Blind Item #2
About a decade ago, this actress was A+ list in her corner of the entertainment world. At that point, she rebuffed this disgraced producer and he got his revenge by releasing a series of pictures that would rock the world. Apparently all is forgiven or she got a nice big check because she did a huge favor for the producer and his family.
Weinstein and ?
ReplyDeleteKristin Stewart?
Was that when the pix came out of her and the director?
DeleteWhat was the favor?
DeleteNot her-it’s Hugeons.. she just wore Marchesa
DeleteVanessa Hudgens???
ReplyDeleteSounds good time wise
Deletehttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/nude-cyber-images-of-some-50-female-stars-stolen/
Not sure I K-Stew: it was 2012 when the affair happened and the pictures broke.
ReplyDeleteThat explains the fluffy dress.
ReplyDeleteWasn't there a blind about him derailing Hudgens career by releasing those pix because she stood up to him?
ReplyDeleteThere was a blind that he accosted her at the Oscars and Zac Enron intervened. Then the pics were released afterwards.
ReplyDeleteEfron.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteWhat a surprise.
ReplyDeleteThis makes me like Zac Efron a lot more
ReplyDeleteSame here Tricia.
DeleteHere’s the blind on the other blog about the incident... gives me a lot more respect for Zac Efron if it’s true. Glad HW didn’t manage to blacklist him.
Deletehttps://blindgossip.com/tougher-than-brad-pitt/
All these hypocrites. Disgusting.
ReplyDeleteanyone think kstew banged weinstein?
ReplyDeleteMarchesa dresses are still as ugly as ever.
ReplyDelete"Rocked the world" though? That seems a bit of a stretch for some nudes. I'm not real uptight about that stuff tho, so probably shouldn't set the bar to my standards
ReplyDeleteMarchesa is not guilty of Weinstein's crimes. It's utterly pathetic that people are scapegoating her.
ReplyDeleteOh please. Nobody wanted to wear that crap. She knew they were being forced to wear her designs.
DeleteShe was complicit. I know because she's a white woman you automatically deem her as innocent, but no, she had her hand in his schemes and lies. Even if she didn't know everything about what he was doing, she at the very least heard the rumors and did nothing to stop him. You are being willfully obtuse if you believe otherwise.
DeleteShe's not guilty for the "sins" of her husband, but I agree with nonya in that she is/was complicit and thqt doesnt make her a great person either.
DeleteIf her husband assaulted me, I damn sure wouldnt be wearing her clothes if she still supported him publicly or privately.
Hudgens and her wearing the marchesa gown.
ReplyDelete@Rosie riveter, Vanessa was underage and had a "good girl" image,it was a big deal at the time.
ReplyDeletePlus she was coming right off of HSM series which is a kids movie so it was a big deal at the time
ReplyDeleteOh come off it Viking.she knew what her pig of a husband was doing and how he was forcing women to wear Marchessa clothes (which she doesn't actually design btw). I don't belive for one second her sob story .you marry a pig and roll in shit with them don't expect to walk away smelling of roses
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteGeorgina was complicit. She and her business benefited from the marriage and his crimes.
Or does anyone think she fell in love for his personality?
Hi Viking Song! What’s new in white supremacy land?
ReplyDeleteAll the wives are fucking complicit. They take the money. And either ignore or directly participate in abuses. They're coven. Every. Single. One. Especially that ugly-wrinkly-lezbo-witch-Capshaw. There's a red-scarf and doorknob in her future...
ReplyDeleteAll wives are not complicit. You know it’s possible for your partner to live a completely different life and not know until it’s too late?.... I’m sure she only thought he was cheating, she didn’t know he was allegedly raping women
DeleteAgonyAunt said...
ReplyDeleteAll the wives are fucking complicit. They take the money. And either ignore or directly participate in abuses. They're coven. Every. Single. One. Especially that ugly-wrinkly-lezbo-witch-Capshaw. There's a red-scarf and doorknob in her future...
Lol, here I go quoting Agonyaunt again... I like the way she thinks.
You're exactly right, I wonder how many aftermarket and discounted items are flowing Miss Markle's way now since that black market channel has opened?
Hooookay! Would our female CDAN'ers please indulge my need for a reality check please ...
ReplyDeleteWHICH OF YOU CURRENTLY HAS, ONCE HAD, OR WOULD EVER HAVE NAKED PICS OF YOURSELF ON YOUR CELL PHONE?!!! (I am WAAAy beyond an age where that even I would want to see pics of myself naked on a phone, but even at my best (which was smokin') - that woulda been a definite nope from me.
