February 11, 2017
The only reason this C+ list celebrity of a foreign born permanent A list singer/actress got cast in a new movie is she was willing to have real sex and not simulated sex. Sounds like porn to me. She says it is an art film.
Chloe Lattanzi
ImDB has nothing upcoming listed for her and one direct to the DVD bargain bin movie the past 15 years.
ReplyDeleteI feel bad for her. She is one messed up girl.
ReplyDeleteApparently, the movie starts filming in march and still has no name: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-4214150/Chloe-Lattanzi-reveals-s-set-star-movie.html?ITO=1490&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490
ReplyDeleteIf she's happy and willing to have sex on film for the role, what's the big deal? There's nothing indicating she was forced to have sex. And there nothing wrong with porn, since you all watch it yourselves.
ReplyDeleteStop acting precious. Y'all a bunch of hypocritical skanks.
You can only say with absolute certainty that you watch porn. You don't speak for me.
ReplyDeleteBut more to the point, this sad case is trying to call herself an "actress", not a "porn star". We will therefore continue to judge her freely.
"Porn star" is too generous. More like "performs porn for a little bit of money."
ReplyDeleteYES kween
ReplyDeleteHer grandfather was a Genius, you would think she would have inherited a few brain cells or at least 10% of mom's talent. Porn is pathetic.
ReplyDelete> We will therefore continue to judge her freely.
ReplyDeleteHoes like you usually have 6 children by 5 different fathers, but act Christian to feel better about your sad choices. Slut, please.
whoa. I had to google her. She has an unfortunate face but sexy in a trashy silicone bimbo kind of way. Mom and dads good look genes didn't combine very well.
ReplyDelete"Ya'll"
ReplyDeleteYou'd better be from some crappy southern state to use that stupid phrase.