Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Blind Items Revealed #4

January 10, 2017

This still young one named singer who actually might be as well known for a recurring role she had on a long running sitcom is about to be dropped by her label because she won’t have sex with the guy who replaced the last guy she was having sex with at the label.

Tinashe


13 comments:

  1. sandybrook1:49 AM

    It took all day but someone actually got this right. Congrats JC!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sunspirit1:51 AM

    I'd look her up to see who she is but CBA

    ReplyDelete
  3. longtimereader2:25 AM

    Her last album was good but this is sleazy music biz b.s.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have no idea who she is.

    But if she is talented, someone will sign her.

    (...and then try to have sex with her.)

    That's how Hollywood works, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. What sitcom was Tinashe on?

    ReplyDelete
  6. 8====D KermitGosnellKnobjob4:09 AM

    She is pretty and has a video with Brit, that is enough for me to remember her name for a few weeks.

    ReplyDelete
  7. melissa4:19 AM

    That sucks.
    As we all know the prettiest, most talented people around are NOT in Hollyweird.
    The ones who sell their souls are.
    Period.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sarah5:59 AM

    She had a recurring role on Two and a Half Men for awhile

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hot Cola7:35 AM

    I hope he comes back in the next life and suffer tje rxact dame pain hes causing her now.

    ReplyDelete
  10. She apparently played Jake's girlfriend on Two And a Half Men. So, really, she's not an actress at all.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks! I'm new to guessing, enjoy all of your guys' ongoing commentary.

    ReplyDelete
  12. JC, a lot of blinds on here are not true and some are taken from tabloids. Tabloids even take things from here and somehow it even becomes news. Read the fine print on all blind sites. Anyone can submit a blind. The sites that doesn't allow anonymous sign ups or submits may be better. It's just entertainment imo.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dumblesnore12:10 PM

    So we don't name the two men involved?

    ReplyDelete