Blind Item #7
It turns out there is not just one, but at least two adoptions that were pushed through illegally by this actress and several that were caught by authorities before they could be completed because of irregularities.
It turns out there is not just one, but at least two adoptions that were pushed through illegally by this actress and several that were caught by authorities before they could be completed because of irregularities.
Posted by ent lawyer at 1:30 AM
Labels: blind item
Angelina?
ReplyDeleteMadonna
ReplyDeleteI wish it was Mariska Hargitay. More than likely St. Ange.
ReplyDeleteMariska Hargitay, Sharon Stone, Katherine Heig and Edie Falco are others that have more than one adoption
ReplyDeleteI know this is Angelina. She is the most basic and prolific form of opportunist that exists on earth. EVERYTHING she does is for her ego and based on her entitlement. Her personality disorder makes it impossible for her to have normal relationships so I am sure there are issues of codependency with her children. She does not allow them space to develop in a stable environment. Her world is always steeped in drama and destabilized. She drags them around with her like possessions she cannot spare for a moment...even for their own well being
ReplyDeleteAngelina and I believe they are referring to Maddox and Zahara
ReplyDeleteAngelina but I think its Zahara and Pax.
ReplyDelete100% Angelina & Maddox. Not sure about the 2nd child. This was in the Daily Mail yesterday.
ReplyDeleteScareCrow Angie! First it Was Zahara Now Maddox! One Word.... KARMA!
ReplyDeleteOl' Nipple-ina gets away with the most morally heinous horseshit.
ReplyDeleteKarma for what, exactly? And don't use "Brad and Jen's already disintegrating marriage by the time she got there" as an example.
ReplyDeleteMia Farrow.
ReplyDeleteYou know no such thing. You only assume it. You've also stated a lot of assumptions about her character and her relationships with her children. Care to produce any evidence whatsoever?
ReplyDeleteSandra or charlize.
ReplyDeleteCrazelina Holie...God poor Brad..
ReplyDeletelol like evidence is important on this site!
ReplyDeletebtw how much is angie paying you to watch this site?
Always with the Angelina. Hate much, Tricia13?
ReplyDeleteSmall penis sounds about right.
ReplyDeleteYour personality disorder renders you categorically unable to communicate, no less try to analyze, anyone. I honestly hope you don't have any children.
Okay, we're not supposed to be here. This site is relegated to the least common denominator. We are interlopers.
ReplyDeleteThis was not in the DM yesterday. Photos were in the DM yesterday.
ReplyDeleteMy god, what the hell is wrong with you people!
100% idiocy.
What ever happened to you? Oh, right, you're dead.
ReplyDeleteThat you, Woody? You disgustingly ugly little pedophile with a teeny weeny dick, you?
ReplyDeleteWhat's the matter, are you ugly?
ReplyDeleteNo need to guess children who have nothing to do with this blind or anything else.
ReplyDeleteA blind that has nothing to do with anything other than to spur Angelina haters, such as yourself, to click, click, click.
Now I'm Woody Allen? Great, then I can give "whatever" the name of a superduper psychotherapist.
ReplyDeleteAs for the case worker suddenly coming out after all this time and not so coincidentally announcing he has power of attorney over Maddox shortly before Maddox reaches legal adult status and can take control of his own affairs...make of that what you will. (It more than likely has more to do with $$$$ than any real concern for Maddox's welfare. And sheds a lot of murkiness over the truthfulness of his claims.) Same for Zahara's bio mother. Why NOW and not eight years ago?
ReplyDeleteSo you are admitting you are paid to post shit for 'celebs'?
ReplyDeleteYour post is stupidly stupid and i assume u r stupid also.
NO offence
XOXO
Dirty divorce.
ReplyDeleteHow do you guys get these celeb-defending comment type jobs? Is it a Fiverr thing, or what?
ReplyDeleteIt'd be more credible without the ad hominem attacks but I guess it would cost extra to avoid that approach.
[…] March 20, 2017 […]
ReplyDelete