Blind Item #6
Look for this news executive to not return to his post when he says he will return. This is all posturing to make him and everything else about to go down, look good.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Advertisements
Popular Posts from the last 30 days
-
August 1, 2014 How is it that this actress is rolling in dough? I mean she could literally shower with $100 bills every few minutes and not ...
-
An offspring of a former A++ lister is hooking up with an A+/A list singer. Their first hookup was a messy drunken spectacle in front of sev...
-
October 15, 2024 Apparently, the growing rift between the alliterate one and her husband began shortly after the big funeral. The alliterate...
-
For old times sake, these two bad actors/former co-stars/former couple hooked up. They will blame it on being drunk.
-
October 16, 2024 I guess things are getting more serious considering the permanent A list "singer" has Narcan ready to go througho...
-
October 16, 2024 Speaking of alliterate, this foreign born alliterate A list actor thought Oscar was a lock for his latest role. Now that he...
-
October 19, 2024 What is going to be crazy is this. Neither of the escorts the dead rocker slept with said they used protection. What if the...
-
Speaking of A list actors and hookers, this A+/A list actor had a bevy of them while out of the country. His girlfriend probably wouldn'...
-
October 17, 2024 Even though it is ridiculous, the permanent A list actor does actually believe his 16 month old texts him. So, obviously no...
-
October 20, 2024 This permanent A list singer needs to look no further than her former husband (not the sperm donor one) as to why she has s...
Bill Shine?
ReplyDeleteJeff Zucker
ReplyDeleteMaybe Les Moonves
ReplyDeleteLove when Tricia13 guesses immediately & it makes absolute sense. But didn't he just sign a big deal? I like the Jeff Zucker guess too with his ticker.
ReplyDeleteI don’t it’s him...but i tried 😊lol
DeleteCan't be Bill Shine. He's working in the White House now. Zucker makes the most sense.
ReplyDeleteJeff Zucker has done more to make the news business a worse place than almost any living human being, now that Roger Ailes is dead.
ReplyDeleteZucker just took six weeks off for heart surgery.
ReplyDeleteWhat else will go down? CNN has struggled in ratings forever. Why would they change anything now?
ReplyDeletemaybe they are about to do mass layoffs, they are struggling
ReplyDeleteNot sure I would describe him as executive, but Chris Hardwick could fit...
ReplyDeleteZucker def makes sense, especially with AT&T buying out Time Warner (which owns CNN)
ReplyDeleteIf CNN would quit with the panels of screaming "experts", in favor of actual news reporting (and no, that is not Lisa Ling working up some tears to try and imply she has a soul), they might gain back some viewers.
ReplyDeleteCan't be having any news or reporting on CNN. It's all attitude TV over there.
Bring back Ted Turner. Get him on the air talking about apocalypse and cannibalism....contrary to what you might think, that's not a euphemism for his marriage to Jane Fonda.
ReplyDelete@Plot, I have to agree with you.
ReplyDeletePlot, as someone whose default news channel is CNN, I must agree. Don Lemon and his Brady Bunch people squares MUST GO
ReplyDeleteSo what else is supposed to go down, what is supposed to be happening?
ReplyDelete+1 Plot. Stopped watching CNN last year and switched to MSNBC for this reason, but lately they're inexplicably going the insufferable idiot panelist route lately, too. It must garner ratings.
ReplyDeleteJeff Zucker
ReplyDeleteIt's all Mockingbird media. You get screaming panelists because they have a script.
ReplyDeletehttp://carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_and_media.php
With the repeal of the Smith-Mundt Act in 2013, the "news" media people are now propagandists. They don't want you getting your information from non-Mockingbirds because OMG, they might actually do journalism and report the truth since they are beholden to no one but their own personal integrity.
http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1203&context=nulr
https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736
When people like Rachel Maddow are paid $30K per show to push an agenda, you better believe that agenda will get pushed.
There's a very real possibility that the "panelists" could be FBI or other agency assets... so in that case, you can bet your bottom dollar that they are there for damage control or to push an agenda. https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2016/o1607.pdf
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4731767/operation-mockingbird-exposed-span
The more aware we are as a whole, the less they (propaganda pushers) can manipulate the populace.
+1 amazing quotes
ReplyDelete@Mandi
ReplyDeleteThanks for the heads up on the repeal of Smith-Mundt Act.
They know the storm is here. Mockingbird Media is paid by Black Hats. They're all going down. It's going on behind scenes now guaranteed
ReplyDeletePlot and mandi are out of their tiny little minds. When are the black helicopters coming to take you away?
ReplyDelete