Don't believe the rumors/hype/conspiracy theories about the wife of this foreign born A list dual threat actor. Yes, you could say triple threat but did you see him in the play? Was it really all that? Anyway, she is not a human trafficker.
Maybe not a human trafficker but either plays a small part in the process or has friends/acquaintances associated with this industry, like Weinstein who was buddies with Jeffrey Epstein.
Thanks to the same blogger who created a whole Japanese death threat straight out the over played Hollywood handbook after she revealed he nonsensical 'tea'. This blogger should b ashamed of the level she took her hatred and accusing someone of such a crime with zero proof but some so called flow chart of an IP address.
So Ms Hunter marries a man who once did a film which was distributed by another man, who was once acquainted with yet another man, who was in the same/related industry and also had a sideline in fucking underage models AND THIS IS YOUR EVIDENCE FOR SOPHIE HUNTER BEING A TRAFFIKER? ARE YOU INSANE?
Epstein who just got arrested (again) mind you. She used to work at his associate's 'modeling' agency back in NYC too. Using the resources of a sizable network involved in Illicit trade, be it of humans or narcotics, is all it takes. The person doesn't have to be involved in all aspects of the business. What they've got now is a whole Color Guard worth of red flags and the public isn't blind.
The person that put the woman's address and picture up? Not cool. WTH is wrong with You? You think she's nuts, we get your point, fine. Why bring it here? You want to punish her for something and that screams of a personal vendetta. Nothing to do with the subject at all. It almost seems like you are either a closet, current or ex-"skeptic" that dislikes this woman for some reason and wants to punish her. If I were to venture a guess, it would seem like that crazy Aussie is sticking her head out her a** again. Don't know why, don't care why. She should go bury it back up there again and leave this site alone.
Any word on the wife's porn video? She did work with Epstein. That was scrubbed from the net. She said she modeled at 15.
Shut up Aeltrileaf and take your meds. Nobody is denying Epstein is a sleazy motherfucker. But to accuse the Cumberbatches of this? Only a sicko nutter like you who spends her days on infowars would do that.
Wrong again. Last I checked she still goes by 'Hunter', singular. The last ploy to boost her profile on Cumberbatch's back via deed poll back fell through. No one is implicating him in her mess, quite the opposite.
That gatorfisch woman and her accomplice are both seriously ill. Someone needs to contact their families and get them some mental health care. The things they say are so harmful and absurd.
She has no need to use a deed poll. She's married to the man she can use Cumberbatch, Hunter or eother depending on the circumstances. Jeez there are some real effing idiots on here
Bonkers Gator and her mates believe this blind was planted by 'PR' to bring attention to the rumors. Real PR would get their lawyers to sue her ass off for libel. And if there really was a people smuggling ring SH was involved with they'd be round knocking on Gator's door and breaking her kneecaps.
It wasn't a very good Hamlet that's for sure. Not sure why his crazier fans think up all these conspiracy theories when the obvious is so obvious: he knocked her up and he married her. End-of-story (except they swear she was never pregnant--the crazy is strong with those cumberbitches).
This just perfectly illustrates that Gator has been sending in blinds, as usual - anytime Gator mentions anything on her site, a related blind usually shows up. Enty isn't reading her blog, he's reading the shit she sends directly to him. And this time he said, "just piss off with the trafficking conspiracies"
Gator has her own agenda and can't see anything but her own desperate (3 years now) desire to have something on Sophie. At one point she asked people to go to the "dark net" and find stuff! (yet now she's able to identify & track IPs, of course) And there were months when she would claim that something big exposing Sophie's criminal past was just around the corner. And then that Disney would "save" BC from Sophie. Lordy.
Ever vigilant in her proof-less quest, Gator doubled down on the drug addict rumor (Gator started to begin with) and decided Sophie traffics drugs too, but that didn't get much attention either so, voila! The real triple threat. Sophie's also a human trafficker! That got em talking. Yeah, about how wrong you. always. are.
I mean just imagine making up rumors, hoping something, anything will stick, and then sending them into the only gossip site that will take them, and now he's even like, please shut up.
All the while, Benedict's "crazy fans" remain the most interesting thing about him. I mean just read the thread. Sad but true.
You daft cow. She's married to him, she doesn't need a deed pole. And you nutters know that because you bought the baby's birth certificate. You are fucking stalkers.
Holy shit that was debunked ages ago. It wasn't her, didn't even look like her. But no you lot scoured dodgy sites basically searching for what would have been child porn. You're sick.
Cute. Drugs rumors about me too?! Boy! Since you're clearly attempting to engage me, I'll take this space to reiterate: Gator has been consistently 100% wrong about every single claim she has ever posted.
This might be your first rodeo, but I've been watching the whole time. In the beginning Gator claimed her sources told her there wouldn't be a pregnancy announcement. She also claimed sources also told her BC wouldn't be getting married on Valentine's day.
