Thursday, October 03, 2013

Today's Blind Items - The Payoff

This B- list actress/singer/celebrity has cost her parents $1M. That was the amount of the payoff to a tabloid who had photos of the offspring on a bed with another woman making out and half undressed. The offspring was covered in all the right places so the tabloid could have published the photos. Instead they made a deal and this time it was just for cash. No trades. The tabloid needs the money to survive a few more months. I wonder what will happen when the tabloid does finally fold here in a bit. Do the parents have the only copies of the photos? Will they keep paying off tabloids? You know why they are paying off? They don't think their daughter is gay and don't want her to be forced into explaining it later. Yeah, I'm pretty sure she is gay. This is not her first time or her first other girlfriend.

68 comments:

  1. Beyonce and Jay Z are paying off tabloids already?

    ReplyDelete
  2. haha @Barton!

    No clue.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Is this Willow Smith again?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like the willow smith guess - it would have been too easy if they put more detail about parents in blind.

      Delete
    2. @VIP--(of course) you nailed it!

      Delete
  4. I thought Willow too but does she act? Also with both parents being Bi would it be an issue for them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:01 PM

      Montana, if Willow emulates either of her parents, she does indeed act. Act straight.

      Delete
  5. I was thinking Willow Smith too.

    ReplyDelete
  6. But isn't Willow Smith still a kid? A tabloid isn't gonna publish photos like that of a kid... I hope.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Willow had a tongue ring at one point. They said it was fake. More like, they had her remove it.

    Her Tumblr page was filled with half-naked women but since has changed greatly. Guess her parents finally paid attention to her.

    Like mother, like daughter.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ Zeeky

    Times are hard.

    Since she was clothed, it wouldn't be considered porn.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Miley? But I would rank her higher....

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous10:25 AM

    LMFAO @ FSP!!!!

    Willow is only 12... the wording of "on a bed with another woman" makes it seem like someone older than a tween, no??

    ReplyDelete
  11. Are Will and Jada practicing Scientologists? Not sure of COS stance but maybe that would lead them to buy off pics.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The fact that it says that the offspring was covered in all the right places makes me think it is a minor. Because if it was someone older than 18, the tabloid could just use black bars to cover indecent body parts

    ReplyDelete
  13. VictoriaJustice or Zendaya (if she sings)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Willow will turn 13 at the end of the month. I think printing pics of a 12 year old is pretty low.

    ReplyDelete
  15. One less tabloid, one less cover of of The K-Trash I have to see while standing inline at Walmart!

    ReplyDelete
  16. I don't understand; if the daughter is a "B- list actress/singer/celebrity", why are the parents paying off the tabloid? Wouldn't she have her own money??

    ReplyDelete
  17. If she is under age, then she prolly don't have access to her money.

    ReplyDelete
  18. If the parents are smart or they have a good lawyer advising them the money should be placed in a trust fund for the kid until the kid is legal and give them an allowance un the meantime.

    Everybody saying Willow understands she is extremely young? And someone would be responsible to turn the child molestor in if they know that person.

    ReplyDelete
  19. If it IS Willow, the blind would make sense because they'd be charged with distributing child pornography if she wasn't covered up. But still, posting photos of a 12-year-old is vile, and I wonder who would honestly be buying the magazine to see that other than pedophiles. And the magazine is...the Enquirer? Or Star?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Elissa, I think this is a clue to the identity of the person. Someone with parents who run/manage their career.

    ReplyDelete
  21. If you spend any time with middle school kids you know making out on a bed with some clothes off isn't surprising. They are very sexually active these days. It's terrifying. The tabloid would want the shock value of who the patents are, not necessarily the sexuality of the situation.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I agree Willow is too young. Someone else.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Also, she may be with another 13 year old and not a child molestor.

    All still wrong though.

    ReplyDelete
  24. What about Asslee Simpson?

    ReplyDelete
  25. I want to know what tabloid is in that much trouble.

    ReplyDelete
  26. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  27. @ Count There was a story a little while back that stated Jada makes the children work for their own money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous3:12 PM

      Freya: they work hard for the money....so hard for the money....

      Delete
  28. How about Emma Roberts?

