Saturday, January 27, 2018

Blind Item #4

This foreign born D list mostly movie actress who has no problems getting naked in movies and most of you know or have seen pictures/stories of despite the D rating paid $2M towards the financing of a movie to get herself a part. A big part, but maybe some acting lessons would be the better route.

31 comments:

  1. Emily Ratajkowski?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Can Emily rat face afford $2m?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Between her yachting and IG hooking,probably ....

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:23 AM

      Another yachter? I feel incredibly naive, all this stuff is eye opening.

      Delete
    3. I know one needs a spreadsheet, but she’s pretty prolific with it. Takes pix all over the world on her IG acct claiming to be with her “BF” who was a front apparently....right with the Hadid crew😉if yachting were a sport she’s be Phelps...Well call her Emily Rataphelpski

      Delete
    4. Yes! thanks to her “sponsors” @Seachica

      Delete
    5. @Tricia you just made me lol at Rataphelpski, and I think she could afford it - she recently launched a swim suit line that is basically scraps of fabric held together by off cuts of random pieces of string - saw a lot of gals on IG “waiting to get their hands on it”... going to direct link this blind on there now lol they need to at least know their RMH is a sea-faring prostitute.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous11:14 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous11:15 AM

    hahaha, Tricia. Brilliant.
    She looks great but I never see her with her clothes on..she's even outdone Kim K ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's not Emily Ratajkowski. She's a model first and foremost, which would be mentioned, and she's been A- or B+ list in previous blinds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous1:48 PM

      Lol. She’s a hooker. Model, my ass.

      Delete
  6. Another translation into English (I hope people don't mind this. I'm finding it amusing):

    There is this "lady". She thinks of herself as primarily a movie actress, although with a D list rating this might warrant some re-thinking.

    She is what you might consider a "free spirit". This means that she gets nakee a lot for movies and in photos and makes darn sure we see her that way. Of course, this may be because she is foreign born. We all know those foreign people don't have morals like we do!

    And then there are all the stories!

    So, our lady wants to further her acting career, as you would if you were a D lister (it can't be me! I just keep getting lousy parts!).

    And ordinarily, if you're an A list actress, you just head to some fabulous Hollywood hotel or a studio, service a few producers, and your schedule is set for the year.

    Not our lady. Either she refuses to compromise her integrity (as if), or she's so lousy at acting that the casting couch isn't even working for her.

    So.

    She's put some $2,000,000 of her OWN cash into financing a movie just to get herself a nice part.

    Of course, she's still a crap actress. Enty sarcastically suggests she might have invested in acting lessons instead.

    ReplyDelete
  7. not trying to say emily ratajkowski is poor, but i have a hard time picturing her being "pay 2 million of my own money to get into a movie" rich. seems like something an older actress with a few more years of desperation behind her would do

    ReplyDelete
  8. When I think "bad actress" the first image that pops in my head in Emily Ratajkowski

    ReplyDelete
  9. What about Elizabeth Hurley? Don´t think she is D-list, but she loves to post those semi-nudes photos on Instagram and I think she can afford $2 milliom

    ReplyDelete
  10. Louise Linton.

    Foreign-born.
    Definitely a lousy actress.
    Has the money: married to Steve Mnuchin.
    Well-known (infamous): see her Instagram.
    Don't know if she likes appearing nude:

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ohhhh I like this better than my guess. I think ratty and Katie wouldn’t be described as actresses and I have a hard time seeing Paz scrounge up that kind of loose change

      Delete
  11. Louise Linton.

    Foreign-born.
    Definitely a lousy actress.
    Has the money: married to Steve Mnuchin.
    Well-known (infamous): see her Instagram.
    Don't know if she likes appearing nude:

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Louise Linton. She's been here before, in a BI where she made Steve Mnuchin be on set while everyone else on set filmed her, take after take, in a lengthy and gratuitous nude scene. She's a fascinating character. Her life is like a storyline on Dynasty or Falcon Crest, but actually a real woman's experience.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Paging Enty, paging Enty!!

    Please be advised, moving forward, you're ordered to forward Poster Fustian all future posts for English interpretation.

    Thank you.
    That is all.
    XOXOX

    ReplyDelete
  15. Louise would have to be an excellent actress to be able to saddle up onto that ugly ass she married. No one's gonna tell me she would've married him if he had no money. Nope.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Becky with the poopy hair, Very flattering, but most of the blinds don't need any translation. Enty is a master at compacting his message. The information is all there, but you have to work a little to get it sometimes.

    I'm having fun uncompacting some of them. If I get to a blind early enough (not much sense in translating a blind everyone has guessed and moved on from) and it is both short enough and little convoluted I'll try and do some mildly amusing translating as long as people seem to enjoy it.

    Besides the fact that lots of CDAN'ers may not find my sense of humor particularly amusing, there is always the danger that, not knowing the actual story, I may inadvertently get important details wrong. For example, in this one I was tempted to wax eloquent about the ways the actress may have put together $2 million assuming that the early guesses about Emily Rat were correct. But if the blind is really about Louise Linton, those details may have been very misleading.

    Tricky game!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I don't get it. Why pay $2 million to be in a movie? There are so much better ways to invest her money. And if she's hot and comfortable with her sexuality she should just dance and do porn and invest. She could make a ton.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The $2 mil may be an investment in the movie, not just a fee that gets her the role. If the film does well, she may get some of her money back. And maybe a career boost. So if, if, if I know ... this might actually work out pretty well for her.

    But I don’t know who it is.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This is Linton for sure

    ReplyDelete
  20. "We all know those foreign people don't have morals like we do!"

    Ok that shit made me giggle!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Linton, not Ratjkowski

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days