That in itself tells you everything you need to know.
And yet Gator STILL claims to have mutual connections to Benedict, and has identified Sophie's iPhone IP address and has been tracking it to ports all over the world.
Please tell me, what were you saying about bath salts?
Deed poll is a means of legally changing one's legal name in the UK. People are assuming Cumberbatch wife Sophie Hunter because an obsessed blogger is spreading the story.
I didn't like the production, but I thought Cumberbatch's performance Hamlet was just fine. I've seen others I have liked more, but his was quite good. Unfortunately, I was only able to see the NT live production in a movie theatre. I don't understand why the strange obsession with his wife that some people have. Frankly, it baffles me. I enjoy gossip, but the things people say about his wife, have never made a whit of sense.
The poster talking about Ben's wife not being able to go by Cumberbatch for some reason obviously is not British and knows zero about British law.
Under British law it is legal to go by ANY name you choose. I could legally become Lisa Cumberbatch in like ten minutes (and apply for and receive a passport in the name Lisa Cumberbatch in a few weeks).
Under UK law, your legal name is whatever name you go by. "Deed poll" is literally just a piece of paper affirming that you intend to go by the new name. You can type one up at home and it's 100% legally binding, doesn't need to be witnessed or approved or anything. Some organisations require you to file the deed poll with the RCJ but this costs £36 and simply involves sending them a signed statement saying "I renounce old name and will hereby be known as blah blah." Like literally that is IT, that's all you need to do, and that's enough to get a new passport, driving license, everything.
However if you are married, you don't even need to do that. You can legally start using your married name from the minute you say I do. Don't need to file paperwork or anything. If you want to change your name on your passport the you just send a copy of the marriage certificate to the passport office.
So it's simply not physically possible for someone to try and fail to change their name here.
I heard that there were some really crazy Cumberbatch fans saying weird things about his wife! This takes the cake! I wish I hadn't said that 'cuz now I want cake! I really liked him in Doctor Strange!!!
I wish the cumberbitches (the ones who vigorously defend their lord and his wife against any and all critical comments) would just stfu and stop trying to police the Internet, publish names and home/work addresses of people they don't agree with, and bully anyone who has a differing opinion. Do I believe the wife is involved in human trafficking? No. Did she used to be an escort? I don't know. Is she an opera director as she claims? Hardly. But, what's important is not who is right or wrong in terms of theories, comments, gossip, speculation about this couple. What turns the stomach is a self-righteous small group of conspiracy theorists who for years have read one person's blog and ascribed almost magical powers to her, now presuming to even tell us what Enty is actually thinking, and so persistent in their bullying, doxxing, and ugly behavior, that Cumberbatch's reputation for rabid fans is being dragged down by them. Enty, you dissed the Cumberlord in the blind. You'd better lock your doors and windows.
Ya know, veracity of this claim aside, it was a really stupid idea to post this. I hadn't heard about this claim until I saw it here, and when I did, the first thing I did was hit Google to find out what the hell it's talking about. How many other people did the same? Posting this only created a Streisand Effect.
If you're going to post here, don't post things that are word for word identical to posts on your blog.
No one -- literally NO ONE -- is going to read an obsessive hate blog devoted to demonising the wife of a movie star they're in love/obsessed with. Posting literally round the clock, many dozens of posts every single day, oh and including stuff like photoshopping photos of said dead wife onto murder victims. Coming up with the wildest conspiracy theories involving some random unknown "prostitute" who somehow single handedly controls the entire world press, the Church of England, the UK government and the British Royal Family, but is using this IMMENSE power to do nothing more than force some B-lister to pretend to be married to her. And now the conspiracy theory has developed to say she's also head of the Mafia or something and running a global human trafficking organisation?
And by some amazing coincidence, literally the only people on earth who know about it just happened to be a couple of random middle aged women living in Midwest USA who happen to be totally fixated and sexually obsessed with this woman's celebrity husband? And not a single bad word about this actual literal cartoon super villain has ever leaked in the press or online, ever?
No one is going to read that and think anything other than, "Yikes! This obsessed fan needs psychiatric help!" Promise.
I think Cumby is a weird fugly over-privileged posho who was really good in Cabin Pressure but vastly overrated in most of his career.
But sure, keep telling yourself anyone who objects to deranged stalkers who spent all day every day harassing every journalist and blogger they can find, sending them dozens of emails and phone calls every day begging them to "expose" something which if even 1% of it was true would make Watergate look like nothing. Not to mention harassing and cyberstalking every single person who works with or comes into contact with Cumberbatch, or even people who happened to see him on the street or in a restaurant! Keep telling yourself the only people who could possibly find that objectionable or mockworthy are superfans.
