#1- This A+list singer says she owes her career to one of her employees who was convicted of beating a woman. Strange twist.
#2- This married celebrity chef who always seems to be cheating might not actually be married any longer. She recently filled out a government form and indicated she is single even though she publicly says she is married.
#2- This married celebrity chef who always seems to be cheating might not actually be married any longer. She recently filled out a government form and indicated she is single even though she publicly says she is married.
2) GIADA
ReplyDeleteRihanna/Todd english
ReplyDeleteOr read it wrong
DeleteTori/gianda
RiRi and Gordon Ramsey?
ReplyDelete1) dre? And..
ReplyDeleteDre/Ri
DeleteIronic because of Chris Brown beating
DeleteRih?
ReplyDeleteGiada
Oops the chef is female so Giada
ReplyDeleteTodd Thompson and Giada still follow each other on Twitter. I guess that's not the the best indicator of anything - but if they are keeping up appearances, he's earning whatever it is he gets to do so.
ReplyDeleteRihanna
ReplyDeleteThe Blow Job Queen
giada and??
ReplyDeleteriri but don't get the connection
ReplyDeletei thought enty said statham and rosie were over
ReplyDeletehttp://www.justjared.com/2014/09/01/rosie-huntington-whiteley-jason-statham-hold-hands-during-labor-day-weekend/?ref=footer
#1 is Tina Turner!
ReplyDeleteSigh.... some things never change.
2. Obviously Giada
ReplyDeleteChris Brown was never an employee of Rihanna. Giada should be divorced so she can screw whomever she wants since she is doing that anyway. Her ex-husband can find somebody that respects him a little more
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteIt was never implied that Brown was the employee, just the irony of the employee being convicted of beating a woman.
All of this assuming Rihanna is the singer in question.
First on not Riri. Says employee did the beating and Chris Brown was never her employee.
ReplyDeleteBefore you call first, re-read the blind. It says it's ironic that she owes her career to an employee who is a woman-beater, not that she was beaten by her employee.
DeleteIs anyone else a little unnerved that whatever Giada put for her marital status on a government form is now public knowledge? Is there no expectation of privacy anymore, even in government paperwork? Will someone be publishing her tax returns? Should we expect a blind involving her SSN next?
ReplyDeleteIt's called public record. Almost every form you fill out becomes public record at some point. Google Freedom of Information Act.
DeleteI don't think we're supposed to think the employee beat the singer, but that she owes her career to a woman-beater. Being a twist, it sounds like it would be Rihanna.
ReplyDeleteUm, not quite, Aeol. This blind sure doesn't sound like someone got their info from a valid FOIA request or something in the public record. Otherwise, it wouldn't be a blind, it would be, as you say, public record. This reads like info leaked by a government employee who happened to see the form, found it gossip-worthy, but should not have revealed the info, hence it's now a blind item.
ReplyDeleteAnd, FYI, "Google it" is, like, the least convincing argument ever. If you only know about it because you Googled, something tells me you're not terribly knowledgeable about it. ;)
+1 Enny.
Delete@\Tina Malette
ReplyDeleteThey never broke.They just had an argument around Cannes fest
#2 has to be Giada. Has he been on her show lately?
ReplyDeleteOr Rachael Ray?