December 26, 2017
Don't believe the hype. As much as her publicists are trying to make it happen, these two once long ago co-stars who are both A- list and foreign born are not dating. She is totally not his type. She has never played the PR game before, but that career is going downhill fast.
Emma Watson/Robert Pattinson
Don't believe the hype. As much as her publicists are trying to make it happen, these two once long ago co-stars who are both A- list and foreign born are not dating. She is totally not his type. She has never played the PR game before, but that career is going downhill fast.
Emma Watson/Robert Pattinson
Emma isn't but tka twigs was ok. Maybe Emma likes guys who shower once in a while?
ReplyDeleteShe starred in one of the highest grossing films of 2017 how is her career going downhill?
ReplyDeleteI’m not a huge Emma Watson fan but if R Patt really thinks he’s better than her he needs mirrors and a sense of smell stat.
Emma can’t open a movie. Beauty and the beast could have opened itself (and it did)
DeleteDo interesting indie movies like dan or retire with your fortune.
ReplyDeleteBeauty and the Beast may have been the highest grossing films, but her performance was so sub par. It was panned by about everyone except ppl that just loved the Beauty and the Beast story. I do, and I loved the movie visually, but she was the same performer she always is, very flat, it was not good. She is not a great actress and her attitude makes it even worse.
ReplyDeleteI thought her line-readings were adequate, but she doesn't know how to act a song. If you can act a song, you don't need great technique (Bernadette Peters); if you have great technique, you can get by without being terribly expressive (Sarah Brightman). Watson was on key, that was all.
DeleteWhen "The Circle" bombed shortly after B&B, we knew she was no movie star. She's a soulless presence onscreen, though that's not stopped some others in Hollywood. But knowing she played beauty to Weinstein's beast in real life has probably ruined her forever. It has with me.
ReplyDeleteGood for Emma to sticking to her morals. But, she seems so boring. I don't think it's solely the fact that she won't fuck for roles thats tanking her career. It's not like she'll be hurting for money anyway
ReplyDeleteI wanted to comment on her particular version of resting bitch face, but realize it's more of an active bitch face. -- All tight lips (Behave, Count!) furrowed brow and dead eyes. Is she... um, not terribly bright?
ReplyDeleteShe's boring and a sub par actress.
ReplyDeleteWhat a bunch of judgmental yahoos. She was lovely in B&B and The Circle was just an awful movie. Even Tom Hanks was quite mediocre.
ReplyDelete@DDonna —
ReplyDeleteThe way you phrased that answer made it sound consensual on her part. The photos, however, tell a different story, especially this one:
https://medium.com/@DrGJackBrown/body-language-analysis-4093-fear-and-harvey-weinstein-emma-watsons-reaction-nonverbal-and-ab6d413f3ec4
Those eyes of hers are wide with fear, not with excitement. She knows she's in for an unpleasant evening.
Google Harvey Weinstein Emma Watson car and you'll see what I mean. That was the first set of photos that made me think that Weinstein was used to coercing women into giving up sexual favors and he didn't care who knew it.
Ugh, poor girl!
DeleteMan, you guys are rough on Emma Watson. She's a fine actress. She just doesn't have that "it" factor or that whatever charisma that stars have. She looks so young, she could have milked that by playing teen roles, maybe in rom coms. Now, she either needs to prove she has range in some tough indie roles or try being part of some ensemble casts or relegating herself to supporting roles. She's unfortunately too milquetoast to try character roles.
ReplyDeleteI do not believe this one Emma Watson just had biggeer hit of her career Beauty and The Beast made over $1 billion dollars she also made $15 million due to success of thé film.In Hollywood Watson is définitiely A list.
ReplyDeleteShe may have been in a hit, but what is she working on now? IMO, hers was the weakest performance by far. No one else was autotuned, and it was painfully obvious that she was. If you're going to hire an actress for a musical, it might behoove you to be sure she can actually sing.
ReplyDeleteYesterday I watched 'Good Time'on Netflix,Pattison was brilliant in it (a very challenging film to watch though)
ReplyDeleteEmma can most certainly act, but only when she is in character as someone other than herself (if that makes sense)...
ReplyDeleteBut it is near to impossible for her to conceal her own emotions (which is why we could all tell she was not happy alongside Pattinson, even with her graceful smile). Personally, I don't think this is a bad thing; It means she isn't fake.
"But it is near to impossible for her to conceal her own emotions"
ReplyDeleteWell Maude, by definition I suppose that means she's not a great actress.
Well, Hunter, I already qualified my statement. Just re-read after the first comma. Shouldn't take too long, love😘
ReplyDeleteSome actresses can't even act in character (*cough cough* Emily Ratajkowski *cough cough*)
Also, I never said she was great. That was your interjection. I simply said she could act.
ReplyDeleteBut, please, if being condescending to complete strangers on a Friday night is how you get your jollies, continue.