Blind Item #10
You know the alliterate actress who had the secret baby? Yeah, her. Apparently the father of the baby has visited the now, not a baby, several times in 2018. To my knowledge, those were the first visits ever.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Advertisements
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
The mother of a barely there celebrity was overheard musing about how much the sperm donor is worth way more dead than alive, at least to th...
-
August 1, 2014 How is it that this actress is rolling in dough? I mean she could literally shower with $100 bills every few minutes and not ...
-
An offspring of a former A++ lister is hooking up with an A+/A list singer. Their first hookup was a messy drunken spectacle in front of sev...
-
October 15, 2024 Apparently, the growing rift between the alliterate one and her husband began shortly after the big funeral. The alliterate...
-
For old times sake, these two bad actors/former co-stars/former couple hooked up. They will blame it on being drunk.
-
October 16, 2024 I guess things are getting more serious considering the permanent A list "singer" has Narcan ready to go througho...
-
October 9, 2024 The Sean Combs of Hollywood documentary coming is going to send the alliterate one and her husband running like cockroaches....
-
October 16, 2024 Speaking of alliterate, this foreign born alliterate A list actor thought Oscar was a lock for his latest role. Now that he...
-
October 19, 2024 What is going to be crazy is this. Neither of the escorts the dead rocker slept with said they used protection. What if the...
-
Speaking of A list actors and hookers, this A+/A list actor had a bevy of them while out of the country. His girlfriend probably wouldn'...
january Jones?
ReplyDeleteJanuary Jones and maybe Bobby Flay?
ReplyDeleteMatthew Vaughn??
ReplyDeleteHer baby wasn't secret.
ReplyDeleteDaddy is though Sara.
ReplyDeleteMeghan Markle was my first thought but Enty usually calls her 'A- former actress', right? She supposedly had a baby when she was in college. If true, that kid could be 15-18 by now.
ReplyDeleteMystery baby usually points at a married daddy.
ReplyDeleteIf it is Markle, all the trivia her family is releasing to the Daily Mail takes on an entirely different tone. It sounds a lot more like blackmail - send more money or we'll release the real dish.
ReplyDeleteThat said, the family keeps using Markle's preferred photo agency when they are SUDDENLY CAUGHT UNAWARE by the DM photographers, so maybe Meghan's working with them as a distracting tactic.
Better late than never. I could be critical, but I'll just applaud this turn of events.
ReplyDeleteOooh Nutty I like that idea. Her family is very self aware if they don't realize how idiotic this is making them look so they really are dumb if they're pushing their own agenda.
ReplyDeleteAlso I keep thinking it's odd that there are constant articles saying "Royal family in a tizzy over Markles" "Meghan devastated by father" from inside sources but the royals haven't done anything to stop it...It's probably all orchestrated for publicity.
How’s having her estranged family continuously bash her good publicity? How is causing problems within her new family good? It’s hella embarrassing. That family wants money and the royal family refuses to be extorted so they won’t pay up. Eventually they’ll go away
Delete@unknown. No kidding. As long as there are people out there believing every single thing about her, the extortion will continue. Good grief. He is not all that.
DeleteIf this were true and they knew wouldn’t you think she would’ve been paid them to shut up? This is bullshit and that family can just stop bc she’s NOT paying up
ReplyDeleteUnknown - I thought everyone realized during the 2016 presidential campaign that for celebrities any publicity is good publicity is the golden rule.
ReplyDeleteThe Markle drama keeps the royals at the front page of every tabloid for free. Do you really believe that The Firm is so incompetent that they would have frequent "emergency meetings" about a situation and still be unable to resolve it?
I still believe it's entirely possible that the Markles are just that stupid (humanity is constantly finding new lows in that regard), I just find it odd that if the royals are that upset they haven't figured out a solution after months of this.
That being said I don't think this is about Meghan. I think it's January Jones. Meghan clearly doesn't have custody of the kid so how could the father visit? And it doesn't say former.
True, it doesn't say former. But if if if it was true, the baby could've been given up for adoption. And if the father was a sleazy/user/opportunist, he sees Meghan all over the media and tracks down the child to cash in.
Delete@Ophelia I agree with you about the publicity - but whose publicity?
ReplyDeleteThe Royal Family doesn't need publicity, except for the usual stale sort where they cut a ribbon on a new motorway or tour a rehabilitation center and shake hands with photogenic commoners.
