Saturday, August 20, 2016

Blind Items Revealed #8

July 20, 2016

Speaking of yachting, how strange is to ask your celebrity ex to watch the kid you had together so this former A list mostly movie actress can go yachting for the night.

Kate Hudson


17 comments:

  1. sandybrook3:56 AM

    So Kate took the whole family to Dubai including baby daddy so she could yacht?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, Enty!
    Why don't you change the rating system for these escorts ( I mean prostitutes, i am actresses.)
    Let's just start referring to them for what they truly are.
    A+ Escort?
    or B- Escort wanna be?
    Let's not refer to them as actresses anymore since most can't act anyway.
    Just an idea!

    ReplyDelete
  3. TopperMadison4:19 AM

    Kate Hudson has absolutely no need to sell herself, now or ever. That is, if that's what is inferred by the new euphemism of "yachting". And no, it wouldn't be strange for her to get an invitation to a party on a yacht and then asking her ex to watch the kid.

    Just because the woman is on a yacht doesn't mean she's selling her body to be there. (Spaketh a woman who has partied on a yacht a time or two.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. S.D.AUNTIE4:51 AM

    She does not have the right look for yachting. She looks messy and needs a good scrub down.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kno Won Uno4:55 AM

    I also thought having her ex keep the kid was no big deal. If she'd hired someone, that would also be scandalous.

    ReplyDelete
  6. And-so-on..5:46 AM

    Hostess, celebrity companion procurer SWAG HAG?! Anything extra cost big bucks..

    ReplyDelete
  7. Guesser the5:49 AM

    According to Enty you are.a yacht girl! All woman on yachts are for sale now. No exceptions! No mater if you're rich, poor, famous or not. Pippa Middleton, Kate Hudson, not just drugged up has been models and actresses, A Listers and women with billionaire fiances, doesn't matter.

    ReplyDelete
  8. pifal6:09 AM

    I attended the Grand Prix in Monaco last summer. I arrived on a yacht as did many other women, even went topless a few times as is customary in that part of the world. I didn't bring my daughter because sometimes adult trips are a good thing, and I wasn't paid to be there. I planned the trip as a Bday present for my boyfriend, huge car enthusiast, and I PAID FOR IT. Yachting isn't always whoring. Good hell people.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Whatever7:24 AM

    Not curvaceous or pretty enough to be a proper 'yacht' girl. She still has a 'name' so I'm sure she was there on that basis (to party, not to whore herself).

    ReplyDelete
  10. magnolia belle10:18 AM

    Thank you, thank you for saying out loud what I have been thinking for years!

    ReplyDelete
  11. magnolia belle10:22 AM

    Unfortunately, the only 'yacht' I was ever asked to be on turned out to be a lovely boat filled with ladies, who turned out to be...well, you can fill in the lines. Never found out why they invited me because they knew I was...Irish Catholic, not Lesbyterian. But had a hell of a good time. Those gals told dirty jokes, cussed and went through a whole case of Cruzan Rum! Good times.

    ReplyDelete
  12. PlasticPony10:24 AM

    I always thought her mother needed a good scrub and flea dip. She looks so unkempt

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh FFS. Nothing amazes me anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  14. TopperMadison1:14 AM

    Guesser the,

    Back in my day, rich guys only wanted to stock their party with lots of pretty girls with the hopes of getting the girls drunk enough that they'd get laid, and it wasn't difficult to find some. "Hey, girls! Want to come to a party on a yacht?" was pretty much all that was needed.

    Boy, these days I WISH someone would ask me to party on a yacht with billionaires eager to throw big money at me for sex. I've got a massive mortgage to pay off. Ah, youth. It's wasted on the young...

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hey, TopperMadison, I think you missed the Bani Blinds from about a year ago.
    Enty, has promised to reveal who he/she is in November(?) 2016.
    I think I know who he/she is, but I probably won't "Nail It!"

    ReplyDelete
  16. Implied, not inferred

    ReplyDelete