I worked with LT on something else right after Hamlet, and the staging was totally FUBARed. Basically Es (who is amazing) developed a concept involving a revolve with four sides, including one of Ophelia's room. Once they did the get-in they discovered that because of the Barbican's tech requirements and vast size, it took the revolve something like 30 seconds just to make a quarter turn. They had a lot of set changes planned, so it basically would have been like half an hour of just sitting watching the set turn. So at very late stage they had to ditch the entire set and come up with a new set from scratch, hence the weird "staircase full of dirt" nonsense.
2. The photos you've spent the past few years claiming were escort card photos came from a cover photoshoot for a major European magazine, copies and scans of which are widely available online.
3. Spending your spare time scouring porn and watching hundreds of hours of porn, praying that it turns out to be UNDERAGE porn (which is illegal to even watch) simply so you can prove the wife of a celeb you've never even met was raped as a child is not a normal or healthy thing to do. Even if it was true (it's not), what do you think would happen? Seriously, what do you think would happen if you went to the press with a child porn movie starring Sophie Hunter? Realistically, you would be arrested and charged for spreading child porn, all copies would be destroyed, and Sophie would be lauded as a helpless victim who's managed to overcome terrible abuse. Because, you, know, doing porn as a child is RAPE. The fact you think someone hypthetically having been raped as a child makes them a slut or a terrible person just shows how sick you are.
People on this comment section, need to get a bloody life. Like seriously, you sad motherfuckers. This guy is some actor, who looks like an albino with a permanent cold, and he doesn't give a shite about any of you. Get a grip on yourselves.
I'm not surprised you are accusing me of being G. Word for word? Hardly. Even though I said I don't believe in the rumors. Because to you, and your cumberbuddies, everyone is G. She's magical, everywhere! Look, you and your cronies are bullies, and you make up things. I read G's blog from time to time only because I find the bullying of her of interest. She's not the first or only one you've bullied. I don't particularly like Cumberbatch and don't have a dog in this hunt in terms of caring about him or his family. I think he's all about promoting an image and probably "trapped" in an unhappy marriage of convenience. None of my business, really. But what I do find interesting and objectionable is the harassment of non-public figures who write theories in their personal blogs with which you disagree, and who discuss those ideas with their friends. They never go into your blogs and comment. They pride themselves on "staying in their lane," as they call it. Just wanting to discuss among themselves. I don't agree with most of what I read there (G, etc.). But I do know that more than half of what you wrote above is lies. I don't like liars. You don't care about the truth. You care about demonizing, doxxing, etc., a certain blogger and others whose gossipy posts about your Cumberlord infuriate you. And all of your paranoid activity only spreads the rumors and puts your lord on the defensive about them. And I'm going to call it out when I see it.
I agree, Artemis. Just sucks in more people and from what I gather, many end up staying around because where there is (some) smoke, there's probably (some) fire. And the behavior of the fans is interesting to watch. The cumberbitches should just work on building their shrines, buying autographs, and stalking him, and otherwise stfu. They are only adding numbers to his critics, and like a lot of celebrities we read about here on CDAN, he probably doesn't want scrutiny of the stories and images he is putting out there.
Herewegoagain:"But what I do find interesting and objectionable is the harassment of non-public figures who write theories in their personal blogs with which you disagree, and who discuss those ideas with their friends. They never go into your blogs and comment. They pride themselves on “staying in their lane,” as they call it. Just wanting to discuss among themselves." Um... complete bullhooey! The Septics (haters of Cumberbatch's wife) are the ones who harass all sorts of "non-public" people who tweet about seeing BC and Sophie. They harassed a mother of a dead child who complimented Sophie for reading a letter of hers at Letters Live a while back. And they also harass all sorts of colleagues of Cumberbatch. They have sent hateful tweets to Adam Ackland (co-owner of SunnyMarch, BC's production company), Shaun Usher (another friend of BC's who is with LL), they have publicly tweeted statements of complete disbelief to Amanda A. (Of Sherlock) about Sophie visiting the set of Sherlock, they have called out Louise B. (Of Sherlock) for mentioning going to BC's wedding, they have tried to get an ordinary person fired because she had the audacity to tweet that she had seen Sophie with Ben at her place of work... the list of their harassement of co-workers, friends, fans and even just ordinary people who say they have seen Sophie and Ben together is endless. They spend countless hours hacking into private accounts of anyone remotely connected with Cumberbatch's wife to publish pictures, And they even publicly spread completely false rumours and misidentified a man and his wife as being Sophie and her supposed "lover" to prove that she was on a "date" with someone who wasn't BC - the fellow had to contact facebook and deal with them. They don't stay in their lane at all. They are not harmlessly just gossiping amongst themselves in private. They knowingly spread hate and lies and brag about how "entertaining" it is.
I do know there have been questions about where some/all of the money raised for "charity" has gone, so perhaps some of the cumberlord's associates have been queried about that. I have not followed that discussion closely, and it's not something I would do (contact his associates), but I understand concern about lack of financial transparency and see no problem in the general sense of trying to encourage honesty. I don't give money to charity without a clear understanding beforehand, but many Cumberbatch fans are probably young and unquestioning. But if you keep posting about it here, you're just inviting more scrutiny. And I don't think the cumberhouse of cards is strong enough to stand up to being in the spotlight. Or that you want responsibility for that. But you are describing things in an overly-inflammatory and deceiving way. Which is lying, in my book.
