinstein doesn't look to be very savvy with high-tech (the guy's mind is stuck in the Stone Age). It's just that, for guys in their twenties, women like Hudgens (High School Musical), Lawrence or particularly Emma Watson were often their first celebrity crushes when they were teenagers, hence the disproportionate interest in them.

    ReplyDelete
  27. People are 'punishing' Marchesa bc it is alleged everywhere Weinstein's wife knew and looked the other way I am sure this is true. If insiders in Hollywood all knew she really got to whiff of it. She was complicit. Plus with Weinstein disgraced Marchesa's profit is a viable source for him to access for legal fees, for the future, etc. It is HIS income as well.

    ReplyDelete
  28. All I know is Thank God nobody has released naked pics of Harvey WasteStain ... now that would definitely Rock the World

    ReplyDelete
  29. If naked Weinstein pics are released then we'll ALL be in the #MeToo movement.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Can you imagine getting a dick pick from Harvey? I'm not sure if I would gouge out my eyes or go for the bleach.
    To be fair though, he's got so much gut that it's probably a micro. So I would likely go with the bleach.

    ReplyDelete
  31. For some reason I thought of Jenna Jameson. Not sure how it would fit though.

    ReplyDelete
  32. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  33. If we go by that logic that all wives are complicit, then we have to include Melania Trump as well. She had to know that her husband has groped and grabbed women for years, as well as walking into the Teen pageant contestants dressing rooms being a creeper to teens as young as 13 by his own admission on Howard Stern.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Sure Melania's complicit. Like the others, she's looking for cash.

    Any other blindingly obvious insights?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Cmon, his wife wasn't with him for his looks. She saw $$$$ and that's all she focused on. She was probably happy when.he cheated and stayed away from her. However, that doesn't mean she knew he was a massive sexual predator.

    ReplyDelete
  36. @J said..Sure Melania's complicit. Like the others, she's looking for cash.

    Any other blindingly obvious insights?

    @J Did I hit a nerve? There, there, now go in the corner stand on your head and have your pups!!

    ReplyDelete