Blind Item #8
About two years ago this actor was right there at A list. The his first solo film came out and bombed and he has steadily dropped to a B-. No franchise to keep him artificially boosted. His latest movie was supposed to be his return to A list but his acting is so bad that the script had to be revised and he is being edited out of as much of it as possible while still using his name to sell it.
Sam worthington?
ReplyDeleteBradley Cooper?
ReplyDeleteBut Clash of the Titan's was a franchise to keep him boosted. Who was that guy in that super bomb a about 2 years ago? Something to do with a book or tale or something.
ReplyDeleteThe John Carter movie? Is that the one?
DeleteTaylor Kitch?
ReplyDelete*Titans
ReplyDeleteSomeone from the Twilight franchise? Maybe Kellan Lutz?
ReplyDeleteSam still has franchise movies coming out and B Coop is still going strong
That's it! Thanks guys!
ReplyDeleteRe: Taylor and John Carter that is.
ReplyDeleteKitch
ReplyDeleteTaylor Lautner, abducted
ReplyDeleteYup
DeleteYup
DeleteYep
DeleteRobert Pattinson or Liam Hemsworth.
ReplyDeleteMostly because I don't like either of them.
Shia
ReplyDeleteRobert Pattison. Looks of a model. Talent of a rock.
ReplyDeleteI first thought Riggins with John Carter but the franchise comment makes me agree with Lautner. He's not a good actor.
ReplyDeleteI'm with Robert Pattinson guess
ReplyDeleteidk-I think Taylor was never right there at A list.
ReplyDeletebut Shia may have been and there are no Transformer movies coming out to keep him boosted
Totally Lautner.
ReplyDeleteTaylor Lautner Abduction Sucked!
ReplyDeleteNo, they're filming Transformers 4 this week in Chicago. They move to the studio next week for all the CGI work.
ReplyDeleteTotally Taylor Lautner. They were billing him as the next Tom Cruise (like that's a compliment -- career-wise, maybe).
ReplyDeleteNow..."Tracers" is in post-production. Wonder how much he'll actually be in it? Terrible actor. Laughably.
Ashton Kutcher
ReplyDeleteYou gotta look at who has movies in post-production.
ReplyDeleteTaylor Kitsch - no
Asston Kutcher - no
Shia - yes "Nymphomaniacs"
Pattinson - yes, x2
Taylor - yes, "Tracers"
Sam Worthington - yes, x2
Still going with Taylor Lautner, who SUCKS harder than any of the above.
Deffo lautner
ReplyDeleteThis sounds like Taylor Lunter. The film Abduction was going to launch him into the A-list and the next Tom Cruise but it bombed badly. He's a bad actor. The franchise is Twilight. A franchise can make an actor famous but it doesn't always translate to box office draw, even Chris Hemsworth Rush hasn't done that well at the box office. Look at Robert Pattinson.
ReplyDeleteTaylor Kitsch is a good actor, so I don't think this blind is about him, despite the crash and burn of John Carter.
ReplyDeletetaylor or robert p
ReplyDeletewhat about zach efron, high school musical franchise, all other movies after bombed and isn't he in Parkland and well he's a mess
ReplyDeleteI still dont understand why they are trying to make Taylor Kitsch happening. Meh, he sucks
ReplyDeletetaylor lautner, definitely.
ReplyDeleteWhy would they want to use his name to sell a movie if his movies bomb and nobody sees them?
ReplyDeleteTaylor Lautner, he's hot but his acting isn't so great.
ReplyDeleteAgree it's Lautner. Kitsch was always really good on Friday Night Lights.
ReplyDeleteI'm hoping this is Taylor Lautner and not Daniel Radcliffe. Radcliffe isn't the best actor, but he seems to be improving, and he just seems like such an interesting person. Either way, I'm sure either Lautner or Radcliffe have enough money from their hit movies to not need much of a career.
ReplyDeleteAgree with you all about Lautner. It should've been titled Abortion, not Abduction.
ReplyDeleteLautner. He's gonna be gone soon.
ReplyDelete