Blind Item #2
There is so much buzz right now about the "baby" of this A+ list mostly movie actor and the woman he calls his girlfriend that it is deafening. The biggest issue right now which is causing the buzz is two PR teams who can't decide on a story to stick to.
bradley cooper and irina shayk?
ReplyDeleteBCoop and Shayk's bebeh
ReplyDeletei'm assuming we're back to regular blinds with familiar names.
ReplyDeleteI don't think she was pregnant at all. What a wierd guy.
ReplyDeleteno matter what happens the moment the paps catch a shot of the baby, they will know it aint bradley cooper's. the middle eastern billionaire + irina = Very non-white baby.
ReplyDeletesooner or later these sloppy beardings will come crashing down....by association. I esp think of taylor swift...and how if every previous fake fling came out of the closet....her whole schtick would be out and also, considering where the future is going...looks a lot like some homophobic bullshit. ill pretend with you that you are straight (but always have that dirt on you), write some fake songs, teen fans swoon, nobody is the wiser...(that last part is where they are wrong)
Bradley is and always has been a big mama's boy. His mother is NOT going to allow him to claim, name and raise a kid who is not his! Yes, this IS going to implode and out him once and for all. By Middle Eastern are we talking Israeli, Arab, Turk? Huh?
ReplyDeleteGod forbid they make a decision on their own. I guess with all the drugs and screwing around, they don't have time to.
ReplyDeleteNot only does Cooper have this problem but also Jason Statham! How I would LOVE to be a fly on the wall at their PR offices!! These closet actors need to be a little sharper and have a "no pregnancy" clause included in these yacters contracts. Can't they see that us reg folks aren't fooled much anymore? BUT, unfortunately, their careers would collapse if they came out. Certain areas of the entertainment and sports world etc. are fine with a gay person but not if you are trying to attract straight people by playing a straight role for example
ReplyDeletePffft... A "clause" would do nothing! Absolutely nothing... What makes these celebrities vulnerable is their visibility. Basically, any time they're at the mercy of a rolling [maybe live] camera they have no control over, it's a battlefield for them.
ReplyDeleteFirst off, the "relationship arrangement agreement" can have a "no pregnancy clause" but who's to stop them from "playing the media" when they bait and troll the media? These days, all you need to do is suggestively drape yourself around a celebrity (with that totally-knowing, smug look in your eyes) in a photo, and talk baity to get yourself noticed (imagine trying to prohibit or exclude that kind of behaviour in an agreement). Ask a man, "do you ever take anyone home to stay overnight?" (as Cousin Violet put it, "vulgarity is no substitute for wit"—but I suppose you really have no choice when you have nothing clever to say) and you're set for lifelong 'stardom' because the mainstream media take the bait (and want the clicks), report/ask about it like crazy, et voilà : you're permanently attached to a permanent A-lister's name on Google search!
Seriously, second of all: A PR firm can have an "arrangement agreement/NDA" that stipulates, "no talking to the press [about the "relationshit" or any possible pregnancies]", but the signing Party can work around that by baiting on social media by liking pregnancy-themed Instagram photos/tweets, posting suggestive memes... You can even have an air-tight contract that manages to explicitly ban that kind of behaviour, and she'll still poof her dress/wear loose outfits (to lead people on into thinking she's preg) while out in public when live cameras are rolling (or when you have zero control over what a media outlet's editor will/won't publish—because the whole "freedom of the press in a democracy" is sooo perfect like that). Even if the contract bans "calling the paps", she'd still be able to troll the media into thinking she's pregnant (even if she's really not) when they're at the mercy of like ~30 photographers on a live-streamed red carpet. There are a shittone of loopholes famehoes can use. And even if she were in breach of a contract, once the "news"/speculation of a pregnancy or relationshit is out there, it's out there. And she may get a payment cut/have the deal terminated, but she still won the media game and got the limelight/attention/fame/notoriety she's been so thirsty for.
Even working with high-end escorts (who presumably have experience staying "not pregnant" working with high-profile clientele in the past, and had a great track record of being discreet) can't guarantee they'll be predictable... The only thing that's predictable about them is: Once they get a taste of that level spotlight, they'll get addicted to it and do whatever it takes to cling to it...
What makes you think that?
ReplyDelete"Considering where the future is going." LOL! This kind of behaviour will go down so bad in history... If they wanted "fame" and "attention", they got it!
ReplyDeleteThe stupid thing is that their careers would only collapse because of the homophobes in Hollywood who pull the strings, who use the excuse that they won't sell a movie if they are gay. The reality is the general public don't care and will still buy movie tickets regardless, as long as they play their part on screen well.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I can only have the biggest respect for any mostly-gay actor who plays straight convincingly (anyone who can play whatever is the opposite of who they are IRL, basically). I don't give a shit what they do in bed IRL.
ReplyDeleteI agree. I read all the celebrity magazines while on the treadmill, and never once has there been a photo of Shayk in a form fitting dress, with her big belly, and belly button showing. Nope. No photos at all. In fact, the last photo was of Shayk on a raft in the water, as svelte as ever.
ReplyDeleteScandal, see response above.
ReplyDeleteSorry, auto correct. Scandi.
ReplyDeleteExactly. If Tom Cruise can still have hits despite being gay, offensive, and in that cult, anyone can have a hit.
ReplyDeleteAsia is a HUGE Market, Arab Countries are a huge market, Russia is a HUGE market for movies, and they don't want to see gay man. They wont buy the ticket and by by to these HUGE international sales. So the actors in the movie industry have a very large insentive to keep it under the rug.
ReplyDeleteWow. Interesting read @Scandi
ReplyDeleteLuke Evans is gay and played Gaston in Beauty and the Beast. He's very 'manly' and can play straight convincingly.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Hortensia.
ReplyDeletePS: I fucking love how that's what autocorrect "corrects" me to. Love that show. Love, love, love Olivia Pope. LOVE.
i agree, interesting read...but Beards do what who hire them give them the power to do, i mean, i can mock beards all i want, but they exist bc someone need them...so, i have no synpathy for BOTH the parts
ReplyDeleteYou know absolutely nothing about genetics
ReplyDeleteWell, I wouldn't go so far as to say they're "necessary" (because I don't believe you can 'need' them). If anything, I think the men who use them come off "desperately defensive"—like you know those people who are hiding something but end up waffling endlessly about their lies unprompted, and then it backfires and people end up figuring you've got something to hide? (Kind of like Trump when he started rambling about a "grand conspiracy" during the campaigns, and now we see all this stuff with Russia going on? Like that.)
ReplyDeleteAs for for the beards: I can only tolerate them up until they decide to get greedy for the limelight... The greedy ones are absolutely despicable human beings.
Not everyone read's enty/gossip blogs. My auntie still thinks tom cruise just hasn't met the right woman. They also buy movie tickets.
ReplyDeleteThe baby can come out looking very white and still be a middle easter daddy who sired him. Phenotypes are attributes you see but the DNA does not lie, i.e. blue eye baby, a very black parent. Hello.
ReplyDelete