Welll, well well, Herewegoagain, for someone who claims to "not followed the discussions very closely" you certainly have mentioned every last one of the Septics' "talking points" that they keep harping about on their hate blogs! That's quite a peculiar coincidence, is it not??FYI there is NOTHING shady about any of the financial dealings of any of BC's colleagues and if you think there is, then how come no one has reported them to their respective police/fraud investigators to handle this supposed shadiness??? I'll tell you why - because NOTHING shady or illegal has happened, that's why! All that talk is just more lies and hateful, jealous grumbling from the Septics. And what's with the veiled threat from you trying to keep me quiet??? I welcome more "scrutiny" - in fact I am sure Cumberbatch would too! So we'll see whose "house of cards" comes tumbling down if their actions (slanderous lies about BC's wife and children, business associates, colleagues and friends) are exposed more fully. It won't be Benedict Cumberbatch or his wife - it will be the Septic Haters and all those who propagate their lies. You and your Septic friends are the only liars on here as far as I can see! So cook in that stew for a bit and see how you like the bitter taste! Tah-tah for now!
But these people don#t stay in their own lanes and it's not harmless gossip. It's libellous statements (not opinion) of criminal behaviour against ordinary people. Such as vicars, registrars, doctors and palace staff. It's the habitual posting of stolen private pictures and the harassing or individuals both in SH's wider social circle and people who have just seen her on the street. It's piss poor supposed photo analysis posing as science, and constant letters and emails to journalists, agents, friends, and registry office staff.
The discussion of the 'skeptics' isn't about defending Cumberbatch, he's an adult (though you wouldn't believe it from their focus on him being their one-dimensional Dorkybatch doll) but about countering lies and fabrications that affect ordinary people and the spreading of misinformation about UK law, photo analysis, IP tracking etc.
If they were intent on staying in their lane as you say they would have a private discussion group not public blogs where they tag every lie with marvel, Disney etc. and where they write impassioned pleas to the PR depts of those companies to announce a split NOW!!!!!!
Thanks for showing your true colors in much better fashion than I could ever describe to an outsider not part of this fandom. I have not threatened you, and I said I had not followed "that" discussion closely. If you are going to quote, try being accurate. Everything I have written is true. I already said I don't agree with much that is written by skeptics. But it's free speech. I disagree even more with the comments and tactics of the self-appointed, nasty, cumberbitch police bullies, like yourself.
Free speech doesn't allow anyone to slander innocent people unabated without some kind of pushback, regardless of whether their husband's an actor or not. Free speech doesn't mean you get to make up lies about someone's marriage and deny the existence of their children without accepting the likelihood that someone else is going to call you out about it. That's what the Septics don't like about anyone else rejecting their bullshit lies - they think this "free speech" thing is a one-way street and only applies to them when they want to call his wife vile names or call his children inanimate objects. Anyone who tells the truth (even about minor things like seeing the Cumberbatches together in a restaurant) is called a "bully" and in your words should "stfu". I haven't tried to hide my true colours. I don't like Septics because they lie and spread their lies everywhere they can and then claim that they "stay in their own lane" and act like they don't have to answer for their slanders.
Sophie Hunter?
ReplyDeleteMaybe not a human trafficker but either plays a small part in the process or has friends/acquaintances associated with this industry, like Weinstein who was buddies with Jeffrey Epstein.
ReplyDeleteThanks to the same blogger who created a whole Japanese death threat straight out the over played Hollywood handbook after she revealed he nonsensical 'tea'. This blogger should b ashamed of the level she took her hatred and accusing someone of such a crime with zero proof but some so called flow chart of an IP address.
ReplyDeleteSo Ms Hunter marries a man who once did a film which was distributed by another man, who was once acquainted with yet another man, who was in the same/related industry and also had a sideline in fucking underage models AND THIS IS YOUR EVIDENCE FOR SOPHIE HUNTER BEING A TRAFFIKER? ARE YOU INSANE?
ReplyDeleteEpstein who just got arrested (again) mind you. She used to work at his associate's 'modeling' agency back in NYC too. Using the resources of a sizable network involved in Illicit trade, be it of humans or narcotics, is all it takes. The person doesn't have to be involved in all aspects of the business. What they've got now is a whole Color Guard worth of red flags and the public isn't blind.
ReplyDeleteThe person that put the woman's address and picture up? Not cool. WTH is wrong with You? You think she's nuts, we get your point, fine. Why bring it here? You want to punish her for something and that screams of a personal vendetta. Nothing to do with the subject at all. It almost seems like you are either a closet, current or ex-"skeptic" that dislikes this woman for some reason and wants to punish her. If I were to venture a guess, it would seem like that crazy Aussie is sticking her head out her a** again. Don't know why, don't care why. She should go bury it back up there again and leave this site alone.
ReplyDeleteAny word on the wife's porn video? She did work with Epstein. That was scrubbed from the net. She said she modeled at 15.
You don't know enough about the people involved to know what you are talking about. It goes deeper than that, a lot deeper.
ReplyDeleteBloggers who posting several anti-racism posts reveal their true colors as horrible racist. That's so hypocritical white people.
ReplyDeleteShut up Aeltrileaf and take your meds. Nobody is denying Epstein is a sleazy motherfucker. But to accuse the Cumberbatches of this? Only a sicko nutter like you who spends her days on infowars would do that.
ReplyDeleteWrong again. Last I checked she still goes by 'Hunter', singular. The last ploy to boost her profile on Cumberbatch's back via deed poll back fell through. No one is implicating him in her mess, quite the opposite.
ReplyDeleteThat gatorfisch woman and her accomplice are both seriously ill. Someone needs to contact their families and get them some mental health care. The things they say are so harmful and absurd.
ReplyDeleteSure, and we have a lovely bridge in Brooklyn to sell you, too. Why does Cumberbatch have so many crazy fans? He attracts the weird ones.
ReplyDeleteAeltri hangs out on infowars? Isn't she big into the whole social justice thing? That's hilarious.
ReplyDeleteOh my. Busted, "sceptics".This is rather funny, isn't it?
ReplyDeleteIn all seriousness tho, Enty reads the conspiracist's blog? and he even bother posting this ^ ^ ^ ^ as a response? Like WTH?
ReplyDeleteEven skeptics no longer believe her. G-fisch will abuse BC as a pedophile eventually.
ReplyDeleteShe has no need to use a deed poll. She's married to the man she can use Cumberbatch, Hunter or eother depending on the circumstances. Jeez there are some real effing idiots on here
ReplyDeleteBonkers Gator and her mates believe this blind was planted by 'PR' to bring attention to the rumors. Real PR would get their lawyers to sue her ass off for libel. And if there really was a people smuggling ring SH was involved with they'd be round knocking on Gator's door and breaking her kneecaps.
ReplyDeleteWhat's a deed poll? Why does everyone assume this about cumberbatch spouse? Is there someone else this could refer to- what about Clooney wife?
ReplyDeleteIt wasn't a very good Hamlet that's for sure. Not sure why his crazier fans think up all these conspiracy theories when the obvious is so obvious: he knocked her up and he married her. End-of-story (except they swear she was never pregnant--the crazy is strong with those cumberbitches).
ReplyDeleteWell, I think that's the strongest "Ignore that man behind the curtain!" message I've seen in a looooong time.
ReplyDeleteThis just perfectly illustrates that Gator has been sending in blinds, as usual - anytime Gator mentions anything on her site, a related blind usually shows up. Enty isn't reading her blog, he's reading the shit she sends directly to him. And this time he said, "just piss off with the trafficking conspiracies"
ReplyDeleteGator has her own agenda and can't see anything but her own desperate (3 years now) desire to have something on Sophie. At one point she asked people to go to the "dark net" and find stuff! (yet now she's able to identify & track IPs, of course) And there were months when she would claim that something big exposing Sophie's criminal past was just around the corner. And then that Disney would "save" BC from Sophie. Lordy.
Ever vigilant in her proof-less quest, Gator doubled down on the drug addict rumor (Gator started to begin with) and decided Sophie traffics drugs too, but that didn't get much attention either so, voila! The real triple threat. Sophie's also a human trafficker! That got em talking. Yeah, about how wrong you. always. are.
I mean just imagine making up rumors, hoping something, anything will stick, and then sending them into the only gossip site that will take them, and now he's even like, please shut up.
All the while, Benedict's "crazy fans" remain the most interesting thing about him. I mean just read the thread. Sad but true.
You daft cow. She's married to him, she doesn't need a deed pole. And you nutters know that because you bought the baby's birth certificate. You are fucking stalkers.
ReplyDeleteHoly shit that was debunked ages ago. It wasn't her, didn't even look like her. But no you lot scoured dodgy sites basically searching for what would have been child porn. You're sick.
ReplyDeletewhen did you realize you were addicted to bath salts?
ReplyDeleteHaven't been to any of the skeptic blogs on Tumblr for nearly a year now. And THIS is what they're talking about these days now?! ?
ReplyDeleteOkay... [Quietly re-exits.] ?
Cute. Drugs rumors about me too?! Boy! Since you're clearly attempting to engage me, I'll take this space to reiterate: Gator has been consistently 100% wrong about every single claim she has ever posted.
ReplyDeleteThis might be your first rodeo, but I've been watching the whole time. In the beginning Gator claimed her sources told her there wouldn't be a pregnancy announcement. She also claimed sources also told her BC wouldn't be getting married on Valentine's day.
