Blind Items Revealed
January 27, 2009
I guess older teenagers couldn't be found. This B list actress from a hit network drama and A list name recognition has been telling everyone that her latest boytoy is 21. To her closest friends she has admitted he is actually 19. This despite the fact she is in her late 30's. It probably wouldn't be an issue except for the fact that she knows that he is actually only 17. Oh, and to make it extremely cliche he is her pool boy and not a guy about to graduate from college as she has told everyone else.
Shannen Doherty
Did she meet him at a Singer party?
ReplyDeleteProbably a lot of 'pool boys' looking for work there.
@Bacon Ranch
ReplyDeleteSinger's parties were/ are all/only for guys and gay-oriented
@Bacon Ranch
ReplyDeleteShe met him around her own pool apparently
Ahh caroline, thanks. I thought they were just wild parties, didn't know they were gender specific.
ReplyDeleteAww cute. Now if the sexes were reversed, it would be a moral outrage. What a world we live in....
ReplyDeleteI know I'm supposed to high five her, but teenage boys just ain't my thing.
ReplyDeleteUgh, right?! Too scrawny...and do they even know what they're doing?! I'll take experience over stamina myself. ;-)
DeleteYou and I are both members of the Big Boy FanClub, AKM, totally on the same page
Delete@ploksy
ReplyDeleteI have no problem as long time as he or she's legal and consent
Wasn't she irrelevant even back in 2009? Did she have a project back then? When did she have friends?
ReplyDeleteOh Shannen..How cliché!
ReplyDeleteYes he was underage and as she is more than 2-3 years older it is illegal and should be viewed with outrage. (if the tables were turned....)
I wasn't in to teenage boys even when I was a teenage girl. I like my men good and filled out. They're usually scrawny in their teens, even if they work out and have muscles.
ReplyDeleteI can't get over the fact the age of consent in Canada was 14 until they upped to 16 in 2007/2008.
ReplyDeleteYes in the state of Hollywood here is the law
In California, there is a crime of "Unlawful sexual intercourse", which is an act of sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 18 who is not the spouse of the person. (CA Penal Code § 265.1 (a))
The punishment is varied, depending on the ages of the perpetrator and the victim:
Any person who commits the crime with a minor not more than 3 years younger or older than the perpetrator is guilty of a misdemeanor. (CA Penal Code § 265.1 (b))
Any person who commits the crime with a minor who is more than 3 years younger than the perpetrator is guilty of a misdemeanor or a felony. A misdemeanor conviction is punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year. A felony conviction is punished by imprisonment in a county jail for 16 months, or two or three years, or in the state prison, depending on the person's criminal history. (CA Penal Code § 265.1 (c))
Any person 21 years of age or older who commits the crime with a minor under 16 years of age is guilty of a misdemeanor or a felony. A misdemeanor conviction is punished by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year. A felony conviction is punished by imprisonment in a county jail for two, three or four years, or in the state prison, depending on the person's criminal history. (CA Penal Code § 265.1 (d))
There are also civil sanctions possible for a violation stated above. (CA Penal Code § 265.1 (e))
Furthermore, any person who engages in sex acts with a person under the age of 14 and seven or more years younger than the perpetrator is guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child. This crime is a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for a term of 15 years to life. Separate offenses, even with the same person are punished with consecutive sentences. (CA Penal Code § 269)
There are separate crimes for committing sodomy with minors. (CA Penal code § 286)
There are separate crimes for committing any lewd or lascivious act with a person under the age of 14. (CA Penal Code § 288)
Age of consent is indeed a dumb law.
ReplyDeleteI find it way worse (more punishable) to bone a (semi) pure chick in her 20s like Taylor Swift than to bang some 16 yo with more semen inside her than blood (most females today), and in the male version, imagine the Pope and whatever 16 yo dude who f words all of the cheerleaders in his high school.
A17 year old is not a kid...whatever the law says. I was in my first year of university at 17. That 17 year old was having the time of his life.
ReplyDeleteLol you're right, HR Lady, I forget sometimes what 17 is like. Been a loooong time. And they all look so bloody young.
DeleteIt's not just the age, it's the unequal power relationship & it is ick.
ReplyDeleteI doubt the pool boy was worried about the unequal power relationship, when he was hit on by SD. Lol.
ReplyDeleteThey do look young TTM, and teenage boys were never my thing, not even when I was a teenager. Lol
ReplyDeleteBut this is no big deal to me, they both knew what the deal was, and had some naughty fun together.
Good for her....I had a fling with a 19 year old when I was 30 and it was untold! Who cares these days? Too many pearl clutchers it seems...
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure 17 year olds have stamina, I'm imagining it would be all over in 5 minutes....
ReplyDeleteAnd wait, Shannen can afford a pool and a pool boy?? When did she get her last pay packet?
I'm sure his high school buddies are very jealous.
ReplyDeleteI'm thinking the vast majority of heterosexual 17 year old males would be thrilled to be banging Shannen Doherty. All this conspiracy theory crap is silly.
ReplyDeleteI'm sure his dad and his high school buddies' dads are jealous. His own buddies probably don't even know who she is.
ReplyDeleteDo NOT understand the appeal of teens and adults.
ReplyDelete