The people who benefit from this type of publicity are the DM (thousands of comments every single day, even on stories about obscure Markle relatives, what an advertising bonanza!), the family if they're getting paid, and Meg herself, who is presumably trying to position herself for a celebrity career outside the royal family after they dump her.
It looks like she's in Canada at the moment and Harry's in Botswana. True love, dat.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletelol it wouldn't be surprising if the blind about Meghan getting extra cash by using her friend's clothing samples is true that she would be getting a cut (they always use very flattering photos of her like you mentioned!).
ReplyDeleteIf she loses the marriage she definitely needs to have enough publicity and celebrity status to stay relevant on her own.
Also I could see the new generation of royals being okay with anything that keeps them relevant rather than slipping into the background like other European royals.
Not saying I believe any of this myself - just think it's somewhat plausible conjecture for fun and we definitely don't see all that's there with powerful families :)
There was another blind about Megan lying to her boyfriend about her ability to have kids and it would be interesting to see his reaction when she does get pregnant. Sounds way more like January Jones to me.
ReplyDeleteHere goes the group think again, this time about Markle. *rolleyes*
ReplyDeleteHow old is January Jones’s kid now?
ReplyDeleteLaura Linney?
ReplyDeleteLauren London?
ReplyDeleteJeremy Piven. But then again, Claudia Schiffer has been getting papped a lot lately.
ReplyDeleteBlah blah poor January.
ReplyDeleteAs long as the baby daddy isn't Hamm. I still want to believe that he is one of the few decent guys left in HW
Lucy Liu had a surrogate baby a couple years ago?
ReplyDeleteI would say, Meghan Markle...she has more skeletons in her closet than a haunted house. Pretty sure she's already separated from Henry. They haven't been photographed together in public in weeks.
ReplyDeleteAlrighty then.......WHO??????
ReplyDeletehamm isnt a decent guy.
ReplyDeletedidnt he haze a the fraternity iniates at his college and get caught and arrested? wasnt he the pledge master?
he’s just another sicko that its in perfectly with the rest of hollyweird
Janet Jackson??
ReplyDeleteYES!!!
Deletenot Markle. January Jones and either Vaughn or Jason Sudekis
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletey'all don't know its Khloe Kardashian
ReplyDeleteJamey Jackson is what I thought right away. I'm old
ReplyDeleteJone's baby was never a secret, just the father.
ReplyDeleteJanuary Jones or Janet Jackson.
ReplyDeleteSpeculation on top of speculation about Markle is a touch ridiculous.
Revision: not Janet Jackson. I don't think she's acted since Poetic Justice.
DeleteThis is confusing as it says the baby is a secret... not that the paternity is the secret. January's baby is OUT THERE but the man who fathered the baby is not. I wish the wording would be better on these blinds.
ReplyDeleteThis is clearly January Jones - I don't know how people are staying MM.Any chance to drag her under the bus i swear.
ReplyDeleteJanet Jackson and El dabarge. Longtime rumors
ReplyDeleteSome of y’all ain’t thinking! It’s not Janet Jackson her secret baby would be 30 if the child existed.plus Janet is primarily a singer not actress, Janet makes a movie ever 9 years on average. It’s not Meghan Markle’s. If she had a secret child, her dumbass sister would’ve dropped dime a lot no time ago.
ReplyDeleteDuhhhh it’s Drake. The mother is a Porn Star. I.e. Adult Film Actress. The baby was just publicized this year.
ReplyDeleteHis child’s mother was NEVER a porn star
DeleteThe Markles were used as a distraction for the Royal Family so the spotlight would be off Prince Charles being linked to Peter Ball former Clergy man who is a paedophile. A statement from Prince Charles was read out on the 27th July 2018 to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). It was a five-day case study into how allegations against the former Church of England bishop were handled comes to a close.
ReplyDeleteYou cannot have a King to be linked to another paedophile after another of his close friends Jimmy Saville's major paedophile scandal. So the Markles were brought in to bring headlines and to keep Prince Charles away from scrutiny. Not one person questioned why he did not appear in person and why he was allowed to write a letter instead of being under oath answering questions. So he threw the new daughter in law to the wolves. He is a lovely father in law isn't he?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-charles-wales-child-sexual-abuse-paedophile-bishop-peter-ball-church-a8467461.html
Janet Jackson
ReplyDeleteVery Nice And Interesting Post, thank you for sharing
ReplyDeleteShort Inspirational Quotes - Gym Quotes
Best Quotes - Success Quotes
Positive Life Quotes - Image Bank
Future Quotes - Øكم عن الØياة
كلام جميل - Øكمة اليوم