That in itself tells you everything you need to know.
And yet Gator STILL claims to have mutual connections to Benedict, and has identified Sophie's iPhone IP address and has been tracking it to ports all over the world.
Please tell me, what were you saying about bath salts?
I always thought her friends were bad for her. Just a hunch.
ReplyDeleteDeed poll is a means of legally changing one's legal name in the UK. People are assuming Cumberbatch wife Sophie Hunter because an obsessed blogger is spreading the story.
ReplyDeleteI didn't like the production, but I thought Cumberbatch's performance Hamlet was just fine. I've seen others I have liked more, but his was quite good. Unfortunately, I was only able to see the NT live production in a movie theatre. I don't understand why the strange obsession with his wife that some people have. Frankly, it baffles me. I enjoy gossip, but the things people say about his wife, have never made a whit of sense.
ReplyDeleteThe poster talking about Ben's wife not being able to go by Cumberbatch for some reason obviously is not British and knows zero about British law.
ReplyDeleteUnder British law it is legal to go by ANY name you choose. I could legally become Lisa Cumberbatch in like ten minutes (and apply for and receive a passport in the name Lisa Cumberbatch in a few weeks).
Under UK law, your legal name is whatever name you go by. "Deed poll" is literally just a piece of paper affirming that you intend to go by the new name. You can type one up at home and it's 100% legally binding, doesn't need to be witnessed or approved or anything. Some organisations require you to file the deed poll with the RCJ but this costs £36 and simply involves sending them a signed statement saying "I renounce old name and will hereby be known as blah blah." Like literally that is IT, that's all you need to do, and that's enough to get a new passport, driving license, everything.
However if you are married, you don't even need to do that. You can legally start using your married name from the minute you say I do. Don't need to file paperwork or anything. If you want to change your name on your passport the you just send a copy of the marriage certificate to the passport office.
So it's simply not physically possible for someone to try and fail to change their name here.
Oh and you can go by two different names in the UK. Very common for actors.
ReplyDeleteI heard that there were some really crazy Cumberbatch fans saying weird things about his wife! This takes the cake! I wish I hadn't said that 'cuz now I want cake! I really liked him in Doctor Strange!!!
ReplyDeleteI wish the cumberbitches (the ones who vigorously defend their lord and his wife against any and all critical comments) would just stfu and stop trying to police the Internet, publish names and home/work addresses of people they don't agree with, and bully anyone who has a differing opinion. Do I believe the wife is involved in human trafficking? No. Did she used to be an escort? I don't know. Is she an opera director as she claims? Hardly. But, what's important is not who is right or wrong in terms of theories, comments, gossip, speculation about this couple. What turns the stomach is a self-righteous small group of conspiracy theorists who for years have read one person's blog and ascribed almost magical powers to her, now presuming to even tell us what Enty is actually thinking, and so persistent in their bullying, doxxing, and ugly behavior, that Cumberbatch's reputation for rabid fans is being dragged down by them. Enty, you dissed the Cumberlord in the blind. You'd better lock your doors and windows.
ReplyDeleteWho put someone's picture up? A picture of his wife?
ReplyDeleteSame. He gave a great performance but I didn't love some of the staging, and that's on the director.
ReplyDeleteAcclaimed UK theater productions don't give you much cache in the US anyway, he's really a dual threat unless he does Broadway or something big here.
Also, my bad, it was nominated for four Oliviers, including one for him.
ReplyDeleteYa know, veracity of this claim aside, it was a really stupid idea to post this. I hadn't heard about this claim until I saw it here, and when I did, the first thing I did was hit Google to find out what the hell it's talking about. How many other people did the same? Posting this only created a Streisand Effect.
ReplyDeleteOh, do shut up, Gator. It's over.
ReplyDeleteLOL.
ReplyDeleteIf you're going to post here, don't post things that are word for word identical to posts on your blog.
No one -- literally NO ONE -- is going to read an obsessive hate blog devoted to demonising the wife of a movie star they're in love/obsessed with. Posting literally round the clock, many dozens of posts every single day, oh and including stuff like photoshopping photos of said dead wife onto murder victims. Coming up with the wildest conspiracy theories involving some random unknown "prostitute" who somehow single handedly controls the entire world press, the Church of England, the UK government and the British Royal Family, but is using this IMMENSE power to do nothing more than force some B-lister to pretend to be married to her. And now the conspiracy theory has developed to say she's also head of the Mafia or something and running a global human trafficking organisation?
And by some amazing coincidence, literally the only people on earth who know about it just happened to be a couple of random middle aged women living in Midwest USA who happen to be totally fixated and sexually obsessed with this woman's celebrity husband? And not a single bad word about this actual literal cartoon super villain has ever leaked in the press or online, ever?
No one is going to read that and think anything other than, "Yikes! This obsessed fan needs psychiatric help!" Promise.
