Oh, this is so good and so typically small town Hollywood. Guess who, when she was back doing pay for play on that game show hooked up with this now disgraced A list mostly movie director. Yeah, so no big deal about that and apparently she was willing to hook up with him for free. Not for free though, was this partner of the disgraced director who now has a national stage. Yep. There is no way she is telling her future husband about those though right? For sure not the latter.
I can't even get through this one. I have no idea what it's trying to say. :-/
ReplyDeleteMeghan Markle?
ReplyDeleteMeghan Markle on Deal or No Deal
ReplyDeleteBrett Rather and??
@undercover_LBD, seriously, this gave me a headache.
ReplyDeleteNo way, national stage huh?
ReplyDeleteMnuchin for partner
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteHollywood scandal reaches business partner of Trump’s Treasury Secretary
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article182290861.html
Steve Mnuchin?
ReplyDeleteLatter could be Russell Simmons
ReplyDeleteDammit Sara lol ;)
ReplyDeleteOmg you guys this is totally Meghan Markle.
ReplyDeleteI get the Meghan Markle reference, and seeing a disgraced director, but what the hell is the rest of this about ?
ReplyDeleteWow! Am guessing MM is sweating out these last few weeks before the big wedding! May 19 can't arrive too soon.
ReplyDeleteGuessing is MM but dont understand whats gone on?????
ReplyDeleteThat she hooked up with Rattner and yachted with Mnuchin, doesn't want Harry to know, especially about Steve.
DeleteMeghan Markle. Director Bret Ratner- his partner James Packer.
ReplyDeleteEwww, didn't Serena Williams used to date Brett Ratner? Wonder if that's how Meghan and Serena became friends.
ReplyDeleteSo Meghan Markle hooked up with both Brett Ratner and Steve Mnuchin.
ReplyDeleteThis is all an op to delegitimize Saxe-Coburg-whateverthefuck
ReplyDeleteYou'll look back fondly on the day the illegitimate prince married the lady who once had Steven Mnuchin's penis in her mouth.
ReplyDeleteActually, it was several times.
Nicely done sir
DeleteMariah Carey dated Brett Rather and James Packer too.
ReplyDeleteI would insist on being paid to hook up with Steve Mnuchin. Ugh.
ReplyDeleteThe confusing wording of this blind reminds me of a funny quote on BLACKLIST the other night when a CIA bigwig said, "Whether Zarak Mosadek was in the employ of the CIA, I am not going to non-deny deny. What I will not deny is that he is no longer in their employ if he ever was, which I will not confirm. Or deny."
ReplyDeleteThis. Love Blacklist!
DeleteThat sequence was so fun...non-deny deny. Cooper got her back though!
DeleteAs a Brit, if there is something really nasty to come out about MM i hope its before the wedding. And i sense there is a lot of stuff out there from Hollywood fun times. The RF can survive scandals but the Monarchy is getting shaky as the prospect of not having The Queen around gets closer. The RF can put up with the misdemeanours of its own blood but not of outsiders....Diana, Fergie
ReplyDeleteI feel like I'm the only one here who understood this blind. The writing is poor, but I understood the gist of it nonetheless. It's saying that Meghan Markle hooked up with Brett Ratner(sp?) and Steve Muchin (whoever those people are) while she was on Deal or No Deal. We already know she was pay for play back when she was on Deal or No Deal, so this isn't exactly surprising. I sincerely doubt that Harry would care, he's in lust and isn't going to snap out of it anytime soon.
ReplyDeleteMarkle
ReplyDeleteMnuchin
If this is well known enough to be a blind item - Harry knows. Hell the whole royal family knows. It's not like the royal family doesn't have deep background checks done on potential spouses. Harry was rather wild & free himself (Vegas naked photos). Obviously he doesn't care!
ReplyDeleteYeah, they already know her background in detail. If there was any uncertainty, it was over whether they could keep it under wraps, and whether they're past the point where she can be removed from the picture if they can't.
ReplyDeleteWhat I think, is that Harry was being pressured to marry. So in a fit of rebellion, chose somebody completely inappropriate (in the eyes of the Royal Family anyway) as a big F.U.
ReplyDeleteThey courted as publicly as possible so it would be difficult to get out of. Harry has a reputation of his own
and they want him to be respectable.
He knows who she is, and all about her past. As do the rest of the Royal, and they are doing everything possible to cover it up and avoid embarassment. Maybe that's why they had such a short engagement, just to get it over with.
Harry could not care less.
All royals have short engagements. Wasnt Wiil & Kate’s only like 3 weeks? Charles & Diana also had a short engagement. They would have married a month ago if Kate wasn’t pregnant.
DeleteAll royals have short engagements. Wasnt Wiil & Kate’s only like 3 weeks? Charles & Diana also had a short engagement. They would have married a month ago if Kate wasn’t pregnant.
DeleteAll royals have short engagements. Wasnt Wiil & Kate’s only like 3 weeks? Charles & Diana also had a short engagement. They would have married a month ago if Kate wasn’t pregnant.
DeleteTrue and he is just the spare heir. Ain't gonna be king so it really doesn't matter too much anyway. Everyone needs to calm down.
Delete+1. Harry and the rest of the family have all been around the block. Folks may not like the choice but I think everybody there understands the score.
DeleteUnknown you have a very odd sense of time. Will and Kate were engaged in November married in April.
DeleteThey look in love who cares about their past. There's a lot of haters regarding Megan look into our royal history and see just how bad the real totals are? we had a Nazi sympathizer king who abdicated after feeding info to the Germans which possibly led to our troops dying. Princess Margaret was involved in all kinds of debauchery and Andrew is rumoured to be a paedophile. Charles has kept some very ropey company look at his friendship with jimmy savile. Harry is loved and good luck to him and Megan he can't do any worse than the lot before him.
