Friday, March 02, 2018

Blind Item #6

More money for them to share is the feeling of the remaining members of this group. The one member not performing was the one who wanted the most money and is the least talented, so they think it is a win win.

42 comments:

  1. Spice Girls/Victoria

    ReplyDelete
  2. Spice Girl. Victoria's out.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Spice Girl. Victoria's out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Self important, greedy bissh.
    Good for them for not giving in.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mrs. Beckham just cut her nose to spite her face. She's gonna need that money real soon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Smashing Pumpkins.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Darcy had no leverage. Not them.

      Delete
  7. Has she really backed out? After all those PR Insta posts??

    ReplyDelete
  8. I find it hard to believe social climber Victoria would back out of a gig for Harry and Meghan.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Do you think it will come out that Harry is illegitimate?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No. That will never come out. Plus, despite the red hair, he has Charles closely-spaced eyes and looks more legitimate as he gets older.

      Delete
  10. Yes, because the rest of the Spice Girls are SO talented. I get chills when I hear their songs, just like when I listen to Whitney Houston.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Geeljire No, I don't. Harry looks exactly like Phillip did at his age, minus the red hair. He is Chuck's son.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Harry sure looks like that cad soldier polo player who turned Diana into his own personal Farrah Abraham.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Was Posh anyone's favorite of the group?

    ReplyDelete
  14. lol!! @parissucksliterally

    Best comment so far.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't know about you guys but I'd push a tranny prostitute off a fire escape for Mel B.
    Too soon?

    ReplyDelete
  16. The very fact the "royal" family is allowing H to marry MM is the best indicator he's illegit.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This BI was written a slightly different way a couple of days ago. 😣

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And will be again!
      Tune in tomorrow!

      Delete
  18. It is likely she prefers to attend as a guest rather than as the paid entertainment.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Oh for FS already! Harry is not the child of douchebag Hewitt. Just because he has red hair....he really doesn't look anything like him!

    The reason they don't care who he marries is 1) he's so far down the list to inherit the throne at this point that it would be like the movie King Ralph coming true if he did and 2) on a more optimistic note, maybe since it's not the dark ages, they realize that he's an adult and should be able to marry who he wants. The royal family has had plenty of lessons in why suggested/arranged marriages are not really a great ideal.

    ReplyDelete
  20. @nicksauntie that's an interesting opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I can't believe the Enquirer would possibly make up any story they published like who Harry's real father is and he's invited to his wedding too!😮

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'd say he looks more like Hewitt than he looks like his (half-?) brother.

    Much more, actually.

    ReplyDelete
  23. It would be wrong to not invite your biological father to your wedding of a mulatto prostitute.
    Fancy a quadroon ball?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Kno Won Uno: I'd ignore Geeljire (I think it's either Xpensive Hobutt, or they came from the same trolll farm or were hired by the same person). Vessimede Barstool too.

      Ddonna Tarttty has also posted some blatantly racist stuff about Amal Clooney and Beyoncé/Jay-Z. His comments revolve around stealing/theft, getting away with murder and making it look like a suicide/accident, and conspiracy theories about school children lying about shootings.

      They're trolls. I never saw them around here until certain people criticised a dehydrated D-lister.

      Delete
    2. xyzxyz33 (I think previously 346NYC) and Raspy, James, an initial i can't remember, and some others I can't remember. We'd do better ignoring them.

      I noticed on the Hedge thread about Africa, some of these people don't really have anything to say/info to add. They're not compelled to post because they have something to say, but rather because they have to say something (Plato's words). They'll Google basic info about the subject matter, and post that, just so they can insert themselves in the conversation, and then shoehorn their agenda in it. Either that, or they change their stance on things too swiftly/to an extreme.

      There's a pattern of behaviour. Just ignore them.

      Delete
  24. Exactly @parissucks--There's a fight to the bottom amongst these "singers."

    ReplyDelete
  25. I used to think Harry wasnt Charles' kid then I saw a photo a couple of years where Harry was the spitting image of Charles if it was forty years ago only with red hair. There was no doubt about it. Gingerism runs in Dianas family anyway , so I'm pretty certain he's legit.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Did your father defend your legitimacy as much as you find yourself defending Harry's?

    ReplyDelete
  27. I am 47 years old, and remember Harry growing up. He looked just like Charles as a little boy, and red hair is in Diana's family.

    I am so bored of the "Harry is not Charles's kid" bullshit.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Back to the blind.
    Jesus, to be "Least talented" in the Spice Girls is a bar set so low that you'd have to tunnel to get to it.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The least talented at what? Cuz they all fucking suck lol

    ReplyDelete
  30. Harry looks like Diana’s brother.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Can all the stupid people stop with the "Harry's not REALLY a royal" bullshit now? Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Why do people say she needs money when David is worth so much?

    ReplyDelete
  33. Maybe it's Kandy Buress..she's not on new Escape album?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Has anyone ever seen her smile? I never have.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days