The only reason this C+ list celebrity of a foreign born permanent A list singer/actress got cast in a new movie is she was willing to have real sex and not simulated sex. Sounds like porn to me. She says it is an art film.
Completely unrelated. But did anyone else try to watch dumpy Dunham's 73 questions w vogue? She is super annoying and has a tacky house and style....I couldn't get through the whole thing:/ she's terrible
So she's willing and I have sex during filming to snag the role. So what? It's just sex. Sex work is just another job. You all like to shame celebrities for having sex, but you're all fine with your own ho lives. smh
Chloe Lattanzi/(Olivia Newton John)
ReplyDeleteAnother comment missing.
ReplyDeleteCompletely unrelated. But did anyone else try to watch dumpy Dunham's 73 questions w vogue? She is super annoying and has a tacky house and style....I couldn't get through the whole thing:/ she's terrible
ReplyDeleteWho the hell wants to listen to what Lina Dunham has to fart of her mouth?
ReplyDeleteSo she's willing and I have sex during filming to snag the role. So what? It's just sex. Sex work is just another job. You all like to shame celebrities for having sex, but you're all fine with your own ho lives. smh
ReplyDeleteAs long as you recognize that having sex to get a role, a job, or anything else is prostitution. Which is entirely different than just "having sex".
ReplyDeleteWell, technically real sex on film is indeed porn.
ReplyDeleteIf it is thought to have artistic merit, it is not considered porn.
ReplyDeletei watch artistic videos every night before i go to sleep.
ReplyDeleteAny idea how soon pre-production movies "pop" up on IMDB? I see nothing in the works for her, but your answer makes sense.
ReplyDelete[…] February 11, 2017 […]
ReplyDelete