Thursday, February 15, 2018

Blind Item #4

This permanent A/A- list dual threat actress who is more well known for an iconic television role is ticked off because she was supposed to be on the cover of at least one tabloid next week. Instead, they are devoting the cover to the school shooting from yesterday. Sounds about right for her.


57 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Hey Brayson! I think Mrs Em May have it—SJP is in Entys shit list of late lol

      Delete
  2. SJP -- Kneepads. article was supposed to be about her marriage to Broderick.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +1. She seems like an abominable creature.

      Delete
    2. @Mrs. EM - SJP is on the cover of People. I got my copy in the mail.

      Delete
  3. is she really an asshole??

    ReplyDelete
  4. Replies
    1. I think she is alleged to be— phony (at least by Enty), And very much a fame/press monger (eh while complaining about privacy etc)

      Delete
    2. I actually don’t like Aniston at all. In those St. Jude commercials she seems so fake... and the kids are really awesome and seriously she just doesn’t look like she cares at all. She’s too worried about doing yoga poses or showing off her fake tan or whatever.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous7:41 AM

    I'm going with SJP....Aniston doesn't seem that cold and heartless.

    ReplyDelete
  6. My first time commenting -- I guessed because I heard last week she was going to be on the cover and it was going to be misleading. I forgot what it was supposed to say, but it would lead the reader to believe it was about her and Kim Catrall. Something like, "how I got through it.. " It's supposed to be about 20 years of marriage to MB.

    ReplyDelete
  7. How are the guesses above "dual threats"? Just curious since that made me think otherwise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous7:47 AM

      It’s kind of like Kaepernick being called a dual threat QB even though he barely completes half his pass attempts. These days all you gotta do is show up for the trophy.

      Delete
    2. On this site - and this site only - dual threat means they act in movies AND on television (or stage).
      It doesn’t mean what it means in the rest of the whole entire world.
      But Enty won’t change it.

      Delete
  8. SJP also sings - was on Broadway when she was younger. Could be that. She's also a designer so that could be the thing too. Jennifer I think produces?

    ReplyDelete
  9. In Entyspeak "dual threat" means television and film.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Tricia! Yes SJP's personality fits a lot more than Jen's, never saw Jen as that type of person.
    Of course I've never considered SJP a dual threat, I had to google to remember her non S&C movies.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It could be either one of them, though I lean more to this being the new york old nag.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'm stumped on what SJP is really like. The comments I see throughout this site about her makes her seem like a self-absorbed bitch. But then reading any articles about her it appears that she's the nice one and KC is the bitch. How can there be such a discrepancy in explanation of her personality and behavior? Enty tends to be in sync with a lot of Daily Mail articles and DM doesn't portray SJP in the same light. What am I missing?

    Anddddd... If she really is as bad as so many people say, why is everyone in Hollywood rallying around her ever since the KC Twitter rant? Seems like this would be a good time for the women in Hollywood to rally around the person who is not the bitch. I certainly would rally around the NON-Bitch, no matter how unpopular that might be.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Because Hollywood never rallies around a bitch or male villain, never ever, it would have to be a first time.

    ReplyDelete
  14. SATC ended because of SJP's salary demands. Her costars hated her (and still do from what I understand.) A friend of mine encountered her several times and she was not nice at any point, so...

    ReplyDelete
  15. Your vs You're: I suppose it's possible that SJP is entirely self-absorbed. And, Kim C. is entirely a bitch also.

    It's kind of like Rose McGowan's appearance. The trans thing that was yelling at her is quite one of the most odious of its kind--a total attention whore. And yet, Rose is pretty clearly in need of serious therapy and medications. In such a situation, stay well to the side and signal the waiter for more drinks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. GORDON SCOTT: Finally someone who doesn't think in black-and-white terms around here! You see all 50 shades of grey!!!! Yaaaassss! 🙌🏼

      I heard yesterday's shooting wasn't even the first of 2018, apparently it was the fifth. And it's only mid-February. Horrific.

      Delete
  16. Seriously, if it is SJP, then Kim was all kids of right about her. She's got two tabloid covers this week. Why the hell does she need more?

    FFS

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm also torn about SJP. I do know she has a raging eating disorder, though

    ReplyDelete
  18. Is Spur and Saddle Monthly a tabloid?

    ReplyDelete
  19. @Brayson87
    Yes, I agree with what you were inferring. My thinking is more along the line that while both women are somewhere on the same bitchiness scale -- although one more or less than the other -- which one is the “MALICIOUS” one? Perhaps only WOMEN can understand the whole magnitude of what “malicious” bitchiness can do to another woman. It’s one thing to be a bitch because you’re pre-menstrual, but entirely different when a WOMAN IS “MALICIOUSLY” A BITCH TO ANOTHER WOMAN.

    @Gordon Scott
    Yes, my thoughts as well – that both women have dirt on their hands, however, I’d love to know who the “malicious” one is. That’s where a hint of evil lives within a woman and it can be the worst kind of scorn to suffer when directed at another woman. (I am woman, so I am speaking from experience.)