I think Cumby is a weird fugly over-privileged posho who was really good in Cabin Pressure but vastly overrated in most of his career.
ReplyDeleteBut sure, keep telling yourself anyone who objects to deranged stalkers who spent all day every day harassing every journalist and blogger they can find, sending them dozens of emails and phone calls every day begging them to "expose" something which if even 1% of it was true would make Watergate look like nothing. Not to mention harassing and cyberstalking every single person who works with or comes into contact with Cumberbatch, or even people who happened to see him on the street or in a restaurant! Keep telling yourself the only people who could possibly find that objectionable or mockworthy are superfans.
I worked with LT on something else right after Hamlet, and the staging was totally FUBARed. Basically Es (who is amazing) developed a concept involving a revolve with four sides, including one of Ophelia's room. Once they did the get-in they discovered that because of the Barbican's tech requirements and vast size, it took the revolve something like 30 seconds just to make a quarter turn. They had a lot of set changes planned, so it basically would have been like half an hour of just sitting watching the set turn. So at very late stage they had to ditch the entire set and come up with a new set from scratch, hence the weird "staircase full of dirt" nonsense.
ReplyDelete1. That video looked nothing like her.
ReplyDelete2. The photos you've spent the past few years claiming were escort card photos came from a cover photoshoot for a major European magazine, copies and scans of which are widely available online.
3. Spending your spare time scouring porn and watching hundreds of hours of porn, praying that it turns out to be UNDERAGE porn (which is illegal to even watch) simply so you can prove the wife of a celeb you've never even met was raped as a child is not a normal or healthy thing to do. Even if it was true (it's not), what do you think would happen? Seriously, what do you think would happen if you went to the press with a child porn movie starring Sophie Hunter? Realistically, you would be arrested and charged for spreading child porn, all copies would be destroyed, and Sophie would be lauded as a helpless victim who's managed to overcome terrible abuse. Because, you, know, doing porn as a child is RAPE. The fact you think someone hypthetically having been raped as a child makes them a slut or a terrible person just shows how sick you are.
Probably half the entertainment industry has had some tangential connection to Epstein at some point in their career. So what?
ReplyDeleteOh no! What a pain that must have been! I had no idea!
ReplyDeleteI guess it's what gossip mongers do.
ReplyDeletePeople on this comment section, need to get a bloody life. Like seriously, you sad motherfuckers. This guy is some actor, who looks like an albino with a permanent cold, and he doesn't give a shite about any of you.
ReplyDeleteGet a grip on yourselves.
I'm not surprised you are accusing me of being G. Word for word? Hardly. Even though I said I don't believe in the rumors. Because to you, and your cumberbuddies, everyone is G. She's magical, everywhere! Look, you and your cronies are bullies, and you make up things. I read G's blog from time to time only because I find the bullying of her of interest. She's not the first or only one you've bullied. I don't particularly like Cumberbatch and don't have a dog in this hunt in terms of caring about him or his family. I think he's all about promoting an image and probably "trapped" in an unhappy marriage of convenience. None of my business, really. But what I do find interesting and objectionable is the harassment of non-public figures who write theories in their personal blogs with which you disagree, and who discuss those ideas with their friends. They never go into your blogs and comment. They pride themselves on "staying in their lane," as they call it. Just wanting to discuss among themselves. I don't agree with most of what I read there (G, etc.). But I do know that more than half of what you wrote above is lies. I don't like liars. You don't care about the truth. You care about demonizing, doxxing, etc., a certain blogger and others whose gossipy posts about your Cumberlord infuriate you. And all of your paranoid activity only spreads the rumors and puts your lord on the defensive about them. And I'm going to call it out when I see it.
ReplyDeleteI agree, Artemis. Just sucks in more people and from what I gather, many end up staying around because where there is (some) smoke, there's probably (some) fire. And the behavior of the fans is interesting to watch. The cumberbitches should just work on building their shrines, buying autographs, and stalking him, and otherwise stfu. They are only adding numbers to his critics, and like a lot of celebrities we read about here on CDAN, he probably doesn't want scrutiny of the stories and images he is putting out there.