The wives who aren't complicit are stupid.
ReplyDeleteIt was a very big deal when Hudgens pictures dropped. The HSM movie was everywhere and she was held up as a "good girl" icon.
ReplyDeleteConsidering what we know about Kenny Ortega, Hudgens pix could've come from any number of people.
Weinstein's wife, like Cosby's wife, like the woman who had Bryan Singer's baby---all of them are complicit.
More talk of creepy Kate Capshaw's coven would be good. There is a network of evil women just as bad as the men, but so far they've mostly skated. The lack of coverage of the ongoing Weinstein trial, and how Asia Argento's name is being left out of it as his lawyers tear her claims to shreds, is yet another sign this whole thing was concocted.
I always rather liked the theory that the fappening wasn't hacking many cloud accounts but rather a singular hack of Weinstein's personal stash.
ReplyDelete@Dahling
ReplyDeleteThe female celebrities didn't necessarily store naked pictures on their cellphone. The hackers didn't have physical access to the actual phones. They were sending this stuff to their boyfriend or companion, especially when they had to spend months apart because they had to shoot a project in Georgia or Canada, then deleted it from their phone. Either they had a copy created on the cloud (usually with iCloud) that wasn't deleted at the same time they did this on their phone, or the hackers actually hacked into the account of their significant other.
Celebrities had usually created their iCloud account long ago, along with security questions ("What is your mother's maiden name? What was the name of the street where you grew up?", etc.) that ended up to be public knowledge years later when they became stars and there was so much interest in them. They didn't think about changing them. And their partners didn't see any reason to be targeted, so they didn't suspect anything when there was some phishing attempt on their account.
There were at least two single guys, now in jail, who were obsessed with celebrities, minor or major, and managed to collect the content of dozens of accounts. They started from personal e-mail addresses, then sent requests to the hosts and fake e-mails, which sometimes gave them access to the full login and password. They would download everything in bulk, then trade it weeks later on some private boards in exchange for bitcoins. Then, collectors would try to get all the sets, with some inside trading, until some disgruntled guy who had been promised a great set of so-or-so through a trade, was disappointed, and started to post his collection on some more public boards, so the values of these sets would drop to nothing, for everybody playing this game.
There's also no reason to suspect that the Lawrence or Hudgens leaks came from some targeted operation mandated by Weinstein, especially as Weinstein doesn't look to be very savvy with high-tech (the guy's mind is stuck in the Stone Age). It's just that, for guys in their twenties, women like Hudgens (High School Musical), Lawrence or particularly Emma Watson were often their first celebrity crushes when they were teenagers, hence the disproportionate interest in them.
People are 'punishing' Marchesa bc it is alleged everywhere Weinstein's wife knew and looked the other way I am sure this is true. If insiders in Hollywood all knew she really got to whiff of it. She was complicit. Plus with Weinstein disgraced Marchesa's profit is a viable source for him to access for legal fees, for the future, etc. It is HIS income as well.
ReplyDeleteAll I know is Thank God nobody has released naked pics of Harvey WasteStain ... now that would definitely Rock the World
ReplyDeleteIf naked Weinstein pics are released then we'll ALL be in the #MeToo movement.
ReplyDeleteCan you imagine getting a dick pick from Harvey? I'm not sure if I would gouge out my eyes or go for the bleach.
ReplyDeleteTo be fair though, he's got so much gut that it's probably a micro. So I would likely go with the bleach.
For some reason I thought of Jenna Jameson. Not sure how it would fit though.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIf we go by that logic that all wives are complicit, then we have to include Melania Trump as well. She had to know that her husband has groped and grabbed women for years, as well as walking into the Teen pageant contestants dressing rooms being a creeper to teens as young as 13 by his own admission on Howard Stern.
ReplyDeleteSure Melania's complicit. Like the others, she's looking for cash.
ReplyDeleteAny other blindingly obvious insights?
Cmon, his wife wasn't with him for his looks. She saw $$$$ and that's all she focused on. She was probably happy when.he cheated and stayed away from her. However, that doesn't mean she knew he was a massive sexual predator.
ReplyDelete@J said..Sure Melania's complicit. Like the others, she's looking for cash.
ReplyDeleteAny other blindingly obvious insights?
@J Did I hit a nerve? There, there, now go in the corner stand on your head and have your pups!!
(((Weinstein))).
ReplyDelete