    ReplyDelete
  29. @Jane the blind says the offspring is with another woman, not girl, so she is a molester

    ReplyDelete
  30. I'm pretty sure this is Demi Lovato. She keeps getting in trouble with pics of her and other women/girls based on the blinds I've read.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I don't know if this fits, but what about Georgia May Jagger and Cara Dewhatsherpickle, they were in the photos yesterday

    ReplyDelete
  32. Megan McCain. Oh, if only...

    ReplyDelete
  33. How about either Kendall or Kylie Jenner?

    ReplyDelete
  34. Oh, sorry the Jenner girls don't sing.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Joy, I also thought Demi. she's just kinda old to be having her parents pay off though. She's old enough to do so herself.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I don't think this is someone underage, since the pics would never be published anyway, since it would be labeled kiddieporn then and the mag would go under immediately.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Willow has the worst hair cut ever.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I wish this was Megan McCain

    she is insufferable

    ReplyDelete
  39. I doubt it's Demi. I don't think her parents have that kind of money. Also, this comes across as a minor/barely legal kid who's still under parental watch.

    ReplyDelete
  40. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  41. As long as no naughty bits are showing, not kiddie porn. Lil bim lez pics would be the sales spike a dying publication would need.

    ReplyDelete
  42. I don't think it's Willow. Enty said another "woman" and did not refer to the person as a tween. If child porn had been part of the blind, he would have exploited it.

    How about Clint Eastwood's daughter. Does she sing?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Miley Cyrus? We've all seen her nekkid but not with another woman.

    ReplyDelete
  44. I shudder to think that Willow Smith is anywhere near B- list. Also not an actress.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Don't think this is willow smith. She's not old enough, but more than that that, I don't think her parents would even worry about the pictures for some reason. This sounds like Bella Thorne to me.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Paris Hilton. Fits the description.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Anonymous3:14 PM

    A Willis. They have their mum's penchant for soda stream refills, and their dad's preference for fisting.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Anonymous3:50 PM

    Warwick!

    ReplyDelete
  49. The impression I get from the blind is that it's the parents who care about their daughter being exposed as gay. Not the daughter, but the parents. So look for conservative/religious parents for whom this would be an issue.

    Next bit - neither of the parents are described as celebrities, so I think we can exclude accomplished persons like the Pinketts.

    So - parents who aren't celebrities themselves, but who really don't want to believe their daughter's gay, and yet who have the bucks to make such a payoff.

    Parents: the Simpsons. Daughter: Jessica.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Someone asked which tabloid is in financial trouble. It is probably "National Enquirer" and its parent American Media International. They did a refinancing deal in the last year and there have been cash flow issues for a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Nobody would be publishing or threatening to publish any photos of Willow partially dressed on a bed making out with anyone. That would be child pornography.

    ReplyDelete
  52. If publication of scantily clad under age girls was child pornography, then every retailer with a girl under 18 in a bikini on their website or in their catalog would be up on criminal charges. If their private parts were covered and not being touched, then there would be no problem with publishing the photos.

    If the photos were not publishable, then the parents wouldn't have had to pay a dime. Do you think they didn't consult an attorney before forking over a million dollars?

    Personally, here in the digital age, I wouldn't believe the parents got the only copies of the pics. Even if there was a penalty written into the sale contract, it is a publication on the brink of bankruptcy. They could publish them as a last ditch cash grab a week before going under.

    That brings a tremendous thought. Say the Enquirer or Star was finished, 2 editions left before going under. Would they publish all the stories they buried? Would they throw caution to the wind and tell where all the bodies in Hollywood lie?

    ReplyDelete
  53. It's pretty sad when parents are willing to pay $1 million to prove their offspring isn't gay. Who the f*ck cares? No one who isn't an old fart with one foot in the grave (do the world a favor, ye bigots, and die, already).

    Being gay isn't like the plague. Being gay never caused The Dark Ages or The Holocaust. Being an asshole did.

    ReplyDelete
  54. Britney Spears maybe?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Scratch that guess I'd say Brit Brit is A - liking the Miley guess but don't know that the rating is right? She can't sell anything out on her own but wouldn't she have A+ name recognition?

      Delete
  55. Not Willow Smith. She's too young. From the wording I thought the offspring was in her late teens/early twenties. I would've thought Dakota Fanning but she doesn't sing does she?

    My guess would've been Demi Lovato but I like the Bella Thorn guesses better.

    ReplyDelete

Advertisements

Popular Posts from the last 30 days