ReplyDeleteHerewegoagain:"But what I do find interesting and objectionable is the harassment of non-public figures who write theories in their personal blogs with which you disagree, and who discuss those ideas with their friends. They never go into your blogs and comment. They pride themselves on “staying in their lane,” as they call it. Just wanting to discuss among themselves." Um... complete bullhooey! The Septics (haters of Cumberbatch's wife) are the ones who harass all sorts of "non-public" people who tweet about seeing BC and Sophie. They harassed a mother of a dead child who complimented Sophie for reading a letter of hers at Letters Live a while back. And they also harass all sorts of colleagues of Cumberbatch. They have sent hateful tweets to Adam Ackland (co-owner of SunnyMarch, BC's production company), Shaun Usher (another friend of BC's who is with LL), they have publicly tweeted statements of complete disbelief to Amanda A. (Of Sherlock) about Sophie visiting the set of Sherlock, they have called out Louise B. (Of Sherlock) for mentioning going to BC's wedding, they have tried to get an ordinary person fired because she had the audacity to tweet that she had seen Sophie with Ben at her place of work... the list of their harassement of co-workers, friends, fans and even just ordinary people who say they have seen Sophie and Ben together is endless. They spend countless hours hacking into private accounts of anyone remotely connected with Cumberbatch's wife to publish pictures, And they even publicly spread completely false rumours and misidentified a man and his wife as being Sophie and her supposed "lover" to prove that she was on a "date" with someone who wasn't BC - the fellow had to contact facebook and deal with them. They don't stay in their lane at all. They are not harmlessly just gossiping amongst themselves in private. They knowingly spread hate and lies and brag about how "entertaining" it is.
ReplyDeleteYou've been drinking koolaid.
ReplyDeleteI do know there have been questions about where some/all of the money raised for "charity" has gone, so perhaps some of the cumberlord's associates have been queried about that. I have not followed that discussion closely, and it's not something I would do (contact his associates), but I understand concern about lack of financial transparency and see no problem in the general sense of trying to encourage honesty. I don't give money to charity without a clear understanding beforehand, but many Cumberbatch fans are probably young and unquestioning. But if you keep posting about it here, you're just inviting more scrutiny. And I don't think the cumberhouse of cards is strong enough to stand up to being in the spotlight. Or that you want responsibility for that. But you are describing things in an overly-inflammatory and deceiving way. Which is lying, in my book.
ReplyDeleteWelll, well well, Herewegoagain, for someone who claims to "not followed the discussions very closely" you certainly have mentioned every last one of the Septics' "talking points" that they keep harping about on their hate blogs! That's quite a peculiar coincidence, is it not??FYI there is NOTHING shady about any of the financial dealings of any of BC's colleagues and if you think there is, then how come no one has reported them to their respective police/fraud investigators to handle this supposed shadiness??? I'll tell you why - because NOTHING shady or illegal has happened, that's why! All that talk is just more lies and hateful, jealous grumbling from the Septics. And what's with the veiled threat from you trying to keep me quiet??? I welcome more "scrutiny" - in fact I am sure Cumberbatch would too! So we'll see whose "house of cards" comes tumbling down if their actions (slanderous lies about BC's wife and children, business associates, colleagues and friends) are exposed more fully. It won't be Benedict Cumberbatch or his wife - it will be the Septic Haters and all those who propagate their lies. You and your Septic friends are the only liars on here as far as I can see! So cook in that stew for a bit and see how you like the bitter taste! Tah-tah for now!
ReplyDeleteBut these people don#t stay in their own lanes and it's not harmless gossip. It's libellous statements (not opinion) of criminal behaviour against ordinary people. Such as vicars, registrars, doctors and palace staff. It's the habitual posting of stolen private pictures and the harassing or individuals both in SH's wider social circle and people who have just seen her on the street. It's piss poor supposed photo analysis posing as science, and constant letters and emails to journalists, agents, friends, and registry office staff.
ReplyDeleteThe discussion of the 'skeptics' isn't about defending Cumberbatch, he's an adult (though you wouldn't believe it from their focus on him being their one-dimensional Dorkybatch doll) but about countering lies and fabrications that affect ordinary people and the spreading of misinformation about UK law, photo analysis, IP tracking etc.
If they were intent on staying in their lane as you say they would have a private discussion group not public blogs where they tag every lie with marvel, Disney etc. and where they write impassioned pleas to the PR depts of those companies to announce a split NOW!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteThanks for showing your true colors in much better fashion than I could ever describe to an outsider not part of this fandom. I have not threatened you, and I said I had not followed "that" discussion closely. If you are going to quote, try being accurate. Everything I have written is true. I already said I don't agree with much that is written by skeptics. But it's free speech. I disagree even more with the comments and tactics of the self-appointed, nasty, cumberbitch police bullies, like yourself.
ReplyDeleteFree speech doesn't allow anyone to slander innocent people unabated without some kind of pushback, regardless of whether their husband's an actor or not. Free speech doesn't mean you get to make up lies about someone's marriage and deny the existence of their children without accepting the likelihood that someone else is going to call you out about it. That's what the Septics don't like about anyone else rejecting their bullshit lies - they think this "free speech" thing is a one-way street and only applies to them when they want to call his wife vile names or call his children inanimate objects. Anyone who tells the truth (even about minor things like seeing the Cumberbatches together in a restaurant) is called a "bully" and in your words should "stfu". I haven't tried to hide my true colours. I don't like Septics because they lie and spread their lies everywhere they can and then claim that they "stay in their own lane" and act like they don't have to answer for their slanders.
ReplyDelete[…] August 2, 2017 […]
ReplyDelete