Blind Item #7
This A- list mostly television actor on a hit almost network show lives paycheck to paycheck because he spends all of his money on women and partying and he says he doesn't care because he always finds a new hit to be on.
This A- list mostly television actor on a hit almost network show lives paycheck to paycheck because he spends all of his money on women and partying and he says he doesn't care because he always finds a new hit to be on.
Posted by ent lawyer at 8:30 AM
Labels: blind item
Charlie Sheen----he must be going broke by now
ReplyDeleteIsn't that cable though
DeleteSheen still has over $100million.
DeleteCumberbatch
ReplyDeleteIan somerholder?
ReplyDeleteWomen?
DeleteMy thoughts too.
DeleteMade me immediately think of Keifer, but I know he doesn't fit (Fox is network, correct?).
ReplyDeleteGreat guess, although I believe he's an exec producer on 24 which means he gets residuals on top of that paycheck
DeleteAlmost network is CW. Are there any others? Think rest are cable..
ReplyDeleteDylan McDermott /American Horror Story/FX
ReplyDeleteFSP, shut your mouth :), I second Sheen. At least they are big paychecks!!!
ReplyDeleteBob Vila
ReplyDeletenot Ian..nooooooooooo
ReplyDeletehe's is my guilty secret-that and the Vampire Diaries
yeah I know its lame
Well, I like the devil may care attitude. I could never be that cavalier tho.
ReplyDeleteAlmost network is CW, Fox is now a real network after 25 years.
ReplyDeleteFX is cable.
Sheen will die before he runs out of money. Syndication money is still rolling in.
ReplyDeletePiven
ReplyDeleteWayne Brady
ReplyDeleteSide comment..."women" = so it's not John Barrowman then? Well damn. Who else on the CW is A-list and has been on more than one hit show (other than the obvious Ian)? I'm disregarding the Supernatural boys because both are married with child(ren), with how long the show has been on the air I just don't think they'd still be this reckless.
@fs..I know, but FX is a subsidiary of fox(which IS A Network)so technically , it's an almost network
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete