Blind Item #12
To be fair, this Victoria's Secret model with the familiar sounding name didn't know the actor she hooked up with was married. She didn't even recognize his name. She didn't know who he was until she saw him at a party she was co-hosting with his actress wife. Different last names will do that sometimes.
ok Joyn Krasinski and Emily Blunt for the marrieds mebbe?
ReplyDeleteJustin Theroux/Jen Aninston for couple
ReplyDeleteYeah, because it's way too complicated to navigate to a google search page from literally anywhere on the planet and everyone knows a married couple with different last names in so extremely rare as to be non-existent /s
ReplyDeleteI'm not buyin'. Too stupid.
Wait - if's it's Kendall Jenner, then OK.
ReplyDelete"School" isn't a big deal in that house. She might not be able to spell google.
chanel iman Peter Sarsgaard Maggie Gyllenhaal
ReplyDeleteyeah right...like IF a VS model would hook up with an actor without knowing who they are...and if they can name him they won’t fuck him....sure jen
ReplyDeletehttp://www.justjaredjr.com/2016/01/17/chanel-iman-celebrates-vandal-restaurants-grand-opening-in-nyc/
ReplyDeleteKoekel?
ReplyDeleteThis blind is not logic
ReplyDeleteAt least we know she is not a gold digger because she rode his dick without even recognising his name, just out of pure lust and thirst for seed.
ReplyDeleteDon't see him as the cheating type
ReplyDeleteHer, for sure
+1 ....both Chanel and Iman are familiar names so good guess
ReplyDeleteoooh, good guess @ Elle B . definately +1
ReplyDeleteWell the culprit has once again been chosen, by concensus, to be Peter 'Cheater' Sarsgaard and Maggie Gyllenhaal, who must by now have read at least 100 blinds about her husband's supposed cheating ways just from this website alone.
ReplyDeleteHonestly, I'll easily buy Sarsgaard is gay and closeted before I buy the amount of supposed cheating he does with models, actresses, anything that moves. It sounds like total overkill to me. Or just that someone has it in for the guy.
Cara Develgine.
ReplyDelete