ReplyDeleteAmen!!!
DeleteThe royal family would know all about this. Especially after Diana and Fergie, prospects are run through the wringer. There should be nothing in these blinds about Meghan Markle, that the Royals don't already know about.
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't really matter who Harry marries, because he's so far from the thrown, with William and three children, that his line will never see the light of day.
So what? MM's record is pretty clean, IMO; she's 36 years old and most people have had sex by the time they are 36. She's normal when you consider the general dysfunction, off-color remarks, inbreeding, alleged pedophilia, entitlement, adultery, and historically treasonous behavior of the RF. Haters wanna hate.
ReplyDeleteMeghan Markle may have played for pay when she was on that briefcase show, and maybe even later on in her career but I think she's perfect for the role she's embarking upon as half of this royal couple. I would guess her shady past is known to the royal family but she's so gracious, smart and elegant, and she presents so well. With Harry going from bad boy to humanitarian in the style of his mother, Markle goes well with him. She'll never assume the role of queen anyway.
ReplyDeleteAgree 100%
DeleteHarry looks happy so leave them be. I know plenty of women who had a “wild” past who are the utmost wives and moms. Worry about your own house, not someone else’s.
ReplyDeletemegan markle
ReplyDeletedeal or no deal
bret ratner
steve mnuchin (current treasury secretary)
Pardon?
ReplyDeleteI give them 5 years tops.
ReplyDeleteBack this pushing Meghan was some call girl who slept around with men. For what? She's never gotten any movie roles from them and are you saying she did all this while dating/being married to Trevor? And he married her anyways (she was on suits when they married). Yeah sure, she's just sleeping with these guys for free. TOTALLY believable.
ReplyDeleteThis is all over the place.
We've seen some big time and small time people posted here. I find it suspect that suddenly Meghan is now with Prince Harry and now everyone has a story about her.
She had a small part in Horrible Bosses, which Ratner produced.
DeleteAlso, the allegation is that Mnuchin paid her. I'm not sure when the first MM escort rumors surfaced, but I think the general rumor about Deal or No Deal case girls has been around longer than she's been with Harry.
DeletePay for play that worked out perfectly.
ReplyDeleteGood for her. She hit the jackpot
It’s just ...odd he could do so much better
ReplyDeleteShe slept with a munchkin ? :)
ReplyDeletePrince Harry has a few hookers in his closet and I doubt he gives a flying F. It's not like he went overseas and bought a mail order bride. He has good taste I must say.
ReplyDeleteMarkle, Ratner and Cohen? Lol ewwwww
ReplyDeleteIn recent times I can think of three Royal women who had very shadey pasts.
ReplyDeletePrincess Mabel of the Netherlands (the widow of the present Kings brother) and Crown Princess Mette-Merit of Norway, who will one day be Queen . The have both turned out amazingly well in their roles both at home and abroad and totally lived down their past. Princess Sofia, the sister in-law of the next Queen of Sweden also had a racy past and she seems to also be doing very well in the job, even though their marriage is relatively new. I see no reason Meghan can't follow their path.
Harry must be proud that she's been cocked more often than John Wayne's gun.
ReplyDeleteOf course. She's probably picked up some talents over the years.
DeleteQ send me!
ReplyDeleteThis mssge is to thank you MR. Tony Stark alias: Robert Downey Jr alias: Enty
FOR HELPING EXPOSING THE PEDO WITHIN H
Who is writing on this board?
RDJr ;)
CHEERS MY FRIEND!
Legs behind the head perhaps.
ReplyDeleteRun, Harry, RUN!
ReplyDeleteSo why is the Meghan Markle cruise missiles still poised to strike the target?
ReplyDeleteBannon may not have gotten everything he ever wanted but he certainly got his turning.
If it is Markle, I cannot judge her choices.
ReplyDeleteShe was networking.
Nobody does 'yachting' as a final goal.
It got her an audition.... A modeling job.... Etc.
Men do this sort of social climbing every day. No one faults them for it.
Just to add here the rumours in the UK that both William and Harry were given their first sexual experiences by a 'soceity girl' called Tara Part Tomkinson (i think that's her name). She was see as a part time nanny to the general public, but rumours are she was basically used by the princes for sex.
ReplyDeleteShe was certainly off her head, crashing and burning in public in the 2000's on Coke and drink and TV talk shows. She seemed a very unhappy woman (yet desperate for care and love), very possibly used and abused by the royal family.
The publicists are in here. No discerning poster would assert that Princess Sparkles of Yacht is "elegant."
ReplyDeleteNo way in the world royal family doesn't know every single thing about her. Probably more than she does.
ReplyDeleteHarry's self-destructive, if likable.
He's gonna pay big time for this is several dimensions.
Eventually.
Let's remember Harry's mom Diana for a moment. Not the fashionista, but her serious side.
ReplyDeleteOn Jan. 15, 1997, one of the world's most famous women walked through an active minefield in Angola, and detonated a mine in front of the press.
In August 1997, Diana was preparing to speak in the Netherlands, at a forum to ban land mines. She mysteriously died in a tunnel, just before that speech.
Diana's popularity catapulted into the stratosphere, with those land mine photos.
Before that, Diana was a glamour girl. But in Jan 1997, all of that changed.
Harry is always going to push the envelope. He is always going to take a risk.
He gets that from his mom.
Hey, emeraldcity, you left out the most important one! The numero uno, the one that started it all, the biggest transition evah, Grace Kelly. Where do you think the tradition of yachts at the Cannes Film Festival came from? Ranier made all the European "royalty" (as well as some newly rich arabs) super jealous with his "catch". To be fair, Kelly was known in Hollywood to be pretty good in the sack.
ReplyDelete