According to a post on
Radar this morning, Brooke Mueller is living alone with her kids and the temporary guardian, who is pulling in $55K a month for taking care of the kids has left the house and is back home at his own place in Orange County. Considering that Brooke is living down the street from Charlie Sheen I'm guessing he knew and doesn't care any longer because Brooke is his bff and Denise Richards is his mortal enemy and he is too worried about getting married to his porn star girlfriend and having new babies because the last four or five if you think Denise's latest addition is really a Charlie Sheen stripper love child are getting the full love and attention that parents should give their kids. Brooke has a nanny and a sober companion with her but there is no way she is paying for them by herself which means that the $55K the guardian is getting is probably going to Brooke because everyone knows that an addict should have that much walking around money. The article says that Brooke's condo in the valley was just too small for Brooke and her "staff." She thinks she is on track to regain custody at a hearing in May. If I'm the judge and I'm not or else I would have ordered FAS testing I want to know why she violated a court order to NOT move into the house.
Here go hell come!!
ReplyDeleteHOW DOES SHE STILL HAVE THOSE KIDS???
ReplyDeleteNice hand sores.
ReplyDeleteIt's Friday Enty get your bottle and start drinking. Two posts, two bitchy posts.
ReplyDeleteThis defies logic and known history. Way to go california CPS.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like about 15 years from now we'll get to see what happens when we have two exceptionally wealthy serial killers running around. These boys are set up to fail in horrific ways. I really hope that someone in that family has enough love in their heart to help those two boys by any means necessary. Emilioooooooooooo!!! Where are you?!?!
ReplyDeleteThat said, I *do* love the term "walking around money."
Disgusting mess.
ReplyDeleteThese kids come with a trainload of maintenance money wherever they lay their very cute heads. To an addict like Brooke, mummy-love = $$$$$$ = lots of drugs.
ReplyDeleteWhy would any family member want to devote 20 years, or a lifetime, to drug damaged spawn of irresponsible parents?!?!?! I keep asking this. These kids need professional care. Denise couldn't handle them and she is a Saint!
ReplyDeleteWTF!?!
ReplyDeleteWhy does she have the kids? Because Charlie is getting what he wants- people to serve and obey him, and Brooke is getting what she wants: money and access. No one gives a shite about the boys, except Denise, whom they blasted out of the picture for being too responsible and focused on actual reasonable, necessary priorities. So, this outcome should surprise no one. CPS has failed the boys, and the judge has failed the boys. Next up, the boys fail, too. Tragic, totally avoidable outcome, due to a true confederacy of selfish asshats and morons.
ReplyDeleteGood too see she's replenishing her electrolytes!
ReplyDeleteDef on the road to recovery.
Is this Enty a former Fox news reporter? This is an inflammatory spin if ever there was one.
ReplyDeleteFrom the article:
1. She isn't "living alone." There are two people with her.
2. The guardian didn't "bail." The source simply said, "He hasn't been spotted at the house lately."
3. There is no mention of the $55K support money--that's complete speculation.
4. The judge ruled that there was no evidence to support needing FAS testing.
5. There was no mention of a court order banning her from the house.
I can't believe I defending this woman, but seriously...Brooke IS their mother, and if she is sober and supervised when she's with them, why stir up shit?
This whole situation is a clusterfuck.. The guardian is suppose to be around to do his job.. not leave them with crackhead/meth mom. we have already seen how well her sober coaches do their jobs with this nut.
ReplyDeleteJeez those kids, just cannot catch a break.
Holy run on sentences, Enty! Take a breath! Or maybe three!
ReplyDelete"What about the grammar? Won't someone think about the grammar?"
*baby Jesus cries*
Topper, she may have born those children, but she is NO mother! Children need to be thought of as a privilege, not an entitlement. This idea that children should stay with their birth parents, no matter what, is destroying future generations. We have the same idea here in Australia & it is ridiculous & irresponsible.
ReplyDelete"or five if you think Denise's latest addition is really a Charlie Sheen stripper love child"
ReplyDeleteWhat? This is the website that posted that information. Is the writer now claiming he/she lied?
Dumbass.
She's very pretty without makeup.
ReplyDeleteJesus Christ, what a mess. These kids have the saddest future ahead of them. No hope in being rescued from this madness. :(
ReplyDeleteNo, Diana, Enty was simply commenting on the assertion as it has never been proven or, as far as I know, even come up in the "mainstream" rags. He's just reminding us of it.
ReplyDeleteDumbass.
I love the fact that repulsive hot messes like this twit and Justin Bieber are photographed wearing Leafs clothing.
ReplyDelete