    ReplyDelete
  20. I agree with Ms Em- this is SJP. She's desperate to do damage control on the whole Kim Cattrall fiasco

    ReplyDelete
  21. I will say one thing, women have a language all of their own. All kinds of things can be going on and most men have no idea. It's all in the "interpretation". Takes a special guy to decode.

    ReplyDelete
  22. If you have ever asked SJP for an autograph you would know she is a biiiiatttchhhhhh!!! MB cool though. Signed my kids hat and t-shirt at a Starbucks in NYC a few years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ok, so then question for the women. Anyone who has a clearer perception of SJP and KC personalities.

    If SJP and KC were the only two women you could choose from for a BFF and you would be sharing personal details of our life with, which woman would you feel safest picking?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh god. Even my wife says I’m basically a dude when it comes to understanding the “subtleties” of the way most women communicate among themselves.

      First impression: I’d pick KC because she seems to sit on her secrets until someone pisses her off.

      On the other hand, as someone who unwittingly pisses people off and never quite understands why, I’m gonna go with SJP because it sounds like she would never make time for me unless she wanted paparazzi attention, and that’s public enough to keep me from sharing anything too personal.

      Delete
  24. Cattrall would be my choice. SJP seems like she needs constant validation.

    ReplyDelete
  25. As you bought up Aniston...Has anyone else noticed that when married to The Actor she was at her thinnest? As were Gloop, Lewis and Jolie. Always made me wonder if he took them from behind and pretended they were 12yo boys. Sorry buts it's been in my mind since stories from Jens marriage to him and how thin she got during that time.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @Juliaph so true, and that's exactly what the Aziz Ansari situation illustrated. Men do not pick up on the same things that women do. I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with that, it just is what it is.

    @Your vs. You're Cattrall. She at least seems honest. Who stood to benefit from SJP's public condolences? That's something you do privately.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Team Cattrell. She seems like a blast to hang out with, and a "bitch" in the best possible sense of the term.

    I wouldn't trust SJP as far as I could throw her. And hanging with her seems like it would be a complete pain in the ass. Like she would need constant attention and make everything a competition. No thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anyone who’s remained devoted to that much black eyeliner this far into the 21st century and well past the appropriate age is too emotionally fragile to deal with. I gave up collecting people that require kid glove handling.

      Delete
  28. Pauley Perrette. (jk. I doubt it's her. But it fits her).

    ReplyDelete
  29. Thanks for all the feedback. I've been convinced. I'm totally comfortable now with how I'll perceive blinds in the future on SJP, and I gotta go with Team Cattrall now. :)

    ReplyDelete
  30. Don't kid yourselves, people. Jen A. is EXACTLY that type of person.

    Having said that, SJP is a bitch on wheels. #TeamCattrall

    ReplyDelete
  31. I have friends that have encountered Aniston, Cattrall and SJP, and they had pleasant encounters. Make of that what you will 🤷🏼‍♀️
    (And Ellie Goulding too...not so nice apparently)

    ReplyDelete
  32. Aninston/Theroux announced split....coins that be the cover?

    ReplyDelete
  33. SJP has devoted herself to arts in the schools, and not just elite schools, but those at the 99% poverty level.

    She's got fabulous clothes, talent, beauty, children, a wonderful husband, an out of this world home in NYC, and that must make for incredible jealousy.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Jennifer Aniston and her divorce?

    ReplyDelete
  35. Jennifer Aniston and her divorce from what's his face.

    ReplyDelete
  36. @Your versus You're
    I would choose Kim Cattrall. She has always been a class act and forthright. You could always see that SJP was very jealous of her. Besides, it is obvious in interviews that SJP is extremely self-conscious about not being pretty and not being educated. She will go out of her way to use a three dollar word just to sound "smart." And please "aria" is your favorite word? I don't think so.

    ReplyDelete
  37. this is 100% SJP

    she's terrible, just terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  38. @MrsEM

    u got it:

    "last week she was going to be on the cover and it was going to be misleading. I forgot what it was supposed to say, but it would lead the reader to believe it was about her and Kim Catrall. Something like, "how I got through it.. " It's supposed to be about 20 years of marriage to MB."

    i recently found out broderick went on a car ride with the actress lead from dirty dancing and killed two people i think (car accident)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Broderick#1987_car_crash

    "Broderick told police he had no recollection of the crash and did not know why he was in the wrong lane."

    looks like SJP & Broderick are perfect for one another....

    ReplyDelete
  39. No way I believe that about Aniston unless someone has a concrete 100% story that is not hearsay. With SATC I'm sure there is truth in each side. I for sure see major personality clashes. Sjp was getting more control over the stories and production. Yea she's the star of the show but each woman was crucial to the show and story.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Barbara Streisand

    ReplyDelete
  41. I thought Jennifer and Justin broke the news so they could get ahead of the tabloid stories coming out. Us Weekly just did a story about them being in love.


    SJP is on the cover of People but the blind could still be about her. People prints & mails out very early. The magazines that don't may have ditched her story to cover the shooting. Good.

    ReplyDelete