February 13, 2016
This B+ list mostly movie actress who has a franchise and is a great Tweeter blew off a recent premiere. This is totally unlike her. She is always where she is supposed to be at the appointed time. She didn’t want to see her now ex-boyfriend who has been hassling her about her new boyfriend.
Anna Kendrick
Nailed it
ReplyDeleteOr maybe she tried to avoid the stalker or stalkers, who sometimes sends blind items to this site,,,
ReplyDeleteI nailed it, guys! Please like me and give me attention!
ReplyDeleteWhat did she do to piss in your Cheerios?
ReplyDeleteShe didn't respond well to the stalking, I gather.
ReplyDeleteHow inconsiderate! Shouldn't celebrities shower us with attention?!?!
ReplyDelete/sarcasm
Is the ex-boyfriend the stalker or is the stalker someone else?
ReplyDeleteI never saw her appeal. I don't hate her or love her. I just think she is as bland as oatmeal.
ReplyDeleteI find her rodent-like features very off putting, but she has a lovely voice.
ReplyDeleteThat's what I was wondering! If she's being stalked & she's avoiding an ex maybe the ex is the one that's stalking her.
ReplyDeleteHow is she ungrateful? The blind makes it pretty clear that she always shows up on time for things, but this time she's got an ex that was also there & might be stalking her or not taking the breakup well. Someone acts in 30+ movies, always shows up on time for everything, but she doesn't show up one time because she's got an ex that might be stalking her & that negates the rest of her career? Maybe everyone below your comment is right & you're the stalking ex.
ReplyDeleteI do not see what you are seeing.
ReplyDeleteDitto
ReplyDeleteReally though, who hasn't nailed it?
ReplyDeleteDerek Harvey, bitch.
ReplyDeletePegging counts as nailing it
ReplyDeleteShe sure has a lot of man trouble.
ReplyDeleteHow do you figure? Lady was dating that British dude for years and then has only been associated with Diplo since.
ReplyDeleteWell, there's this story about not wanting to explain the ex boyfriend to the new boyfriend. She has dated some of her directors and of course the stalker which is a flat out nightmare scenario. I have seen her in only one movie but somehow always see her dating life splashed on the gossip pages. Not her fault of course but it always looks like trouble.
ReplyDeleteMy comment was meant to go here.
ReplyDeleteI think she dated the one director for 4 years but haven't heard of any others. I think her dating life is splashed all over because she makes some pretty blunt and sarcastic tweets on a regular basis so it draws the gossip sites
ReplyDeleteI certainly didn't mean to diss her. She seems like a very nice girl.
ReplyDeleteThis story is bullshit. Anna doesn't have a new boyfriend, she's had the same one (Ben Richardson) for the past 3 years. They were just seen together last week. Also Anna has only dated ONE of her directors, Edgar Wright, which lasted 4 years. And since they broke up she's been with Ben for 3 years. So I don't know where you get this "her dating life is splashed all over" thing.
ReplyDeleteNever take anything you read on CDAN seriously. This is all click-bait. There have been a few Anna blinds in recent months that got debunked by other people, showing how incredibly bogus this site can be at times.
Another reason why this story is rubbish is that I highly doubt Edgar Wright would be harassing Anna about Ben 3 years after they broke up. Especially given that they still follow each other on Twitter and are still friends. She still likes Edgar, so this makes no sense whatsoever. Anna doesn't have a new boyfriend, and she didn't have any premieres in January to blow off either. This story is 100% false.
Huh? She's had 2 boyfriends in the last 7 years and she has man trouble? Of all the women in Hollywood, Anna seems to be one of the few that actually has her shit together when it comes to relationships.
ReplyDeleteI think it's pretty clear that there's some douche out there sending fake Anna blinds to this site. There have a been a few ones sent recently that were proven to be false.
ReplyDelete